Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
So it seems that Tony quit his job at Chong+Koster to be a freelance trans consultant?
Confirmation from LinkedIn:
1671528513910.png1671528528890.png

All of his non-troon Twitter friends likes on the announcement are from Chong+Koster employees:
1671528598251.png1671528614669.png1671528636239.png1671528667451.png1671528677151.png


1671528742413.png

I clicked on "all 2 employees" and is this thing just Tony? "0-1 employees" and it suggests Chong+Koster plus Tony's prior "job" when you look at it:
1671528782916.png
1671528832893.png1671528847197.png
1671529019813.png1671528991774.png

Trans Formations Project has yet to file any documents required of 501s, so its status as merely Tony cannot yet be confirmed until later next year.

edit: oh and this is part of how he's claiming DEI Consultant, he took a LinkedIn "course" a year ago:
1671529573299.png1671529587900.png

While I'm here, all the Skills Tony claims, see how many you agree on!
1671529698635.png1671529710722.png1671529738920.png1671529754533.png
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Ngl, this is also another reason why troonism has gotten so far. Pure misogyny.

Even in this very thread, there's assholes that have popped up, and said women both created, and deserve troons because of "muh feminism".

It's clear that while they hate troons, they hate women more, and enjoy watching them suffer, and therefore will continue to let the problem fester because "lol roasties deserve it for wanting independence".
There's so many normal and noncrazy men in this thread I feel bad for whenever some dick starts spouting off insanity like this. There's still societies behind on women's equality yet they're usually not that prosperous with massive inequality money wise even between men and yet these dipshits think letting women do X or Y forced the western world into a death spiral when it's a complex set of factors.

Women aren't some mystical coddled group that shits on men 24/7 from our ivory tower OR goes on the cock carousel and gets 20 abortions a year while making 3 baby daddies pay for their kids, they're a fucking spectrum of human beings like your retarded tendie eating ass. Go outside.

Queer theory, not even once
The internet has taught me that 90%+ of all people who research social justice topics cannot be trusted to find their ass with both hands and a map. You don't usually need a degree to do it and those who do have one are almost always suffering from rich kid dumbass syndrome.

This is really interesting. It's like we want someone to give us special knowledge, and we'll always find someone to just GIVE that respect to when they haven't done anything to earn it. If you start valorizing victims, the ones who have it worst have the most special insight, I guess, and we would rather just let them talk than think for ourselves? I'm curious how this mirrors other trends in history or if it's the result of losing faith in religion or institutions or ... what.
I'd look up psychology of religion on this. I'm sure there's been studies. Maybe it's an evolutionary thing where humans looking to a leader bonds them and helps them be more willing to work together for a common goal? Maybe it's easier for the mind to have someone help you in times of hard struggles to have a human cheat sheet that you'd feel lost without since you're already under stress and can't spend the brainpower to think as much as you'd like? It's a good question.

I hate that he calls it "Erin's Map of [The thing that is mapped]". Most normal people and organizations call it "Map of [The thing that is mapped]" and don't need to put their names front and center because they're focused on the thing, not on branding or themselves.

Screenshot_20221220-081846_Samsung Internet.jpg
Also, lol. My brain isn't powerful enough to say why right now, just... lol. :story:
 
Our boy's got himself a shiny new website: erininthemorning.com (archive). Twitter announcement (archive.vn). Let's hope no-one visits erininthemorn.com by accident.

View attachment 4116297View attachment 4116300View attachment 4116315View attachment 4116318View attachment 4116351

Background image from the front page:
View attachment 4116294
I can't believe he's dedicated an entire room in his terrace house to be his influencer studio. He doesn't even have an office; his PC is out in the living room.
This is the description of Tony's house on Zillow, presumably from when it was last sold in 2013 (Tony rents):

This has got to be the upstairs third bedroom.

So it seems that Tony quit his job at Chong+Koster to be a freelance trans consultant? In his custody fight with his ex, Tony's divorce lawyer gave her a grilling for being unemployed. Now that Tony has willingly made himself unemployed and taken on a role with uncertain and unstable prospects, centred on his extremist political beliefs, perhaps it is time for the custody arrangement to be reassessed?

Here's the post containing the bit in the divorce documents about Tony's ex-wife's employment. It's long, so search for "disgusting" to jump to the right bit.

This is the specific part I was thinking of, from a deposition, Q is Tony's lawyer, A is his now-ex-wife.
tony-website-bg_1671549775165.jpg
 
Late to reply, but most of us older dykes/fags have always been wary of trannies. But there used to be a massive distinction between transexuals and transvestites... now known as HSTS and AGP respectively. We were cool with transexuals up to a certain point, but they had their own agenda and we had ours. Trannies back in the day would say shit like, "I know I'm not a woman/man, but I want to look like one and I want to be seen as one." And they put in a ton of effort to pass. We all kind of banded together because everyone hated us, but it was never a solid alliance. Fast forward to the current day... there's self ID... trannies claiming there's no difference between cock and puss, passing is unnecessary, dysphoria is irrelevant. Most young homos have been brainwashed, but ask anyone over the age of 28 how they really feel and most would tell you they're sick of troons invading our spaces and putting themselves front and center of every cause. Most of us just keep our mouths shut unless directly asked by someone we can trust. I personally don't want to lose my job, so I don't go around publicly announcing what I think, but in private and in niche online communities, my feelings are well known. I suspect that's how it is for a lot of us.
Plus it used to be that almost all troons were homosexuals and thus were more accepted among other homosexuals, are far as I know people who are straight who then transition (transbians, gaydens) were literally never accepted among gay people until now.
 
He literally has a screw loose. :lol:
Looks more like a bolt to me…
frankensteins-monster.jpg

I thought I'd have to spend some time unpicking this one (twitter.com, archive.vn), but actually it's fairly shallow:
ErinInTheMorn-1605192669256376320.png
It links through to this tweet (archive.vn), which links to this blog post (archive.vn).

You have to work pretty hard to paint the material at issue as nefarious, and accordingly the linked blog post uses 3,700 words to do so.

The below takes the "Trans Safety Network" blog post at its word, though they provide no evidence for their claims, and the one link to something about the group of clinicians gives a 404 not found error. So take it with even more salt than usual.

Tony claims that it is "the NHS" (ie, as a national organisation) that is "utilizing materials from a group that pushes Christian conversion therapy on trans people". This is untrue.

First off, the NHS is made up of many mostly autonomous bodies we call "trusts", and this post relates to one training session provided to the Lambeth Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, responsible for youth mental health in one part of inner London, and a small part of one trust.

The training was provided by a group of therapists known for their caution when it comes to gender dysphoria. Tony claims the materials were "from a group that pushes Christian conversion therapy", but this is a leap. It relies on (apparently) Bayswater Support Group being mentioned in the training. The "Christian conversion therapy" link is thus: Bayswater is a UK support group for trans-identified people which itself takes a cautious approach on gender dysphoria; Bayswater once gave a positive review to a book by US author Maria Keffler; Maria Keffler has written one post for Christian parents at US website thegospelcoalition.org.

In his second tweet, Tony says that "the documents" (slides, of which 8 are shown in the blog post) "paint a picture that being trans is a negative outcome to be avoided". He says that the slides state "that parents and caregivers should consider banning social transition". As evidence he includes this slide:
slide.png
Leaving the deeper questions of social transition entirely aside for one moment, this is in summary what the slide states:
  • “Some clinicians … advocate that if a child wishes to transition socially … then they should be supported to do so.”
  • “Other clinicians argue that [this] is not a neutral intervention.”
  • “There are important questions … around whether [social transition] may affect the trajectory of gender exploration.”
  • “Current evidence … is insufficient … to predict the long-term outcomes”.
It does not raise "banning social transition" at all but gives an objective summary of the current debate among medical professionals. Tony is lying.

More generally, leaving Tony aside, the "Trans Safety Network" blog post tries to make a mountain out of a molehill. The factual medical situation is such that the mood is changing in some parts of the NHS, so there is even more pressure to paint cautious clinicians as "transphobic" (or as Christian fundamentalists, who are extremely fringe in Britain, in this case).

I imagine that trans activists are particularly concerned about social transition, which they try to paint as children "just" going by slightly different names or wearing their hair shorter/longer (depending on the sex stereotype!). But that's not an argument that, in Britain, serious people can take up because the Cass interim review, in section 5.19 on page 62, shows it to be on very shaky ground indeed:
Dr Hilary Cass said:
Social transition – this may not be thought of as an intervention or treatment, because it is not something that happens within health services. However, it is important to view it as an active intervention because it may have significant effects on the child or young person in terms of their psychological functioning (64, 65). There are different views on the benefits versus the harms of early social transition. Whatever position one takes, it is important to acknowledge that it is not a neutral act, and better information is needed about outcomes.
 
Last edited:
Maria Keffler's org, Advocates Protecting Children (archive), does say that its founders are all Christian, specifically "Anglican, Methodist, and non-denominational." Their advisory board also seems to be mostly Catholic. They also have degrees in education and psychology, and one of them is "detrans" in the sense that she believes talk therapy helped her work through her gender issues without being medicalized. They provide literature to churches to describe and oppose trans ideology in a way that fits with biblical principles, but their other guides focus on things like parental rights, ability to consent, free speech, medical malpractice and other principled opposition you can take regardless of whether you are religious or not.

Bayswater could easily use their materials and read their work because, while the org is definitely based on religious principles, it has a broad approach that might be of use to secular dissenters. Religious views are just one of many reasons to oppose cutting off teen tits.

They have a bunch of memes on their site that are pretty based.

Let's Think About Schools .png
 
Goddamn that court testimony pisses me off so bad. I want a lazer beam on his income. I shared this very sad story from the trans widow site in chat the other night because it resembles Tony’s situation in many ways. Side note, there appears to be an edit war ongoing over the Trans Widow wiktionary entry.

Can’t wait for more awesome content from Coach Pink Pill’s studio.
 
Am I the only one in this thread who reads "Erin's map of consent hormone therapy" as "Erin's map of consent accidents"?
Rapin' All Over the World.

Tony did an interview with Marketplace Tech (archive.vn) this morning, part of Minnesota NPR. It's short, less than 10 minutes, though I've not listened to it myself yet:


I also wanted to give another plug to this hour-long online video interview Tony did last month that @Tard Whisperer posted, which has some fantastically unflattering square-on shots of Tony's face. Ditto about not going through it myself yet.
Watching this interview with Tony from last month...
Local copy:
 
Tony did an interview with Marketplace Tech (archive.vn) this morning, part of Minnesota NPR. It's short, less than 10 minutes, though I've not listened to it myself yet:
View attachment 4124772
Tony is OBSESSED with LOTT. If you took a shot every time he mentioned it in this 6 minute clip (the first minute or so is the channel begging for donations) you'd be wasted. It is almost as if this one "hate account" is all he has in regards to his "research". To hear him tell it, LOTT is an account with Sorosian influence and power, as if Chaya has a fascist army at her disposal ready to bomb children's hospitals and drag shows at a moments notice. He quit his job to make reaction content for ONE account? Brilliant career move Tony!
 
I still get the occasional reaction to my post showing that the Kiwi Farms is Tony's second-most-visited website:
KF is Tony’s second-most visited site after Twitter.
Out of curiosity, I rewatched the video:
Contact your legislators
And Tony revealed his email address, which I don't think we had before, as erinreed44@gmail.com
tony-email.png
God, imagine how difficult finding things for this thread would be, if Tony wasn't just addicted to sharing his dox.
 
Back