Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Less targeting them more that they are the exact same annoying retards on social media who had been protected before Musk and now getting their shit pushed for actually braking the rules.
A lot of these people had insiders in twitter to get unbanned, now its all gone.
It's almost like people warned them about having principles instead of relying on the idea that only Good People™ you agree with will always be in power.
 
Not when the company still has your Tweets saved on their servers for the next 30 days. They can still get it. Hell, her account could be locked to make sure they can get all of it.
Hey faggot. I worked at twitter engineering. Tweets are not stored for 30 days. They are stored forever. Even if you delete them. Deleting them just sets a flag "dont show this tweet, is deleted" in the manhattan database. But the tweet remains in the database forever.

All social media do this, in case you do some retarded shit and the feds needs your tweet history.
 
Last edited:
Obviously from such a wealthy family, why even do this? It's obviously a mental disease. This will undoubtably ruin her even more, Twitter is all she had.

Why not just go to law school or become an "accountant" and live easy of the old folks money?
I mean law school fucking sucks and for a rich kid who went to an expensive private high school she would’ve had to probably be a legacy at an ivy (not a shitty one either) to get in for undergrad and then score very high (like 98th percentile) on the lsat to compete in the very small pool of undifferentiated rich kids spots to get into even a top 25 school. Unless her parents have like hundreds of millions of dollars? but even then…. And people like her can’t go to a state school. That would expose their parents as not being rich enough to buy a child who can achieve what is socially necessary. There would be a social forensic investigation done by their friends and colleagues on how they fucked up their shitty kid which would resume every time they left the room at a party. And even if they send the kid to like one of those 75k per year Lena Dunham ass schools that don’t even assign grades, that kid is not going to be able to just go be an accountant while their friends have lives that at least look exciting and fulfilling on instagram.

I’m just speculating because I don’t think I know anyone who is both from a super wealthy family and honest/self aware enough to articulate it, but I think there is this hilarious trap that the children of wealthy fall into, especially in the US where we like to pretend we are all bootstrapped and self made. They literally don’t need to work to survive, but their parents control the purse strings and instill the need to “have a job” not “support yourself” from the time they are young. The wiring between work and reward and and value is all fucked up and fried because humans weren’t meant to live like that. Making choices and dealing with the fallout is kind of the entire point of life. If your choices don’t matter because it’s just your dad bitching at you to make them or your only motivation is your mom being passive aggressive/you want your friends to not laugh at you, then you don’t get to enjoy any of the rewards that come with good choices, so the protection from making a bad choice is worthless. You’re a bratty kid who just keeps getting older and fatter and more embarrassing,.

And then there are the parents themselves. Children are resilient, but imagine having two high status parents, who are neurotic and probably Jewish as fuck, who can pay all the au pairs in france to nanny you so you don’t become the “Cokehead kid” of the social circle, but are too rich and crazy and alienated from normal life to be good parents even if they cared to try?

I think the most typical outcomes are:
1. I’m gonna out-daddy my daddy and then he will be obligated to admit that he loves me. (Donald trump did this with Fred, mostly men not women)
2. I am going to fuck up and humiliate you by making you answer awkward questions at parties when people ask if I’m doing well in my latest rehab until I OD (Steven spielberg’s adopted daughter didn’t do this… but I can’t imagine how many calls his assistant had to make to keep her little public announcement from Picking up steam in the press. There’s plenty of examples of #2 though)
3. I am too lazy to do #1 and even though I blame you both for everything in my life that is bad, I didn’t have access to heroin early enough (thanks Nannies!) for it to destroy my self preservation instincts. I am also too ugly to be a model or actor. Journalism it is! I can just do unpaid internships until they hire me and to do the social media beat!

At least this is my own personal cope.
 
Hey faggot. I worked at core-storage at twitter. Tweets are not stored for 30 days. They are stored forever. Even if you delete them. Deleting them just sets a flag "dont show this tweet, is deleted" in the manhattan database. But the tweet remains in the database forever.

All social media do this, in case you do some retarded fedposting and the feds want your tweet history.
If they actually do this they are in violation of the GDPR.

Considering how many insiders with an axe to grind have been fired and no GDPR suits are active because of this I'm calling bullshit.
 
If they actually do this they are in violation of the GDPR.

Considering how many insiders with an axe to grind have been fired and no GDPR suits are active because of this I'm calling bullshit.
Screenshot_20221218_035346_Brave.jpg
Screenshot_20221218_035413_Brave.jpg
As we all know, it's impossible for a social media company to differentiate between the countries its users hail from 🙄
 
If they actually do this they are in violation of the GDPR.

Considering how many insiders with an axe to grind have been fired and no GDPR suits are active because of this I'm calling bullshit.
Call it whatever you want eurofaggot. It is how things works and, no, US companies do not give a shit about your GDPR faggotry.
 
If there's one boon to Elon being an immature self-obsessed egomaniac manchild it's that he will happily nuke anyone dunking on him, be it small time twitter Literally Whos or untouchable "journalist" parasites like Tay here. Anyone else with either a hint of patience or maturity would just let it slide for fear of alienating news outlets but Elon's too impulsive to realize why that might be a bad idea. He is, by sheer accident, the perfect honeypot. An easy target for lazy idiots with big names to go after, and be subsequently swatted down and humbled by him having the capital of an US city and thus not having any real reason to fear them.

Cockroaches like her will never really truly go away but I hope this reality check gets to her & her worthless colleagues. The only worse thing than an untouchable, lying journalist is an untouchable smug lying journalist.
 
If there's one boon to Elon being an immature self-obsessed egomaniac manchild it's that he will happily nuke anyone dunking on him, be it small time twitter Literally Whos or untouchable "journalist" parasites like Tay here. Anyone else with either a hint of patience or maturity would just let it slide for fear of alienating news outlets but Elon's too impulsive to realize why that might be a bad idea. He is, by sheer accident, the perfect honeypot. An easy target for lazy idiots with big names to go after, and be subsequently swatted down and humbled by him having the capital of an US city and thus not having any real reason to fear them.

Cockroaches like her will never really truly go away but I hope this reality check gets to her & her worthless colleagues. The only worse thing than an untouchable, lying journalist is an untouchable smug lying journalist.
Thing is man all the news outlets already hated him, just for signing the buyout in the first place. It is foolish to give in to the demands of people who hate your guts. Even right wing press only tolerates him, because he is currently smacking their enemy's with the ban hammer. They will also turn on him when the rules are used against them. All journoscum are faggots, right or left and everything in between.
I just realized what this means, even more ELON IS TOTALLY BROKE AND DYING and TWITTER IS DEAD hot take videos and write ups from the eternally assblasted. It is going to be a laugh reading them :story:
 
Well, I am the guy with the verified badge that I worked for big tech and you are the rando. So who to trust?
At Google I was personally writing part of the code for lawful intercept for nova/project-fi? Guess what, all chat messages from your phone are stored forever and we even coded up an api for leo to access and copy every singe sms or chat you ever sent.
It is almost like that is a mandatory requirement in order to get a licence to operate.
It's almost like this is what noyb referenced in one of their court cases (schrems ii) that got facebook assblasted.

It might have worked like this before you got your dumb ass fired, but data retention has changed a lot recently.
 
It is almost like that is a mandatory requirement in order to get a licence to operate.
Social media saves everything you do so they can mine it for targeted advertising or just sell your info not because it's required by any law. There are no legal requirement for what you describe, it's really the opposite. A few cell providers I'm aware of only save about 30 days worth of your SMS messages mainly because of the costs associated with fulfilling legal requests. It's much cheaper to say "we don't save anything longer than 30 days, bye" than to archive everything, staff people to fill requests and then be liable if you miss something covered in a subpoena.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Backinpogform
It's almost like this is what noyb referenced in one of their court cases (schrems ii) that got facebook assblasted.

It might have worked like this before you got your dumb ass fired, but data retention has changed a lot recently.
You just do not have any idea about what you are talking about.
Nothing has changed. You can delete posts and you can delete the account but all data will be retained indefinitely.
It just means that when you search for it you will not see it.
But when special agent BOB searches for the tweet history of the latest school shooter he will see every single tweet
deleted or not.
I do not understand how this is hard to understand. there is even fucking legislation that forces social medial to retain all this data
for cases like that.

Your mouth smells like cock.

Social media saves everything you do so they can mine it for targeted advertising or just sell your info not because it's required by any law. There are no legal requirement for what you describe, it's really the opposite. A few cell providers I'm aware of only save about 30 days worth of your SMS messages mainly because of the costs associated with fulfilling legal requests. It's much cheaper to say "we don't save anything longer than 30 days, bye" than to archive everything, staff people to fill requests and then be liable if you miss something covered in a subpoena.
There is absolutely a legal requirement for this.
 
You just do not have any idea about what you are talking about.
Nothing has changed. You can delete posts and you can delete the account but all data will be retained indefinitely.
It just means that when you search for it you will not see it.
But when special agent BOB searches for the tweet history of the latest school shooter he will see every single tweet
deleted or not.
I do not understand how this is hard to understand. there is even fucking legislation that forces social medial to retain all this data
for cases like that.

Your mouth smells like cock.
I'm not going to powerlevel like retard like you do, so you'll have to argue with facts you mongoloid.

Fact is that Twitter absolutely considers itself covered by the GDPR, what you described earlier would be in breach of the GDPR, and no tranny "whistleblowers" have talked publicly about how Twitter is in breach of the GDPR or gotten lawsuits filed.
 
I mean I fucking wrote part of the software at google that allows leo's to log in and "this phone number, gimme all texts send or received between these two date." and also "please list all phone numbers received or dialed with their date and duration". I fucking wrote some of that software because we were legally required to provide a portal like that.
And when was this? Was it before or after schrems ii?

So sue them then.
Also the trannies do not work in core engineering. They work in faggot places like "community outreach" etc.
They would presumably work in places where they knew about data retention policy.
 
Back