Nader Elshamy / Daddy Naddy / Nader Saad Elshamy / نادر سعاد الشامی & Debbie-Ann Colbeck / Deedee.Loulou - Chef at Chef Cook, Romance Scammer, "Real Man," Failure at Everything, Convicted Stabber, Alleged Abuser/Rapist, Charity Scammer, Fucks Fat Chicks for Money, Semi-Closeted Homosexual, Loser, Liar, Coward + his degenerate girlfriend

And yet, somehow, he's got the makings of a beginner gunt.
View attachment 4013016
Enormous plate of food plus beetus drink (no really, look at that, that looks like a serving for someone as big as Chantal):
View attachment 4013028
The little piggy ended up changing into gym shorts to eat. I suppose we should be grateful he did that instead of just unbuttoning his pants.
View attachment 4013112
Here's a tip, fatty: Don't drink your calories. Try water.
No need to go to the gym since he’s so thin and never sits down according to him.
It would not surprise me if they only eat one very large meal a day.

That place must stink of fried foods and old oil. The wanna be chef also uses the same towel to wipe his hands covered in chicken juice then proceeds to wipe the oil overflow on range top and finishes it off by wiping the whole counter with the same oil / chicken juice soaked towel.
So glad that Deedee loves it the most!!
 
The Lachine bums don’t have much in their fridge or freezer. I guess they can’t hustle much from Chantal anymore. Better get Angelhorns and her crew to wire you money soon so you don’t have to go without.

Nader’s mother is still a slag!
View attachment 4011849View attachment 4011852
When does Canada give out their food stamps? I expect the day after that the fridge and counters will be full again.
 
We don't do food stamps or SNAP type cards. In Ontario, if you're either on provincial disability or welfare, you get 1 check meant to cover all needs. On disability, certain medical conditions, (requiring air tight documentation), will get you a bit extra for added or special food items monthly & that has to be re-certified annually. Pretty much the only other source of food items is the network of food banks. Got to have your shit together there as a recipient as most only allow you to draw one food box a month & right now, the food banks are really hurting - staggeringly high demand & fewer donations as food inflation bites hard.
 
There's groups that cover him almost religiously. Search MoTranslates on twitter and the people she follows are mostly Nader archivers. He's not really talked about anywhere else unless he does something dumb and is clipped on Reddit.
I usually lurk, but I haven't recently seen anyone talking about Nader's court date this morning. Here or otherwise. Don't forget to sign up to watch if you haven't.
 
Continued to January 18th, the Crown seemed a bit surprised that they wanted to push it again, asking whether or not he was giving up his right for the proceedings to move on quickly.
They finally officially elected for no preliminary inquiry, in front of a judge alone. (as opposed to a jury)
That’s smart. He’s incredibly unlikeable and unsympathetic.
 
Continued to January 18th, the Crown seemed a bit surprised that they wanted to push it again, asking whether or not he was giving up his right for the proceedings to move on quickly.
They finally officially elected for no preliminary inquiry, in front of a judge alone. (as opposed to a jury)
Do you have an actual summary for those of us who missed it? It would be helpful. TIA
 
Do you have an actual summary for those of us who missed it? It would be helpful. TIA
That's basically all that was said as the discussions surrounding him lasted at most 45 seconds, is there anything specific you're looking for that I could try to answer?

From my imperfect recollection, and I welcome corrections or additions- his lawyer took care of several of her cases at the same time, asked for this case to be delayed to a further date, The Crown prosecutor lightly questioned this and mentioned that they first appeared in June and no election regarding the proceedings had been done yet, an election was made (Trial in front of the judge alone, no preliminary inquiry which means they are not seeking for the prosecution to prove that they have enough proof to move forward with the case) and a date was set.
 
That's basically all that was said as the discussions surrounding him lasted at most 45 seconds, is there anything specific you're looking for that I could try to answer?

From my imperfect recollection, and I welcome corrections or additions- his lawyer took care of several of her cases at the same time, asked for this case to be delayed to a further date, The Crown prosecutor lightly questioned this and mentioned that they first appeared in June and no election regarding the proceedings had been done yet, an election was made (Trial in front of the judge alone, no preliminary inquiry which means they are not seeking for the prosecution to prove that they have enough proof to move forward with the case) and a date was set.
Sorry -- it's a bit for me, but also just for the thread. Autism and all. We need to archive these facts.

My understanding is that his lawyer showed up. The lawyer did not show up in August, which is why Cracky had to appear in person in October. Today, the lawyer asked to postpone the proceedings again, which surprised the judge somewhat, who asked if he was willing to waive his right to a speedy trial. The lawyer said that was okay, and they would proceed to a hearing (trial?) with a judge only, not jury. I don't know if a date was set for that or not.

As a first-hand observer, can you verify or correct these statements?
 
Continued to January 18th, the Crown seemed a bit surprised that they wanted to push it again, asking whether or not he was giving up his right for the proceedings to move on quickly.
They finally officially elected for no preliminary inquiry, in front of a judge alone. (as opposed to a jury)
I would have thought that if I was being taken to court for something I didn't do, I'd want it over and done with quick bloody smart, rather than have it hanging over my head for so long. I would also want the crown to prove they have an actual case against me. If he is innocent as he claims, then the crown can have no case against him and no evidence. Is this Mae's (dumbest victim ever) case, or the other alleged one we've heard about via the super-unreliableChantal but know nothing about.
 
Sorry -- it's a bit for me, but also just for the thread. Autism and all. We need to archive these facts.
Agreed, if only it were possible to just capture the entirety of his appearances and simply affix subtitles, lol.

I can't remember who was the lawyer at any of the hearings- I want to say he had a male one at some point? Unsure whether it was a colleague replacing his actual lawyer or a case of changing lawyers. Right now. Maître Annabelle Clavet-Routhier is the lawyer representing him, and I don't think she's our semi-equivalent to a public defender, and I can confirm she was there this time. I know that he (Nader) once didn't show up when he was supposed to, which made the Court issue a suspended mandate to force him to show up lest he be arrested- this was the Court date before the last one, I believe, I would have posted at about it here, so you should be able to find my summary of events if you use the search function by poster name. I missed the last hearing due to technical issues, but I do believe he was represented by a lawyer then, however he had been ordered to be present at the last hearing which isn't true this time around.

A date was set for this, January 18th.

I would have thought that if I was being taken to court for something I didn't do, I'd want it over and done with quick bloody smart, rather than have it hanging over my head for so long. I would also want the crown to prove they have an actual case against me. If he is innocent as he claims, then the crown can have no case against him and no evidence. Is this Mae's (dumbest victim ever) case, or the other alleged one we've heard about via the super-unreliableChantal but know nothing about.

I don't think there has been any confirmation that this is truly Mae's case. I haven't heard anything about the cause of action during any of the hearings I've attended.
 
Did we ever find out what these court dates are for? I know there was talks and theories, I just can't remember if it was ever verified?
From memory only, all we've ever heard is Mae confirming certain court dates pertain to her charges against him, and one was for a second alleged victim. Chantal confirmed that as well. Both Mae and Chantal are notorious for their attention seeking though, and I wouldn't trust a word coming out of either of their mouths.

Then there is Monty who just makes shit up that has said he knows someone that works in the court system in Gatineau and has claimed these are sexual assault cases.
 
Nader’s court case file number has been the same from his first appearance in June 28th. According to the docket then he didn’t have a défense assign to him yet. The name of his current lawyer only appeared at his 2nd court date.
This criminal case must be to deal with Mae’s charges since it coincides with the previous date she has mentioned.

Nader the big jail boss who claimed that Canadian prisons are like a vacation spots keeps delaying his court case. Maybe his big boy balls have shrivelled up to chickpeas.
01E9031F-A11D-4178-A5EC-115B7B21EB11.png85EF1696-32B7-4C94-8BEB-E97982B66042.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nader’s court case file number has been the same from his first appearance in June 28th. According to the docket then he didn’t have a défense assign to him yet. The name of his current lawyer only appeared at his 2nd court date.
This criminal case must be to deal with Mae’s charges since it coincides with the previous date she has mentioned.

Nader the big jail boss who claimed that Canadian prisons are like a vacation spots keeps delaying his court case. Maybe his big boy balls have shrivelled up to chickpeas.
There is allegedly a second case which was listed in court for Oct 4 but not in Gatineau, (his Gatineau appearance was Oct 12). No-one was able to find it though, so speculation is rife and only backed up by Mae and Chantal confirming this second case with both saying it's another sexual assault case. In other words, who knows if it's real or not...but could it explain his recent absence from youtube?
Crossposting for relevance: I haven't been able to riddle out where the hell today's hearing took place just yet, already exhausted Ontario's lists but haven't had time for Quebec or other provinces. Quebec takes a bit longer to search since we don't know if this non-Mae hearing is for a criminal or civil case.

Mae seems to think that it’s Toronto where the other case is, it happened when he was there with chinny, apparently he took some time out from her to go and see some friends when they were staying there. So by see some friends, it must be camel code for sticking his teeny green peen somewhere it wasn’t wanted AGAIN…
 
Back