𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

"this poll was slammed and gamed"
And where were you when 2020 happened, or when people were peddling "Russian influence" in 2016?
"Musk put up a poll as to whether to reinstate Trumps account. It passed by a quite narrow margin."

"BOTS! BOTS EVERYWHERE!"

"Musk put up a poll as to whether to reinstate banned accounts. It passed by an almost three-to-one margin."

"BOTS! BOTS EVERYWHERE!"
 
Making their communications about Hunter's latop public.


Oh yesss. It won't change anything (at least not in the immediate future), but I love me a good spaghetti spill.

Yeah, it would be more interesting than Trump taxes returns and O.J. Simpson trial.
Let's hope Musk lives through this shit. I wonder if the top tier goons will be sent after him.
 
I am glad it will be a banable offense to deny the slow and calculated jewish genocide of Palestine.

Deny an implausible historical event that has resoundingly been used as a cynical tool for power? Banned. Deny a fundamental reality about nature that stems back to the earliest forms of life? That's just like, your opinion man.

Can you reconcile "genocide" with the following fundamental reality for me?

Screen Shot 2022-11-25 at 9.15.25 AM.png
 
Can you reconcile "genocide" with the following fundamental reality for me?

View attachment 3933561
Yes
1669387856335.png
Don't forget when money wasn't motivating the British to move fast enough with this plan, the jews thought it prudent to murder and torture British officers and representatives. The first dozen or so prime ministers of their state were openly involved in that or similarly violent political terrorism and genocidal efforts against Palestinians.
 
Last edited:
Yes
View attachment 3933639
Don't forget when money wasn't motivating the British to move fast enough with this plan, the jews thought it prudent to murder and torture British officers and representatives. The first dozen or so prime ministers of their state were openly involved in that or similarly violent political terrorism and genocidal efforts against Palestinians.
The only real complaint you have is 1947, everything after that is the result of people starting shit with the Kikes and getting themselves embarrassed
 
Yes
View attachment 3933639
Don't forget when money wasn't motivating the British to move fast enough with this plan, the jews thought it prudent to murder and torture British officers and representatives. The first dozen or so prime ministers of their state were openly involved in that or similarly violent political terrorism and genocidal efforts against Palestinians.
They're reclaiming the indiginous ancestral territory of their kingdom that was forcefully stolen away from them #landback :^)
 
Yes
View attachment 3933639
Don't forget when money wasn't motivating the British to move fast enough with this plan, the jews thought it prudent to murder and torture British officers and representatives. The first dozen or so prime ministers of their state were openly involved in that or similarly violent political terrorism and genocidal efforts against Palestinians.

Could you please explain to me how the term "genocide" can be logically associated with a group of people whose population has increased by a factor of 5 times over the last 60 years?

How successful are genocide efforts that have resulted in 4 million MORE of the people that are supposedly being genocided?

If what's happening in Palestine is genocide, then they're doing it wrong.
 
Last edited:
Yes
View attachment 3933639
Don't forget when money wasn't motivating the British to move fast enough with this plan, the jews thought it prudent to murder and torture British officers and representatives. The first dozen or so prime ministers of their state were openly involved in that or similarly violent political terrorism and genocidal efforts against Palestinians.
The sheer arrogance of camel fuckers never ceases to amaze. Not only are they supposed to be given a pass for starting wars, they are also supposed to be given a pass for losing them
 
And none of those ragheads ever offer the Palestinians refuge in their own countries. Can't imagine why that is.

While the Palestinians ceaselessly motherfuck Israel, and piss and moan about the West Bank Wall, they conveniently overlook the walls that keep them out of Egypt and Jordan, who also want nothing to do with their terroristic shit.
 
Only other ragheads and leftist mudshark white women cry about Palestains.
The sheer arrogance of camel fuckers never ceases to amaze. Not only are they supposed to be given a pass for starting wars, they are also supposed to be given a pass for losing them
It should be obvious enough that I care more about denigrating the duplicitous kikes than crying about Palestinians. Thought it'd sound less spergy to use palistine for the joke over the other democides they facilitate everywhere they go.

Guess I could have suggested that commies won't be able to deny the talmudic origins of the communist purges or something like that.
 
Last edited:
It should be obvious enough that I care more about denigrating the duplicitous kikes than crying about Palestinians. Thought it'd sound less spergy to use palistine for the joke over the other democides they facilitate everywhere they go.

Thank you for dropping the "genocide" nonsense.

Although "democide" is still highly retarded and cringe inducing, it's at least somewhat more accurate.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Pee Cola
So I decided to watch some excerpts from the Joe Rogan Podcast interview with Moxie Marlinspike that was brought up in this thread, and he's clearly someone suffering from cognitive dissonance, as a lot of these far-left anarchist types do. On the one hand he concedes that, "those spaces [there social unacceptable ideas were allowed to develop] don't exist on the internet today", and suggests this lack of freespaces online is a bad thing that has stifled innovation:


"Fundamentally I feel like private communication is important because change happens in private. Everything that is fundamentally decent today started out as something that was a socially unacceptable idea at the time. You look at things like, obvious things like, abolition of slavery, the legalization of marihuana, same sex marriage, even, you know, constructing the declaration of independence, those were all things that required a space for people to press these ideas outside of the context of everyday life. And those spaces don't exist on the internet today. And I think it's kinda crazy the way the internet works today.(...) We're living through a shortage of brave, or bold, or courageous ideas in part because people don't have the space to process what's happening in their lives outside of the context of everyday interactions."

But when we here on KF use our freespace to compare notes and think things through, and our conclusion is something like, "hey, it's starting to look like all this troon shit is actually bullshit and harmful to others", we have to be censored because we didn't reach the conclusion that our overlords wanted us to reach.

But in this other segment from the same interview , he says that he had high hopes for people using the internet to inform one another, but it turns out, people only use the internet to spread anti-vaxx and flat-earth theories, whereas in his time there were all these zines and thriving subcultures around them - which is bullshit, because, to give you a personal example, the first time I myself ever read an "AIDS conspiracy article" (this was an article that linked to all kinds of actually published scientific research but in a way that aimed to prove the idea that AIDS was supposedly deliberately manufactured/engineered) in my life was in a Flipside zine issue in the early 1990s, so I know his claim that zines were supposedly more intellectual, discerning or conscientous back then is total bullshit:


This part of all parts IMO perfectly illustrates why I don't want this snowflake touching any aspect of Twatter at all: he claims that people who have grown a thick skin and a duck's back due to being relently attack and criticized online can't be anything other than emotionless psychopaths:


So if you don't care what random people on the internet have to say about you - because some stranger's opinion of you really doesn't fucking matter, and it's actually adulting to live your life that way - it only because you're a psycho.

No, I don't want this guy encrypting Twatter DMs. I don't want this guy returning to Twatter. There has to be some other encryption expert out there who can do whatever he does.
This guy has an agenda, and it's a far-left agenda, it's what got us into this shit in the first place.
 
So I decided to watch some excerpts from the Joe Rogan Podcast interview with Moxie Marlinspike that was brought up in this thread, and he's clearly someone suffering from cognitive dissonance, as a lot of these far-left anarchist types do. On the one hand he concedes that, "those spaces [there social unacceptable ideas were allowed to develop] don't exist on the internet today", and suggests this lack of freespaces online is a bad thing that has stifled innovation:




But when we here on KF use our freespace to compare notes and think things through, and our conclusion is something like, "hey, it's starting to look like all this troon shit is actually bullshit and harmful to others", we have to be censored because we didn't reach the conclusion that our overlords wanted us to reach.

But in this other segment from the same interview , he says that he had high hopes for people using the internet to inform one another, but it turns out, people only use the internet to spread anti-vaxx and flat-earth theories, whereas in his time there were all these zines and thriving subcultures around them - which is bullshit, because, to give you a personal example, the first time I myself ever read an "AIDS conspiracy article" (this was an article that linked to all kinds of actually published scientific research but in a way that aimed to prove the idea that AIDS was supposedly deliberately manufactured/engineered) in my life was in a Flipside zine issue in the early 1990s, so I know his claim that zines were supposedly more intellectual, discerning or conscientous back then is total bullshit:


This part of all parts IMO perfectly illustrates why I don't want this snowflake touching any aspect of Twatter at all: he claims that people who have grown a thick skin and a duck's back due to being relently attack and criticized online can't be anything other than emotionless psychopaths:


So if you don't care what random people on the internet have to say about you - because some stranger's opinion of you really doesn't fucking matter, and it's actually adulting to live your life that way - it only because you're a psycho.

No, I don't want this guy encrypting Twatter DMs. I don't want this guy returning to Twatter. There has to be some other encryption expert out there who can do whatever he does.
This guy has an agenda, and it's a far-left agenda, it's what got us into this shit in the first place.
These people all have the same face that screams for a backhand with the ring hand
 
That map is full of shit.
The worst lie is the labeling of the green color in the first panel.
That was not "Palestinian Land".
That color marks all land that wasn't privately owned by Jews at the time. That doesn't mean it was owned by Arabs:
  • Most of it was empty and unclaimed desert.
  • Much of the rest used to be public land owned by the Ottoman Empire, then inherited by the British occupation, then became disputed (desired by both the nascent Arab and Jewish national causes) when the Brits left.

Another bullshit aspect of the map is that it measures a different statistical quantity in each panel:
  1. land ownership (Jews only, see above)
  2. proposed but rejected political borders
  3. military ceasefire line
  4. effective political borders
...but labels them all the same as if they were directly comparable.
An apples to oranges comparison.


Disliking Jews is fine.
Falling for muslims' (and Western libtards') anti-zionist propaganda is cringe.

Don't forget when money wasn't motivating the British to move fast enough with this plan, the jews thought it prudent to murder and torture British officers and representatives.
This is true though.
The early Zionists used terrorism very effectively against the British, to get them to remove their military bases and leave.

Some crazy Wild West shit like, the British military would arrest the leader of a Jewish militia and have him whipped & hanged, so the Jews captured two British officers and did the same to them. Or blew up a British court house with explosives.
 
Back