Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

"nothing matches the bird site for virality potential"

This fucking addict. His "virality" means jack shit. The 2100 new followers mean jack shit. Updoots and asspats, which he's received far less than mockery, will not help him lose weight, get on good terms with hia own children, or pay his, what are we up to, $33k debt.

"I'm such a scamp that I will actively fuck with the owner of the platform's businesses tee hee"

If Fatrick had a dime to his name I don't know if Elon would even then waste the time going after his dumbass.

"No child. Those twenty one hundred new followers are NOT bots. NONE of them in fact, stalker child. What you have just posted is illegal allegations and I WILL put them in my filing to the FBI, stalker, and you WILL be put in prison, child."

While most of the new followers are not bots they are most likely either people tuning in to watch the drunken ape stumble around (shitposters) or are people who follow anyone who posts anything of a certain political persuasion (NPCs). Neither group will lift a finger to actually help him. Cope and sneed piggy.
 
Someone from Germany reported Pat:
Untitled.png
Link | Archive

He also has a new pinned tweet advertising his shitty book:
image.png
How much did he pay this guy to shill for him?
Untitled1.png
 
Last edited:
Possibly late. People see a child in Patso's 'meme' because of its size relative to the horses. Adults woud be larger. The illustration is of someone who is child sized, or at the least very small. The face is child-like. At best it is an image of bestiality and apparently on of the *things* Patso is into. Also, there is that whole motif of young girls liking horses. Easiest way to sanitize it would be to shoop Boxcar Nikki's face onto the girl's. Maybe shoop Tyrone's face -- or Ooga-Booga's -- on the stallion. Patso's face could go on the horse's ass.

I do not think it is CP or CP adjacent, but I understand how people see it that way. No matter, it is a strange thing to post in a discussion about an automobile company's revenue sources.

From where has he stolen the 'weird nerd' label he has started using? He was probably called that recently, maybe by a family member or in-law when they told him to stay away from Thanksgiving dinner.
 
Someone from Germany reported Pat:
View attachment 3950289
Link | Archive

He also has a new pinned tweet advertising his shitty book:
View attachment 3950295
How much did he pay this guy to shill for him?
View attachment 3950310
"Hard Sci-fi" :story: these people obviously never read science fiction before. Hard science fiction actually cares about scientific accuracy. We've seen how little this man understands science. A Fall of Moondust, Red Mars, Green Mars, and Blue mars (great trilogy) are hard sci-fi.
 
"Hard Sci-fi" :story: these people obviously never read science fiction before. Hard science fiction actually cares about scientific accuracy. We've seen how little this man understands science. A Fall of Moondust, Red Mars, Green Mars, and Blue mars (great trilogy) are hard sci-fi.
Rick has written some of the hardest science fiction ever about the "plane of the eclectic."
 
"Hard Sci-fi" :story: these people obviously never read science fiction before. Hard science fiction actually cares about scientific accuracy. We've seen how little this man understands science. A Fall of Moondust, Red Mars, Green Mars, and Blue mars (great trilogy) are hard sci-fi.
Maybe we are overanalyzing this comment, and he just meant that reading about trans crabs gets him hard.
 
It really is astounding how loathsome he manages to be. It's like he was meticulously bioengineered to be the biggest prick alive.
I don't follow Fatrick much precisely because of that. Fatso Jack is even more of an asshole, but he's entertaining, MovieBob is also a deeply unpleasant person but hilarious to laugh at, while Fatrick is just an asshole with little to no redeeming qualities. He actually manages to get under my skin with his behaviour, unlike the other two I mentioned, and he's such an unlikeable retard that he simply pisses me off. It almost feels like someone took some of the bad aspects of Chris Chan (being an idiot with severe delusions of grandeur), Fatso Jack (big manly man posturing from a pussy) and MovieBob (entitlement and rage, asshole complex, while trying to be trendy cool guy) and distilled them all into a package shaped like a lardass!

Did anyone ever beat him up? If this guy acts like this with complete strangers over a minor slight, I can't imagine he won't do the same in public. And I can't seriously imagine anyone meeting him without wanting to leave the place some five minutes after, this guy is really an asshole!

This fucking addict. His "virality" means jack shit. The 2100 new followers mean jack shit. Updoots and asspats, which he's received far less than mockery, will not help him lose weight, get on good terms with hia own children, or pay his, what are we up to, $33k debt.
Honestly, going from what I know about this guy? His children are better off without him in their lives. What could he teach them? How to make fools of themselves? How to get on a screaming match with police officers (which is a real risk of getting tasered and even shot)? How to be pathetic fucks that are liked by nobody else?

Fuck, it's something when you realize all it takes for someone to have friends is simply not being an asshole. Making for pleasant company goes a long way, Fatrick on the meanwhile shows that being deep inside your own ass earns you nothing. Fatrick makes most assholes look like decent people!
 
Did anyone ever beat him up? If this guy acts like this with complete strangers over a minor slight, I can't imagine he won't do the same in public.
He's an absolutely massive coward in real life. He only picks on people he knows won't try to beat him up. When Andrew and later Dan @Funster went to Pat's favorite bar, taunting him about it, he just stayed home like a pussy and called them cyberterrorists online. In Dan's case, despite being fully doxed to Pat, Pat did literally nothing before, during and after, besides talking big on the Internet, with Andrew there was at least the failed attempt at a restraining order. And even Andrew and Dan wouldn't have done anything except call Patrick a fat faggot to his face.
 
That's not entirely correct. He was suspended for a long time once and paid a sum of money once. The circumstances are sketchy: First he stated that he paid $5,000 to Twitter itself, later he implied that it was an "investment". I think I've also seen him claim that the 5K was for legal fees when pressed by texting atalkers, but you should always take his defensive squealing with a grain of salt.

What you might be thinking of is speculation that he might've paid $5.000 (or some other sum) long before all this in exchange for his checkmark. It's been an open secret that Twitter practices were corrupt and nepotistic and Elon and others have since confirmed it. Rick is and was a complete nobody, so there's a strong possibility that he wasn't eligible for a checkmark and he tried to bribe his way in. There's been talk of Rick having a "contact" at Twitter that's been protecting him but I don't know if I buy that. He was suspended for 10 months until he bought his way back in again, I don't think he had any real friends at the company watching his back, at best a janny intending to squeeze the rube for money.

I think we're all so busy laughing at the fact that he paid $5K to get his account back that we rarely stop to think that, wait a minute, that's really fucking shady. There's clearly some underhanded shit going on there if they weren't legal fees (and even then it's fucking bizarre). It's also the reason I have seen some people theorize on why he never got his checkmark back: he wasn't ever supposed to have one in the first place. When he oinked/paid enough for them to review his account, it probably came up that he wasn"t eligible for one of them. It would also explain why he's been squealing that his should be reinstated on the grounds of the felony imposter accounts instead of, you know, him being a famous public figure like he was before all the trolling.
Found the other Pat tweet about the 5k hole which clarifies things a bit:

6-F81-DA94-DEA5-4-C45-BDC5-1-DDA054961-A8.jpg

So to recap:

September 2019 Pat says he paid $5k to get a real person at Twitter to review his ban. November 2019 he states that he invested $5k to get Twitter to look at it. Two years (and a lot of mockery of the topic) later he specifically mentions they were $5k in legal fees.

It's hard to know what to make of this. On the one hand, whether there ever were legal fees. I personally find it far fetched that you would need to hire a fucking to get Twitter to look at a ban. Then again, Rick has shown that he is not above wasting money hiring them for petty pursuits so it's at least within the realm of possibility. On the other hand, it's equally possible he's just lying in the last tweet, like he is about his tweets not violating ToS (yes, child, they did). Like I alluded to, he was constantly bashed by the atalkers over the 5k. I wouldn't put it past him to lie to make it look a bit better. It also doesn't help that Technicality Tomlinson worded his earlier tweets so vaguely that either option is viable.

Whatever the case might be, this mfer paid $5.000 for Twitter. Moreover, the circumstances surrounding the loss of his checkmark and his inability to get it back, along with the "connections" he supposedly made are still suspicious to say the least. It honestly wouldn't surprise me if that 5k wasn't the first sum of money he spent on that site.
 
Found the other Pat tweet about the 5k hole which clarifies things a bit:

View attachment 3951180

So to recap:

September 2019 Pat says he paid $5k to get a real person at Twitter to review his ban. November 2019 he states that he invested $5k to get Twitter to look at it. Two years (and a lot of mockery of the topic) later he specifically mentions they were $5k in legal fees.

It's hard to know what to make of this. On the one hand, whether there ever were legal fees. I personally find it far fetched that you would need to hire a fucking to get Twitter to look at a ban. Then again, Rick has shown that he is not above wasting money hiring them for petty pursuits so it's at least within the realm of possibility. On the other hand, it's equally possible he's just lying in the last tweet, like he is about his tweets not violating ToS (yes, child, they did). Like I alluded to, he was constantly bashed by the atalkers over the 5k. I wouldn't put it past him to lie to make it look a bit better. It also doesn't help that Technicality Tomlinson worded his earlier tweets so vaguely that either option is viable.

Whatever the case might be, this mfer paid $5.000 for Twitter. Moreover, the circumstances surrounding the loss of his checkmark and his inability to get it back, along with the "connections" he supposedly made are still suspicious to say the least. It honestly wouldn't surprise me if that 5k wasn't the first sum of money he spent on that site.
I think he paid someone at Twitter, either directly or through a lawyer (who probably took a cut), a bribe to get unbanned. It's been reported since Elon took over that Twitter employees were soliciting bribes from users for blue checkmarks, so it's not far-fetched to assume some of them were taking bribes for other services too. Maybe a blue checkmark reinstatement was in the conversation but cost too much for Rick.
 
Back