I had to read Jay Exci's pozzed interpretation of Rick And Morty. And now, so do you.
(
Link,
Archive)
To be fair, you have to be extremely tolerant of people's gender expressions to understand Rick and Morty. The humour is extremely progressive, and without a solid grasp of intersectional feminism most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Rick's radical queer outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from gender-diverse literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the basic human decency to truly appreciate the inclusivity of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they lift up marginalized people. As a consequence people who dislike Rick & Morty truly ARE bigots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existential catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Rumfitt's punk trans novel Tell Me I’m Worthless. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those transphobic dipshits scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's queer allyship unfolds itself on their television screens. What intolerant scumbags.. how I pity them.
And yes, by the way, i DO have a Rick & Morty tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for transfems' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate their penis size is within 5mm of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid
Welp, Jay found out about my
post about him on this very thread.
link,
archive
For now, he calls it "extremely funny" that KF bigots are so upset by his Rick And Morty shitpost, but he'll no doubt slip into the victim role if ever it becomes favourable for him to do so.
FYI, I genuinely hope that this
doesn't happen and that he can just continue to laugh it off – but I've been disappointed by Jay before so, IDK man.
Moreover, the accusation is that someone talked about wanting to
beat Jay to death. This is a very serious thing to allege. And take note that Jay
didn't read the thread to confirm this – he was informed by a third party. But presumably this third party assumed that the poster was serious, otherwise Jay wouldn't have phrased it as such.
Now, which post on here could it be referring to? My best guess would be this one:
I would say Jay Exci is a massive faggot who should be beaten with a stick, but quite frankly he looks like someone already did.
He should buy some rope.
For what it's worth, I
don't endorse what was said in this comment, but a rational observer needs to be able to differentiate:
"This person should be beaten. He should also kill himself." does NOT mean
"I personally want to beat this person to death." – one might of course feel that both of these sayings are bad, but the latter is way more threatening than the former. Yet I can see how a habitual victim piss-baby might take it that way regardless.
This is likely how stories get distorted when journalists report on the Farms. But on to...
TL;DR a lot of people in the replies thought KF was gone for good, and are only now finding out that it's back up (Dammit Keffals, you had
one job!) And for what it's worth, it's actually quite refreshing to see they're not particular fond of Keffals either.
The ones who discuss specifically this post seem have reached a consensus that we reacted in a
totally unhinged and disproportionate way towards a not-so-serious fun post from Jay. Admittedly, the information that they base it on is at least third-hand by this point, but I'm concerned about this silly fuck, who seems to have actually read this thread and my post in it:
"The person who posted it there thinks it's 100% serious."
I am unable to reason
where in
my post I gave that impression. True, I was motivated to screenshot the post because I thought it is bad (and not just in a
"Haha, you make bad pun!" kind of way), but heck, even
I'm not too autistic to recognise the humourous intent behind it, which is possibly why I should clarify:
The joke is that the characters are all judgy pricks who'd tell someone off for calling a biological male a man – and you're supposed to laugh with them if you're the target audience of the joke because you regard this behaviour as a positive.
So yes, it's very much possible to understand that something is a joke while also disliking the sentiment behind it. I hope that clears things up.
archive.ph
archive.ph
archive.ph
archive.ph
archive.ph
archive.ph
