I think what he is trying to say is that gay men and troons (Redundant, i know) attach themselves to movements similar to the ones women do plus women are always more accepting of things like trannies and gay men, probably because they perceive gay men as weak or something that they naturally feel compassionate about them.
Giving rights to women also gave power to these degenerates, I'm pretty sure it was unintentional but it still happened. If you want an example, look at a troon being violently and savagely murdered by someone's words in a video. Usually the first one to jump out in their defense is almost always a woman.
It's really hard to convey to women that the guy that they are trying to defend is the kind of guy who will most likely creep on them on the bathroom, or worse if they are unlucky.
As a side note, i feel like that last bit is one of the main issues of things like troons, Internet liberty, society, and many other things. It's really hard to convey to a person that the little changes happening today will have disastrous results in the future. You'd appear crazy to them if you told people of the past that giving gay men the right to marry would one day mean that we'd have tranny jannies censoring the Internet.