- Joined
- Jul 10, 2016
I stand that the Legend trilogy is the peak of Spyro content, and I will never forgive Skylanders for killing the Spyro's Kingdom game we were going to get.I honestly think that, if some games were to get proper remakes and fleshed out a bit more, then they could be really good. For instance, the Legend of Spyro trilogy; all three games got rushed really badly - Eternal Night in particular, though Dawn of the Dragon has a TON of cut content as well - and it's part of the reason why they're kinda shit at points in terms of gameplay and story. I feel like, if the trilogy got update to fix some of the bugs, and maybe tone down some of the darker shit, then the games could honestly be a lot of fun; I'm a genuine fan of the Legend trilogy, despite its flaws.
Anyone else think the Legend series could do well if they toned the edgy stuff down and got some fixes in there?
Spyro One was good, but Riptos Rage onwards was an absolute pile.
I actually dig the 'edgy' stuff. You need evil to make a good, epic story, IMO, and if Malefor was just some dipshit that had a hate boner or something, it would just feel stupid. Edge is far too subjective to really hate, IMO. After all, some people consider just having a war in your game as 'edgy.'