Jaron Seth Bloshinsky / Jazz Jennings / I Am Jazz - Puberty Blockers: Not Even Once

Most people live longer than 55-60 years, so it could be considerably more than 40 years in a mutilated body. I would imagine most of them will eventually give up on dilating, so "que sera, sera" down there. It's not as if it's impossible to live happily without children or even sex -- people do it all the time -- but Jazz and others will have to find something else to give their lives meaning and satisfaction. Freud referred to it as "sublimation." Religion, vocation, art, causes, service, etc.
 
Three part series:

1671050901286.png

1671050969385.png

1671051007877.png
"Jazz" says the same thing in 2/3 captions.
 
Oh, damn. I wasn't joking, but I had hope.... I think this

imagen_2022-12-14_230017711.png

is exactly how it's gonna end. Actually, I think this is gonna be very toned down compared with the final result...

I was going to say they could adopt, but I doubt these people have the mental stability to be good parents after everything that's been done to them.
You think woke adoption agencies are gonna care for that? Jazz needs to be validated as a woman, so he needs a child to become a mother and they will give him one. What are you? A bigot?
 
You think woke adoption agencies are gonna care for that? Jazz needs to be validated as a woman, so he needs a child to become a mother and they will give him one. What are you? A bigot?
The Dougherty Dozen are a heartbreaking testament to the lack of shits given by the system in that regard.

That said, adoption is a long and expensive process, especially if you're looking for a baby. If I Am Jazz is still going in a few years, I could see adoption being a plotline.
 
1. Why would you paint with your shirt off? Especially when you’re a hairy little hedgehog like Sander.

2. God, those dollar canvases and cheap acrylics are awful. And this is an adult man wanting a crappy rainbow elephant painting his apartment? Any woman walking in is going to think his kid painted those.
 
Between this, Kellog introducing medical circumscion while burning off the clits of baby girls, the over-medicating of young kids, and the occasional instances of child sacrifice throughout time, I wonder if there's some weird, dark part of the human condition that seeks to destroy or warp the young.
In nature, getting rid of the competition by going after the young is commonplace. Lions are a famous example of this, but it's not unique to them. There are countless animals whose leading cause of death is not from natural predation, but from other members of their species.

I'm completely spitballing here, but there's a theory that gay men exist as a way to ensure that their siblings kids have a better chance to survive. So if normal gays are there to strengthen their own families, then pedophiles must be the inverse of that. They exist to weaken other families.
 
In nature, getting rid of the competition by going after the young is commonplace. Lions are a famous example of this, but it's not unique to them. There are countless animals whose leading cause of death is not from natural predation, but from other members of their species.

I'm completely spitballing here, but there's a theory that gay men exist as a way to ensure that their siblings kids have a better chance to survive. So if normal gays are there to strengthen their own families, then pedophiles must be the inverse of that. They exist to weaken other families.
The theory is not very solid because there is a sizable overlap between gay men and pedophiles (ephebophiles especially). There is a reason NAMbLA is more active than NAMgLA.
Before someone misquotes me, I don't think all gay men are pedos, but I think that by picking a random gay man and a random straight man, there is a higher chance the gay one is a pedo compared to the straight one.
It's also a fact that a certain number of gay men who were diddled as children then try themselves to recreate the same scenario with young meat. They usually don't view this as abuse but as 'healthy sexual awakening'. This is one of the reasons why Drag Queen shows 'for all ages/children' are made. So many pedo queens have been caught in the henhouse already.
 
The theory is not very solid because there is a sizable overlap between gay men and pedophiles (ephebophiles especially). There is a reason NAMbLA is more active than NAMgLA.
Before someone misquotes me, I don't think all gay men are pedos, but I think that by picking a random gay man and a random straight man, there is a higher chance the gay one is a pedo compared to the straight one.
It's also a fact that a certain number of gay men who were diddled as children then try themselves to recreate the same scenario with young meat. They usually don't view this as abuse but as 'healthy sexual awakening'. This is one of the reasons why Drag Queen shows 'for all ages/children' are made. So many pedo queens have been caught in the henhouse already.
Actually aren't little girls more likely to experience child sexual abuse than boys, by the numbers?
 
Actually aren't little girls more likely to experience child sexual abuse than boys, by the numbers?
Yes.
7F8E2AF3-4B1C-41A5-95A4-10E75F7E31DD.jpeg
Something often overlooked in the Catholic abuse scandal is that 1 out of 4 child victims were female.

However boys are less likely to report such abuse because of the stigma around homosexuality, so those numbers are possibly higher than reported.
 
Well, without going out of topic, leftism overall doesn't see children as humans, just accessories of a cause. This is because of liberalism and their dislike of families and obligation, they see children as a burden that goes against their freedom, with the only kids to protect are their own. Leftism leads to progressiveness, reason why so many mothers see their kids as a way for them to become famous and special. The kid is also an accessory. Is there any trans kid whose family is a RW or conservative? No, because they all started as normal liberals who just wanted fair wages and all that shit... and here they are.

/sperging.
 
It could simultaneously be true that little girls are more likely to be victims of CSA and that gay men are more likely to be diddlers. The percent of all men who are gay is very low.
Eg if 50% of gay men are diddlers and gay men are 5% of the male population, and only 10% of straight men are diddlers but straight men are 95% of the population, that’s still 3-4x more girls getting diddled than boys.

Note I pulled all of these statistics out of my ass just to make the point of what is hypothetically possible. You can’t even google “what percent of men are gay” these days without getting nonsense figures like 30% of Gen Z are LGBTQIA+” which is essentially a statistic showing nothing about orientation but rather what % of Gen Z have woke political brain rot
 
Back