Stopped watching F. D. Signifier after making a video on the manosphere and the video "Conservatives Are Bad at Sex". I'm not linking it because I've revisited them too much and it rots my brain. If you listen carefully to what he says, he leaves out important details and isn't being fully honest in his arguments. He also on the Wakanda bandwagon like other black fanatics are.
--
For example, the point about Thomas Sowell:
"Certain venereal diseases dropped in the 50s and 60s because medical treatment of them in the form of penicillin significantly improved, making the spread of said diseases less likely."
What relevance does this have in terms of what was said? Whether he was familiar with this or not doesn't change that the spike of STDs in the 60s still happened regardless of the breakthroughs regarding penicillin as opposed to making sure STDs don't happen this often. There was an incoming rise of STDs before HIV was introduced to the United States; they were only amplified when the HIV-1 strain was considered to have arrived in the United States.
"The spread of these diseases is attributed more to socioeconomic factors like the rise in crime and poverty in the 70s."
You just told everyone that correlation does not imply causation, and then said this statement. "Causation" and "attribution" are different, and this was a point never made as an affirmative or dissident argument by Sowell.
To dismiss the correlation between the introduction of sex education and the rise of STDs is itself a fallacy (the
fallacy fallacy). People have historically used "correlation does not imply causation" to dismiss scientifie evidence, such as the link between tobacco use and lung cancer. That's why correlation implies prediction instead.
"The rise in condom use and comprehensive sex education since then has drastically reduced every negative..."
Again, this argument was never made. Why obtain an STI when you can do your best not to get an STI and get caught up in an obscure and unjust healthcare system that involves money and may or may not give you good guidance regarding an STI, or a supply chain shortage where the medicine needed may not be available at times?
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/17/magazine/sexually-transmitted-infections-surging.html
"Places with the biggest problems still are places in the South where comprehensive sex education is lower and poverty is higher."
You showed a Huffington Post chart where the Southern states weren't the only ones that didn't have adequate sex education, but also many Northern states. According to data from the National Council for Home Safety and Security, those stated in the northwest are the ones with the least amount of risk for STDs. Cities like New Orleans and Baton Rouge, where STDs/STIs are prevalent also lean very liberal. Politicians there have every opportunity to give better sex education if they wanted. There are also cities poorer than the ones in the South, particularly those in California and New York, that have high STD/STI rates. Poor states like West Virginia reportedly have the lowest STD/STI rates.
https://cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gray/EXVHG4VTXZPEXIUVVDBY2VFZMY.jpg
It's also interesting that you didn't post the pictures that correspond with the HP one you had, such as the ones with states that required no sex education, states that required no HIV education, and states that emphasized abstinence and not contraceptives.
https://ohsmagnet.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/fullsizeoutput_49.jpeg
He then proceed to do a ton of ad hominem and unsubstantiated accusations and don't even consider the notion that black people can think differently from the norm. They are not a monolith. If you even allowed for discussion much like Destiny and even Vaush, you could see as much.
Also: the term "coon" doesn't come from "raccoon". It originated from the Portuguese word "barracoon", which means "slave depot for black people." "Coon" just means "black person. Zora Neale Hurston wrote a posthumously-released book regarding this. It makes no sense for "raccoon" to be it in a historical context; otherwise we would be using the word "Cooney" instead. It's in the same vein as the N-word. "Coon" was used by slave owners and racist whites to insult black people. And you're embodying them by calling people "coons".
--
This is just a snippet of why I stopped watching him.
