Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 133 38.6%

  • Total voters
    345
Also, Rumble is now traded on the NASDAQ. Nick is beyond fucked if the major shareholders start complaining.

I am a firm believer that effective alt-tech needs to be kept private. Like Kiwi Farms.
you're saying that as if Kiwifarms could ever go public, if null tried and even made it that far
Liz Fong Jones and her squad of trannies will immediately dox and harrass the direct of the SEC and get it undone.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Angry Shoes
Also, Rumble is now traded on the NASDAQ. Nick is beyond fucked if the major shareholders start complaining.

I am a firm believer that effective alt-tech needs to be kept private. Like Kiwi Farms.
There is absolutely no question about that. With enough time shareholder interest always breaks against principle, and the company is legally obligated to make the maximum profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lady Rackets Ass
I think we should be nice to him.
We were nice to him. All we said was it was gross for him to overshare his sex life and please stop doing it. This thread only became outright hostile when he straight up attacked his viewers who wouldn't sign on for his coomer shit.
how much would we need to raise to buy over half of rumble collectively to prevent this.
It's a $6.76 a share now and jumped today on news of this "Rumble Launches a New Interface for Desktop and Mobile Web"

edit: they did indeed do an update and it seems better.
 
Exceptional detective @Spectre_06 hypothesizes that @CGoody564 may be another actually another well-known exceptional detective.

Hey, @Bryan Dunn, would you like to comment on this?
Alternatively, @Juan But Not Forgotten could do an analysis. He's good and determining whether something is a KoP sock or not.

1673044220361.png

Archive:
(Also, he's reading this thread, because he straight up lifted @Yandex Captcha Solver's screencap).

EDIT TO ADD: I've just been handed a document which strongly hints CGoody could not possibly be Dunn. There may be more to follow about that.

how much would we need to raise to buy over half of rumble collectively to prevent this.
Like a hostile takeover? You'd need 51% of the outstanding shares.

Right now, that would run you approximately $1.326 billion (Market cap * 0.51).

1673045101728.png

That's a gross oversimplification of how to do a hostile takeover, but the point is it likely wouldn't be cheap or easy. Even for a small(ish) operation like Rumble.
 
Last edited:
Looks like Fat Cock Friday is on the menu boys
View attachment 4205598
I was never one to dive into the social memes, but goddamn, im starting to believe that yes, there *are* NPCs in our world, people whose sole existence is to revolve around PCs, not a single unique thought. Incapable of making their own decisions. Programming is incapable of doing anything that was not put in by someone else.

How the fuck do you sleep at night knowing that you shared your bulge to complete strangers on the internet and there's a very high chance your smelly crotch will end up on a larger forum?
 
That has to be the most attractive photograph of John Goodman I ever saw.
It's from C.H.U.D.
There is absolutely no question about that. With enough time shareholder interest always breaks against principle, and the company is legally obligated to make the maximum profit.
Tell all the woke-as-fuck publicly-traded companies that have thrown billions of dollars of profit at troonery this. Unfortunately for shareholders, even absolutely idiotic decisions are usually protected against derivative shareholder suits by something called the "business judgment rule" which almost negates the fiduciary duty toward stockholders (except against really obvious stuff like actual embezzlement).

They can throw away enormous amounts of money to look woke at shareholder expense with impunity (or for that matter engage in literal human rights abuses that similarly cost shareholder money by making the company look monstrous).

It's actually something that makes lolberts look like fools currently, because the lolbert theory has generally been that rational self-interest would cause corporate behavior at least to be predictable albeit amoral. That relied on the false assumption that anyone at all is acting rationally in current year.
 
I want to clarify that Nick has never asked me for any favors. He just remarked once he thought the people in the thread were dumb and prudes. I tried to explain that a lot of people like him and have expectations. That's basically the entire exchange.

Edit: the similarity was that Dick and I had a vaguely similar conversation where he said people in his thread were idiots during a time he was actively provoking people on the forum via Twitter.
 
I want to clarify that Nick has never asked me for any favors. He just remarked once he thought the people in the thread were dumb and prudes. I tried to explain that a lot of people like him and have expectations. That's basically the entire exchange.
It's still low-tier Karening. It isn't humiliating, but it is definitely EMBARRASSING. Remember, his public position is he completely doesn't care at all. He has spent several hours telling people how much he doesn't care.
 
I want to clarify that Nick has never asked me for any favors. He just remarked once he thought the people in the thread were dumb and prudes. I tried to explain that a lot of people like him and have expectations. That's basically the entire exchange.

Edit: the similarity was that Dick and I had a vaguely similar conversation where he said people in his thread were idiots during a time he was actively provoking people on the forum via Twitter.
Do you think there's a chance he'll learn from or acknowledge anyone's argument about his hedonism and content? Or does it look like he'll have his balls strapped to the balldo preventing any oxygen from going to his head, and just continue calling old fans prudes and incels?
 
I want to clarify that Nick has never asked me for any favors. He just remarked once he thought the people in the thread were dumb and prudes. I tried to explain that a lot of people like him and have expectations. That's basically the entire exchange.

Edit: the similarity was that Dick and I had a vaguely similar conversation where he said people in his thread were idiots during a time he was actively provoking people on the forum via Twitter.
Just fyi, watched your MATI stream today, and one of the points you made about Elissa Clips was not completely true. Her nudes were never posted in Nick's locals, it was from a previous relationship. Someone got mad at Elissa Clips for posting negative things about Nick and then came into Potentially Criminal's discord and posted her nudes there.
 
Back