Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

This is an inevitability. I have no idea how Xenforo works, but if it's possible to ban people that joined after a certain date from posting in specific threads, that's something Null would have to seriously consider. That and a shitload of Stinkditch jannies, as I can see other troons also getting/giving the fedposting treatment.
So many headaches, all because a bunch of mentally ill perverts don’t like their very public dirty laundry on a platform that refuses to entertain their degeneracy.
 
That's where I disagree the most. I don't think we should be judging anyone through the lens of fucked up retarded lolcow trannies, and we especially shouldn't be doing it only when it makes them look bad.
While I'm perfectly fine with holding them to their own standards, and when that shows how fucked up their standards are, laughing and moving on. There's a lot of interesting opinion stuff to dig down on with this topic, but that's the gist. This thread has the evidence of what he said about 'consent accidents', both when he's been accused of one and when he's the accuser. Not our fault he's a massive hypocrite.
 
Can someone with some Photoshop skillz pls put Epstein and Savile side by side? Maybe Fred West too, for good measure.

You know, it actually would soil the memories of these men to be shopped into a picture with Fong Jones.

They were despicable and hideous, but at least they tried to cover their actions, not brush them off as peculiar misunderstandings.
 
He was at Google for 10 years. I think that counts as "lasting".
Well okay, but it's not like he's made anything of it. You'd think if he came highly recommended he could manage somewhere other than some non-business that barely even exists.
Here's a full-body exploitable to celebrate 300 pages :-)
View attachment 3935664
What a walking cartoon, or should I say cartroon.
HerroAmellica.png
 
Well okay, but it's not like he's made anything of it. You'd think if he came highly recommended he could manage somewhere other than some non-business that barely even exists.
Indeed. I very much doubt that there was any kind of merit based recruitment process for his job with Honeycomb. Most likely it was offered to him and only him.
 
That's where I disagree the most. I don't think we should be judging anyone through the lens of fucked up retarded lolcow trannies, and we especially shouldn't be doing it only when it makes them look bad. I think he fucked some kind of weirdo lolcow and I think it's hilarious he's getting grilled for it months or years later because I don't like him and I think it's funny when bad stuff happens to him, but calling him a rapist instead of a weirdo who fucked a lolcow is disingenuous and histrionic and puts us on the same level as the braindead retards who call us terrorists and murderers.

The thing is, the person that he "consent accidented" themselves called it rape, and No Dong Fong actually wrote that. Since the person it happened to called it rape, shouldn't it be accepted that it was? Isn't that the standard we currently operate under in clown world, if someone screams "Rape!!!", even if it was 50 years ago, and the person who did it is dead, and there is no obvious evidence, we are supposed to believe them until their accusations are disproven, no? Who, other than the victim, has the right to declare it rape? Who are we, or anyone else, to declare it not rape when the person who was violated says it is rape?
 
Well okay, but it's not like he's made anything of it. You'd think if he came highly recommended he could manage somewhere other than some non-business that barely even exists.

What a walking cartoon, or should I say cartroon.
View attachment 3936408
Is it bad that I want to follow Fong around with the beginning of the "Turning Japanese" song and a giant gong to hit?

I think it is kind of bad if to follow closely in case the stink ditch hasn't been cleaned out in a while.
 
He's a literal fucking NPC.
How the fuck do people not have thoughts?
Like do they just operate on the level of animals where everything is instinct?
I suppose that would make sense for coomers, like dogs humping everything, but then again Im pretty sure dogs think, I know mine are fucking cunning as shit.
I've heard about people without an "internal narrative" but I just can't picture it.
I think it’s amphetamine burn out, unironically. I think the porn and amphetamine’s these people depend on have become turned them into husks where critical thinking brings them down from their high.
 
Last edited:
The thing is, the person that he "consent accidented" themselves called it rape, and No Dong Fong actually wrote that. Since the person it happened to called it rape, shouldn't it be accepted that it was? Isn't that the standard we currently operate under in clown world, if someone screams "Rape!!!", even if it was 50 years ago, and the person who did it is dead, and there is no obvious evidence, we are supposed to believe them until their accusations are disproven, no? Who, other than the victim, has the right to declare it rape? Who are we, or anyone else, to declare it not rape when the person who was violated says it is rape?
No, we're not supposed to do any of that retarded clown world nonsense, and you know damn well you wouldn't be if it wasn't happening to somebody you don't like.
 
The thing is, the person that he "consent accidented" themselves called it rape, and No Dong Fong actually wrote that. Since the person it happened to called it rape, shouldn't it be accepted that it was? Isn't that the standard we currently operate under in clown world, if someone screams "Rape!!!", even if it was 50 years ago, and the person who did it is dead, and there is no obvious evidence, we are supposed to believe them until their accusations are disproven, no? Who, other than the victim, has the right to declare it rape? Who are we, or anyone else, to declare it not rape when the person who was violated says it is rape?

Time to lock the thread.
 
No, we're not supposed to do any of that retarded clown world nonsense, and you know damn well you wouldn't be if it wasn't happening to somebody you don't like.
He said he did something sexual to someone and it was without consent, but it was accidental. I seriously doubt it just involved stray dog hair.
 
That's where I disagree the most. I don't think we should be judging anyone through the lens of fucked up retarded lolcow trannies, and we especially shouldn't be doing it only when it makes them look bad. I think he fucked some kind of weirdo lolcow and I think it's hilarious he's getting grilled for it months or years later because I don't like him and I think it's funny when bad stuff happens to him, but calling him a rapist instead of a weirdo who fucked a lolcow is disingenuous and histrionic and puts us on the same level as the braindead retards who call us terrorists and murderers.
Not to mention the fact that Liz "Consent Accident" Fong-Jones is more objectively hilarious.

Liz "The Rapist" Fong-Jones just makes us look like a bunch of Karens and anyone who thinks that he's broken any sexual assault laws should really be reporting him to the police instead of parading the accusations around like some sort of mattress girl.
 
Liz "The Rapist" Fong-Jones just makes us look like a bunch of Karens and anyone who thinks that he's broken any sexual assault laws should really be reporting him to the police instead of parading the accusations around like some sort of mattress girl.
"A guy made a vague admission to committing some sexual act against some unidentified person without consent. You should go arrest them."

Not gonna fly.

I think I can call him a guy who committed some sexual act against someone without their consent, though. Or the short for that is "rapist."
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a consent accident when there is a misunderstanding/miscommunication where you honestly believe you have consent from the other person, but you really don't? I think people who put themselves in sexual situations where that's even possible are not very smart (did they not have a safe word?) and are probably degenerates, but I'm not willing to call that rape.
 
Back