- Joined
- Apr 2, 2021
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zelensky visited the liberated Kherson too, but did your cuck of a PreZident ever visit his "new territories"?Guys WTF! why is Zelenski saying they have no electricity?
Is he not aware of the millions of western transformers and generators being flooded into Ukraine that are rendering wide spread blackouts obsolete?
View attachment 4118130
Zelensky visited the liberated Kherson too, but did your cuck of a PreZident ever visit his "new territories"?
Of course not, because outside of his shirtless horse rising photos that he forced for like 20 years to fake him as an strongman, he is nothing but a cuck who is hiding in a bunker.
I…is this a Russian psyop? Ukie bros, you alright?Zelensky visited the liberated Kherson too, but did your cuck of a PreZident ever visit his "new territories"?
Of course not, because outside of his shirtless horse rising photos that he forced for like 20 years to fake him as an strongman, he is nothing but a cuck who is hiding in a bunker.
Zelensky visited the liberated Kherson too.....
I…is this a Russian psyop? Ukie bros, you alright?
Except that Putin actually visits front line troops, Ukrainian parasite Zelensky just green screens his 'visits' to Bakhmut..... On the bright side at least Zelensky doesn't shit himself when he visits the pope....Pointing out that Putin is a cowering little bitch is more fact than psychological operation.
From the most callous and purely advantage-seeking viewpoint, I.e. US neocons' viewpoint, it's not actually a risk for Zelenski to visit the front. If he were killed it would put an end to any of those observations people make that he was elected on a platform of seeking peaceful negotiations with the breakaway negotiations and with Russia; or those observations about the mansions bought and his huge personal wealth. And he doesn't have any practical role in the actual conducting of the war. If anything his being killed visiting the front would silence all those calling him an actor and puppet. And the gap would be quickly filled by a Pentagon appointee such as Zalushny who is 100% committed to militarily confronting Russia. It would also be a very big boost to his party come the elections next year (if they happen which I have doubts about).Zelensky visited the liberated Kherson too, but did your cuck of a PreZident ever visit his "new territories"?
Of course not, because outside of his shirtless horse rising photos that he forced for like 20 years to fake him as an strongman, he is nothing but a cuck who is hiding in a bunker.
They withdrew because holding it, in the face of repeated assaults and the destruction of bridges over the dnipr, was untenable. Withdrawal of an enemy force from a position you're attempting to take is a victory for the attacker, however you retards try to spin it."liberated"
Like all their other "victories" the brave UKR neo-nazis "liberated" a city with zero resistance because Russian forces had already withdrawn. We'll just ignore the months of multiple failed attempt to take it by force. Lol.
Except that Putin actually visits front line troops
Ok, then the "best/strongest" military, the US military, in the world got completely routed by a bunch of unsupported, untrained camel jockeys as the the Taliban completely routed US forces from Afghanistan leaving behind billions of dollars of equipment.They withdrew because holding it, in the face of repeated assaults and the destruction of bridges over the dnipr, was untenable. Withdrawal of an enemy force from a position you're attempting to take is a victory for the attacker, however you retards try to spin it.
Yes.Ok, then the "best/strongest" military, the US military, in the world got completely routed by a bunch of unsupported, untrained camel jockeys as the the Taliban completely routed US forces from Afghanistan leaving behind billions of dollars of equipment.
Yes.But, here you are ridiculing the Russians for fighting against troops trained and armed by the US and EU and actually winning.
Except Russia isn't losing. Cope.Yes.
Yes.
The Russians are losing against people armed by the people who were routed from Afghanistan, which was caused by retarded decisions at every level of command.
Almost a year into a campaign that was meant to take two weeks, repeatedly beaten back in days from territories that took weeks or months to conquer, forced to retreat from Kherson immediately after declaring it "Russian territory", and stalemated at Bakhmut for several months. All this by a military that everyone assumed would fold like a wet paper bag at the first sign of resistance.Except Russia isn't losing. Cope.
Do you have some sources on that pal? Or are you gonna take the route of the laugh harvester in this thread and post unrelated russian articles not supporting your claims, just for later to say the time frame for completition of the operation didnt matter anywayAlmost a year into a campaign that was meant to take two weeks
It's funny watching the cope become more and more desperate as the sheer magnitude of the damage this disastrous war has inflicted on Russia becomes impossible to hide and how totally outclassed they are economically, militarily, and technologically by NATO.Almost a year into a campaign that was meant to take two weeks, repeatedly beaten back in days from territories that took weeks or months to conquer, forced to retreat from Kherson immediately after declaring it "Russian territory", and stalemated at Bakhmut for several months. All this by a military that everyone assumed would fold like a wet paper bag at the first sign of resistance.
Winning!