Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

WE LOST VIC BROS!
vic.PNG

Case Detail | Ghostarchive

ghostarchive.org ghostarchive.org
No doc or order yet issued

EDIT:
vic2.PNG
vic3.PNG

TJB | SC | Orders & Opinions | 2022 | December | December 30, 2022 | Ghostarchive

ghostarchive.org ghostarchive.org
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • DRINK!
Reactions: 6thRanger, BlueSpark, Karl Franz and 9 others
Tybros no..... Not like this.....
Does anyone have the God awful picture of that dolt wearing the shirt that says "we lost the case, Nick." The sheer arrogance of Ty makes this L taste very sweet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bush did USS Maine
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: 6thRanger, ThatDumbPhilosopher, 5t3n0g0ph3r and 3 others
mindlessobserver said:
Shit, it's gonna take him at least 91 days to get it in and it probably won't be signed.
Click to expand...
His petition to the Supreme Court of Texas was on time, signed, and even had very little spelling errors. It shows that he can still make things happen properly. Or maybe I'm just coping.
 
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Allanon, 6thRanger, Syaoran Li and 1 other person
Useful_Mistake said:
His petition to the Supreme Court of Texas was on time, signed, and even had very little spelling errors. It shows that he can still make things happen properly. Or maybe I'm just coping.
Click to expand...
You and me both. My cope is Ty just has to coherently argue the Public Person doctrine was misapplied and the SCOTUS will grant cert for that alone.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Allanon, Syaoran Li and Useful_Mistake
Useful_Mistake said:
Yes. Some rules were slightly reworded for ease of understanding, others, like Rule 17, were entirely deleted. Most changes were removal of certain requirements. You can see all the changes, and the listed reasons, here
Click to expand...
I mainly meant as it applies to the deadline, since if they take effect in 2023 I'm not sure if they'd retroactively change a deadline that already started ticking.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Syaoran Li
& so the story ends
based on laziness.
WE LOST VIC BROS!
Don't you love it .
At least Johny Depp won
Vic lost due to Tye & Chup public figure take from the court.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: 6thRanger
Interesting tidbit. The Supreme Court of Texas denied his motion, not refused it. That means they saw error in the Appellate Courts judgement but decided "that the petition presents no error that requires reversal or that is of such importance to the jurisprudence of the state as to require correction". The Rules state that if the Supreme Court of Texas thinks that the appellate court did nothing wrong they must instead refuse the petition
vic4.PNG
Rule 56.1 (b)
Anyway, Ty also has 15 days to file a motion of rehearing if he wants to as per Rule 64.1
Terrifik said:
Vic lost due to Tye & Chup public figure take from the court.
Click to expand...
Vic lost because the trial court rewrote the entirety of contract law, in addition to a shit public figure take. The appellate court was just too unwilling to reverse a clear error.
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Wendy Wheelchair, The Demon Pimp of Razgriz, Allanon and 12 others
Useful_Mistake said:
Interesting tidbit. The Supreme Court of Texas denied his motion, not refused it. That means they saw error in the Appellate Courts judgement but decided "that the petition presents no error that requires reversal or that is of such importance to the jurisprudence of the state as to require correction". The Rules state that if the Supreme Court of Texas thinks that the appellate court did nothing wrong they must instead refuse the petition
View attachment 4165588
Rule 56.1 (b)
Anyway, Ty also has 15 days to file a motion of rehearing if he wants to as per Rule 64.1

Vic lost because the trial court rewrote the entirety of contract law, in addition to a shit public figure take. The appellate court was just too unwilling to reverse a clear error.
Click to expand...
Yep got love based court best not to rock the boat of the court if you don't have to because fuck weebs.
1672417450746.png
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Uranus Pink, Irrational Exuberance and Useful_Mistake
Useful_Mistake said:
Interesting tidbit. The Supreme Court of Texas denied his motion, not refused it. That means they saw error in the Appellate Courts judgement but decided "that the petition presents no error that requires reversal or that is of such importance to the jurisprudence of the state as to require correction". The Rules state that if the Supreme Court of Texas thinks that the appellate court did nothing wrong they must instead refuse the petition
View attachment 4165588
Rule 56.1 (b)
Anyway, Ty also has 15 days to file a motion of rehearing if he wants to as per Rule 64.1

Vic lost because the trial court rewrote the entirety of contract law, in addition to a shit public figure take. The appellate court was just too unwilling to reverse a clear error.
Click to expand...
He has to in order to be thorough. It will add another month to this purgatory
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Terrifik
Useful_Mistake said:
Vic lost because the trial court rewrote the entirety of contract law, in addition to a shit public figure take. The appellate court was just too unwilling to reverse a clear error.
Click to expand...
But, based on the distinction between SCOTX denying the petition vs refusing it, he didn't necessarily lose because of that... even if SCOTX considered that the trial court interpreted the law wrongly it would nevertheless not affect the case being ultimately dismissed. Most likely it was the Tylerphone notary shit that actually killed it.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: 6thRanger and Terrifik
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back