Science Going Barefoot Is Good for the Sole - Footfag Win

Article Archive

Going Barefoot Is Good for the Sole​

Walking without shoes builds calluses, but that does not limit sensation.

1670900685527.png

Some research shows walking barefoot is better for the body than wearing deeply cushioned soles. Photo by Westend61/Getty Images



Evolutionary biologist Daniel E. Lieberman caused an international stir nearly a decade ago when he published a paper showing that running in cushioned sneakers encourages people to hit the ground harder than running barefoot.

Lieberman, a professor of biological sciences at Harvard University, also started running barefoot himself as an experiment and kept doing it because he enjoyed it. Every spring, after running the Boston Marathon, he would trade his traditional sneakers for a pair of minimal shoes or no footwear at all. The more he ran barefoot, the more callused and protected his feet became. “But I could still feel the ground just as well as when my calluses were really thin,” Lieberman says. From an evolutionary standpoint, it made sense that callused feet would still feel: they are the body’s only contact with the ground, and ancient people could not afford to lose that sensation, he thought.

Now Lieberman and his colleagues at Harvard and in Germany and Kenya have conducted another study, published Wednesday in Nature, that confirms his suspicions. It finds that although calluses thicken as people walk barefoot more often, there is no trade-off in sensation from that extra protection. Essentially, the hard surface of the callus transmits mechanical force through the foot to the nerves deep inside the skin equally well as an unprotected sole.

Calluses are made out of the protein keratin, the same material as fingernails, glued together with another special protein. “There’s no viscosity to calluses, so forces from the ground go right into deeper layers of skin, and you don’t lose any information,” Lieberman says.

Lieberman and his colleagues measured the sensitivity of the sole to mechanical stimuli, showing that people with thick calluses were as sensitive to vibrations as those with thin or no calluses. The researchers compared calluses and foot sensitivity among 81 people from western Kenya, some of whom regularly went without footwear and some of whom did not. They also collected similar data from 22 people in Boston.

With cushioned shoes, the stiffness of the sole slows the rate at which the body hits the ground, making the impact more comfortable, but the force is the same, Lieberman says. “The energy that gets shot up your leg is about three times bigger in a cushioned shoe than if you’re barefoot,” he says, adding that “we have no idea what that means” for joint health. It is theoretically possible, he says, that this extra impact is behind the doubling of rates of arthritis of the knee since World War II—about the time that technological advances in footwear design allowed for more cushioned soles. But there is no solid evidence to support such a connection.

In some ways, walking barefoot is better for the body than wearing deeply cushioned soles, Lieberman says. But he insists he is not antifootwear: “I’m not saying people shouldn’t wear shoes.” Rather he thinks that scientists do not yet understand the impact of footwear on the body over the course of millions of steps. Lieberman says it would be challenging to study the effects of wearing shoes for millions upon millions of steps over the course of 70-plus years in humans, but he is currently exploring the impact of such cushioning on animal locomotion.

Balance might also be a casualty of soft soles. People’s feet become less sensitive as they age. If they have also lost touch with the ground, they might become more vulnerable to falls, Lieberman explains. “If your feet can’t sense what’s going on on the ground, maybe you’re more susceptible and more vulnerable [to falls], and shoes may be a part of that,” he says. “If we can give people’s brains, their reflexes, more information, that might help them.”

Gymnasts and martial artists go barefoot to increase their connection with the ground, and Formula One race car drivers wear hard-soled shoes that actually boost their sensitivity, according to one study.

With today’s cushioned shoes, “we add comfort, but we reduce functionality,” says Thorsten Sterzing, a footwear scientist who designs high-performance shoes. He was not involved in the new research but hopes to build on it in his own work. Too often, people opt for footwear that fits society’s idea of beauty, yet that does not promote healthy walking, he says. Studies like Lieberman’s can lead to better-designed shoes that complement the body’s natural abilities rather than undermine them.

Kristiaan D’Août, a senior lecturer in musculoskeletal biology at the University of Liverpool in England, says the foot is one of the least understood structures in the body because of individual variation, the complexity of foot bones and ligaments, and because so much of what happens inside the foot is impossible to see. D’Août was not involved in the recent paper, but he conducts related work and wrote a commentary about the study that appears in the same issue of Nature. In one of his research studies, D’Août had participants wear minimal shoes for six months. Although they were uncomfortable at first, “quite a few people prefer them now,” he says. “One of the things that I would really hope would come out of this research and footwear research in general is that people will start to realize that shoes can be quite invasive.” (D’Août admits he usually wears regular shoes himself because of the wet, gloomy weather in Liverpool.)

People have probably been wearing shoes for about 40,000 years, Lieberman says, although some suspect that Neandertals remained shoeless. In some parts of the world, including India and Kenya, where Lieberman conducts research, many people still go their whole lives without wearing shoes. “I find it unimaginable to be barefoot in middle of Europe in the Ice Age, but then again, all the other animals in Europe during the Ice Age were barefoot—so maybe our cousins, the Neandertals, were able to handle it just fine,” Lieberman says.

Still, he says, he has no plans to test going barefoot himself during a New England winter.
 
Did people really think that sensation didn't cross through callouses? Because my hands would argue the opposite. I know when something is hot, it just doesn't burn and blister the skin the way it does an office worker. And as for running barefoot, it feels great, and you do have a lighter step and gain stronger toes and ankles to boot.
 
There's a whole argument that shoes actually cause us to walk in a way which promotes blowing our fuckin knees out prematurely, which only kind of gets a mention here, but try walking toe-heel instead of heel-toe for a bit, it feels a bit awkward but especially with thinner shoes with less prominent heels it is quite comfy just, not in muscle memory most of us develop. Most importantly, your foot and all the flexible parts of it are absorbing the impact before it gets to your ankle and thus your knee, potentially reducing stress there.

That whole field of research is super hempy which resulted in some of the ugliest shoes I've ever seen which put all the padding and sole 2/3ish forward so kinda mid-foot, I can't remember the name of 'em for the life of me, we're talking nearly 20 years ago now, but were based around the idea of changing how you walk so as to reduce the impact at the heel, and the shoes were intended to force that change in your habits.

Interesting shit though obviously the foot fetish jokes write themselves.
 
There's a whole argument that shoes actually cause us to walk in a way which promotes blowing our fuckin knees out prematurely, which only kind of gets a mention here, but try walking toe-heel instead of heel-toe for a bit, it feels a bit awkward but especially with thinner shoes with less prominent heels it is quite comfy just, not in muscle memory most of us develop. Most importantly, your foot and all the flexible parts of it are absorbing the impact before it gets to your ankle and thus your knee, potentially reducing stress there.

That whole field of research is super hempy which resulted in some of the ugliest shoes I've ever seen which put all the padding and sole 2/3ish forward so kinda mid-foot, I can't remember the name of 'em for the life of me, we're talking nearly 20 years ago now, but were based around the idea of changing how you walk so as to reduce the impact at the heel, and the shoes were intended to force that change in your habits.

Interesting shit though obviously the foot fetish jokes write themselves.
Hokas are kind of like that, they've got a weird "rocking" feeling in them where they pushed it forward:
1670903361749.png
 
I agree on the theoretical level with the general idea, but I really do want to protect my feet. Even the thin shoes the article recommends if you don't want to go barefoot don't look like they would protect you from a little bit of broken glass. I like plastic or composite over the soles of my boots for that reason. Boots that go over your ankles help prevent rolled or sprained ankles as well.
 
That whole field of research is super hempy which resulted in some of the ugliest shoes I've ever seen which put all the padding and sole 2/3ish forward so kinda mid-foot, I can't remember the name of 'em for the life of me, we're talking nearly 20 years ago now, but were based around the idea of changing how you walk so as to reduce the impact at the heel, and the shoes were intended to force that change in your habits.
"Negative heel" Earth Shoes?
1670903912249.png
 
I've always wanted to try some barefoot shoes, but just about everything I can find locally is some autistic Vibram 5 fingers rip off. I can't find any shoe place that carries any of the normal looking barefoot shoes. I also don't want to order online and risk a misfit.
That said, I don't wear shoes or flip flops at home and don't understand why anyone would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBJ_4_Ever
"Negative heel" Earth Shoes?
View attachment 4059906
Looks wrong, but same concept. The ones I'm thinking of were more colorful and had a very distinct sole bulge deeper than the heel by about 1/2 an inch or more. I remember thinking they looked horribly unstable at the time but I was also in single digit ages.
 
There's a whole argument that shoes actually cause us to walk in a way which promotes blowing our fuckin knees out prematurely, which only kind of gets a mention here, but try walking toe-heel instead of heel-toe for a bit, it feels a bit awkward but especially with thinner shoes with less prominent heels it is quite comfy just, not in muscle memory most of us develop. Most importantly, your foot and all the flexible parts of it are absorbing the impact before it gets to your ankle and thus your knee, potentially reducing stress there.
Weren't the goofy-looking Vibram shoes (the ones with toes) sold on that premise and then had to do a class action lawsuit/saw their sales dry up when it turned out to be complete bullshit?

I don't really see those shoes anymore, yet Crocs are still enduringly popular.
 
Back