Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 56 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.7%

  • Total voters
    354
His reputation was previously as a man who put a tremendous amount of effort into helping a man who was a stranger to him because he thought what was happening to him was a terrible injustice. That's why he was admired, even if he (pretty openly and candidly) was also profiting from the media he created while raising over $300,000 for a stranger.

However badly that turned out, it was a noble course of action and he got a lot of reputation out of it.

Now he's besmirched even that to some degree because of how hypocritical a lot of the accusations and criticisms (however valid) he made about people like Chris Sabat and Ron Soye and the shoe-eater apply just as much to him as to them.

I enjoyed his show because he made "lawsplaining" actually fun, when it is usually painfully boring. Someone like Leonard French can be very informative about the arcana of intellectual property law (and is probably who I would pick over Randazza at least for a normal IP case as opposed to the flashy shit Randazza generally gets involved in), but let's face it, that stuff is dull as dishwater. It's just the subject area. I mean I find it fascinating but I'm a weirdo. Most people don't.

Another reason I like his commentary is that while he is fairly lazy on prep, he actually, contrary to most criticism, generally has a good head on his shoulders on legal topics and I usually agree with him. He has a few kooky fringe opinions (like on Marbury v. Madison) but when he does air them, he's candid about the fact that he knows he's outnumbered and explains the normie legal position as well. He also has a tendency to shoot from the hip (which I share) and occasionally get things not quite right, but he usually corrects it when he does (which I also try to do).

However, it's not really his opinions and legal conclusions I need. I can make up my own mind what I think about a legal document and its merits. It's that he doesn't take things out of context and specifically, actually contextualizes the documents he goes through in their entirety. He doesn't seem to want to do that any more, which is no big deal. While I liked that, I'm not going to die without it or anything.

And finally, perhaps his best trait was talking about law like a normal person. Most lawfags do not do that at all. Instead of just stating a basic legal principle in a sentence and moving on, we tend to state the basic principle and then go on for several paragraphs about exceptions and "but in Louisiana" and other shit that makes people's eye glaze over. Worse, this kind of shit can cause someone to end up even more confused about what the actual general principle is than they were beforehand (because of the way law school teaches you to write if you go through a dense patch of legalese you should go to the beginning and there is probably a short and simple statement in there somewhere and if there is not you are reading something from an idiot).

Anyway all this stuff earned Nick a good reputation at the top tier of "LawTube" (if I must use this horrible word), and indeed, he was a much better legal streamer than people who are definitely better lawyers than he is, but often horrible speakers.

I think he made a mistake burning himself out on legal topics with endless streams on various fairly arduous trials and now he can't stand what was his bread and butter any more. Frankly, I think he should have sucked it up and taken a break, then moved forward at a less mind-bending pace and maybe mixed in some of the racier content that is now all he does, with some sense of decorum about it.

But whatever, we lost a legal commentator and gained a lolcow. There but for the grace of God etc.
Lenord has good lefty cuck analysis but is as interesting as a saltine. One thing I really find distasteful is when Nick will say something with an obvious menaing like "put them on the wall" and then pretend it has some special meaning in his head that is divorced from common understanding and the context which he used the term.
 
For some reason the quote and reply button's are missing from @Yandex Captcha Solver post a couple pages ago other wise I would have chosen to use those.
2023-01-12_21-33_1.png
2023-01-12_21-29.png

How do the wine moms and SIMPs not get what the original audience want? Its literally staring them in the face every stream. rekieta LAW, LEGAL TOPICS, as in LAWSUITS etc.

But I get it, Nick doesnt want to do that content because I need a second dad or something. Silly me I just thought multiple years of legal topics meant it was a channel that covered that content. Meanwhile, Viva and Barne's locals is doing gangbusters and has a community from what I hear that doesn't post 50 year old hags and discuss that famed elusive thing that's hard to find these days LEGAL TOPICS. At this point its clear if I want to blow $5 out my ass for another forum style place to post it would be better spent on them.

From the numbers they seem to do consistently I assume most the rekieta audience that wanted what was originally advertised already went there.
 
Part of the problem with Nick is that he is driven by pure greed. Money is best thought as a means to an end rather than an end in itself. Nick has no real "ends" and there is nothing that Nick really needs more money to do. Nick has no profession, no interests, no hobbies and no real interest in developing any of those things. He lays around the house drunk all day. He buys a car he doesn't understand, doesn't know how to drive and can't drive. He doesn't dress well. He doesn't seem go out of the house to the point where he needs much of anything. He doesn't even know what a good vacation would be. And socially he only seems interested in hanging out with no-class trashy people.
He has that nouveau riche white trash attitude where he wants to create an impression by driving a mustang or drinking half a bottle of whisky. But the only people that creates a positive impression with is the stupid and immature.

This is an old story. There is no end of idiots who chase money only to get it and then discover that it doesn't mean anything. Then they inevitably fall into alcoholism, drug abuse, degenerate stupid dangerous sex and so on until they have destroyed themselves. Nothing changes.
1 Timothy 6:10 KJV For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows
 
His reputation was previously as a man who put a tremendous amount of effort into helping a man who was a stranger to him because he thought what was happening to him was a terrible injustice. That's why he was admired, even if he (pretty openly and candidly) was also profiting from the media he created while raising over $300,000 for a stranger.

However badly that turned out, it was a noble course of action and he got a lot of reputation out of it.

Now he's besmirched even that to some degree because of how hypocritical a lot of the accusations and criticisms (however valid) he made about people like Chris Sabat and Ron Soye and the shoe-eater apply just as much to him as to them.

I enjoyed his show because he made "lawsplaining" actually fun, when it is usually painfully boring. Someone like Leonard French can be very informative about the arcana of intellectual property law (and is probably who I would pick over Randazza at least for a normal IP case as opposed to the flashy shit Randazza generally gets involved in), but let's face it, that stuff is dull as dishwater. It's just the subject area. I mean I find it fascinating but I'm a weirdo. Most people don't.

Another reason I like his commentary is that while he is fairly lazy on prep, he actually, contrary to most criticism, generally has a good head on his shoulders on legal topics and I usually agree with him. He has a few kooky fringe opinions (like on Marbury v. Madison) but when he does air them, he's candid about the fact that he knows he's outnumbered and explains the normie legal position as well. He also has a tendency to shoot from the hip (which I share) and occasionally get things not quite right, but he usually corrects it when he does (which I also try to do).

However, it's not really his opinions and legal conclusions I need. I can make up my own mind what I think about a legal document and its merits. It's that he doesn't take things out of context and specifically, actually contextualizes the documents he goes through in their entirety. He doesn't seem to want to do that any more, which is no big deal. While I liked that, I'm not going to die without it or anything.

And finally, perhaps his best trait was talking about law like a normal person. Most lawfags do not do that at all. Instead of just stating a basic legal principle in a sentence and moving on, we tend to state the basic principle and then go on for several paragraphs about exceptions and "but in Louisiana" and other shit that makes people's eye glaze over. Worse, this kind of shit can cause someone to end up even more confused about what the actual general principle is than they were beforehand (because of the way law school teaches you to write if you go through a dense patch of legalese you should go to the beginning and there is probably a short and simple statement in there somewhere and if there is not you are reading something from an idiot).

Anyway all this stuff earned Nick a good reputation at the top tier of "LawTube" (if I must use this horrible word), and indeed, he was a much better legal streamer than people who are definitely better lawyers than he is, but often horrible speakers.

I think he made a mistake burning himself out on legal topics with endless streams on various fairly arduous trials and now he can't stand what was his bread and butter any more. Frankly, I think he should have sucked it up and taken a break, then moved forward at a less mind-bending pace and maybe mixed in some of the racier content that is now all he does, with some sense of decorum about it.

But whatever, we lost a legal commentator and gained a lolcow. There but for the grace of God etc.
Basically how I feel.

Gonna add: Null gave him some solid advice, both as a person who has seen the birth and death of many lolcows as well as someone who has been a friend (parasocial or not) to Nick. If he spergs out about what Null had to say he's a lost cause because he wasn't even being mean. Josh could've been real mean if he wanted to, but he didn't. Just because it's a topic nobody wants to be confronted with doesn't make it automatically mean.
 
Last edited:
Little collection from today so far
First we learn that cgoody was trying to sext libtardcynthia
2023-01-13_10-21_1.png
In this log you'll see aCompleteRandom have a seething day. He got in a car accident and was crying about it. I didn't clip it, because I really don't care, but it's very funny none the less.
2023-01-13_10-18.png2023-01-13_10-19.png2023-01-13_10-19_1.png2023-01-13_10-20.png2023-01-13_10-21.png2023-01-13_10-21_1.png2023-01-13_10-21_2.png2023-01-13_10-21_3.png2023-01-13_10-22.png2023-01-13_10-22_1.png2023-01-13_10-23.png2023-01-13_10-24.png2023-01-13_10-29.png
Like clockwork they start seething about @chudbere due to her stream last night.
2023-01-13_10-33_1.png
Isn't that what all of Nick's content is? Discussing events that are in regards to other people's life?
2023-01-13_10-29.png2023-01-13_10-29_1.png2023-01-13_10-31.png2023-01-13_10-31_1.png2023-01-13_10-32.png2023-01-13_10-32_1.png2023-01-13_10-32_2.png2023-01-13_10-33.png2023-01-13_10-33_1.png2023-01-13_10-33_2.png2023-01-13_10-33_3.png2023-01-13_10-34.png2023-01-13_10-34_1.png2023-01-13_10-35.png2023-01-13_10-35_1.png2023-01-13_10-35_2.png2023-01-13_10-36.png2023-01-13_10-37.png2023-01-13_10-37_1.png2023-01-13_10-38.png2023-01-13_10-38_1.png

Then the day moves into the term "parasocial" after a brief mention earlier which has some amazing copes about how Nick being interacting with Locals and encouraging certain behaviors isn't parasocial.
A parasocial interaction, an exposure that garners interest in a persona,[6] becomes a parasocial relationship after repeated exposure to the media persona causes the media user to develop illusions of intimacy, friendship, and identification.[5] Positive information learned about the media persona results in increased attraction, and the relationship progresses.[6] Parasocial relationships are enhanced due to trust and self-disclosure provided by the media persona.[5] Media users are loyal and feel directly connected to the persona, much as they are connected to their close friends, by observing and interpreting their appearance, gestures, voice, conversation, and conduct.[6] Media personas have a significant amount of influence over media users, positive or negative, informing the way that they perceive certain topics or even their purchasing habits. Studies involving longitudinal effects of parasocial interactions on children are still relatively new, according to developmental psychologist Sandra L. Calvert.[7]
Chat clearly also has the inability to read cynthia's message that has @Captain Manning beautiful meme from the Sally texting Nick.
2023-01-13_10-41.png
2023-01-13_10-39.png2023-01-13_10-39_1.png2023-01-13_10-39_2.png2023-01-13_10-40.png2023-01-13_10-40_1.png2023-01-13_10-40_2.png2023-01-13_10-41.png2023-01-13_10-41_1.png2023-01-13_10-41_2.png2023-01-13_10-41_3.png2023-01-13_10-42.png2023-01-13_10-42_1.png2023-01-13_10-42_2.png2023-01-13_10-43.png2023-01-13_10-43_1.png
Then locals tries to dump some logs on cynthia that say that "Nick was having sex with other women". Only to realize that the receipts are shit when other locals users point out it was talking about arttheclown.
2023-01-13_10-43_2.png2023-01-13_10-43_3.png2023-01-13_10-46.png2023-01-13_10-46_1.png2023-01-13_10-47.png2023-01-13_10-48.png856549_uexb8opgx6yrjyx.jpeg2023-01-13_10-48_1.png2023-01-13_10-49.png2023-01-13_10-50.png2023-01-13_10-50_1.png
Nick is still 100% not mad. The farms are mad.
2023-01-13_14-25.png2023-01-13_14-25_1.png
2023-01-13_12-28.png2023-01-13_13-26.png2023-01-13_13-27.png2023-01-13_13-27_1.png2023-01-13_13-28.png2023-01-13_13-30.png2023-01-13_13-30_1.png2023-01-13_13-39.png2023-01-13_13-39_1.png2023-01-13_13-39_2.png2023-01-13_13-40.png2023-01-13_13-45.png2023-01-13_14-23.png2023-01-13_14-25.png2023-01-13_14-25_1.png2023-01-13_14-25_2.png2023-01-13_14-55.png2023-01-13_14-56.png
We finish the days up with some testicular torsion purchases and lewds. Not paranoid about chat logs. Because when you put something on the internet it's there forever, so that is why you should post lewds in Locals? Nah post them cause fuck the haters. They will live on forever. Nipple is okay now, Nick was participating in chat while it was posted. Here's a little song for this section https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1faGNp9xvNQ
2023-01-13_17-18.png
2023-01-13_10-54.png1328589_byfw2fyjit3q5iv.jpeg2269443_y58tghf3nclr8eq.jpeg2023-01-13_10-55.png2023-01-13_12-26.png1453114_ju818p23vxdu162.jpeg2077457_ixxks21m9sj94ik.jpeg2023-01-13_12-28_1.png2023-01-13_16-31.png2023-01-13_16-32.png2023-01-13_17-18.png2027144_p3w8j7op52r1jan.jpeg2023-01-13_17-18_1.png2023-01-13_17-20.png2023-01-13_17-33.png2023-01-13_17-33_1.png2023-01-13_17-35.png2023-01-13_17-39.png2023-01-13_17-41.png2023-01-13_17-50.png

Edit: aCompleteRandom now has PTSD like every SJW, no injuries other than being butthurt
2023-01-13_18-28.png
 

Attachments

  • 2023-01-13_14-24.png
    2023-01-13_14-24.png
    32.1 KB · Views: 25
Last edited:
I think he made a mistake burning himself out on legal topics with endless streams on various fairly arduous trials and now he can't stand what was his bread and butter any more. Frankly, I think he should have sucked it up and taken a break, then moved forward at a less mind-bending pace and maybe mixed in some of the racier content that is now all he does, with some sense of decorum about it.
He didn't even need to take a break if he needed to stream, as he could just do streams about paintings toy soldiers with Sargon or whatnot. Hell, if he really needed to get the weird perversion out of his system, he could have done what he did in the past, bring on a guest to talk about a topic in a detached way, like he did with the diaper furry or that guy who makes sex dolls, because there's a big difference between having that layer of separation and him just going "look how many rolls of quarters I can shove up my ass before my wife needs to call a doctor."
 
I would love for jim, and null to go on rekita's show, fuck lets have dax on. Then have coach red pill. Finally they reach out to ralph and for get one retarded 15 minutes I can feel like I have all my gay internet daddy's joking around.
Your wish may come true, if only partially.

Reminded me of his birthday stream.

In that same stream when talk of thumbing buttholes came up, Nick claimed he was cool with it. If Ethan's enlarged pig heart doesn't give out, I can see Nick doing a episode with him on Dicks show.
 
I honestly wonder how much of this is rebellion against the family expectations.
I think its slightly different. IMO, the evidence is that Nick, Wife and Children were supported by family for many, many years. When you take the family money, you have to do what the family says. You can still see the anger over living like that come out in Nick's comments sometimes.
Hitting it big in streaming finally gave him the ability to become an adult at 40 in the way most kids do around 23. He finally had his own money and nobody could tell him what to do.
IMO, his family never seemed to have any particular expectations for him. If anything, they indulged him in his decisions such as getting a degree in creative writing and starting a big family he had no means of financially supporting. They tried to support him in every way they could to the point where he never experienced the consequences of his bad decisions. They made life incredibly easy for him, they bailed him out of his bad decisions and he responded with binge drinking.
 
Nick please, I have a genius idea. Use your new found wealth, by a cheap house in the middle of nowhere load it up with cameras and invite ArtTheClown, EgalitarianBitch, CGoody, CynthiaLibtard, Sally78, Lordofthereee and like 2-4 other prominent locals simps/thots. It'll be a big brother/survivor/bachelor esque show. Chat can vote each week who gets kicked off. It'll be an absolute shit-show, they probably won't all make it out alive, and in the end you balldo the winner. Talk about the ultimate grift.
 
Nick please, I have a genius idea. Use your new found wealth, by a cheap house in the middle of nowhere load it up with cameras and invite ArtTheClown, EgalitarianBitch, CGoody, CynthiaLibtard, Sally78, Lordofthereee and like 2-4 other prominent locals simps/thots. It'll be a big brother/survivor/bachelor esque show. Chat can vote each week who gets kicked off. It'll be an absolute shit-show, they probably won't all make it out alive, and in the end you balldo the winner. Talk about the ultimate grift.
They already made a ton of movies about that, they're called the Saw franchise.
 
Back