Tech you miss/ new tech trends you hate - ok boomers

Microsoft also just up and deleted all the comments from their old MSDN blogs. Nearly two decades of MS engineers answering questions directly, gone.
With good reason. Can't have people use outdated versions of Windows reliably! Gotta prop up Win11!

Its all bullshit, Between the spam crap SEO, what you describe, issues with 365 exchange? Just run /sfc scannow! responses, and vendors wont keep docs up to date on their lets change shit all the time bullshit. I am just getting sick of it, and to make support even harder how search engines now "Customize" searches based on what they think you want vs what you really want. A few times this has fucked me over giving me results for something even if I included the context it should have needed to say "Oh hey Stupid is looking for x in y field and not z like normal".

I noticed that too! No wonder people never get out of thir bubbles!

If you want to fix camera equipment and old outdated shit from 5 years ago, you're better off trying it yourself.
 
Last edited:
Also, I hate SEO and SEOmaxxing websites. Before, you could google an issue and get reliable help from a tech forum or subreddit in the first page.

Now? The first pages are filled with generic articles from shitty websites that offer a basic solution to the most basic problem. The first 5 or so pages are just "here is how to fix this issue and others in 2022! Guaranteed to work!" from 100 or so separate websites competing for top page. They don't even offer a solution, but it is guaranteed that the words you used in the query will appear at least once. Your problem better not be outside the 3% common problems with the thing, or you're fucked!
This has become the bane of my life. Can anyone explain why the fuck this has happened? Any "how to..." search I make that doesn't include "reddit" just yields dozens of shithouse article farms giving me 10,000 word answers to a 10 word problem that don't include a fucking solution!! Are these articles AI-generated? Is there a way to exclude them from my search?
 
Can anyone explain why the fuck this has happened?
More or less because Google stopped caring once their focus shifted from search being a product to search being a free source of AI training data.
Back in a previous geological era Google actually did successfully crack down on the link farms of the time, but SEO has always been something of an arms race and Google stopped competing.
 
Some would only overclock a little before flaking out.
It was often the ways many boards generated the clocks, back then that all worked a bit differently. Some boards had very fancy and accurate (for the time) clock generators, some delivered very skewy clock signals through cheap tricks. (and logic) This was usually decided by price. Also the way voltage generation was done when 3.3V cores became common. Also some boards were just very poorly designed and bad at keeping the noise out. Of course on top of that, like you said, silicon lottery. Just saying, there was a lot of variation and many factors. Mainboard manufacturers like to pretend it's still this way (and theirs is the best) but it's not really. A lot of boards are just CTRL+C, CTRL+V copies of the reference design. Often not worth it to experiment, especially since the board manufacturers themselves don't seem to understand some intricacies of the designs anymore. Probably the most unique thing about board designs these days are the gamershit heatsinks. (which not rarely are plain unnecessary)

This was also the time of crazy process shrinkage. The Pentium went from 0.8 µm to 0.35 µm in barely five years (and switched from 5V to 3.3V during that development) then the P3 went from 0.25 to around 0.1 in two. Efficency gains (and shady intel practices) were insane in the early 00s and left alternative developments like that 128 bit Transmeta chip in the dust. Like in the parody song, your computer was obsolete before you managed to unpack it, and back then obsolete didn't mean "a few points less in some synthetic benchmark which simulates things you'll never encounter during normal usage" but "can't run current software". Around that time I bought what was basically a new PC about every ten months and always had three generations of computers running at any given time. I still have all these systems in some box and you can nicely see the evolution if you put the boards next to each other. Intel wants to lay the Pentium branding to rest next year. It's oddly appropriate seeing where we are (stuck) now. It's funny that these old systems had such an cultural impact considering that at least for me and I'm sure many others, they were only technologically relevant for months, sometimes a few years at best. I've probably used some linux window managers longer than I seriously used the Amiga as daily driver, still so much happened in these few years.

What a fucking blog entry. I am sorry.

Near the end they had a chip that did video, audio, and more or less anything a computer needed on one chip, but for some reason it never found much of a market.
The MediaGX. One of my favorite retro computers from that time and I have a Pi-sized industrial computer with one. Neat machine for old DOS and early 9x games. Well AMD ended up inheriting the technology and in a way the modern APUs are distant ancestors, so it wasn't all for nothing.

Any "how to..." search I make that doesn't include "reddit" just yields dozens of shithouse article farms giving me 10,000 word
Sometimes I stumble about the (genuine, non generated) blog of some nerd who writes it just because and I always bookmark that shit so hard. It's like finding water in the desert.
 
One thing in really old tech I miss is the whole "entire computer on a card" thing. The first of these that I actually used was something called Quadlink by Quadram which literally had a 6502 processor and an entire Apple ][ computer on it, so you could boot up an IBM PC as an Apple.

This was apparently really rare and if I still had it it would be worth a lot, especially if it worked.
 
Got a Pixel 7 the other day, cracked my cheap TCL screen at the gym. Never been one to get "Flagship" phones but eh, fuck it. These support GrapheneOS which interests me. Anyway, why the fuck are phones so slippery? Why can't these companies add stippling or serrations in areas to make them not feel like picking up a fish? I know, everyone uses cases, but no cases locally so I am waiting on one. It's just stupid how despite how everyone would like a design that is grippy, they do this smooth garbage that just makes a tiny expensive device harder to hold onto and more likely to even slide off a hard countertop. Just add some serrations in the corners, some minor stippling to the back. It can look good and be functional.
 
Got a Pixel 7 the other day, cracked my cheap TCL screen at the gym. Never been one to get "Flagship" phones but eh, fuck it. These support GrapheneOS which interests me. Anyway, why the fuck are phones so slippery? Why can't these companies add stippling or serrations in areas to make them not feel like picking up a fish? I know, everyone uses cases, but no cases locally so I am waiting on one. It's just stupid how despite how everyone would like a design that is grippy, they do this smooth garbage that just makes a tiny expensive device harder to hold onto and more likely to even slide off a hard countertop. Just add some serrations in the corners, some minor stippling to the back. It can look good and be functional.
Because Apple made a phone that was shiny polished glass on the front and back and shiny polished stainless steel on the sides. And because everyone has to copy Apple, well, every Android flagship has shiny polished glass on the front and back and shiny polished stainless steel on the sides.
 
I miss lan parties. Everyone's grown up with kids and responsibilities and shit. So am I for that matter.

View attachment 4082631View attachment 4082643View attachment 4082679

We can't go back, can we? Not even just for a weekend?
I'd imagine those computers would be a bitch to haul from house to house.

I miss when you could play a game online without having to agree to some terms and conditions. Especially when it hinders access to the single player.
 
Because Apple made a phone that was shiny polished glass on the front and back and shiny polished stainless steel on the sides. And because everyone has to copy Apple, well, every Android flagship has shiny polished glass on the front and back and shiny polished stainless steel on the sides.
Yeah, I know. It's always Apple first. I just wish one of these outlier companies would do something. Motorola or someone that takes a risk with a phone design for once. You can make a metal aesthetic object still look very appealing with serrations and stippling, look at firearms.
 
They also had to actually finish the game and do a number of QA cycles before release instead of releasing a buggy mess and patching it later and adding content that missed the deadline.

However what I don't miss is breaking/losing the CD ROM and having to buy it again, as well as having to have the physical CD as proof of ownership unless you rolled the dice with a no cd crack.


Where is your nearest game store though? 100gb at 512mbit/s is ~30mins and have opening hours: if I want to play Max Payne 2 at 2am nothing can stop me (aside from os compatibility issues lol)

All things considered, digital distribution is still superior.
Until the Studio/Distributor/ISP/etc... decides your last post was offensive, and pulls ALL your games...
(read the TOS, gamer...)
 
This was apparently really rare and if I still had it it would be worth a lot, especially if it worked.
I have a few of them, PCs-on-a-card for the Amiga. The Amiga 2000 had his Zorro II slots (Commodore's own expansion bus) and a passive ISA backplane, and these "bridge cards" as they were called (briding the world of Amiga and IBM compatibles together, as they would say, clever ain't it?) would contain an entire PC (usually 8088, the most advanced one I have is a 286) would plug into both Zorro and ISA backplane, facilitating that the Amiga side could control that PC or like, use the Amiga input for PC software or have the DOS prompt on AmigaOS in a screen or have a HD image on Amiga side the PC could load etc.. Then because of the passive ISA backplate you could add normal PC hardware, like graphics cards and such. The 8088 one Commodore made was quite good, the 286 one was kind of a mess and very slow for an 286 as far as I remember.

For the smaller Amiga 500 I have two such things. A 8088 that goes into the trapdoor slot, the special thing is that here, the 8088 would basically "hijack" the Amiga to use it as graphics and sound output and the Amiga's CPU as the "traffic cop" orchestrating it all. When it was turned off then the Amiga could use the 512 kb on the Board as expansion RAM and the PCs RTC as clock, just like the normal trapdoor expansions of that time. If the 500 had a HDD expansion, it could use that too. This actually worked pretty well as far as I remember.

I even have a more advanced version of this (even still in it's original box) which is a 286 CPU together with some kind of ASIC on a tiny board you plug directly into the 68k slot and then the 68k CPU on top. With the software you'd then toggle your Amiga into "PC mode". It'd do the same thing and also do some Pseudo-VGA output fuckery. (which the older chipset Amigas couldn't quite do so I'm not sure anymore how that worked) I also remember that both these expansions profited from accelerators in the Amiga by making the PC experience quite significantly faster if available.

This stuff was so clever considering the time it was made and it was worth it too if you considered that such an Amiga could run you 3-5k depending. Nowadays hard to imagine.

There used to be a "Mac" card like this to, but it wasn't nearly as intricate (basically just the Mac ROMs) as hardware wise the Amiga wasn't that different. Macs were better emulated fully in software and if you had the right hardware, your Amiga wasn't any slower than an actual 68k Mac, with the advantage that you could run both OSes concurrently.
 
Look at Mr moneybags over here with his fancy hub. Try trunk network with coax cable setups. Think I still have these BNC T-pieces and terminators lying around here. To be fair though, that stuff could bridge quite a range and was pretty fast (for the time) too.
Hey! We used BNC and null modems up until I think it was 1998 or 1999? 10mbit PCI network cards with both BNC and TP ports became cheap at that point (~€20). Still no routers. But Linux was around. Remember the fun of installing and running Linux in 1998? And configuring a 486 shitbox filled with network cards to act as a router so everyone could share a single modem connection? Good times. I'm angry now.
This was also the time of crazy process shrinkage. The Pentium went from 0.8 µm to 0.35 µm in barely five years (and switched from 5V to 3.3V during that development) then the P3 went from 0.25 to around 0.1 in two. Efficency gains (and shady intel practices) were insane in the early 00s and left alternative developments like that 128 bit Transmeta chip in the dust. Like in the parody song, your computer was obsolete before you managed to unpack it, and back then obsolete didn't mean "a few points less in some synthetic benchmark which simulates things you'll never encounter during normal usage" but "can't run current software". Around that time I bought what was basically a new PC about every ten months and always had three generations of computers running at any given time.
That is a time I remember fondly. Video cards weren't that expensive, the latest ones maxed out at $299 and they were released so fast that the one I had could be sold for 200-250 or traded online. At no real cost, I had a G200 and dual Voodoo 2's when what was a thing.
Same with CPUs, I went from the new Pentium 166 to close to a gigahertz in three years and the thing that was by far the most expensive of all of those was the Pentium 166.

Something I really, really do not miss was the fucking DAC situation on video cards. It became very apparent, or a very blurry if "apparent" was written on the screen, when buying cheaper video cards. That's why I really liked Matrox. I had the Mystique, PowerVR add-in, G200 and G400 Max during that small period of time.
 
I'd imagine those computers would be a bitch to haul from house to house.
It wasn't so bad, the case didn't weigh that much, a 14" monitor wasn't heavy either, they were just bulky. I almost shit myself once, thinking I killed a baby. On a commuter train my arm slipped while getting off and when trying to catch the computer I accidentally spiked the sharp corner of it into a baby carriage. The mother was right next to it holding the baby so it was fine.

At 3am any patrolling police would be curious about people having a wheel barrow full of computers though.

Pro-tip is to get a thick rubber strap and rivet it to the top of the case to make a handle, makes it much easier to transport.
 
This stuff was so clever considering the time it was made and it was worth it too if you considered that such an Amiga could run you 3-5k depending. Nowadays hard to imagine.
What I loved was just being able to click a combination of buttons. Now I'm a PC! Now I'm an Apple! It was so awesome.

I miss those days.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AmpleApricots
One thing in really old tech I miss is the whole "entire computer on a card" thing. The first of these that I actually used was something called Quadlink by Quadram which literally had a 6502 processor and an entire Apple ][ computer on it, so you could boot up an IBM PC as an Apple.

This was apparently really rare and if I still had it it would be worth a lot, especially if it worked.
Just put Portable Ubuntu on an SSD.
I'd imagine those computers would be a bitch to haul from house to house.

I miss when you could play a game online without having to agree to some terms and conditions. Especially when it hinders access to the single player.
You can have gaming laptops now that are 50x stronger than those PCs were, and 10x lighter.

Sure you might not be able to lan party Doom 2020, but URT, HL2, Starsiege? Easily.
 
routers. But Linux was around. Remember the fun of installing and running Linux in 1998? And configuring a 486 shitbox filled with network cards to act as a router so everyone could share a single modem connection?
I remember a linux distribution that was made extra to be used like this and would fit on a floppy. It had a 4 in it's name I think? A quick google didn't tell me anything. My current, all-fat-trimmed kernel with just hardware support for things this computer actually has is 17 mb big, and that's compressed. About ~6-7 mb is the initramfs programs so that leaves an 10-11 mb kernel with firmware blobs needed for this computer only. And practically, this computer isn't more usable than a 1998 486 with the kernel of back then probably weighting in at about 1 mb, like at all. The other day I noted my very lightweight alpine installation on the Thinkpad with basically just a browser, a terminal emulator minmal X with ratpoison and a browser+supporting tools weights in at about 1 GB. Just system files, /home not included. It's kinda disturbing if you think about it.

Something I really, really do not miss was the fucking DAC situation on video cards. It became very apparent, or a very blurry if "apparent" was written on the screen, when buying cheaper video cards. That's why I really liked Matrox. I had the Mystique, PowerVR add-in, G200 and G400 Max during that small period of time.
The trick early-on was to look out for the DACs that could do "true color" vs. only 256 "indexed" color. For true color, the DACs had to be better quality. The MUSIC dacs on the cheap cards were the worst. Cirrus Logic also did DACs directly inbuilt into their graphics chips (not their invention, they acquired a small outfit called Acumos Inc. to get into the graphics market, I still have a graphics card with Acumos branded chip which is virtually identical to the early Cirrus one) and for the longest time, they were the only ones. These were decent too, but often were on the more expensive side. (Cirrus logic is still around and still does signal processing last time I checked)

Sometimes you could get a better VGA signal by removing the ferrite beads on the output or playing with the termination resistance, it was a crapshoot though. Interestingly, I bought an OSSC (yes, that thing for consoles) to connect old PCs to modern screens and with that OSSC, every single graphics card I have lying around looks like I'm running pixel-perfect scaled dosbox. It's really impressive how far we have come. (I combined it with a small 16:10 display which also does very good internal scaling and supports 70 Hz, which puts me straight into DOS heaven)
 
I remember a linux distribution that was made extra to be used like this and would fit on a floppy. It had a 4 in it's name I think? A quick google didn't tell me anything. My current, all-fat-trimmed kernel with just hardware support for things this computer actually has is 17 mb big, and that's compressed. About ~6-7 mb is the initramfs programs so that leaves an 10-11 mb kernel with firmware blobs needed for this computer only. And practically, this computer isn't more usable than a 1998 486 with the kernel of back then probably weighting in at about 1 mb, like at all. The other day I noted my very lightweight alpine installation on the Thinkpad with basically just a browser, a terminal emulator minmal X with ratpoison and a browser+supporting tools weights in at about 1 GB. Just system files, /home not included. It's kinda disturbing if you think about it.
I don't remember what it was called but a 486 desktop computer worked very well was a router of sorts.
The trick early-on was to look out for the DACs that could do "true color" vs. only 256 "indexed" color. For true color, the DACs had to be better quality. The MUSIC dacs on the cheap cards were the worst. Cirrus Logic also did DACs directly inbuilt into their graphics chips (not their invention, they acquired a small outfit called Acumos Inc. to get into the graphics market, I still have a graphics card with Acumos branded chip which is virtually identical to the early Cirrus one) and for the longest time, they were the only ones. These were decent too, but often were on the more expensive side. (Cirrus logic is still around and still does signal processing last time I checked)

Sometimes you could get a better VGA signal by removing the ferrite beads on the output or playing with the termination resistance, it was a crapshoot though. Interestingly, I bought an OSSC (yes, that thing for consoles) to connect old PCs to modern screens and with that OSSC, every single graphics card I have lying around looks like I'm running pixel-perfect scaled dosbox. It's really impressive how far we have come. (I combined it with a small 16:10 display which also does very good internal scaling and supports 70 Hz, which puts me straight into DOS heaven)
That went on so long, up until things went DVI/HDMI/DP. I remember getting a cheap GF2 for free and it was just awful, benchmarks were on point but the image was off at my resolution. I kept using my GF2MX.
One thing with the DACs on the cards was that the quality degraded when pushing HZ and Resolution, that's why Matrox is still my waifu. Same with monitors, that should be mentioned, running most consumer monitors at 85-100hz would dim it in a way that made pure white screen look grey-ish if it showed up.
 
I don't remember what it was called but a 486 desktop computer worked very well was a router of sorts.
I used a 486 as a router running FreeBSD for something like six years. Literal just set it and forget it other than the occasional manual update. I once even forgot where I had it.

The only other machine like this was one time a Novell fileserver at one of my jobs failed (there were literal rats in it) and nobody still working there had any idea where it even was because it had been there ten years. I miss that kind of rock-solid stability. There has been nothing like Novell since.
 
Back