Gen Z ‘shocked’ to learn their ‘digital footprint’ could ruin job prospects - They're shocked posting your degeneracy with their real info could have any consequences

Article | Archive

Young people are discovering that “digital footprints” are real — and a real problem for our most-online generation.

A TikTok user has gone viral after sharing their social media nightmare, claiming they missed out on a job because of something their potential colleagues had seen them post online.

“Me realizing the digital footprint is real because when called for a job interview they loved me but when they did a background check they said they didn’t want to hire me anymore,” the TikTok user, @shoomew, wrote in text over a recent video — with more than 4.1 million views since it was posted in October.

In a statement to The Post, the high school student, named Jayden, confirmed the story — and their disappointment.

“I was very shocked and sad even because it was such a good position!” Jayden told The Post in an email. “This wont change how I post because I feel like I’m already too far gone. Hopefully a TV career will take me instead one day haha.”

Older generations have historically approached the internet with caution amid early warnings about their traceable activities online. Gen Z, on the hand, was born well into the internet age. As a result, their online records started essentially from birth, well before they possessed the wherewithal to understand the potential consequences of their digital actions.

1671223056932.png

TikTok user @shoomew was “shocked” when her potential employers found her activity online — and rescinded their job offer because of it.TikTok / @shoomew

1671223093336.png

Cybersecurity pro Chris Southerland Jr. chimed in with advice on how to cover your digital tracks.TikTok / @chrisjr404
More than 7,000 users commented on the video, many of whom were aghast at Jayden’s misfortune — asking how to do a background check on themselves to avoid the same outcome.

“If my future employee ever sees this, please know that i have dreams, thank you,” a panicked user wrote.

“PLEASE I AM NOT MY INTERNET PERSONA,” another wrote.

Lucky for them, a cybercrime expert stitched the video with tips on how companies find potential candidates online.

“Here is how a company can find your digital footprint,” Chris Southerland Jr. captioned the 19-second video, which has been viewed 14.1 million times.

According to Southerland, there are “thousands” of tools companies can use to search your history — depending on the type of job you seek.

“Personally, I am not worried about what I post online whatsoever. If I did want to lock down my online presence, I would use a different real name, username, profile picture, and email for all my different social media accounts,” Southland later told BuzzFeed News.

Fortunately, he also said there are ways to hide some details on the World Wide Web.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Glad to have it ingrained from the first moment accessing the internet to never give anyone or any site personal info or pictures about anything ever.
I grew up with the same "stranger danger" approach to the interwebs drilled in my head over and over. That and practicing common sense OPSEC.

I wouldn't expect the first generation to fuck around with the Internet and social media from birth to know or understand any of the above. Those apps literally demand you give out your real info. A big part of why I didn't board the Facebook train when it first left the station a long, long time ago.

Also companies “We’d like you to have a personal brand. Please include links on your resume”
This is where knowing how to craft a professional online persona (and keeping that shit separate from any other fuck shit you do online) comes in handy. Goddamn, those "reputation management" firms must be raking it in right about now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
This is where knowing how to craft a professional online persona (and keeping that shit separate from any other fuck shit you do online) comes in handy. Goddamn, those "reputation management" firms must be raking it in right about now.
This right here. I maintain ONE normie social media and its Instagram. Even then it's just traveling pics with the odd group selfie with friends. Everything else is under a handle.
 
If this was really, actually true, you'd be far less worried.

Signed - Stabmaster Arson II, straight outta Locash.

Every single person that plays (or has someone simp for) "that's just my Internet personality" is a cover unless you are very clearly playing a character who doesn't happen to be a slightly exaggerated version of you in a silly hat.

Besides, claim the "it's just my Internet personality" card long enough and someone will catch you in a lie and expose yourself for playing both side (see: Boogie).
 
My computer science teacher was a retired glow in dark a point in which he wouldn't shut the fuck up about on a daily basis. Retired naval strategic services and then later on FBI. Why he taught at a high school? Hell I don't know somebody's got to finish last place. More importantly, he used to tell us all the time that the government was watching you online and that you had to watch everything that you post and he used to go on long rants about how the internet's going to be the future. Mind you, this was during the days of diel up.
 
My computer science teacher was a retired glow in dark a point in which he wouldn't shut the fuck up about on a daily basis. Retired naval strategic services and then later on FBI. Why he taught at a high school? Hell I don't know somebody's got to finish last place. More importantly, he used to tell us all the time that the government was watching you online and that you had to watch everything that you post and he used to go on long rants about how the internet's going to be the future. Mind you, this was during the days of diel up.
The funny thing is the government wasn't watching everything online at that point. A bygone era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaVolt
I used to work for a firm which did background checks. Our clients included huge international law firms, hedge funds, broadcasters, engineering companies, retailers, fashion brands, banks… you name it.

Social media screening was something the clients would ask about constantly and were adopting in droves, and it found EVERYTHING, unless the person being checked used throwaway accounts or made their social media private. If you called your boss an asshole on Twitter 10 years ago, it would be found and flagged up as adverse material. It absolutely stopped some people from getting the jobs they applied for, especially in conservative industries where the firms are very concerned about their reputation (law). Many firms saw over-sharing and inappropriate content on public social media as proof of poor judgement and lack of discretion, which you don’t want in an employee who will potentially be dealing with trade secrets or confidential client information.
Yep

I've only gotten into ONE public Facebook fight with some wannabe faggot communists/anarcho-communists and some bleeding heart faggot who was against the death penalty in all circumstances.

That might be enough to nix me for a job in some companies..... Thankfully they'd be faggot leftist ones
 
The funny thing is the government wasn't watching everything online at that point. A bygone era.
In those days it was worse. No public key infrastructure. Strong cryptography was classified as munitions and disseminating it was illegal. The Feds were trying to put hardware crypto chips in everyone's phones, and they'd hold the keys in escrow. No FISA warrant was denied. (One was denied by the FISC, but the review court granted it.) The internet was much smaller, it was academically-oriented--more people than you might suspect used their real names and affiliations in personal posts and web pages back then. You could finger complete strangers. It was the 80s kids, getting online in the 90s, who (sensibly) brought "stranger danger" to the internet.
 
The funny thing is the government wasn't watching everything online at that point. A bygone era.
Considering he would have art bell or William Cooper playing in the background he was known be into conspiracy theories and extremely paranoid. So really a fun guy. He showed us how to use leapftp and Napster and how to use the aol disks to get free internet
 
In those days it was worse. No public key infrastructure. Strong cryptography was classified as munitions and disseminating it was illegal. The Feds were trying to put hardware crypto chips in everyone's phones, and they'd hold the keys in escrow. No FISA warrant was denied. (One was denied by the FISC, but the review court granted it.) The internet was much smaller, it was academically-oriented--more people than you might suspect used their real names and affiliations in personal posts and web pages back then. You could finger complete strangers. It was the 80s kids, getting online in the 90s, who (sensibly) brought "stranger danger" to the internet.
The government spying aspect was not worse, we may just have to agree to disagree. The government didn't know what to do with the internet and were terrified of normies using encryption which up until then was reserved for governments. Mass spying was infeasible but targeted spying was as easy as vampire clips or hitting up the local telco.
A good example of this, albeit a bit earlier, is how much bullshit they had to deal with trying to catch the hacker in The Cuckoo's Egg by Clifford Stoll. I recommend this book to anyone who enjoys retro tech and/or a mystery as it's written sort of like a mystery while being based on a true story.
Considering he would have art bell or William Cooper playing in the background he was known be into conspiracy theories and extremely paranoid. So really a fun guy. He showed us how to use leapftp and Napster and how to use the aol disks to get free internet
Yeah I bet, the thing is he was just a tad early. Art Bell of all people would understand the spying potential better than most, being the RF nerd he was. I haven't listened to him in awhile but have a local copy of an archive someone put together years ago, it'd be fun to hear what guests and listeners were saying about gov spying back then. Frankly, I think it's worse than even they would have imagined at this point.
 
The government spying aspect was not worse, we may just have to agree to disagree. The government didn't know what to do with the internet and were terrified of normies using encryption which up until then was reserved for governments. Mass spying was infeasible but targeted spying was as easy as vampire clips or hitting up the local telco.
A good example of this, albeit a bit earlier, is how much bullshit they had to deal with trying to catch the hacker in The Cuckoo's Egg by Clifford Stoll. I recommend this book to anyone who enjoys retro tech and/or a mystery as it's written sort of like a mystery while being based on a true story.

Yeah I bet, the thing is he was just a tad early. Art Bell of all people would understand the spying potential better than most, being the RF nerd he was. I haven't listened to him in awhile but have a local copy of an archive someone put together years ago, it'd be fun to hear what guests and listeners were saying about gov spying back then. Frankly, I think it's worse than even they would have imagined at this point.
Among the more technically literate there was alarms bring raised however most of it was being ignored
 
I dunno, does it? I think all this SM doxing is really for a few niche careers like tech and sales/marketing. Most employers don't give a shit about you until they have some Twitter mob on them about whatever is pissing them off today.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
I dunno, does it? I think all this SM doxing is really for a few niche careers like tech and sales/marketing. Most employers don't give a shit about you until they have some Twitter mob on them about whatever is pissing them off today.
That's the problem, they'll never tell you why you didn't get a job. Not really. And since virtually anyone can google you in 5 seconds, it's risky anyway. The advice to make a few accounts and post how you like animals and the weather I think it good.
 
That's the problem, they'll never tell you why you didn't get a job. Not really. And since virtually anyone can google you in 5 seconds, it's risky anyway. The advice to make a few accounts and post how you like animals and the weather I think it good.
What if they google you and they think fuck yeah, hired, tho?
 
Make a FB with your real name. Post some inane bullshit a few times, then let it gather dust. Best shield against this shit.
My FB is full of knitting and sewing stuff.
And cats.
Lots and lots of pictures of cats.
Don't use my real name for it, either. The people that need to know, well, KNOW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
I dunno, does it? I think all this SM doxing is really for a few niche careers like tech and sales/marketing. Most employers don't give a shit about you until they have some Twitter mob on them about whatever is pissing them off today.
I would argue these things go in cycles. The first job I ever had required a 45 minute personality test just to submit the application and then I had to take a piss test. Today, no one wants to work and you can be a felon and show up blazed and they'll offer you the job.

Right now this type of screening might be used for some niche careers. When the job market changes again and HR solution companies offer the Walmarts and McDonalds of the world a turn key solution to help them screen employees for a fraction of the cost social media screens probably cost now, I bet half-assed social media reviews will be common place for most jobs.
 
Given they didn't mention what the dumb zoomer did, I'm guessing they had a Tiktok with something illegal or borderline illegal, like keying a car.


I would argue these things go in cycles. The first job I ever had required a 45 minute personality test just to submit the application and then I had to take a piss test. Today, no one wants to work and you can be a felon and show up blazed and they'll offer you the job.
I never know what to do for those "personality tests", whether it's a "do you know how to behave around other co-workers and customers and not be a complete asshole" or if they're checking for consistency when the same question is worded differently?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Back