- Joined
- Dec 24, 2015
Since Nick is a cishet male they won't white knight him. If he started going by "Nicole" however...
Edit:
He actually is covered in ink. Most of it's just artsy fartsy nonsense.
Last edited:
Inactive Alison Rapp / Maria Mint / 123grapeman - Pedo Defense Force, CP Advocate, Whore. Husband Jake Rapp found his balls and divorced her.
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Status
Since Nick is a cishet male they won't white knight him. If he started going by "Nicole" however...
Edit:
He actually is covered in ink. Most of it's just artsy fartsy nonsense.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2015
They're already white knighting the new Sick Nick. This'd just be redundant.
That said, I bet you still could, and it wouldn't even be that hard. Bate went through his own creepy-crossdresser phase.
Pointless to debunk, eh, Foldable Human? Is this because any such attempt you make to do this will only remind the world of the time you deliberately distributed what you yourself described as child pornography to bring the forces of government violence against a website you didn't like?
Doesn't make you look too good there, buddy. And that's before people start asking if this obscene act was the only reason you had images you yourself described as child pornography on your own computer.
Last edited by a moderator:
GabeRegan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2015
I'm sure he won't be regretting that Felix the Cat tattoo in a few years.Since Nick is a cishet male they won't white knight him. If he started going by "Nicole" however...
Edit:
He actually is covered in ink. Most of it's just artsy fartsy nonsense.
I don't remember, but was it ever mentioned if he got a visit by the police over that?
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
You know, most people who had been fired for advocating child pornography would be glad if their former employer instead issued a face-saving lie that preserved their own reputation as well as that of their ex-employer, and would not draw attention to the fact.
Not Alison Rapp's supporters, though.
"No, she wasn't fired for that harmless, neutral reason! She really was fired for the child porn shit after all!"
Talk about stupid.
These idiots have no clue how the world works.
Not Alison Rapp's supporters, though.
"No, she wasn't fired for that harmless, neutral reason! She really was fired for the child porn shit after all!"
Talk about stupid.
These idiots have no clue how the world works.
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
Any word on if Patrick Klepek has got laid because of his white knighting article on this yet?
………nope? oh well maybe next time Patrick.
………nope? oh well maybe next time Patrick.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
He either was visited by law enforcement and/or preemptively tried to cover his ass by contacting them to report the evil 8chan after Gamergate began to raise hell about him admitting to downloading what he himself said was CP.
Horrorcow Wesley "Laurelai" Bailey was found to be involved in this, part of the SJW assault on 8chan/Gamergate:
Q
QI 541
Guest
kiwifarms.net
You realize she's just going to make a Patreon and live off of that right?
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
If idiots want to flush their money down the toilet that way, there's not much to do about it.
- Joined
- May 26, 2014
Very true. My suggestion is to pop a comfy seat and watch Rome Burn.
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Boycotting nintendo for firing her (against her wishes) has probably done more to make her permanently unemployable than her pedophile shit did. Who the fuck is gonna hire somebody when the last time they got fired a bunch of spergs chimped the fuck out and boycotted their employer?
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
Looks like FemFreak has thrown her/his (I can never tell which of the two write which tweets) into the ring.
Not surprisingly they've come out in support of the Peado lady. Mostly I guess because she's a woman and not because Josh loves underage snatch.
Managed to sneak in a few reminders of FemFreaks current con as well. Please donate to our lastest project in support of women blah blah blah...
Of all the topics to get behind why is it always the peadophiles who they defend with so much vigour?
Not surprisingly they've come out in support of the Peado lady. Mostly I guess because she's a woman and not because Josh loves underage snatch.
Managed to sneak in a few reminders of FemFreaks current con as well. Please donate to our lastest project in support of women blah blah blah...
Of all the topics to get behind why is it always the peadophiles who they defend with so much vigour?
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2015
Why video games?
Why is it that video games are the one industry that attracts all these maniacs? You never see it in, I don't know, machine shops, or airlines. We need more women and trannies in and what have you in gaming because...?
Because these people are extremely lazy and just want to play vidya all day, I guess.
Why is it that video games are the one industry that attracts all these maniacs? You never see it in, I don't know, machine shops, or airlines. We need more women and trannies in and what have you in gaming because...?
Because these people are extremely lazy and just want to play vidya all day, I guess.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2014
Because the vidya industry is still relatively young.
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2015
Rapp being fired has nothing to do with this, if it has the US is more prude then I thought. (Sorry!)Some spergs are speculating it is related to this: https://tweetsave.com/alisonrapp/status/696148368003698688
Unless these aren't all 'harmless' pictures and her nipples show or something, ANY PR-manager worth a damn would ask her to hold the next time a 3DS instead of a e-book reader.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
The US is weirdly prudish when it comes to sex(but not violence), and a large part of anti-GG want it even more so.
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
Because suing an organisation which helps women in actual danger is really going to improve the plight of women.
This is what shits me most about these people. They don't give a damn about issues like domestic violence, abortion, sex trafficking, forced marriage, etc, etc. They care only about their "progressive" agenda and will happily destroy anyone who doesn't support it even if those people/organisations are working in the trenches and not ivory tower idealists.
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2016
Right. I’m now going to do my whole non-shitposty thing now. (There's TL;DR at the end).
The issue of the SJW’s still seeing everything related to the video game industry as something Gamergate related is a very worrying trend. It mostly seems to speak to their own hivemind/wolfpack mentalities in which everything is seen in incredibly stark terms. There is only black and white, there is only good or evil.
There is no grey.
A lot of these SJW types also either work in niche industries where their own views will not really be looked upon, work for themselves or as we’ve seen more often than not, do not work at all.
It speaks a lot to the mentality that, because there were proven conspiracies (namely the approved journalist list) then literally everything must be a conspiracy.
Rapp seems to have been one of those few people who slipped through the net, it happens all the time. Companies like Nintendo will most likely have a fairly strict social media policy in which your own actions and behaviours will be seen as an extension of the company and so you must behave correctly on those channels at all times. You are seen as an extension of that company at all times and this is especially true when you work in more public facing roles such as PR.
The company I worked for previously generally advised us that we simply should not post work related things to our social media as members of the public can and would find it. If they found the content objectionable, they would send a copy of it through to HR and nobody wanted to have to spend an afternoon justifying an image or a tweet.
Indeed several figures from the company's own marketing/PR dept advised that the best way to avoid violating the policy (even by accident) was to simply not talk about work on any kind of open environment because someone would find it and it would get back to them.
Eventually.
And there, ladies and gents of the kiwi audience. Is that key word.
Eventually.
Folks like Rapp and her new SJW ilk don’t appear to understand that when you hurl something up online it is up there in one format or another forever and very publically for any idiot to find and complain about long after your own ardour on it may have cooled.
They don’t seem to understand that there is a huge disconnect to an opinion muttered in a pub corner to your mates once, and effectively standing in front of a concert hall full of people with cameras pointed at you as you scream into the megaphone.
-------------------
Indeed, you can see it when from her own tweets at how confused Rapp is because they chose to dig up Alison Rapp’s Child Pornography apologist tweets.
Now, on their own it’s very skeevy in such a public platform, especially with her (now defunct) relationship with Nintendo. But if you then, say, do a quick google of her name with “linkedin” as most professionals do these days, you then find Alsion Rapp and while browsing that you find her thesis which, on careful reading, can indeed be misconstrued for Child Pornography support.
This is part of her closing argument to justify the entire subject matter of the paper.
This argument is also a straw man to the core, the eradication of child porn would actually go a long way to helping stem the tide of abuse as it would net a lot of the active abusers/content producers. The vast majority of pedophiles are consumers of Child Porn, not producers due to the fact they don’t wish to be caught and jailed.
Provided it is backed up by treating the condition as the legitimate mental illness it is with no legal penalty for those consumers who wish to get help, the eradication of child porn and its production would allow us to go a very long way to treating this issue in a sensible manner.
They are currently trialling this method in Berlin at the moment and initial results appear to be highly positive.
But for now we’ll leave aside Alison Rapp, Child Pornography Supporter and instead focus on the public reason she was fired.
---------------------
Alison seems to have gone “LOL TL;DR” on her contract before signing when she joined and just assumed all her views and sex positivity and all the other guff she believes in was protected. Who reads when there’s games to play, amirite?
It was not.
You can plaster “My own opinions” all over your twitter and your facebook and tumblr all you damn well want, but if your contract specifically has a social media policy, and you sign it, then you have agreed to abide by that policy.
I strongly suspect that Nintendo has quite a strict media policy, that when you sign up your social media presence in effect becomes an extension of the company and that the views espoused there must fit in with the company’s line or you could face disciplinary action or termination. While abiding by such a policy and using it for personal reasons can be done, it’s a very delicate balancing act to play.
Posting lingerie pictures (sent by a fan, no less), pictures of you naked in a bath, and tweets in which you are openly supporting child pornography and its consumption are going to be in violation of this policy.
Especially for a company who’s main market and demographic are families, young children and the elderly.
Second, and the stronger reason she was likely canned, is that she was moonlighting as a risque model.
While many companies do not bar you from having a second or even third job, larger corporations now expect you to understand, and treat them as your primary employer. On that basis you have to inform them of this new job, when the hours are likely to be and how this could effect your primary job or even the company’s reputation and they can approve or disapprove of certain jobs to the point of disciplinary action or more likely, termination.
Rapp simply going off and moonlighting as a risque model means she either didn’t care about the second job, or didn’t inform Nintendo through willful ignorance. Which puts her in violation of the policy.
Third, and one we’re unable to presently confirm is her leaking of information to interested parties. This is the closest Rapp actually comes to a grey area in her (now numerous) contract violations. But this is purely speculative.
Being in PR is a tricky as hell game. You are handed a lot of confidential information, a lot of it is to be later prepped and sent out for release and this is basically all part of your job.
Like most employees at a big company handling sensitive information, she will have signed an NDA like most would. The difference is, her violating it would probably just trigger a disciplinary hearing as opposed to instant shitcanning.
This is why you should always read every policy in full when you sign up to a new job.
Each violation on it’s own ehhh, disciplinary action, rap on the knuckles and she’d have to keep her nose clean for a while following what she’s supposed to the absolute letter.
But two or more? At pretty much the same time? Yeah, no. You’re getting fired.
----------
TL;DR version:
-Alison Rapp, still Pro-Child Porn, as evidenced by her tweets.
-Alison Rapp, didn’t read her contracts and violated them (at least) three times resulting in her being fired
-SJW’s still jumping at shadow of Gamergate
-Trend of SJWs to support people in the Pro-Pedo camp continues its worrying trend.
-Singal unable to research properly (actually come and register and talk to us, we all know you’re reading this)
-Kiwis win, gain lots of milk from all cows
The issue of the SJW’s still seeing everything related to the video game industry as something Gamergate related is a very worrying trend. It mostly seems to speak to their own hivemind/wolfpack mentalities in which everything is seen in incredibly stark terms. There is only black and white, there is only good or evil.
There is no grey.
A lot of these SJW types also either work in niche industries where their own views will not really be looked upon, work for themselves or as we’ve seen more often than not, do not work at all.
It speaks a lot to the mentality that, because there were proven conspiracies (namely the approved journalist list) then literally everything must be a conspiracy.
Rapp seems to have been one of those few people who slipped through the net, it happens all the time. Companies like Nintendo will most likely have a fairly strict social media policy in which your own actions and behaviours will be seen as an extension of the company and so you must behave correctly on those channels at all times. You are seen as an extension of that company at all times and this is especially true when you work in more public facing roles such as PR.
The company I worked for previously generally advised us that we simply should not post work related things to our social media as members of the public can and would find it. If they found the content objectionable, they would send a copy of it through to HR and nobody wanted to have to spend an afternoon justifying an image or a tweet.
Indeed several figures from the company's own marketing/PR dept advised that the best way to avoid violating the policy (even by accident) was to simply not talk about work on any kind of open environment because someone would find it and it would get back to them.
Eventually.
And there, ladies and gents of the kiwi audience. Is that key word.
Eventually.
Folks like Rapp and her new SJW ilk don’t appear to understand that when you hurl something up online it is up there in one format or another forever and very publically for any idiot to find and complain about long after your own ardour on it may have cooled.
They don’t seem to understand that there is a huge disconnect to an opinion muttered in a pub corner to your mates once, and effectively standing in front of a concert hall full of people with cameras pointed at you as you scream into the megaphone.
-------------------
Indeed, you can see it when from her own tweets at how confused Rapp is because they chose to dig up Alison Rapp’s Child Pornography apologist tweets.
Now, on their own it’s very skeevy in such a public platform, especially with her (now defunct) relationship with Nintendo. But if you then, say, do a quick google of her name with “linkedin” as most professionals do these days, you then find Alsion Rapp and while browsing that you find her thesis which, on careful reading, can indeed be misconstrued for Child Pornography support.
The Penultimate Paragraph of her Thesis said:
This is part of her closing argument to justify the entire subject matter of the paper.
This argument is also a straw man to the core, the eradication of child porn would actually go a long way to helping stem the tide of abuse as it would net a lot of the active abusers/content producers. The vast majority of pedophiles are consumers of Child Porn, not producers due to the fact they don’t wish to be caught and jailed.
Provided it is backed up by treating the condition as the legitimate mental illness it is with no legal penalty for those consumers who wish to get help, the eradication of child porn and its production would allow us to go a very long way to treating this issue in a sensible manner.
They are currently trialling this method in Berlin at the moment and initial results appear to be highly positive.
But for now we’ll leave aside Alison Rapp, Child Pornography Supporter and instead focus on the public reason she was fired.
---------------------
Alison seems to have gone “LOL TL;DR” on her contract before signing when she joined and just assumed all her views and sex positivity and all the other guff she believes in was protected. Who reads when there’s games to play, amirite?
It was not.
You can plaster “My own opinions” all over your twitter and your facebook and tumblr all you damn well want, but if your contract specifically has a social media policy, and you sign it, then you have agreed to abide by that policy.
I strongly suspect that Nintendo has quite a strict media policy, that when you sign up your social media presence in effect becomes an extension of the company and that the views espoused there must fit in with the company’s line or you could face disciplinary action or termination. While abiding by such a policy and using it for personal reasons can be done, it’s a very delicate balancing act to play.
Posting lingerie pictures (sent by a fan, no less), pictures of you naked in a bath, and tweets in which you are openly supporting child pornography and its consumption are going to be in violation of this policy.
Especially for a company who’s main market and demographic are families, young children and the elderly.
Second, and the stronger reason she was likely canned, is that she was moonlighting as a risque model.
While many companies do not bar you from having a second or even third job, larger corporations now expect you to understand, and treat them as your primary employer. On that basis you have to inform them of this new job, when the hours are likely to be and how this could effect your primary job or even the company’s reputation and they can approve or disapprove of certain jobs to the point of disciplinary action or more likely, termination.
Rapp simply going off and moonlighting as a risque model means she either didn’t care about the second job, or didn’t inform Nintendo through willful ignorance. Which puts her in violation of the policy.
Third, and one we’re unable to presently confirm is her leaking of information to interested parties. This is the closest Rapp actually comes to a grey area in her (now numerous) contract violations. But this is purely speculative.
Being in PR is a tricky as hell game. You are handed a lot of confidential information, a lot of it is to be later prepped and sent out for release and this is basically all part of your job.
Like most employees at a big company handling sensitive information, she will have signed an NDA like most would. The difference is, her violating it would probably just trigger a disciplinary hearing as opposed to instant shitcanning.
This is why you should always read every policy in full when you sign up to a new job.
Each violation on it’s own ehhh, disciplinary action, rap on the knuckles and she’d have to keep her nose clean for a while following what she’s supposed to the absolute letter.
But two or more? At pretty much the same time? Yeah, no. You’re getting fired.
----------
TL;DR version:
-Alison Rapp, still Pro-Child Porn, as evidenced by her tweets.
-Alison Rapp, didn’t read her contracts and violated them (at least) three times resulting in her being fired
-SJW’s still jumping at shadow of Gamergate
-Trend of SJWs to support people in the Pro-Pedo camp continues its worrying trend.
-Singal unable to research properly (actually come and register and talk to us, we all know you’re reading this)
-Kiwis win, gain lots of milk from all cows
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
I genuinely don't understand the thought process these people have.
Do they sincerely think that years ago, Nintendo hired this chick, all the while gritting their teeth and thinking "Curse these women in games, we must find a way to silence them!" only to decide that now...for whatever reason...the time is finally right to fire her for no reason, thereby silencing the woman in gaming that they...put there?
Do they sincerely think that years ago, Nintendo hired this chick, all the while gritting their teeth and thinking "Curse these women in games, we must find a way to silence them!" only to decide that now...for whatever reason...the time is finally right to fire her for no reason, thereby silencing the woman in gaming that they...put there?
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
Nobody should be more aware than a PR person of how their non-work behaviour can reflect on a company. The very thing they're employed to do is project a certain image of their employer and protect that image.
We're not talking about Jane from the mail room here. We're talking about someone whose job with the company was all about the optics.
- Status