Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

That's what I was thinking, too. Such a stupid choice in tattoo. I bet he got it thinking it made him look nerdy and cool, when it made him look the opposite- a fat faggot with bitch tits.
Not just a fat faggot with bitch tits, but a fat faggot with bitch tits completely ignorant of the opinions of the man or the lore of the world he had tattooed on his fat pig flesh, a vile incantation that Tolkien himself despised. He basically tattooed himself with a declaration that he's a pathetic orc.
 
Not just a fat faggot with bitch tits, but a fat faggot with bitch tits completely ignorant of the opinions of the man or the lore of the world he had tattooed on his fat pig flesh, a vile incantation that Tolkien himself despised. He basically tattooed himself with a declaration that he's a pathetic orc.
An orc could win a bar fight.
 
1670036418246.png
 
I wanted to write a bigass post about Fatrick, but I'm sorry. After he got parental rights taken from him, his wife left him for his much better friend who then proceeded to raise his daughter correct, there's just nothing I can say that will make the situation any funnier.
He literally only has Twitter at this point, and that ship is sailing to new lands with him on it whether he likes it or not.
He's constantly shoving a rotating collection of greasy pegs- his ''car guy'' identity, his remedial writing, his no-nonsense, gun-slinging tough guy persona, his self-proclaimed nerd status, his fake marathoning and other failed health kicks, and so on- in the purpose-shaped hole left by his better wife and daughter rightfully leaving him. It'd be sad to watch if he weren't such a fat and grotesque pig.
 
How much longer can he avoid paying ? He's eventually gonna have his hand forced by the court wont he?
Quasi is entitled to a debtor's exam which will be public (and hopefully livestreamed). I don't know why it's taking so long and if Quasi had done one right after the initial judgement he'd probably be lining up a second one by now. My guess is that the courts are still ridiculously backed up from the Chinavirus

Anyway, so what happens if Fatrick tries bankruptcy? I am guessing it doesn’t help with court ordered payments?
  • Spouses are equally liable for judgement debt in Wisconsin even if their name wasn't on the lolsuit. That said the judgement comes from Cali so I'm not sure if it would stick.
  • Patrick has been selling insurance for 15 years for UHC. According to Glassdoor it's possible he could be making somewhere in the ballpark of $60k (see pic). No judge is going to allow someone who makes $60k to declare bankruptcy over a <$40k judgement especially if his wife's income is also included
  • Judgements that are a direct result of an issue you caused (i.e. filing a frivolous lolsuit against somebody and forcing them to hire a lawyer to defend themselves) are far less likely to be purged in a bankruptcy than something external such as a media company obtaining a judgement for hosting their copyrighted material.
  • Patrick is on tape expressing his intention to skirt paying the judgement before it was even issued (https://youtu.be/qQAetLrXyu0). That won't go over well in front of any judge especially given the ridiculous and obviously frivolous nature of the lolsuit to begin with.
  • The only thing he has going for him is the incoming economic meltdown which could result in him getting "laid off" of his insurance job.
  • There are apparently some obscure "pierce the corporate veil" laws in Cali that Quasi could use against the SFWA after Patrick reveals under oath that they bankrolled the entire thing. I'm not sure how much this will help.
d79dddc2791b8b7a61c55633126eeead.png
 
Last edited:
If memory serves, Quasi can collect at any point; he's just waiting for the amount to reach $40k or so.

First thing to know about bankruptcy: it is not a "Get out of jail free" card for the debtor. The debts will be paid in one way or another. Patrick doesn't know this, and he wouldn't care either way.

There are two kinds of personal bankruptcy here in Burgerland: Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 (named after specific parts of the US bankruptcy code.) Chapter 13 is where you admit to being unable to pay off the debt right away, but agree to pay it off over a period of 3-5 years. Since he'll probably see this as giving his atalkters the win, Patrick will likely go for Chapter 7: his debts will be paid by selling some of his assets.

Here's Chapter 7 bankruptcy won't allow Quasi to take:
  • Pat's house
  • One of Pat's cars
  • Pat's clothes
  • Whatever Pat needs for his line of work. This one will be interesting, as Pat claims to be a writer, but supposedly sells insurance on the side. It'll be illuminating to see which one sustains his income.
  • Pat's food. Yes, this includes his pepperoni stash.
Beyond that, everything else is fair game. This includes money in his bank account, personal effects, collected toys, any extra cars or motorcycles, books, furniture, and so on. As long as the amount does not exceed whatever Quasi chooses to collect on (e.g. $40,000), Quasi can take it. This doesn't mean the fart couch will rest in Quasi's attic; the couch, and all other assets, will be liquidated to pay Patrick's debt. (My opinion: this is where the Pests should stay out; if they get into a bidding war for Patrick's stuff, they could artificially drive up the value of his crap, meaning Quasi can't liquidate more than we'd like him to.)

Since Patrick is too stupid to figure out how to vanish, and too addicted to give up social media, he'll be forced to pay. When that day comes, Dan can make himself useful and upload videos of Quasi's debt collectors taking what is owed.

Tick tock, Patrick.

(Legal Kiwis can feel free to correct me if I got anything wrong)
Aside from what is owed to Quasi do you think he'll sneak in other debts he has. Kinda seems extreme to file for that amount especially if he's working. Like DSP Pat might try to weasel his way out of other debt.
 
Quasi is entitled to a debtor's exam which will be public (and hopefully livestreamed). I don't know why it's taking so long and if Quasi had done one right after the initial judgement he'd probably be lining up a second one by now. My guess is that the courts are still ridiculously backed up from the Chinavirus


  • Spouses are equally liable for judgement debt in Wisconsin even if their name wasn't on the lolsuit. That said the judgement comes from Cali so I'm not sure if it would stick.
  • Patrick has been selling insurance for 15 years for UHC. According to Glassdoor it's possible he could be making somewhere in the ballpark of $60k (see pic). No judge is going to allow someone who makes $60k to declare bankruptcy over a <$40k judgement especially if his wife's income is also included
  • Judgements that are a direct result of an issue you caused (i.e. filing a frivolous lolsuit against somebody and forcing them to hire a lawyer to defend themselves) are far less likely to be purged in a bankruptcy than something external such as a media company obtaining a judgement for hosting their copyrighted material.
  • Patrick is on tape expressing his intention to skirt paying the judgement before it was even issued (https://youtu.be/qQAetLrXyu0). That won't go over well in front of any judge especially given the ridiculous and obviously frivolous nature of the lolsuit to begin with.
  • The only thing he has going for him is the incoming economic meltdown which could result in him getting "laid off" of his insurance job.
  • There are apparently some obscure "pierce the corporate veil" laws in Cali that Quasi could use against the SFWA after Patrick reveals under oath that they bankrolled the entire thing. I'm not sure how much this will help.
View attachment 3987600
Aren't we still waiting on the judge to rule on the SWFA motion to quash the discovery that Quasi was trying to get from them?
 
Sounds like cruel and unusual punishment for any personal trainer to have to fix a body as bloated and obese as Fat's.
Aren't we still waiting on the judge to rule on the SWFA motion to quash the discovery that Quasi was trying to get from them?
The judge ruled on it and said SFWA's lawyers were able to quash the motion because of lack of relevance so Quasi had to pay them $5,000. I'm not sure if he appealed it or not.
 
SpaceEdge gives piggy a choice:

View attachment 3977304

Current number of atalkers facing criminal prosecution *after four years*: 0

The Emperor has no clothes and you can see his tiny faucet dick because of it.
Combining these I what wonder Patirck thinks about the theory that the reason there's been no arrests yet is that every time he pastes his thing Merrick Garland has to update the filing documents with the new number of charges of felony telephone harassment.

Now, you might object that surely the Attorney General of the United States can have people do that for him. But you're forgetting that this is so important that Garland probably said "I want this done right to put these sons of bitches away for good, I'm handling this personally." Then told the naive underling who suggested a local agent in the Milwaukee office could handle a routine felony telephone harassment case to get out of his office.
 
What a fat thing to say.

So he sells insurance over the phone? I’m imagining cold calls. “Buy insurance, child. You’re too simple to understand why you need it.”
Sounds like he doesn't sell insurance. He's a telemarketer lol. He basically just calls people, gets cussed out, hangs up and calls someone else.
 
Last edited:
I propose that anyone who bribed a twitter employee to get an account reinstated or a blue checkmark should be forever banned from twitter. That's harmless, right? Pat surely didn't bribe anyone, he spent 5 grand on a lawyer who made a clear and convincing case to twitter, right? I hope it was all aboveboard, if Pat actually gets yeeted from twitter, there goes his sole social outlet. He may actually kill himself.
 
I propose that anyone who bribed a twitter employee to get an account reinstated or a blue checkmark should be forever banned from twitter. That's harmless, right? Pat surely didn't bribe anyone, he spent 5 grand on a lawyer who made a clear and convincing case to twitter, right? I hope it was all aboveboard, if Pat actually gets yeeted from twitter, there goes his sole social outlet. He may actually kill himself.

Don’t think I am getting soft over him;

He at least lurks with regularity in hooligans.

Talking as a former bartender in several nasty arse bars for losers, even the lowest and most unpleasant low functioning drunkard gets tolerated in something approaching friendship by other losers and drunkards.

Without twitter Fatrick could just moan about being banned from twitter through gin soaked tears to other boozehounds until he dies of obesity.
 
The last thing this big gay baby needs is more time spent in a dark bar, drinking. You're right, though. I was a bartender in a real dive bar, not a play-pretend one like Hoolie's, and it was always amazing to me the kind of shit losers would listen to from each other, just to have that minimal social contact and cheap facsimile of friendship.
 
Aside from what is owed to Quasi do you think he'll sneak in other debts he has. Kinda seems extreme to file for that amount especially if he's working. Like DSP Pat might try to weasel his way out of other debt.
DSP is a pigroach: he's a pig with the survivability of a cockroach. There is nothing that can bring him down.

Patrick is just a pig, and a stupid, arrogant, belligerent one at that. Patrick doesn't have the brains or creativity to weasel his way out. I know Patrick has said he's not paying, but knowing him, that'll just be him refusing to fork over the cash instead of having a master plan to avoid paying Quasi.
 
If memory serves, Quasi can collect at any point; he's just waiting for the amount to reach $40k or so.

First thing to know about bankruptcy: it is not a "Get out of jail free" card for the debtor. The debts will be paid in one way or another. Patrick doesn't know this, and he wouldn't care either way.

There are two kinds of personal bankruptcy here in Burgerland: Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 (named after specific parts of the US bankruptcy code.) Chapter 13 is where you admit to being unable to pay off the debt right away, but agree to pay it off over a period of 3-5 years. Since he'll probably see this as giving his atalkters the win, Patrick will likely go for Chapter 7: his debts will be paid by selling some of his assets.

Here's Chapter 7 bankruptcy won't allow Quasi to take:
  • Pat's house
  • One of Pat's cars
  • Pat's clothes
  • Whatever Pat needs for his line of work. This one will be interesting, as Pat claims to be a writer, but supposedly sells insurance on the side. It'll be illuminating to see which one sustains his income.
  • Pat's food. Yes, this includes his pepperoni stash.
Beyond that, everything else is fair game. This includes money in his bank account, personal effects, collected toys, any extra cars or motorcycles, books, furniture, and so on. As long as the amount does not exceed whatever Quasi chooses to collect on (e.g. $40,000), Quasi can take it. This doesn't mean the fart couch will rest in Quasi's attic; the couch, and all other assets, will be liquidated to pay Patrick's debt. (My opinion: this is where the Pests should stay out; if they get into a bidding war for Patrick's stuff, they could artificially drive up the value of his crap, meaning Quasi can't liquidate more than we'd like him to.)

Since Patrick is too stupid to figure out how to vanish, and too addicted to give up social media, he'll be forced to pay. When that day comes, Dan can make himself useful and upload videos of Quasi's debt collectors taking what is owed.

Tick tock, Patrick.

(Legal Kiwis can feel free to correct me if I got anything wrong)

The only thing I’d add is the issue of whether his primary car must be valued under a certain amount. It’s been years since I learnt about bankruptcy, and it was a different jurisdiction, but in that situation I recall that the car had to be very basic, ie. be valued at less than $X or it would be sold and the petitioner would be allowed $X back to buy a basic car. It would be enforced that the money could only be spent for that purpose.

If spouses are part of the bankruptcy in his state, I wonder whether they are only allowed to keep one car between them, or one each. Does Nikki even own a car?
 
Back