Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

Last edited:
1670891819521.png


Had to look this chart up for an argument recently so I figured I would repost it here. The mainstream makes this data nearly impossible to find which is odd. You would think by not if you google "covid death chance" it would come up directly with the numbers.
 
View attachment 4058643

Had to look this chart up for an argument recently so I figured I would repost it here. The mainstream makes this data nearly impossible to find which is odd. You would think by not if you google "covid death chance" it would come up directly with the numbers.

Oh look, it kills old people near or passed retirement age. Wow we couldn't have worked that out by pure observation. Boomers should have just isolated and vaxed themselves.
 
View attachment 4058643

Had to look this chart up for an argument recently so I figured I would repost it here. The mainstream makes this data nearly impossible to find which is odd. You would think by not if you google "covid death chance" it would come up directly with the numbers.
Sure it sucks that we got another respiratory disease, but this just shows for most people it was about as deadly at its worse as regular pneumonia, and only a loopy hypochondriac would have demanded we ban all holidays and live only in hermetically sealed bubbles to prevent those in the sane times.

I mean it sucks that some people die from respiratory disease, even young people, but we also can't cripple the world for what is typically a fringe case. More kids probably die of choking and we haven't demanded tube feeding only even though that would save so many lives, even moreso from preventing fatties, but it's hideous to strangle every minor joy out of life.
 
Are negative side effects invariable, or do some fare better than others? Can people overcome negative side effects and get better?

I really hope that thing I heard about the coof jab taking out around 2/3rds of those who took it after a year or 2 doesn't happen.
What percentage of people who took the jab now have subclinical (that is, asymptomatic) myocarditis and may die of creeping dilated cardiomyopathy in 2 to 4 years? We don't even know.
 
If the jab really is a weapon of mass murder, why would tyranny want loyal followers wiped out and those left are mostly the "wrongthinkers" "vaccine hesitant"?

Anyway hopefully no symptoms after a year can (easily) mean one is in the clear.
It's a matter of volume. It's like my friend who keeps a fish tank with some small species that incestuously breeds constantly. He doesn't care about the individuals, or even recognize them as such. Sometimes he needs to thin the herd, so he'll cull a chunk of them. He still enjoys having fish, he just doesn't need that many no matter how agreeable they are.

I don't think they intended the people who resisted to be spared, exactly. They aren't killing off all their pets in this scenario. They would probably still have enough to outnumber free thinkers. Maybe they would put the free thinkers in camps or cull them in another way. Maybe it's an elaborate shit test to find the most resilient people for some other purpose.

There are people who just see themselves as our betters, and it's unlikely that taking or not taking a shot changes their opinion of the peasants much. In their eyes, we're all vermin.
 
If the jab really is a weapon of mass murder, why would tyranny want loyal followers wiped out and those left are mostly the "wrongthinkers" "vaccine hesitant"?

Anyway hopefully no symptoms after a year can (easily) mean one is in the clear.
I mean, the "loyal followers" have proven to be weak enough that they can be talked into anything and the won't think for themselves.
Ever have to manage a work team where you had to hold everyone's hand and dumb down instructions at every single step? Tedious as hell.
 
If the jab really is a weapon of mass murder, why would tyranny want loyal followers wiped out and those left are mostly the "wrongthinkers" "vaccine hesitant"?

Anyway hopefully no symptoms after a year can (easily) mean one is in the clear.
The culprits are Neo-Malthusians. Their goal isn't to kill "loyal" or "disloyal" people. We are all mindless animals to them. They don't need or care about your loyalty. Their goal is simply to kill as many people as possible (like around 2/3rds of the population) in Western, wealthy countries, and then corral and capture the survivors in a technocratic surveillance state prison by taking direct control of the banks and forcing people to use implanted ID if they want to access their accounts.



Ten Top Aims:

1. A One World Government-New World Order with a unified church and monetary system under their direction. Not many people are aware that the One World Government began setting up its "church" in the 1920's/ 1930's, for they realized the need for a religious belief inherent in mankind to have an outlet and, therefore, set up a "church" body to channel that belief in the direction they desired.

2. The utter destruction of all national identity and national pride.

3. The destruction of religion and more especially the Christian religion, with the one exception, their own creation mentioned above.

4. Control of each and every person through means of mind control and what Brzezinski call "technotronics" which would create human-like robots and a system of terror beside which Felix Dzerzinski's Red Terror will look like children at play.

5. An end to all industrialization and the production of nuclear generated electric power in what they call "the post-industrial zero-growth society." Exempted are the computer and service industries. United States industries that remain will be exported to countries such as Mexico where abundant slave labour is available. Unemployables in the wake of industrial destruction will either become opium-heroin and or cocaine addicts, or become statistics in the elimination process we know today as Global 2000.

6. Legalization of drugs and pornography.

7. Depopulation of large cities according to the trial run carried out by the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia. It is interesting to note that Pol Pot's genocidal plans were drawn up here in the United States by one of the Club of Rome's research foundations. It is also interesting that the Committee is presently seeking to reinstate the Pol Pot butchers in Cambodia.

8. Suppression of all scientific development except for those deemed beneficial by the Committee. Especially targeted is nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Particularly hated are the fusion experiments presently being scorned and ridiculed by the Committee and its jackals of the press. Development of the fusion torch would blow the Committee's conception of "limited natural resources" right out of the window. A fusion torch properly used could create unlimited untapped natural resources from the most ordinary substances. Fusion torch uses are legion and would benefit mankind in a manner which is as yet not even remotely comprehended by the public.

9. Cause by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, and by means of starvation and diseases in Third World countries, the death of 3 billion people by the year 2000, people they call "useless eaters." The Committee of 300 commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a paper on this subject of how best to bring about such genocide. The paper was produced under the title the "Global 2000 Report" and was accepted and approved for action by President Carter, for and on behalf of the U.S. Government, and accepted by Edwin Muskie, then Secretary of State. Under the terms of the Global 2000 Report, the population of the United States is to be reduced by 100 million by the year 2050.

10. To weaken the moral fibre of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labour class by creating mass unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of Rome, demoralized and discouraged workers will resort to alcohol and drugs. The youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo, thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this regard The Committee of 300 commissioned Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock directed Stanford Research to undertake the work under the direction of Professor Willis Harmon. This work later became known as "The Aquarian Conspiracy."
 
Their goal is simply to kill as many people as possible (like around 2/3rds of the population) in Western, wealthy countries, and then corral and capture the survivors in a technocratic surveillance state prison by taking direct control of the banks and forcing people to use implanted ID if they want to access their accounts.
I hope we don't live in a "grimdark" world where evil pulls that off - and eliminates any chance of resistance through cybernetics.
 
This may be a dumb comment, but I’ve wanted to say this for a while. I’ve been lurking this and the previous thread for quite some time and the information and advice found within has been invaluable and kept me sane. My job, friends, and family, have been threatened by this hellscape of covid restrictions and vax mandates.

I’ve been meaning to sign up here for a while, but registration is usually been closed whenever I’ve thought to have something meaningful to add.

Anywho I hope fauci, daszak, and all the others responsible, get aids and die in prison.
 
Oh look, it kills old people near or passed retirement age. Wow we couldn't have worked that out by pure observation. Boomers should have just isolated and vaxed themselves.
No one should have taken the vaxx they are all slow kill posions! Covid was always a weak virus that any healthy person could beat, the media blew it out of porportion. There are actual safe and effective cures that have been surpressed, HCQ and Ivermectin. Most people dying now are vaxxed. You can also do a google search for died suddenly and compare this year to last and the rise in this term being searched is huge. Get right with God we are living in The End Times.
 
View attachment 4058643

Had to look this chart up for an argument recently so I figured I would repost it here. The mainstream makes this data nearly impossible to find which is odd. You would think by not if you google "covid death chance" it would come up directly with the numbers.
The only time the % was easy to find was the first month or so of lockdowns. It was everywhere. Then when the rate dropped below 2% then they started reporting the rate as a per 100k figure. Which is fucking hysterical to me because you can easily turn a 50 out of 100,000 into a percent, but the media knows most normies can't.

It's a matter of volume. It's like my friend who keeps a fish tank with some small species that incestuously breeds constantly. He doesn't care about the individuals, or even recognize them as such. Sometimes he needs to thin the herd, so he'll cull a chunk of them. He still enjoys having fish, he just doesn't need that many no matter how agreeable they are.

I don't think they intended the people who resisted to be spared, exactly. They aren't killing off all their pets in this scenario. They would probably still have enough to outnumber free thinkers. Maybe they would put the free thinkers in camps or cull them in another way. Maybe it's an elaborate shit test to find the most resilient people for some other purpose.

There are people who just see themselves as our betters, and it's unlikely that taking or not taking a shot changes their opinion of the peasants much. In their eyes, we're all vermin.
One schizo theory I've seen is that the people in charge want to kill off lots of useless eaters and the current crop of politicians. Those who aren't killed by the vax will turn on fauci/biden/ect and get rid of them. This leaves the real people in charge with their desired 500mil and a clean political slate.
 
The only time the % was easy to find was the first month or so of lockdowns. It was everywhere. Then when the rate dropped below 2% then they started reporting the rate as a per 100k figure. Which is fucking hysterical to me because you can easily turn a 50 out of 100,000 into a percent, but the media knows most normies can't.


One schizo theory I've seen is that the people in charge want to kill off lots of useless eaters and the current crop of politicians. Those who aren't killed by the vax will turn on fauci/biden/ect and get rid of them. This leaves the real people in charge with their desired 500mil and a clean political slate.
Sadly this is not so crazy a theory. *sigh*
 
Back