𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Dave. said:
You might be right.
View attachment 3989952
THIS is considered a decent walk?
Click to expand...
25 minutes to walk a fucking mile? stopped before 2 miles and that's "wiped out"? wtf? The average human walks something like 2.5-3mph just walking around normally and this lump managed less than that as an attempt at exercise and managed to get tired? How the fuck are they not ashamed at calling that a "workout"?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria, Ghostse, Wooo and 8 others
WhiteNight said:
If I were Musk, I'd be concerned that people might sue Twitter. By exposing all this wrongdoing, some of the affected might have a case against the corporation, even though it's now owned by Musk. People like James Woods probably wouldn't do this any time soon, if only out of a sense of gratitude and good will, but there's still a risk that any of them might later sour on Musk, or that there's someone more vindictive and/or with nothing to lose who thinks there's a shot at a payout.
Click to expand...
My main concern would be that the politicians who were benefitting from the old regime are going to decide that tech companies defining what flies on their platforms isn't good enough any more.
Not Reddit or Facebook, mind you, just Twitter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buttigieg2020, BlazikenLover and Basement Dwelling Dork
AgendaPoster said:
Let's hope not.
My speech (which I consider moderate) is already probably borderline on what would pass as illegal.
I was basically a law abiding citizen my entire life, I am not liking this "let's make behaviors and speech that were legal for millennia illegal" drive.
When a totalitarian government tried to impose itself too hard over us, we chimped out in quite the bloody manner and dealt with it. I have some doubts that the current generation is able to replicate such an intense desire to live more freely as we once did, things have gotten cucked and lazy.
Click to expand...
Yeah, there’s nothing wrong with your shitposts. Any oligarch that wants to interfere with your free speech deserves a “French haircut”

Try to be more like us burgerland mutt master race and add a constitutional amendment protecting free speech.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Buttigieg2020, YarrBlueballs and AgendaPoster
Quite the character here, This one's addicted to Twitter too and appears to have daily mental episodes.
1670080686259.png1670080714764.png
1670080740407.png1670080792190.png1670080840848.png
1670080918440.png1670080958108.png
1670081015737.png1670081062311.png
1670081129630.png1670081277087.png1670081328766.png
1670082991554.png1670083111454.png1670083146296.png
1670083286586.png1670083347898.png1670083414711.png1670083438231.png
 
Last edited:
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Silverovertime2, Zaryiu2, lurking for the deets and 27 others
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: coof coof, Pee Cola, Peru oso donas and 5 others
Polish Businessman said:
Trust doesn't mean unlimited government. It means that people generally expect that the government will behave by the rules. For example when you see a traffic cop waving at you, you expect that he noticed a lost licence plate or something (or you were speeding), and isn't just trying to extort a bribe. That if someone didn't pay you, you can sue them and recover the debt.
This is what I call 'trust in institutions'. All of this is fundamentally absent in non-western autocratic regimes. They don't have concept of rule of law, only personal power. And power and property are basically the same, that is you expect the government will steal from you unless you have friends in it. That's also why these countries are so poor - you can't make long-term investments in such an environment.'
Click to expand...
AnOminous said:
You don't trust the idiots actually running the institutions, but a real society has principles that it operates under, including the so-called institutions. The offices. Things like President or Supreme Court or whatever. You don't trust whatever dumbass is occupying them.

You trust things like the Constitution that keeps them eternally battling each other with none ever winning and taking over.

This is why idiot liberals freaking out like an idiot like Trump getting to be President shows how they completely fail to understand the whole concept of balance of powers.
Click to expand...
'The rules' are legislative shifting sands, purposefully inoculated with loopholes and vagueness, subject to change on a whim by politicians in power and even applied retrospectively (what you legally own today, may become illegal to possess tomorrow; what you wrote on social media a decade ago, may come bite you in the ass this year). Even in democracies, constitutions can be altered or re-interpreted every couple of years, depending on demand. (And many 'first world' countries don't have a constitution at all). In fact, laws have only as much meaning as the people who interpret them for a living grant them - and they come at a price.

The government could never play by the rules set in laws and you could do jackshit about it, but keeping a facade of 'the rule of law' is beneficial for them and their orbiters economically (as an indicator of 'stability'). At least for now. Watch that facade disappear at the drop of a hat when shit hits the fan.
No law will ever protect you from corrupt actors at every level of the public sector food chain. @Caroline Farrow could testify.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Pig Cups, Next Task, Ghostse and 7 others
Vott said:
Quite the character here, This one's addicted to Twitter too and appears to have daily mental episodes.
View attachment 3990465View attachment 3990468
View attachment 3990474View attachment 3990480View attachment 3990486
View attachment 3990492View attachment 3990495
View attachment 3990501View attachment 3990510
View attachment 3990519View attachment 3990534View attachment 3990537
View attachment 3990690View attachment 3990699View attachment 3990702
View attachment 3990738View attachment 3990747View attachment 3990750View attachment 3990753
Click to expand...
Accidental Racism said:
What's the obsession with shit and piss with these "people"?
Click to expand...
Null has commented on it a few times. It really makes me wonder if Jews have some psychological issue where they will BLACKED post or PeePeePooPoo post out of compulsion.

@Null what should we call the Jewish compulsion to equivocate about their coprophilia and urophilia?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: fartsnstuf and LurkTrawl
Gar For Archer said:
HAHA get fucked, if nothing else I love that Elon is doing to Twitter what they try to do to the Farms. Doesn’t feel so good when the people you hate try to ruin your favorite website, does it, bitch?
Click to expand...
I love when they tell us how they're suffering. I need a good laugh from time to time.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Jonah Hill poster, Pig Cups, Next Task and 14 others
FatalTater said:
I feel concerned for Jack Dorsey's safety. Can't explain it. Keep an eye on him.
Click to expand...
Speaking of Dorsey, this leak has somewhat vindicated him of malice in my eyes. I mean, he's not entirely innocent in this, and he certainly doesn't look that good because he either didn't know what was happening in his company due to incompetence or his hands were tied due to some kind of external forces. I still don't like the guy, especially since he didn't really do anything to stop his own employees from ruining the platform, but it's clear he wasn't taking a lead on any of this shit. I really hope the next dump involves the pajeet CEO, I want to see if he was more involved in this kind of stuff.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: Pig Cups, derpherp2, Mothra1988 and 8 others
TheNazgulKing said:
Ahh, Eddie Gorcenski. Here he is with and without filters.

View attachment 3987087
Click to expand...
This motherfucker looks creepier than the Peter Lorre caricature from Looney Tunes:
9527A5ED-966E-41EB-80F7-11486097C6CF.jpeg
WhiteNight said:
If I were Musk, I'd be concerned that people might sue Twitter. By exposing all this wrongdoing, some of the affected might have a case against the corporation, even though it's now owned by Musk. People like James Woods probably wouldn't do this any time soon, if only out of a sense of gratitude and good will, but there's still a risk that any of them might later sour on Musk, or that there's someone more vindictive and/or with nothing to lose who thinks there's a shot at a payout.
Click to expand...
Since Twitter came out with it publicly on good faith, they will be somewhat protected from lawsuits. Many of the cases are moot anyway, as the accounts/posts in question have already been reinstated.

Who could be at risk is the RNC and Republican actors who did the same thing as the DNC, as well as Twitter employees involved acting as agents of the US government.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back