It's not really much of a boast. I think you could empty out the nearest mental institution and assign it any task and they'd do a better job than the broke-brained subhuman degenerates who orbit Lucas.
I doubt he'd even make it that far. Even the gulag wanted people who could work. They'd take one look at him and realize he was completely useless. I doubt they'd even waste a bullet. It would just be a bayonet.
still there as far as i can see
Its reported, we'll see what youtube does. my guess is side with the nonce
thanks guy, this fucks been bragging about his turbo noncery in the comments and its just fucking me me off how these rockspiders can be so brazen about it
Even then, this is FAR more of a cult than anything else. This is below an MLM because at least you can make money in that no matter how convoluted.
When the wholesome colorblind class based dictatorship of the proletariat is established and the upper middle class white troons in keffals' discord are arrested by comrade cletus and comrade jamal
there is no need to edit the fake beard, it's already growing on his face
You know, I read AF when I was 11 - and when there was an Cold War still going - and even my preteen brain understood, and my 40-year-old recollection of the book recalls bc it is so fucking obvious, that it wasn't purely or even mostly about literal Communism, but rather about power, [human] nature, the inescapability of both, and the corruptive aspect of one to the other. It was also of course a fucking satire, a finger in the eye of those who romanticize Communism, having never lived under it and believing it to be some kind of pure hippy cooperative utopia rather than an unworkable and human-based and therefore necessarily oppressive and corrupt system, but it was actually about larger notions. Jfc.
Yeah but Lucas' beard is more of a "I menace women in public after sitting in my unwashed juices in the dark for three days" type of beard than a santa one which ruins the edit.
I can't help but think about the movie "The Killing Fields", the true story about Cambodia and the revolution that put the Khmer Rouge in power.
It was a lot more specific and allegorical, with most characters representing actual historical figures, e.g., Napoleon is Stalin, Snowball is Trotsky, etc. You don't really need to know that, but it is important to fully grasp the book (unless you buy that whole death of the author bullshit). 1984 is a lot more general because it isn't about any specific ideology. It could be fascism, communism, or something else entirely.
Troons don't delete their accounts when they rage-quit Twatter, they're worried about others scooping them up:
Why shouldn’t you just delete your #twitter ? Abandoned social media accounts represent the same risk as abandoned domain names. Name #squatting works because reputation and influence gets attached over an account’s life -Those followers you spent time building up don’t just dissipate when you go. For a threat actor this is a huge opportunity. Some accounts carry more #influence than presidents. So if you stop using an account purge it, leave a last message, then securely lock it. (Please share)
Marc Rogers 🥜 👋🏼 ⚠️ (@cj@chaos.social)
Why shouldn’t you just delete your #twitter ? Abandoned social media accounts represent the same risk as abandoned domain names. Name #squatting works because reputation and influence gets attached over an account’s life -Those followers you spent time building up don’t just dissipate when you...mastodon.social
Fair point on the specific individual correspondences. But those discorders back-slapping over clever insights like "Ha ha! But they were evil in the end because they were acting like capitalist [literal, lol] pigs, so Orwell was dumb and Communism really is the shit (if they'd just done it right)" - aka purely as political allegory, a literal fable about Communism (with a supposedly self-owning point, no less), are just missing larger points that Orwell cared about. AF is of course political allegory, but the real-world parallels are illustrative of larger points about human nature and power and the dangers of the combination.
A bowel movement?
You can't really expect much better of people idiotic enough to be literal commies after over a century of utter failure by that ideology. You either need to be an abject moron too dumb even to read the Manifesto or a Ph.D. who has read all of Marx and Gramsci and so on and can rationalize utter nonsense.
