Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

Another dust collector for the electronics graveyard. The sex must be near tantric, Frank.

View attachment 3983724
Hey John, ever actually noticed what people who DO the shit use?

crew.png

pain.png

Same thing with his bike...he buys the highpony product... not the wahoo, not the wattbike, not the tacx
but no matter how much you get Frank to spend you simply will never be Monica Ruiz (the Peloton ad lady)
dd.png
 
Last edited:
basically this
View attachment 3984933

Though then she struggled to justify it and then had to abandon it, when she couldn't get back-up


She read it in "The moon is a Harsh Mistress" and tried to practically apply it to near future

Johnnie Johnnie Johnnie

hijinks is a plural noun like clothes or surroundings or congratulations

there is no singular "hijink"
 
Johnnie Johnnie Johnnie

hijinks is a plural noun like clothes or surroundings or congratulations

there is no singular "hijink"
That may be the case now but it isn't from the origin of the word, which used to be two words. And one of them was "jink." Good old Rabbie Burns (who you might recall from "Auld Lang Syne" among other things) wrote this verse in one of his many pomes.

"Our billie's gien us a' the jink,
An' owre the sea.
Lament him, a' ye rantin' core,
Wha dearly like a random splore,
Nae mair he'll join the merry roar
In social key;
For now he's taen anither shore,
An' owre the sea."

That very "jink" made it into "high jinks," and eventually it was portmanteau'ed into "hijinks."

So presumably at some point in history you could have given someone the jink, or even multiple jinks, or perhaps even "high jinks," "jink" meaning an act of evasion or escape.

John has never given the jink to anything but his own dick.

Because he's fat.
 
That may be the case now but it isn't from the origin of the word, which used to be two words. And one of them was "jink." Good old Rabbie Burns (who you might recall from "Auld Lang Syne" among other things) wrote this verse in one of his many pomes.

"Our billie's gien us a' the jink,
An' owre the sea.
Lament him, a' ye rantin' core,
Wha dearly like a random splore,
Nae mair he'll join the merry roar
In social key;
For now he's taen anither shore,
An' owre the sea."

That very "jink" made it into "high jinks," and eventually it was portmanteau'ed into "hijinks."

So presumably at some point in history you could have given someone the jink, or even multiple jinks, or perhaps even "high jinks," "jink" meaning an act of evasion or escape.

John has never given the jink to anything but his own dick.

Because he's fat.
You can still spell it as 2 words,
Jink is still around,like you can jink around a manky section on your mountainbike (more for the rigid and hardtail purists. you FS guys just roll over everything - you have no Jello Biafra in you)
but as the compound nounform it's pluralized the same way we use doings or shennanigans

agreed though
I doubt though, John would really want to use former wording like "dude"
as in "John is a dude"
 
Last edited:
Jink is still around,like you can jink around a manky section on your mountainbike (more for the rigid and hardtail purists. you FS guys just roll over everything - you have no Jello Biafra in you)
HAHA over 40s, Unguided Miss-le / No way Rey following power leveled yourself muh dude!!!
:lit:

URT lives!!!
 
John, of course, has infinite credibility, and would not lie about running 3000 miles a year when he was in his 20s.

View attachment 3983730
This wouldn't prove that "objectively, Elon Musk is a serial liar" as Tesla has at least 110,000 employees other than Musk. Does he think Elon is actually drafting the blueprints, acquiring the parts and physically constructing the vehicles personally?

That was quite a lot of words just to say "it's okay when we do it".

View attachment 3985749
Oh, so then you'll agree it's good to get this information out there so we can see what that fascist movement has done here right?
 
That was quite a lot of words just to say "it's okay when we do it".

View attachment 3985749
"...that tried to overthrow America"
so he's talking about Jan 6th?
That's inductive reasoning there Bri Bri
Let's play that game
So if we assign about half the country to the action of some fuckwits
The we can assign the Towers being taken down to Muslims in general

Ergo, Bri Bri is Islamophobic
 
Ironically enough, I suspect this is true: Moon Rocks launched to Earth as WMDs are critical to the plot of The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, which is contemporary with Project Horizon, a US Army study of how to militarize the Moon. The discussion of the military mission of that project is still classified, but it might have involved throwing moon rocks.
That's where he got it from. and the REAL reason why he just goes to that and snow crash are the 'strong female characters' ..Wyoh in Harsh mistress and Juanita in Snow Crash (that's why John was trying to pawn off his shit game on facial expressions...Juanita was about that)

I think we've had it on here before, kinetic bombardment from the moon has a lot of problems.
you still have a boost phase. the transit times are hella-long
the accuracy is going to be low and subject to deflection which could even plant that on your own soil.
In Harsh Mistres it's more of a terror weapon used by a moon colony.
which, in any sort of practice in the forseeable future has a big problem...the moon would have to be self-sustaining independent nation otherwise embargo those bitchez
I mean it shows up in stuff like Hemrey's Lost Fleet series (and he's an actual naval officer) but that's hitting enemy planets from a fleet, no friendlys planetside, and not from an orbiting moon

I think the funniest part is John said it was the most valuable tactical ground, but talks about big nuke level energies...that's strategic level bombardment putting you in MAD trritory

the practical kinetic bombardment weapons are deorbited from LEO.
the boost phase is abstracted/obscured (cld have been years prior, part of another project, etc etc), the transit time is tiny, etc

I did the austic needful there jesus how has it been 5 years already

Lets put on our interesting physical deformities, grab our signature pets, head to the moon and hold the world ransom with our space rocks.

The Chelyabinsk object was estimated to be 11,000 tons. This didn't impact, it exploded in mid-air, and rattled some windows. But it should make a sufficient warning shot that will make the leaders of the United States, Britain, and the USSR sit up and take notice (and give into our ransom demands for cargo containers of diamonds to be dropped into the ocean so they can be collected and brought to our under-water base.) So as our opener, we need to send 11,000 tons of material to earth. Given the gravity on the moon is 1/6th the earth's , this would be like moving around 2,000 TON projectile on earth.
To give you an idea of the scale, that's like shifting around 3 Christ The Redeemer statues, or about 10 blue whales or your mom. And this is all just to rattle some windows and put on one hell of a light show, mind you.

We'll assume the moon rock is just an unguided projectile. I'm not even going to address the computational horsepower you'd need to put your moon rock onto a target even as small as a city, and the exacting level of calibration you'd need to be able to hit a moving target from a moving target over 300,000km. Because it doesn't matter.

Everyone is welcome to check or correct my math as its been a long time since I've had to do space physics, but accelerating 11,000 of mass to the 2.3Km/s for lunar escape velocity would require 26,394 Terrajoules, or 7,332 megawatts. That's over double capacity of the largest nuclear plant in the US. You could use a ~5-mega ton blast to propel your space rock as well - so about 4 nuclear missles worth of warheads - provided your space rock survives the blast intact and your launch area doesn't absorb any of the energy.

In short, people will notice. And unless you up that energy requirement even more, they're going to have a few days to do something about you and your little moon rock. (Like dispatch a suave MI-6 agent to infiltrate your moon base, seduce your chief scientist, and plant evidence that will turn you and your partners against each other. Or just use their own nukes to knock it off course/fragment it. Whatever feels right.)

Again, this is for a window rattler, not something that would actually impact on the surface.

Conclusion:
To weaponize space rocks, you're going to need nuclear energy. If you've got nukes, why wouldn't you just use those?

Yes, Mr. Bond. Why indeed? Ha. Ha ha. Muwahahahaha.



It would make more sense to use any of the numerous hefty junk objects already in orbit around Earth. Just de-orbit them into the ground. Or do it with an actually valuable enemy asset already in orbit, you get a two-fer that way.

There's absolutely no reason to get an object out of one gravity well just to dump it into another.
Or hell, if you're married to the idea of dropping rocks, just send a small rocket out to any near-Earth asteroid and give it a little nudge. With a little math and a large enough rock, you should be able to get it to hit your target close enough to do what you want, and all at a fraction of the cost of lifting something off the Moon.

Tiny quibble: if you have THE POWER launching from a stable platform like the moon is preferable to trying to seize and rocket and asteroid especially if you care what and where you hit

This john's dumbest idea and I know no one is being serious so I'll tl;dr like mother fucker.

IF you are launching from a more-or-less fixed body like the moon, you can have greater control over your projectile and its quality, basically get a better launch and re-entry trajectory. Also immediacy. Your interplanetary space rock might take a month or even years or more to arrive.

If you are putting a jet pack on a space rock, in addition to needing to find your space rock, you need to guide it back in. your space rock is rather small and likely to affected by the gravity of any objects near its size. Your approach vector will need to contend with the moon, which actually does a hell of a job of screening earth from most impacts. Unless you are sending out a big ship with seismic scanners, you won't know too much about the rock. You can see how much it distorts starlight and get an approximation of the mass, and use that with its size to get a guess at its density and use that to make some reasoned guesses about its make up, but for all you know its two cores of dense material surrounded by shitty low density material and when its starts to heat up on re-entry, it'll explode.

Adding to all these problems is there is no fixed reference points in space. There is no up, down, left or right. Nothing is standing still, everything is moving. So you need to not just guide in you projectile, you need to hit a moving target from a moving target with a moving target.

So your guidance package is going to have to have some serious computational power backing. And while the moon requires you to overcome gravity, you can have your launch driver and power supply as big as you want because you're operating from a base. In your asteroid hijacker, everything will need to be miniturized. It will also very likely change the density and center-of-mass of the object you are working on, so your models will need to update.

In conclusion, John is an idiot, fat, and I would not have sex with him.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
 
Last edited:
Agreed; "Rocks from the Moon" is not a practical WMD.

However, if it's the mid 1960s and many of the things that make it impractical aren't on the drawing board or deployed, it's not unreasonable to consider it an option.

What's truly remarkable is John taking a 50+ year old concept and, out of nowhere, deciding Elon Musk is a James Bond villain.
 
What's truly remarkable is John taking a 50+ year old concept and, out of nowhere, deciding Elon Musk is a James Bond villain.
And that he's such a dumb Bond villain that he'd pull retarded moon rocks shit to piss off John instead of doing the more obvious thing and just buying Twitter and taking away his troon armor.
 
Cristina will be over to stick her finger into your anus in a few hours, John.

View attachment 3991401
View attachment 3991404

Literally Handmaiden's Tale.

View attachment 3991407
Good lord, how many times is John going to spam his four (4) Porsche pics at people? This is, what, the fourth or fifth time in the past week (unless there are even more that our corgi friend hasn't posted)? Seems like he's basically given up on trying to be relatable to the plebs at all and prefers to jack off with his phantom dick at how much of Frank's money he can spend.

@Ghostse: One thing I love about the farms is that so many cows are so retarded, it triggers the autism of much smarter farmers who then go into great detail explaining why they're wrong. I've learned so much from being here, so thank you again for more moon rocks sperging.
 
Back