Preston Poulter et al v. Ali "Dean" Assaf et al (2021)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
Do we have any word about how this hearing turned out?
Click to expand...
Not as of yet, but there's a new proposed order to enforce arbitration on the judge's desk, submitted on that day, that hasn't been signed.

1664687853902.png
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Absurdity, 5t3n0g0ph3r and The Coon
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
@PocketJacks Pay up, GayBoi!
Click to expand...
Indeed, but I don't have to tell you Preston is practically a vexatious litigant at this point, so he's gonna drag this out as long as he can in the hopes that he can get that billable amount reduced via arbitration. His whole argument seems to be his ex-lawyers suck, and he shouldn't have to pay them, because @FROG isn't eating burgers out of a trash can like Ethan Ralph...

....or possibly Vikki.

Speaking of, I checked PACER on Friday, and there has been no movement on the ongoing Federal suit that is this thread's title.

In related lolsuit news...

Saggy Melonz did a 45 minute livestream the other day discussing the infamous semi-dumpster-fire of a GFM that she organized for Dean. This was apparently prompted by Yellowflash throwing shade on Dean for being a scammer (which she doesn't link to, so I don't know the full context of said shade). You will have to watch the video on Youtube's site.


The general synopsis of the stream is that if people want to blame anybody for the GFM, they should blame her, since she organized it entirely on her own. The most bizarre part is that she intends to let Dean keep the approximately $1,100 she raised and gave to him, and she says she has been issuing refunds, on request, out of her own pocket.

I can't tell if that's super altruistic, or super retarded. Maybe a little of both. It would make more sense to me to have Dean give back the money (which she mentions in the same stream that he told her he still has), and then issue the refunds, but she's dead set on taking the financial hit entirely on her own.

She also only glosses over the fact that the money clearly wasn't enough to hire a lawyer. Which, IMO, is really the real failing of the GFM. Not that it was a "scam," but rather that it performed so badly that it couldn't achieve its stated purpose without being mixed with a significant amount of money from elsewhere.

I honestly makes little sense to me, but there you go. Contact Saggy if you tried to help the crackhead fight the cuck, and now express buyer's remorse. I guess.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: The Coon
Captain Manning said:
Indeed, but I don't have to tell you Preston is practically a vexatious litigant at this point, so he's gonna drag this out as long as he can in the hopes that he can get that billable amount reduced via arbitration. His whole argument seems to be his ex-lawyers suck, and he shouldn't have to pay them, because @FROG isn't eating burgers out of a trash can like Ethan Ralph...

....or possibly Vikki.

Speaking of, I checked PACER on Friday, and there has been no movement on the ongoing Federal suit that is this thread's title.

In related lolsuit news...

Saggy Melonz did a 45 minute livestream the other day discussing the infamous semi-dumpster-fire of a GFM that she organized for Dean. This was apparently prompted by Yellowflash throwing shade on Dean for being a scammer (which she doesn't link to, so I don't know the full context of said shade). You will have to watch the video on Youtube's site.


The general synopsis of the stream is that if people want to blame anybody for the GFM, they should blame her, since she organized it entirely on her own. The most bizarre part is that she intends to let Dean keep the approximately $1,100 she raised and gave to him, and she says she has been issuing refunds, on request, out of her own pocket.

I can't tell if that's super altruistic, or super retarded. Maybe a little of both. It would make more sense to me to have Dean give back the money (which she mentions in the same stream that he told her he still has), and then issue the refunds, but she's dead set on taking the financial hit entirely on her own.

She also only glosses over the fact that the money clearly wasn't enough to hire a lawyer. Which, IMO, is really the real failing of the GFM. Not that it was a "scam," but rather that it performed so badly that it couldn't achieve its stated purpose without being mixed with a significant amount of money from elsewhere.

I honestly makes little sense to me, but there you go. Contact Saggy if you tried to help the crackhead fight the cuck, and now express buyer's remorse. I guess.
Click to expand...
Hasn't this GFM disaster ended the friendship between Dean and Saggy?

It looks to me like Saggy was very naive and Dean the Druggy did what druggies do and that's take advantage of naive people.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Coon
I'm not a Robot said:
On last night's Flashcast, Ethan announced that the case in New Jersey will be having oral arguments on October 21st. After that, the gang spends about 10 minutes talking about Preston.

View attachment 3743064
View attachment 3743062
Click to expand...
I was looking into the Judge and(according to her Wikipedia) she has been the New Jersey Superior Court Judge of Burlington County since 2015. In 2014, She ran for New Jersey's 3rd Congressional district as a Democrat and even got a fundraiser hosted by Nancy Pelosi and got $1.3 million in ads from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, but ultimately lost. During said campaign, she defended Obama Care and was cool with Obama freeing his bois 5 terrorist from Guantanamo Bay without informing congress about it. @FROG might have to worry about if some of the things he has said about Democrats and lefties over the years is introduced as evidence(honestly I doubt it, but you never know).
 
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Elwood P. Dowd, Markass the Worst and 5t3n0g0ph3r
Fuck You. Pay Me.

Preston's original lawyers want their money, and after so many delays on the hearing for the motion to arbitrate they're getting close to the trial date. The hearing had been re-scheduled again to October 26th, however, that appears to have been cancelled as well, this time by the judge.

1667352674300.png


Preston's reply is that he fired them after he was billed 60 hours for them to draft three demand letters and two complaints. He says they agreed to arbitrate and that the delays on his motion was the clerk's fault, then the result of a miscommunication between his council and the clerk, then technical difficulties.

1.png 2.png 3.png
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: The Coon
I'm not a Robot said:
Fuck You. Pay Me.

Preston's original lawyers want their money, and after so many delays on the hearing for the motion to arbitrate they're getting close to the trial date. The hearing had been re-scheduled again to October 26th, however, that appears to have been cancelled as well, this time by the judge.

View attachment 3778472

Preston's reply is that he fired them after he was billed 60 hours for them to draft three demand letters and two complaints. He says they agreed to arbitrate and that the delays on his motion was the clerk's fault, then the result of a miscommunication between his council and the clerk, then technical difficulties.

View attachment 3778896 View attachment 3778900 View attachment 3778904
Click to expand...
I can't express in words how much joy I get that Peggy's original lawyers are suing him.

He wouldn't have this problem if he wasn't such an irredeemable piece of shit to file nonsense lawsuits against people.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, Elwood P. Dowd, 5t3n0g0ph3r and 3 others
I'm not a Robot said:
Preston's original lawyers want their money, and after so many delays on the hearing for the motion to arbitrate they're getting close to the trial date. The hearing had been re-scheduled again to October 26th, however, that appears to have been cancelled as well, this time by the judge.
Click to expand...
The hearing on the motion to enforce arbitration that was scheduled for April 22nd, May 12th, September 29th, October 26th, is now scheduled for November 17th. The non jury trial is set for December 13th.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, Dixieland Buckaroo and 5t3n0g0ph3r
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
I can't see this hearing going in @PocketJacks' favor.
Click to expand...
I think he has a good case. Preston says they agreed to arbitration in the contract he signed. The law firm's response is that he waived that right by purposefully delaying any action on the request for arbitration. This was filed yesterday, and it's not good for the Fein Law Firm's argument that the delays are entirely his fault.

fire.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: The Coon
Preston prevailed against Ethan's motion to dismiss in New Jersey.

The court found that it did not have sufficient information to determine whether Ethan's statements were opinion. Their reasoning was that while the livestream is public, the court can only look at the pleadings and not a YouTube link. Therefore, further discovery is needed to ascertain the context in which the statements were made.
When looking only to the Plaintiffs’ Complaint, the Court cannot determine whether the Defendant’s statements were statements of opinion because the Court does not have sufficient information to fully understand the context and events leading up to the livestream, the types of viewers who watched the livestream, the context of the statements within the livestream, or the subject of the livestream and how the Defendant’s statements were brought up during the livestream.
Click to expand...
To quickly summarize the rest: the claim of unlawful interference with a prospective economic advantage continues as it was sufficiently plead. Intentional infliction of emotional distress fails (for now) because there's no facts suggesting it was intentional, only negligent. This dismissal is without prejudice, and Preston will have the opportunity to amend the complaint. The claim of negligent hiring was conceded and is gone. Lamont stays in the lawsuit despite being unnamed by Ethan because he is the author of the comic and it can be assumed that Ethan was also talking about him. At this stage in the lawsuit, all facts and inferences are to be resolved in favor of the plaintiff.

01.png02.png03.png04.png05.png06.png07.png08.png09.png10.png11.png12.png13.png14.png15.png
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Captain Manning, The Coon, AnOminous and 2 others
I'm not a Robot said:
Preston prevailed against Ethan's motion to dismiss in New Jersey.

The court found that it did not have sufficient information to determine whether Ethan's statements were opinion. Their reasoning was that while the livestream is public, the court can only look at the pleadings and not a YouTube link. Therefore, further discovery is needed to ascertain the context in which the statements were made.

To quickly summarize the rest: the claim of unlawful interference with a prospective economic advantage continues as it was sufficiently plead. Intentional infliction of emotional distress fails (for now) because there's no facts suggesting it was intentional, only negligent. This dismissal is without prejudice, and Preston will have the opportunity to amend the complaint. The claim of negligent hiring was conceded and is gone. Lamont stays in the lawsuit despite being unnamed by Ethan because he is the author of the comic and it can be assumed that Ethan was also talking about him. At this stage in the lawsuit, all facts and inferences are to be resolved in favor of the plaintiff.

View attachment 3898344View attachment 3898347View attachment 3898350View attachment 3898353View attachment 3898356View attachment 3898359View attachment 3898365View attachment 3898368View attachment 3898371View attachment 3898374View attachment 3898377View attachment 3898380View attachment 3898383View attachment 3898386View attachment 3898389
Click to expand...
That's lame.
I guess there's the difference between Texas law and NJ law.
 
For the record, I still check PACER concerning this case intermittently. There still has been zero movement on D&V's case since 5/27.

1670214415277.png

The judiciary is obnoxiously slow. This should really have been resolved one way or another by now.

I'm not a Robot said:
Preston prevailed against Ethan's motion to dismiss in New Jersey.
Click to expand...
Unfortunate, but bear in mind he's still paying out the nose for being MATI and it's far from over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FROG
Manwithn0n0men said:
I mean you would be a guy who did cuck porn and admitted to being molested when no one knew or wanted to know..,,,,,, he definitely already hates himself.
Click to expand...
And he will be forever known as Peggy to anyone who is even aware of his retarded cucked existence.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: SargonF00t
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back