At first I was excited for this shit to go mainstream, now the following things have happened on my cuckbook groups.
I'm called pretentious because my ai generated art has perfect hands and faces, even though I'm gladly sharing the steps I did to make it.
I'm being spammed with endless shitty ai art ads. I can do better, for free.
The Art Theft people have changed their arguments in some groups, calling people who use the older, uncensored, unchanged models pedophiles and art thieves.
We really can't have shit without someone slapping a price tag on it or some sort of moral complex argument to it.
At first I was excited for this shit to go mainstream, now the following things have happened on my cuckbook groups.
I'm called pretentious because my ai generated art has perfect hands and faces, even though I'm gladly sharing the steps I did to make it.
I'm being spammed with endless shitty ai art ads. I can do better, for free.
The Art Theft people have changed their arguments in some groups, calling people who use the older, uncensored, unchanged models pedophiles and art thieves.
We really can't have shit without someone slapping a price tag on it or some sort of moral complex argument to it.
As long as it can't be stopped, which appears to be the case at this point, they can cope, seethe, and dilate all they want. Scream into the void while people are busy tweaking code and models.
I'm using Midjourney. Prompt is: DVD screengrab from a James Cameron fantasy sci-fi film 1988 --ar 3:2 --v4
with the subject going between 1988 and the dashes. So something like this: View attachment 4001757
would be DVD screengrab from a James Cameron fantasy sci-fi film 1988 red sky city coast --ar 3:2 --v 4
It's 2022. "Everyone I don't like is a pedo and everything I don't like is for pedophiles."
Some people, especially folks on moral crusades will take any indication of potential abuse and run with it. If someone does something weird and gross with ai, you'd never know unless they shared it/ did it on a public ai server. I want to share all the hilariously gross stuff I've made but some of it crosses various lines and I had to ask Null and the staff permission before even joking about it. Not everyone wants to see Ai Generated Steve Busimi in a Speedo.
There's something so surreal about the moral debate now. Especially since it's been, what? two months since the novel ai leak and everything was absolutely , infinitely saturated with Ai Pornography - which ironically has peaked . The normies who can't even set up Python without bricking their computer are chiming in like they're experts - - AND - - every single non-main stream site has already had the debate and has come to the same conclusion- it's allowed but it's heavily moderated.
Mainstream sites are late to the party and we're just reliving the opening days of Ai generation again.
I just want to get mad with them, but you know, a part of me just wants to teach people that this is one of the coolest things to ever happen and everyone can enjoy it. eVen the freaky degenerates as long as they don't shit up communities with unwanted images.
Well, at least as long as it takes to have one worth paying for. Most of the porn addicts out there also play lotsa vidya, so to me that would indicate a surfeit of cards already capable of generating porn for free. And all you need then is a model file torrent.
The Art Theft people have changed their arguments in some groups, calling people who use the older, uncensored, unchanged models pedophiles and art thieves.
Well, at least as long as it takes to have one worth paying for. Most of the porn addicts out there also play lotsa vidya, so to me that would indicate a surfeit of cards already capable of generating porn for free. And all you need then is a model file torrent.
Half of those coomers are console gamers, as for PC gamers there's an entire generation that only games thanks to steam and vortex whipping their ass for them, they would shit themselves at the prospect of having to configure this, or even install a game manually like in the old days.
My workstation with an GeForce card is currently dead and awaiting a processor RMA, so I messed around and got a ONNX based SD GUI running on my AMD system using these two guides:
UI for ONNX based diffusers. Contribute to azuritecoin/OnnxDiffusersUI development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
https://github.com/JbPasquier/stable-diffusion-onnx-ui (based on the first one)
The GUI is rudimentary, and the speed is about 1/3 what I see on the other system (5700xt vs 2060 12gb), but it is 10x faster than CPU processing.
That's the funny thing.
When I see "[x] is dumb and anyone who tries it is a PEDOPHILE!!!!" and ask them how they "know" that, I'm either ignored or they get irrationally angry at me.
>Be you
>Average zoomer artist graduating college with art degree
>Looking for first job in the field
>Find out about AI art
>You have been replaced by computers
>Realize you wasted four years of your life and now have to pay back tens of thousands of dollars in student loans, and your only marketable skills are now obsolete
>Realize you can now make an infinite amount of the sickest porn imaginable
>spend the rest of your life fapping to AI tiddies
Sorry, but I'm the only one with that model currently. If I can figure out a good anonymous way to distribute it then I wouldn't be opposed to putting it out there. It's just the base model + kiwis.
I don't know if this has been posted before, but someone trained SD on CWC's art and made a model out of it.
I have not tried it myself yet so I don't know how good it is.
I'd be intrigued to see a model with the styles of the more prolific art cows, but I think outside of Chris you'd probably have to be careful about doing it to avoid catching a lolsuit.
Sorry, but I'm the only one with that model currently. If I can figure out a good anonymous way to distribute it then I wouldn't be opposed to putting it out there. It's just the base model + kiwis.
I was under the impression they review models that are submitted to them? I can't think of why they'd refuse to host a model that's just base model + kiwis, so I'll look into that first.
Don't know if this counts because it's a bunch of pictures stitched together, but I'm pretty sure that's how art is going to work in the future anyway.
I was under the impression they review models that are submitted to them? I can't think of why they'd refuse to host a model that's just base model + kiwis, so I'll look into that first.
Is SD 2 shit tier in comparison to earlier version because of this? I've heard a lot of people don't want to move beyond 1.4/1.5 because it's also incompatible with models trained for it. Really don't care for the direction they are taking the project.
