War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
RUAF soldiers report from the Donetsk frontline

As reported from sources with close ties to the Russian Armed Forces, it is with a heavy heart that I must report that the situation on the front lines in Donetsk Oblast is not looking good. Despite the initial successes of our offensive, it seems that our forces are now on the verge of a collapse around the city of Bakhmut.

Over the past week, AFU have launched a series of counterattacks that have caught us off guard and pushed us back significantly. Our troops are tired and demoralized, and there are increasing reports of desertion and infighting within the ranks. Without a concerted effort to bolster our forces and turn the tide of the conflict, it seems that the conflict may be lost.

It is a sad state of affairs, and one that I never could have predicted when the conflict first began. But the reality is that we are now on the brink of a major defeat, and unless something is done to shore up our position, we may soon find ourselves in a very precarious situation.

I urge my fellow soldiers and the Russian leadership to take action before it is too late. We must do everything in our power to hold the line and prevent a collapse of the front. The future of our country and the stability of the region depend on it.


As RuAF soldier reports from Luhansk:
>I must report on a new and highly effective weapon being used by the AFU. M30A1 uses tungsten steel and causes havoc among our ranks.

>The HIMARS missile comes without warning, and is capable of clearing entire sections of the front with a single strike. No soldier is safe in the trenches or vehicles, as the missile is highly destructive and can penetrate even the toughest armor. Even light bunkers are not safe from its destructive power, as it is capable of reducing them to rubble with ease.


Holy shit we need this stuff for our Bundeswehr not a useless overpriced IFV
>inb. it's muh against muh human dignity
Sounds dubious...
Bakhmut is one of the few fronts where Russia is still on the operational offensive.
The letter seems to be more indicating that "oh our government needs to TAKE ACTION" and "bolster our forces!" than it does an actual indication of Russian positions collapsing around Bakhmut. IMO its more agitprop for a second wave of mobilization/conscription.

That being said, I'd love to wake up one morning and be proven wrong.
 
‘Sickly’ Putin cancels biggest speech of his life as first Russian state of nation since invasion is mysteriously axed

VLADIMIR Putin has cancelled his state of the nation address fuelling rumours he is in hiding from the Russian people and could be in failing health.

Putin's spokesman finally confirmed the speech - which would be one of biggest in Vlad's life - will not go ahead before the New Year.

It comes after the mad tyrant also cancelled his end of year press conference and his annual hockey game.

Putin crony Dmitry Peskov insisted the flurry of cancellations were simply down to Vlad not having the time.

But it is further fuelling speculation about the dictator's future.

Some have suggested he is actively trying to avoid by scrutinised and having to defend his failing war in Ukrain

Other unconfirmed rumours however suggest that it could be linked to health problems.
Vlad is believed to thought he could have rolled over Ukraine in days - but has ended up with a long, bloody slog in the trenches.

Russia's advances have been thrown back by a valiant effort from the heroic Ukrainians, who are backed with support from the West.

And now the 70-year-old's future is believed to be tied to his invasion's success or failure.

Putin has been warned he could face an internal uprising unless he manages to achieve something in Ukraine.

It follows claims by senior Ukrainian figures
that Putin fears he will be killed if he loses the war in Ukraine, and so is "fighting for his life".

And secret Russian spy documents revealed by The Sun Online showed fears for Vlad's health.
Putin's condition has been subject of feverish speculation - with him appearing twitchy, unsteady on his feet, and out of breath on occasion.

It has been suggested he could be suffering from stomach cancer - or maybe even Parkinson's.

Mad Vlad was seen clutching a thick blanket earlier this year while watching a parade, and last week was seen swaying and slurring as he spoke with a glass of champagne.

Peskov confirmed media reports that Putin would not deliver his annual state-of-the-nation address on Wednesday.

He wouldnt comment on the reason for postponing the address until 2023.

The spokesman only insisted the cancellation was linked to Putin's work schedule.
It comes as his Ukrainian opposite number Volodymyr Zelensky was flying to Washington DC for a summit with Joe Biden.

The trip would be Zelensky's first known foreign trip since Russia's invasion on February 24.
Zelensky is expected to leave Washington with pledges for a massive £1.5 billion military aid package.

The latest military hardware from the US would include for the first time a Patriot missile battery and precision guided bombs for fighter planes.

Kremlin officials warned about the increasing supply of US arms to Ukraine.

Putin vowed to continue the fight - and claimed they would use the combat experience to bolster their troops.

It is a bold claim considering Russia are now on the brink of losing nearly 100,000 troops in ten months.

His crony Peskov said the expansion of Western weapon supplies to Ukraine "leads to an aggravation of the conflict and, in fact, does not bode well for Ukraine."

Putin had foolishly expected to steamroller Ukraine and for his soldiers to be welcomed as "liberators" - but they have faced a fierce fightback.

Cities and regions seized at the start of the war at the end of February are now being retaken by the Ukrainians.

The West is heavily supporting Kyiv - loading them up with the weapons they need to defeat Russia.

The recent advances by Ukraine now opens the gateway to Crimea, the territory illegally seized by Russia in 2014.

And the return of the peninsula to Ukrainian hands would be an unprecedented failure for Putin.
archive

Why Russia Is Terrified of This New U.S. Weapons Delivery​

Marcel Plichta
Wed, December 21, 2022

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky [/URL]flew to Washington DC to meet U.S. President Joe Biden and address a joint session of Congress Wednesday. The visit is to announce another tranche of aid to his country, but overwhelming focus from American and Russian commentators alike is the announcementthat the U.S. will supply PATRIOT air defense missiles to Ukraine.

The PATRIOT donation had been rumored for a few weeks, and there is no shortage of speculation about how useful it will be.

Reports talking about how it will perform in Ukraine either oversell its capabilities or undersell its value to Ukraine. Proponents argue that the range and proven performance will reduce the effectiveness of Russia’s terror bombing, which has severely degraded the country’s electrical grid and heating in the dead of winter.

The PATRIOT’s detractors argue that the missiles are too expensive (over $1 million per shot), require difficulty and time-consuming training, and would not arrive in sufficient numbers.
The truth is in the middle. The PATRIOT is indeed expensive, but most Russian attacks on Ukraine’s critical infrastructure so far have been with missiles that cost about as much or more than a PATRIOT interceptor. Russia has also launched cheaper, one way attack drones like the Shahed-136 at Kyiv, mostrecently on Dec. 19, but their vulnerability to most air defense platforms means that PATRIOTs would not necessarily have to intercept them if less expensive systems can engage.

In either case, the air defense math equation is not as simple as the cost of the interceptor versus the cost of the missile or drone being intercepted. Even in the case of cheap drones like the Shahed, the damage of a successful strike on a power plant or substation is well beyond the cost of a PATRIOT interceptor, not to mention the impact to Ukrainian civilians who need power and heating.
Ukraine’s Zelensky Gets Ammo AND a Ride in Surprise Trip to D.C.
Moscow also has some choice words for the PATRIOT. Russian officials are constantly threatening to strike PATRIOTs should they be sent. Nearly a month ago, former Russian President Dimitry Medyedev claimedthat PATRIOT batteries in Ukraine would “immediately become a legitimate target of our armed forces.”
For all the bluster, Putin will likely struggle to actually strike a PATRIOT battery. Unlike other U.S.-provided systems, they will be nowhere near the front lines. Poor Russian targeting means that Russia’s focus when bombing Ukraine’s cities so far have been static targets like Power Plants. A PATRIOT battery, which the Ukrainians can move, will be harder for Russia to target. Even if they did manage to hit some part of the battery, it would mostly be a propaganda victory rather than a fatal blow to Ukraine’s air defense.

A single PATRIOT battery (up to 8 individual launchers) is not a silver bullet, but Ukraine is short of air defense. While attacks on Kyiv are mostly intercepted, other Ukrainian cities are much more vulnerable. If a PATRIOT battery frees up other air defense systems to protect places like Odessa or the front line, that is extraordinarily valuable. As more Ukrainians are trained on the system, it also opens the door to providing more as the war progresses.

The PATRIOT has gotten a lot of fanfare, but Europe is quietly providing an equally capable platform. On Dec. 14, Forbes reported that Italy and France have agreed to provision the clunkily-named Sol-Air Moyenne Portée/Terrestre (SAMP/T) missile defense system. The SAMP/T has a comparable range to the PATRIOT, but is faster to set up and requires just 14 crew members per battery, compared to the PATRIOT’s 90.

The Franco-Italian missile system has gotten nowhere near as much press or threats from Russia, likely because Russia is focused on U.S. policy towards Ukraine, and because the PATRIOT is fielded by half a dozen NATO allies. If Ukraine proves that it can operate U.S.-supplied PATRIOTs effectively, non-U.S. PATRIOT operators might consider supplying replacement parts or more interceptors.

Both the PATRIOT and SAMP/T will help alleviate Ukraine’s air defense shortages, but the timelines for their arrival remain unclear. Neither the donated soviet-era air defense systems Ukraine already knew how to operate, nor the simpler air defense systems donated by the U.S. and Europe require the same amount of training to get them up and running. Some systems promised months ago, like the Crotale, have yet to be observed in Ukraine.

Regardless of how quickly these systems arrive, American and European willingness to part with sophisticated systems show commitment supporting Ukraine—and confidence that they can be used to defend against Russian aggression.
Archive
 
Tbh I am surprised that this thing wasn't invented several decades ago.
It was.

M270 went into service in '83. One M26 rocket could cover .23 km² with submunitions. M270 could fire 12 before needing a reload. The US military stopped using and destroyed 100,000 M26 rockets because unexploded submunitions had a tendency to blow kids feet off.
 
The biggest difference between the HIMARS and the MRLS (Grid Square Removal Device) is that the HIMARS only carries one pod and supposedly fixes a lot of the problems with the old MRLS system. (The CPU clock's floating point error was a bitch) It takes less time to set up (supposedly) and can ripple fire the pod and GTFO quicker than the MRLS. (Supposedly) (Note: I have not personally been involved with HIMARS maneuvers) It also supposedly easier to maintain. The biggest thing about it, from the procurement point of view, is an airborne, quick response brigade, or the USMC could load these fuckers on planes faster. They were also designed to handle the 'airdrop' better than the old MRLS wagon.
1671690536663.png
For those unaware of just what he's talking about you can have a couple of Air National Guard troops back it into a C-130 Hercules and then have it be flown anywhere in the world, ready to drive off and lay some waste. Its a lot like Stalin's Organ, if the Katyusha could hit the indirect fire equivalent of a postage stamp out to almost 45 miles. As for how quickly it can be reloaded...
1671691317556.png
All you need to do is move the launcher rail over the pod and winch it up and then secure it to the rail system on that extendable arm, and bam, you're good to go.

Not that there should be anything that surprising about that. The M50 rocket for the MGR-1 Honest John system we deployed in the 1950's had the accuracy of an 8" artillery shell out to about the same range as HIMARS with just a gyroscope and some fins for guidance, and it had a 1,500 pound warhead because fuck you. For those unaware, the Grid Square Removal Tool was a massive departure from the prior American doctrine of using rockets to eliminate specific valuable targets that couldn't be nailed with tube artillery. ATACMS and HIMARS are just a return to form.
 
ATACMS and HIMARS are just a return to form.
Earlier ATACMS variants used cluster munitions for grid-square removal, just grid-square removal 100km beyond the range of enemy counter-bat.

On this subject, PrSM - the replacement for ATACMS - is supposedly planned to enter service 2023; so I'm interested to see what this year brings in terms of American tactical ballistic missile capabilities.
 
I always love that part about how the money should be spent on domestic causes...you'd think they'd ask that question about Russia. Think about how much more good the $100+ billion they've spent so far on this disastrous war would have done if it were invested in Russian infrastructure, housing, education, healthcare, economic development...you name it.

This is by far the biggest geopolitical blunder a country has made since WWII. Total catastrophe for Russia and it's only getting worse at an accelerating pace.
I always find the arguments about spending on Ukraine a bit funny because there's usually this implied idea that if the US wasn't spending the money on Ukraine that they'd spend it on American right wing interests. As though the only thing stopping funding for border security or infrastructure is American politicians just being too worried about the national debt and can't figure out where to find the money for such things.

It's a weird bit of optimism about how the US government operates. It's a helpful talking point for Republican politicians since it acts as a wonderful excuse for why they don't have to achieve anything for their voters, whenever anyone asks why they aren't achieving anything for their side they can just shrug and point to Ukraine.
 
I always find the arguments about spending on Ukraine a bit funny because there's usually this implied idea that if the US wasn't spending the money on Ukraine that they'd spend it on American right wing interests. As though the only thing stopping funding for border security or infrastructure is American politicians just being too worried about the national debt and can't figure out where to find the money for such things.

It's a weird bit of optimism about how the US government operates. It's a helpful talking point for Republican politicians since it acts as a wonderful excuse for why they don't have to achieve anything for their voters, whenever anyone asks why they aren't achieving anything for their side they can just shrug and point to Ukraine.
It was always funny to me how they forgot all about covid spending which was in fucking trillions, yet there's disproportional criticism over helping Ukraine with just a fraction of that, this money is actually going toward something useful for once.
Also worth noting that much of this aid is in gear that would've otherwise been written off eventually and scrapped (correct me if I'm wrong). The very same people are against getting directly involved into foreign conflicts and starting wars, so it's not like you were going to use it anyway. Letting Kremlin have its way with Ukraine is a terrible long term decision, because they have (had?) their sights set on other neighbors further down the line, and could've done a lot of stupid shit high on their own farts if they got the W they expected.

It's almost as if it's all just pearl-clutching from the fans of Putin.
A lot of Russian "patriots" are so high on propaganda, they honestly believed that they could take on America and win, from that standpoint this situation is amusing, as Russian army is being dismantled by Ukrainians using bare minimum that the West provides. Their bruised egos is a reason enough for me.
 
It was always funny to me how they forgot all about covid spending which was in fucking trillions, yet there's disproportional criticism over helping Ukraine with just a fraction of that, this money is actually going toward something useful for once.
Also worth noting that much of this aid is in gear that would've otherwise been written off eventually and scrapped (correct me if I'm wrong). The very same people are against getting directly involved into foreign conflicts and starting wars, so it's not like you were going to use it anyway. Letting Kremlin have its way with Ukraine is a terrible long term decision, because they have (had?) their sights set on other neighbors further down the line, and could've done a lot of stupid shit high on their own farts if they got the W they expected.

It's almost as if it's all just pearl-clutching from the fans of Putin.
A lot of Russian "patriots" are so high on propaganda, they honestly believed that they could take on America and win, from that standpoint this situation is amusing, as Russian army is being dismantled by Ukrainians using bare minimum that the West provides. Their bruised egos is a reason enough for me.
I don't think everyone going on about it is secretly a fan of Putin. Fiscal responsibility is just a really popular Republican meme, which you'd think shit like Rona spending would have demolished as it proved they aren't shy about spending when they want to.

Hell the infrastructure bill Biden signed devotes $10 billion to getting electric school buses. In other words, about 10% of what money the US has pledged to spend on Ukraine. With the numbers so big it can be hard to keep in perspective just how much $100 billion even looks like.

And I've mentioned this in the past, but it seems like a lot of people ignore the fact that if Ukraine lost completely, that you'd have tens of millions of refugees going to Western Europe and North America. It'd be one of the most insane refugee crises imaginable as NGOs would go into overdrive to get them to everyone's countries.

2022-12-22 (2).png
 
Old hat. The US had 'surrender to drones' tech in Desert storm


Context: In desert storm, the US sent over Iowa-class battleships for shore bombardment. And bombard they did. Sadam had deployed significant coastal defense, but they were not ready for 16-inch guns because it wasn't expected anyone had any guns of that size, much less some madlads would send out museum pieces.
The battleships used spotter drones UAVs to real-time beam pictures of the areas they were shelling, allowing the gunnery commander to adjust fire exactly instead of having to interpret spotter reports. After the first few bases were shelled, word got around and the Iraqis in the next base heard the spotter drone and surrendered to it.

Can a Russian speaker deboonk or confirm that this video is real? It just seems a bit too perfect... It's apparently a Russian recruitment ad and it shows a father not being paid by his factory (because sanctions are making Russia richer), and then he overhears his daughter's conversation with a friend and decides to volunteer for the war to make money. In the end, he returns home and gives his daughter a phone that was definitely not looted.

View attachment 4117494
This couldn't have been filmed in Russia. The girl leaves her money unattended with her friend, another Russian. Never happen.

If true it always amazes me how often Russians find themselves getting their paychecks stolen or garnished. In the US, a unit commander or just some asshole in goverment can't just wire some grunt's or retiree's money to his personal account. Has no goverment body in Russia every concidered just establishing a centralized office and setting up direct deposit?
Every friday safety brief, our CO/1SGT would ask if anyone hadn't gotten paid last pay period. And if you weren't getting paid, to let them know so they could pull you from duty: if you aren't getting paid, they don't expect you to be working.

$40+ billion more for Ukraine, I think it was $47 billion specifically. We basically transferred Russia's military budget for the year as a minor addendum to a spending bill. So totally outclassed, did you really think you are a great power Putin?
TBF, what everyone who whinges about "Muh Biggest budget" leaves off just how much of that salary and support for troops. When you pay your army a pittance or give no fucks about their care after leaving, the military budget can be quite small.

I always love that part about how the money should be spent on domestic causes...you'd think they'd ask that question about Russia. Think about how much more good the $100+ billion they've spent so far on this disastrous war would have done if it were invested in Russian infrastructure, housing, education, healthcare, economic development...you name it.

This is by far the biggest geopolitical blunder a country has made since WWII. Total catastrophe for Russia and it's only getting worse at an accelerating pace.
It'd just be more money spent on dem programs for urban niggers.

TBF its not all sunshine and roses for the rest of us. People like to talk shit about the rules-based international order and how its a bunch of pro-Western bunk (which it pretty much is TBH), but its also done a damn good job of keeping the perennial bloodshed and warring the world used to have for the hell of it in check.
Sort of. You still have tons of conflicts in Africa & the middle east that are bloody and hell for the locals, but don't mean much geo-politic wise.
What I believe you mean is there is no more mass-mobilization, turning entire swaths of lands into inhabitable no-go zones a century after the battle is done (forgive the weeping vagina source: https://wariscrime.com/new/battlefields-wwi-still-keep-killing-france/ ). And no war in zones where the local population hasn't been killing another segment of the local population non-stop for the past millennium

To paraphrase: Its no big deal when I see a turd in the toilet. Its a whole other thing to find one on the dining table.

Has this been the biggest war since WW2? I know the ship becoming a sub was the biggest war sinking since WW2.
Edit for clarity: between different nations not civil wars
Desert storm was bigger, and if you want to just count men mobilized/deployed Gulf War II's DA SURGE was as big or bigger.

the M1 Abrams is still the world's best main battle tank
Because it is battle-tested
The M1 Abrams is the best tank to crew because IIRC there have zero crew members killed by enemy fire. There were the dudes who flipped and drown and some training acccidents.

Grid Square Removal Tool was a massive departure from the prior American doctrine of using rockets to eliminate specific valuable targets that couldn't be nailed with tube artillery. ATACMS and HIMARS are just a return to form.
As was explained to us, which might have just been bullshit set on loop, the Grid Square Removal Tool was designed to counter a Soviet mass push. The ability to remove a grid square was half-intentional because they were presuming that anyone on the line was dead, captured or surrounded and about to be, and panicked reare units would be calling for fire and they couldn't be relied on to call it in accurately. The munitions wouldn't take out a T-72, but it would have removed BMPs and any support vehicles, leaving the crews in damaged tanks with no infantry support or refueling.
 
Ghostse said:
TBF, what everyone who whinges about "Muh Biggest budget" leaves off just how much of that salary and support for troops. When you pay your army a pittance or give no fucks about their care after leaving, the military budget can be quite small.

For perspective, Russian conscripts in mandatory service get paid a symbolic ~2k rubles ($28 A MONTH) just so they could say that it isn't slavery.
Even then your officers would likely take it from you under one pretense or another.
 
It would be spent on thousand dollar toilet seats and $2k spanners.
Tell me you're a retard without telling me you're a retard.

The hammers, wrenches, and socket drivers had to be non-magnetic and non-sparking. Custom made.

Not having those killed motherfuckers but people got to go "at least we stopped the government from buying $1000 wrenches! HRRRRRRR..."


As was explained to us, which might have just been bullshit set on loop, the Grid Square Removal Tool was designed to counter a Soviet mass push. The ability to remove a grid square was half-intentional because they were presuming that anyone on the line was dead, captured or surrounded and about to be, and panicked reare units would be calling for fire and they couldn't be relied on to call it in accurately. The munitions wouldn't take out a T-72, but it would have removed BMPs and any support vehicles, leaving the crews in damaged tanks with no infantry support or refueling.
A bit more involved than that according to the MRLS dudes I knew, but basically, yeah. There was suspicion that a bomblet *might* be able to take out treads on the tanks, so just layer the 1K Zone with it as forces pulled back slightly.
 
Sorry for making a fucking joke.
Touch sore spot for me and something that seems to be coming back with popularity lately.

Sorry for my industrial grade butt-hurt.

Anyway...

So let me get this straight. Their AIRCRAFT CARRIER caught on fire and was extensively damaged IN DRY DOCK?

Holy shit.

It's an entire military and country entirely populated by Homer Simpson.
 
Last edited:
So let me get this straight. Their AIRCRAFT CARRIER caught on fire and was extensively damaged IN DRY DOCK?
This isn't even the first time that's happened. They are getting exceptionally good at producing this kind of fuck up.

At least the floating drydock didn't sink this time but that's only because this time the drydock is land based
 
This isn't even the first time that's happened. They are getting exceptionally good at producing this kind of fuck up.

At least the floating drydock didn't sink this time but that's only because this time the drydock is land based
I wonder how many of these accidents are not accidents at all and instead self-sabotage by the crew and/or their buddies who's not looking forward to being deployed after observing this shitshow and the fate of their comrades for almost a year now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back