Inactive Alison Rapp / Maria Mint / 123grapeman - Pedo Defense Force, CP Advocate, Whore. Husband Jake Rapp found his balls and divorced her.

Status
Not open for further replies.
the proof is all there.

1. back tattoo and arm tattoo.
2. same ring.
3. same bulldyke piercing.
4. calling herself mint princess on twitter.
5. EXIF-DATA!!
6. general face shape and hair.
7. deleting the information after it got out.

etc. etc.

their logic is astounding. they are good at censoring and trying to rewrite history, i'll give them that. what more does one need until it goes through the rotted brain?
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Sir Wesley Tailpipe, spiritofamermaid, adderall and 20 others
black petal said:
the proof is all there.

1. back tattoo and arm tattoo.
2. same ring.
3. same bulldyke piercing.
4. calling herself mint princess on twitter.
5. EXIF-DATA!!
6. general face shape and hair.
7. deleting the information after it got out.

etc. etc.

their logic is astounding. they are good at censoring and trying to rewrite history, i'll give them that. what more does one need until it goes through the rotted brain?
Click to expand...

- seattle location..
- skin marks...

and if it's not an issue being a prostitute then why are they trying to deny it so bad and why is it illegal in the state of seattle?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Giovanni, PurpleSquirrel, Dynamite Ninja and 5 others
just saw this at another site covering the story - anyone know enough about Nintendo's games to know if this is anything?
 

Attachments

  • Unnamed.jpg
    Unnamed.jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 869
cgzBqBk.png


f3YTEDW.png


Meanwhile, on Wikipedia...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gamergate_controversy#Alison_Rapp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gamergate_controversy#Removal_of_paragraph_on_Rapp

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=714127168

Consistency is the hobgoblin of small hands;. But seriously: the community should think about the growing deployment, chiefly by right-wing extremists working to keep Wikipedia in line, of crocodile tears. The pearl clutching over an arbitrator using the F word in a signpost article, or calling a joke "terrible behavior," is highly uncivil and, in fact, quite toxic. (If it's terrible behavior, the cover of a recent New Yorker ought to be sanctioned as well.) Conversely, when Gamergaters use Wikipedia to spread rumors about a software developer’s sexual history, or pore through their undergraduate assignments for evidence that they are soft of pedophiles, well, no problem! Oversight will get around to the matter within a day or two of notification, so no big deal, right? (Both the preceding examples are from the past week, incidentally.) This sort of dishonesty is likely to cause the project a lot of trouble, one of these days. MarkBernstein (talk) 20:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=714285335

Speaking of writing that is "incredibly tone deaf", may I introduce this pot, Mr. Kettle? April Foolery is a tradition on Wikipedia. So, too, are “hilarious” personal attacks -- those delightful Gamergate fans call me “Reichstag“ daily. DYK loves puns. It is more than preposterous to equate making fun of "small hands" -- a charge leveled by Marco Rubio, after all -- with "applying the blowtorch to another living person". If that means anything, I suppose it's an allusion to Robert Coover's The Public Burning, and you'll recall that the people who applied the blowtorch to two actually living persons in that affair were Republican zealots, too. And while we're on the subject of small hands, when a page you watch zealously was being used to suggest that a Nintendo marketing employee was a pedophile because she wrote an undergraduate essay, years ago, concerning Japanese artistic and romantic traditions -- well, Ryk72, which side were you on? When another Gamergate target’s page was used to publicize her (alleged, imagined) adolescent sexual history earlier this week, which side were you on?

This is a foolish topic about foolery. It’s also a tactical mistake; you may think this heroic defense of Donald Trump’s small hands will play well in the media, but I believe you'll find otherwise. It's a really bad idea to try to salvage an untenable attack by taking foolish foolery seriously. Lighten up. This parrot is dead. It has gone to meet its maker. It is an ex-parrot.
The cow, the old cow, she is dead;
It sleeps well, the horned head:
We poor lads, ’tis our turn now
To hear such tunes as killed the cow.
Also [301]MarkBernstein (talk) 20:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gamaliel&diff=prev&oldid=714252300

The consensus view matters when it's a consensus, and when it's a view. It’s not a consensus here: it's a bunch of canvassed Gamergate fans and a few score-settlers. And it's not actually their view, or anyone’s: Trump himself raised the matter on TV, it's been covered in humor magazines from the New York on down, and nobody anywhere is really upset about it. Notice how many of these people watch the Gamergate cluster of pages, and how seldom (if ever) they've deleted or called for oversight when (as still happens regularly) real BLP issues that do real harm to real people. One of Gamaliel's detractors, for example, recently edit-warred to include a misleading quote indicating that one Gamergate target was a pedophile; the matter in question was an old undergraduate essay that observed that Japanese law differs from contemporary US law in matters like age of consent and argues that Japan has the right to maintain its laws and traditions. I cannot recall a single instance where any of these terribly-concerned editors chose to edit to the advantage of any Gamergate target, and as you know I’ve been reading the topic for some time. MarkBernstein (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=714571815

Even if the (very badly sourced) speculations I see in the game media are true, they are irrelevant. Alison Rapp was a female game developer who Gamergate supporters believed (falsely) had worked to tone down the sex in US versions of some games. To punish her, they pored through every record, tweet, and photograph they could find, and claim (bizarrely, in my opinion) that an undergraduate essay that endorses Japan's right to enact its own laws and to respect its own traditions is incompatible with employment by a Japanese company. They have now launched a second accusation, apparently containing further speculation about her personal life. Neither the undergraduate essay nor her personal life are germane but of course the harassment is germane. And while it's one event for Rapp, it's just another in a long chain of terror for Gamergate. As {{ping}SirFozzie}} suggests, we should (and indeed must) describe the campaign of intimidation, but I agree we can ignore the details of the smear campaign. MarkBernstein (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=714575096

The harassment campaign is part of Gamergate and must be reported here. Nintendo is not part of Gamergate and, if you feel strongly about that, can be omitted. MarkBernstein (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

You can't pick and choose content like that. Essentially every reliable source that has reported on this has included Nintendo's official response/reasoning with regard to Rapp's termination. Per WP:NPOV, we can't only report Rapp's side of the story without including Nintendo's, precisely because all the sources are doing so. —Torchiest talkedits 16:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Of course we can pick and choose. There's a name for that: editing. And this isn't a he-said, she-said: the harassment and smear campaign is a fact, one directly pertinent to the Gamergate controversy. We can and must report it. Subsequent events and allegations do not involve Gamergate; we need not concern ourselves with them. MarkBernstein (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Anne Other, Whatisgoingon and 7 others
I hate to say it but Bernstein is correct on this one. The SPJ Code of Ethics calls upon journalists to "Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticism or allegations of wrongdoing." In this case this actually legitimate criticism against GameZone, although almost definitely motivated by GG-related partisan warring rather than a genuine concern for journalistic ethics.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Anne Other, Dynamite Ninja and 7 others
NegaCWC said:
I hate to say it but Bernstein is correct on this one. The SPJ Code of Ethics calls upon journalists to "Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticism or allegations of wrongdoing." In this case this actually legitimate criticism against GameZone, although almost definitely motivated by GG-related partisan warring rather than a genuine concern for journalistic ethics.
Click to expand...
I think it's ethically cromulent to let the fine users of "gamezone" know that nintendo didn't fire a girl for being a "girl" but for being a hooker. Nintendo looks bad in this situation and they shouldn't. Regardless of what made them care about her the result is the same.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sir Wesley Tailpipe, Anne Other, Whatisgoingon and 7 others
Buffalo Chan said:
I think it's ethically cromulent to let the fine users of "gamezone" know that nintendo didn't fire a girl for being a "girl" but for being a hooker. Nintendo looks bad in this situation and they shouldn't. Regardless of what made them care about her the result is the same.
Click to expand...

Never argued otherwise, an outlet can contact Rapp for a response, give her a reasonable time to reply and likewise write a story about the subject. Had GamezZone done that white knights such as Bernstein would have had less of an excuse to attack them.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Anne Other and Sarcastic Username
NegaCWC said:
Never argued otherwise, an outlet can contact Rapp for a response, give her a reasonable time to reply and likewise write a story about the subject. Had GamezZone done that white knights such as Bernstein would have had less of an excuse to attack them.
Click to expand...
sorry, I don't know who Bernstein is. I just wanted to say something.
 
  • Winner
  • Autistic
Reactions: Sarcastic Username and cappaint
Buffalo Chan said:
I think it's ethically cromulent to let the fine users of "gamezone" know that nintendo didn't fire a girl for being a "girl" but for being a hooker. Nintendo looks bad in this situation and they shouldn't. Regardless of what made them care about her the result is the same.
Click to expand...
You really embiggened my vocabulary with your use of cromulent.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Urban Superstition, Whatisgoingon, JULAY and 7 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back