Jaron Seth Bloshinsky / Jazz Jennings / I Am Jazz - Puberty Blockers: Not Even Once

The art is offensively bad. But, just like Jazz's ladybits, it's a surface level fakery that's just there to draw attention.
Not to mention this was less about Sander going "I'd like some art to hang on my wall. I'll ask Jazz to make me something" but instead all about creating content for TikTok that combines his "I've got a new home!" storyline with Jazz (the only reason anyone pays any attention to him online).

Possibly with a soupçon of inspiration/motivation/"anyone can make art".

Jazz could have fingerpainted a Freudian depiction of Jeanette chasing him with a bloodied dilator and the words "forced upon me" - Sander would have had the exact same reaction and hung it on his wall, it's just about content (and by extension, having rainbow and Jazz reminders in the background of all his videos he shoots in his bedroom from now on).
 
Actually aren't little girls more likely to experience child sexual abuse than boys, by the numbers?
Depends on the country, in India and afghanistan its more boys than girls. And the amount is fucking outrageous, over 50% of both men and women report being molested as children. That fact makes their state sponsored homophobia make so much more sense, when half of all men (and by extension the people making the laws) were diddled by some faggot lmao.

Well, without going out of topic, leftism overall doesn't see children as humans, just accessories of a cause. This is because of liberalism and their dislike of families and obligation, they see children as a burden that goes against their freedom, with the only kids to protect are their own. Leftism leads to progressiveness, reason why so many mothers see their kids as a way for them to become famous and special. The kid is also an accessory. Is there any trans kid whose family is a RW or conservative? No, because they all started as normal liberals who just wanted fair wages and all that shit... and here they are.

/sperging.
Youre just completely ignoring all the gay conversion therapy that goes on wrt trans kids. There is a lot of conservative parents who would rather have a "straight" trans child than a gay "cis" child, there are multiple examples of just that in the farms, i just dont have any saved. I know there are multiple examples in the "crazy parents of trans kids" thread alone.
 
How is I Am Jazz aired on normie TV? Do the people that watch this unprepared not register the crazy unfolding before them?

TLC is a freakshow channel. They have whole lineups about 600lb people, dwarf families, pimple popping, foot disorders, polygamists, religious nuts with 17 kids. Jazz is just another freak in the stables.
 
TLC is a freakshow channel. They have whole lineups about 600lb people, dwarf families, pimple popping, foot disorders, polygamists, religious nuts with 17 kids. Jazz is just another freak in the stables.
And to think that when I was a wee lass, it was all shows about pregnancy and birth. I called it The Labor Channel.
 
Not only that.

View attachment 4112412

They aren't properly aligned below either. And there is no real need to have them in different sizes. There is no continuity on that and on the series of elements. The two ends are a centered circle and an uneven silhouette. Same for 2 and 4: centered image vs asymmetrical. And this combination doesn't look good with a cream background.

For the kiwis claiming that Jazz can do art, no, he can't. This isn't copying something, this is an original composition by himself and look how bad it is. The more you look at it, the more mistakes you find. This decoration looks like something two blind straight men with Parkinson did when asked to decorate the room of a girl with rainbows.

Fuck it, it doesn't even look like a rainbow, it looks like the rastafarian flag. Anyone seeing that it's gonna think Sander's a stoner.
The two outer ones are on a level with each other, the two inner ones are on a level with each other. The centre picture is lower than the two either side of it by the same amount they are lower than the two outer ones. And I like the spectrum of colour across the set.

I'm not saying cutting off your penis is a good thing, I'm just saying that wall pictures don't have to line up.
 
I personally don't think those pictures are that offensive by themselves, but they look much better as standalone pieces than in group. They are also quick stencil art, I don't think Jazz spent much effort for these and only did them because of Sanders. Could buy similar ones at a hippie grandma's personal art stand. The colors are on the psychedelic/hippie/pot art side.

I remember Jazz being pretty good at drawing for a kid and then...stagnating. For years. More or less it aligns with puberty blockers/HRT though I'm not sure if they had a big impact or it was more of an emotional cause (likely both). Since to Jeannette Jazz being trans was the whole show, anything else he makes is purely in function of that. Which is a pity because Jazz had way more potential than what he has made recently and, more importantly, it's a thing that makes HIM happy and doesn't have to revolve around Jeannette/being trans.
 
I think we can all agree the left’s definition of words and explanation of concepts are, at best, nebulous. So, for them, transitioning can apparently range the spectrum of the objective (social, HRT, SRS, or a combination thereof) to the intangibility of starting and ending transition entirely within the mind (hello Darren Merager). However, if we were to stick to the objective, I feel like concept of “trans kids” is as oxymoronic as “non-offending MAPs” based on the following.

I’ll build up my thesis by briefly breaking down the latter of the two first: So, if you have these desires — whatever they may be — but you never act on them (which includes masturbating in privacy to such mental images), then you’re just someone with weird thoughts (which, in some ways we all are). For that reason, MAPs can never be non-offending, because their very existence is offensive. You don’t touch kids, but you think about them in the shower? Um… Nah, bro. Ur offending. (Aside: This is also why a registered sex offender who happens to be decades removed from their crime and punishment and is otherwise a model citizen, still won’t be left alone with the child of a reasonable person.) In sum, if you think about kids sexually, but you in no way act on or speak about those thoughts in public or private... I would seek professional help, or never talk to any one about it. Either way, you're not a non-offending MAP, but someone with weird thoughts, IMO.

Accordingly, not including the only element that is actually reversible (social), objective transitioning involves the use of medical procedures (SRS), and or pharmaceuticals (HRT). Both of which require consent that kids – which, according to sources are persons ages 0 to 14 – cannot give. Thus, the responsibility for this would ultimately fall to parents or caretakers, both of whom are entrusted to do what is in the best interest of the kid. If a kid throws a tantrum because they want more candy, however, it is in their best interest not to have candy, the choice is clear. However, if that same kid comes and proclaims “I want to cut off my penis!” it is in their best interest to offer a celebratory acquiesce...? (Both of which can lead to adverse health, BTW; but reasonable people can see that cavities, obesity, and potential diabetes are comparatively more manageable (and in some ways absolutely reversible) than the litany of surgical complications, negative endocrinological implications, and other unknown debilitating afflictions that comes with taking HRT and undergoing SRS.)

Mind you, all of this sperging is based on a stupid “Protect Trans Kids” sticker I saw on the back of a car while I was in traffic earlier today. I saw the goofy message - that was stylized in that hippie font with the pink, white, and blue coloring- and rolled my eyes so far back in my head, that I’m glad we were at a red light; as the concept is so stupid if you take more than a minute to think about it (and, obviously the red light gave me that time). Because, again, if keeping to the objective, then there can be no such things as "trans kids," because kids cannot consent to SRS or HRT. Thereby, we what we do have are heavily manipulated and painfully mutilated kids who were not only the opposite of protected, but in fact placed in harm by the very ones entrusted to provide said protection.

Jazz was patently unprotected; a fact in which only reasonable persons can see (which, in the Clown Timeline, is called being transphobic). What makes this all the more ironic (as I review the text wall for spelling and grammar) Jazz is also being subjected to obesity and possibly diabetes. So, they wound up getting the candy and the cut. And this realization has given me the big sads.

In an even more ironic twist, we, here, are actually doing the due diligence of “protecting trans kids” with this forum.

-Protecting them from their misguided (or socially ambitious) caretakers;
-Protecting them from the predacious medical industry that has been built around them
-Protecting them from the other (now realizing that they’re) miserable ones who want company; but most of all…
-Protecting them from themselves; because, as we all know, kids are stupid.

Clown timeline Kiwis.
 
The two outer ones are on a level with each other, the two inner ones are on a level with each other. The centre picture is lower than the two either side of it by the same amount they are lower than the two outer ones. And I like the spectrum of colour across the set.

I'm not saying cutting off your penis is a good thing, I'm just saying that wall pictures don't have to line up.
You are right, they don't have to. But the difference between someone who can decorate and two spergy autistic faggots who aren't even gay is the same between this

imagen_2022-12-21_151245003.png

and this:
imagen_2022-12-21_151640548.png
It's also the difference between men and women. Kinda.
 
You are right, they don't have to. But the difference between someone who can decorate and two spergy autistic faggots who aren't even gay is the same between this

View attachment 4126323

and this:
View attachment 4126350
It's also the difference between men and women. Kinda.
And if you're going to do all black silhouettes with one white, shouldn't the white be in the middle? There's nothing building up to it. I doesn't fit.
 
You are right, they don't have to. But the difference between someone who can decorate and two spergy autistic faggots who aren't even gay is the same between this

View attachment 4126323

and this:
View attachment 4126350
It's also the difference between men and women. Kinda.
I think it's more complicated than this. Picasso had fantastic color and composition sense and yet he was far too straight (multiple women he used and tossed away). Gay furry art is almost universally atrocious in both color and composition, and yet it's made by fags. Moreover, the mistakes made here are not typical of 'male' or 'autist' art, they are typical of children's art, which is just another layer of sad.

I see in Jazz's art a lot of composition mistakes made by children (of all sexes). There is a sun in the corner. All the pieces don't add up to anything together. The colors are in a rainbow progression but the right side is colder for no reason. The two panels on the right have landscapes that don't connect to neighboring tiles. There is also no story told with the images. The whole thing seems to have been made grumpily, as if input-ed by someone else (and it was Sander), and made tile by tile. As standalone pieces, they could pass as an okay assignment for elementary/middle school art class, which I just suspect is where Jazz stopped progressing. Tanner stage 2.
 
Now that we have completed the sperging about the ugly, childish art, and the bad placement, can we comment on Sanders bed and nightstand?

What is that? I have a rollaway cot type bed for extra guests (I have only one guest room) and it looks exactly like that. Does this man not even have a real bed?
Somehow, I doubt the rest of the apartment is much better. If a guy doesn’t have a real bed and some furniture by 26, it’s pathetic. An 18 year old might scoop up a street couch but past college age, buy furniture, even IKEA to start.

They are both very delayed but sometimes I think Sander is worse off.
 
I haven't checked on this thread in a hot minute. I see male fat distribution was discussed, but it still weirds me out seeing Jazz look like that. How do you gain 100 pounds and not gain a single ounce in your face? Pretty sure even men get at least some fat in their faces.

Also I can't believe we're on *season 8* of this shit. Christ.
 
Now that we have completed the sperging about the ugly, childish art, and the bad placement, can we comment on Sanders bed and nightstand?

What is that? I have a rollaway cot type bed for extra guests (I have only one guest room) and it looks exactly like that. Does this man not even have a real bed?
Somehow, I doubt the rest of the apartment is much better. If a guy doesn’t have a real bed and some furniture by 26, it’s pathetic. An 18 year old might scoop up a street couch but past college age, buy furniture, even IKEA to start.

They are both very delayed but sometimes I think Sander is worse off.
YES. Someone brought it up! I've been trying to be good, but goddamn.
1671672313106.png
Nightstand is a $75 number off Amazon
1671672444661.png
Assuming he got the bedframe on Amazon as well, it's likely the Amazon basics one
1671672545102.png
I say this because there's a little gap near the wall instead of the leg being in the exact corner of the frame and also because choosing the very first result for "bed frame" off Amazon seems like a Jennings thing to do. If Sander had looked for like 2 minutes he would have been able to find something like this at the same price point.
1671672694932.png
The crumple on the floor is a gay flag.
 
I remember Jazz being pretty good at drawing for a kid and then...stagnating. For years. More or less it aligns with puberty blockers/HRT though I'm not sure if they had a big impact or it was more of an emotional cause (likely both).
I never understood this reasoning. A kid being good at drawing doesn't mean they are going to be a good artist. A kid playing with blocks doesn't mean they are going to be an architect. A kid(jaron) acting a bit flamboyant doesn't mean he's gay. Kids have hundreds of phases they grow out of. What makes an engineer is getting a degree and an engineering job, not acing a second grade math test
 
Back