Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[repentance]

but hearing him shit on the mother of his kids is just... shit I don't even have words, other than contemptible. I can't respect a guy like that.

That he was willing to say that on camera makes me wonder what he says to and about her in private.

 

[fluxeon]

Well, he kind of has. Nothing egregious, but basically called them uggos and shitty. But he could easily claim he was "JOKING" when he said that... geez, can't the farms just let people have fun?

Not simpin', but these ladies are clearly attractive actual females. Nicks locals chat certainly has a troon or two pretending. LOL

 

[Potatoherder]

This is extremely brutal math which illustrates why many "social media experts" speculated that it was impossible to negotiate an exclusivity deal with Rumble that made sense for both parties.

He also peaked at at least 8,700 viewers on rumble compared to 2,100 on youtube. That is a main reason why rumble not forcing the cutoff for trials is insane. All his nighttime viewers are over on rumble already and the room for growth is during trials.

Sidenote: Anyone with locals access know if he has mentioned anything about his editor? It's been over a month since an edited video has been upload on his channel. He may have abandoned all attempts at growth since he got the rumble contract.

 

[Maude Snew]

He also peaked at at least 8,700 viewers on rumble compared to 2,100 on youtube. That is a main reason why rumble not forcing the cutoff for trials is insane. All his nighttime viewers are over on rumble already and the room for growth is during trials.

Sidenote: Anyone with locals access know if he has mentioned anything about his editor? It's been over a month since an edited video has been upload on his channel. He may have abandoned all attempts at growth since he got the rumble contract.

The editor is still around, pretty sure he just jannies and spams meme videos when Nick gets up to piss. Beyond that it's anybody's guess.

 

[repentance]

As this keeps going on, I grow more concerned for his kids. Nick seems to spend more time getting hammered with whisky and/or thirsting over his wine mom harem than being an actual father to his kids.

I can't help wondering how much time and energy Kayla will put into competing with locals for Nick's attention and at what expense to the kids.

 

[Kopasea]

He also peaked at at least 8,700 viewers on rumble compared to 2,100 on youtube. That is a main reason why rumble not forcing the cutoff for trials is insane. All his nighttime viewers are over on rumble already and the room for growth is during trials.

Sidenote: Anyone with locals access know if he has mentioned anything about his editor? It's been over a month since an edited video has been upload on his channel. He may have abandoned all attempts at growth since he got the rumble contract.

https://youtu.be/-HzYSM-HBsk?t=401 As far as I can tell, Ryan the editor literally does his job and then waits for Nick to give feedback before posting (makes sense) but Nick "doesn't have time" to tell him what to do.

 

[Faticati]

I agree with josh the damage to Rekieta has already been done. His lack of morals and hypocrisy concerning his "faith" in God will cause him irreparable damage. Nick has chosen to walk the wide road, the road mark speaks of when he says "36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? 37 Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?". We know what Nick will give in exchange for his soul, marriage and current lifestyle about $600k. Paul tells us in Galatians "7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. 8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting". Nick now wishes to run a digital brothel and entangle his wife in his sins while glorifying his disgusting friends sexual depravity and adulatory. I feel sorry for his children since they are not responsible for this and do not deserve to have their lives impacted by their fathers sins.

 

[Maude Snew]

I agree with josh the damage to Rekieta has already been done. His lack of morals and hypocrisy concerning his "faith" in God will cause him irreparable damage. Nick has chosen to walk the wide road, the road mark speaks of when he says "36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? 37 Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?". We know what Nick will give in exchange for his soul, marriage and current lifestyle about $600k. Paul tells us in Galatians "7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. 8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting". Nick now wishes to run a digital brothel and entangle his wife in his sins while glorifying his disgusting friends sexual depravity and adulatory. I feel sorry for his children since they are not responsible for this and do not deserve to have their lives impacted by their fathers sins.

Tl;dr: Checkieta yourself before you Rekieta yourself

 

[Strix454]

I agree with josh the damage to Rekieta has already been done. His lack of morals and hypocrisy concerning his "faith" in God will cause him irreparable damage. Nick has chosen to walk the wide road, the road mark speaks of when he says "36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? 37 Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?". We know what Nick will give in exchange for his soul, marriage and current lifestyle about $600k. Paul tells us in Galatians "7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. 8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting". Nick now wishes to run a digital brothel and entangle his wife in his sins while glorifying his disgusting friends sexual depravity and adulatory. I feel sorry for his children since they are not responsible for this and do not deserve to have their lives impacted by their fathers sins.

Part of the problem with Nick is that he is driven by pure greed. Money is best thought as a means to an end rather than an end in itself. Nick has no real "ends" and there is nothing that Nick really needs more money to do. Nick has no profession, no interests, no hobbies and no real interest in developing any of those things. He lays around the house drunk all day. He buys a car he doesn't understand, doesn't know how to drive and can't drive. He doesn't dress well. He doesn't seem go out of the house to the point where he needs much of anything. He doesn't even know what a good vacation would be. And socially he only seems interested in hanging out with no-class trashy people.
He has that nouveau riche white trash attitude where he wants to create an impression by driving a mustang or drinking half a bottle of whisky. But the only people that creates a positive impression with is the stupid and immature.

This is an old story. There is no end of idiots who chase money only to get it and then discover that it doesn't mean anything. Then they inevitably fall into alcoholism, drug abuse, degenerate stupid dangerous sex and so on until they have destroyed themselves. Nothing changes.

 

[Retink Retunk]

I also find it funny Nick claims people are trying to cancel him for his coomer shit yet he flat out did life ruination on Jack Murphy for coomer shit. Life ruination was something Nick claimed he was flatly against.

I don't follow Nick too closely, so maybe I'm missing something, but from what I remember he just mocked Jack and didn't go out of his way to ruin the guys life in the way someone like Duncan tried to ruin Nick's life.

To be fair, Jack Murphy would have gotten away with his degenerate perversions if he didn't attack Sydney Watson live. It was quite shocking when he did that.
Nick hasn't attacked Elissa or Claire.
Nick and Jack could be best buds now, sharing tips on ball-dos, hairy ass analingus, cucking and wife swapping. He lost out and bought a GT500 instead.

Acshhhhuallly, he still could have gotten away with it after that despite how bad it was as Sydney was willing to let it go and all the weird gay porn hadn't been found. What really tipped it off was he went on Tim Pool after that, talked a bunch of shit, called everyone faggots for caring about his "kinky past" which wasn't a big deal, and made it out like Sydney had victimized him because as a man he set boundaries and she crossed them. That's when everything really went to shit with Sydney revealing more info and one of his fans sending the porn dump to Jeremy, and only then did his thread shoot out of control.

 

[AnOminous]

I still hope Nick can pull up and out of this before that happens, but him doubling down to be contrarian is just going to lead to him ending up being subservient to the very people he hates.

I don't know why lolcows invariably think they're somehow "owning the haters" by doing more of the exact hilarious shit they're being laughed at for.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

I don't know why lolcows invariably think they're somehow "owning the haters" by doing more of the exact hilarious shit they're being laughed at for.

Know-alls can never admit fault or acknowledge their own mistakes. Ego as usual is their downfall. Like his retarded "I MEANT to do that!!11!" crap about his mid-life crisis. The over-used term narcissist comes to mind. It's like EVS in comicsgate, never just says "sorry, the comic's really fucking late and that's on me" it always has to be some new hilariously inappropriate excuse and circle back to how amazing he is.
Not sure of the exact point in childhood these guys got the daddy issue+ mommy issue but it plagues them from then on. This need for the approval of strangers who validate their stupid behavior rather than the reality check a real father who isn't distant, insane or a grifter would give them.

9 Adult Behaviors of Someone That Had Emotionally Unavailable Parents As A Child

Growing into a healthy adult is hard when you get a rough start in life. Here are 9 adult behaviors of someone whose parents were emotionally unavailable..

www.powerofpositivity.com

More often, children like this grow up unstable, unable to form normal attachments and are self-sabotaging. Sometimes the overcompensation turns into malignant narcissism as with our youtuber e-celeb cancers and then the compensation for the lack of proper parenting when they were children has turned them into ego monsters.

(we are here)

 

[BelUwUga]

 

[6MillionCoofs]

I don't know why lolcows invariably think they're somehow "owning the haters" by doing more of the exact hilarious shit they're being laughed at for.

Because they know you hate it. Especially if they are, like Nick, making more money from it than the people mad at them will ever make.

 

[AnOminous]

I agree with josh the damage to Rekieta has already been done. His lack of morals and hypocrisy concerning his "faith" in God will cause him irreparable damage.

His reputation was previously as a man who put a tremendous amount of effort into helping a man who was a stranger to him because he thought what was happening to him was a terrible injustice. That's why he was admired, even if he (pretty openly and candidly) was also profiting from the media he created while raising over $300,000 for a stranger.

However badly that turned out, it was a noble course of action and he got a lot of reputation out of it.

Now he's besmirched even that to some degree because of how hypocritical a lot of the accusations and criticisms (however valid) he made about people like Chris Sabat and Ron Soye and the shoe-eater apply just as much to him as to them.

I enjoyed his show because he made "lawsplaining" actually fun, when it is usually painfully boring. Someone like Leonard French can be very informative about the arcana of intellectual property law (and is probably who I would pick over Randazza at least for a normal IP case as opposed to the flashy shit Randazza generally gets involved in), but let's face it, that stuff is dull as dishwater. It's just the subject area. I mean I find it fascinating but I'm a weirdo. Most people don't.

Another reason I like his commentary is that while he is fairly lazy on prep, he actually, contrary to most criticism, generally has a good head on his shoulders on legal topics and I usually agree with him. He has a few kooky fringe opinions (like on Marbury v. Madison) but when he does air them, he's candid about the fact that he knows he's outnumbered and explains the normie legal position as well. He also has a tendency to shoot from the hip (which I share) and occasionally get things not quite right, but he usually corrects it when he does (which I also try to do).

However, it's not really his opinions and legal conclusions I need. I can make up my own mind what I think about a legal document and its merits. It's that he doesn't take things out of context and specifically, actually contextualizes the documents he goes through in their entirety. He doesn't seem to want to do that any more, which is no big deal. While I liked that, I'm not going to die without it or anything.

And finally, perhaps his best trait was talking about law like a normal person. Most lawfags do not do that at all. Instead of just stating a basic legal principle in a sentence and moving on, we tend to state the basic principle and then go on for several paragraphs about exceptions and "but in Louisiana" and other shit that makes people's eye glaze over. Worse, this kind of shit can cause someone to end up even more confused about what the actual general principle is than they were beforehand (because of the way law school teaches you to write if you go through a dense patch of legalese you should go to the beginning and there is probably a short and simple statement in there somewhere and if there is not you are reading something from an idiot).

Anyway all this stuff earned Nick a good reputation at the top tier of "LawTube" (if I must use this horrible word), and indeed, he was a much better legal streamer than people who are definitely better lawyers than he is, but often horrible speakers.

I think he made a mistake burning himself out on legal topics with endless streams on various fairly arduous trials and now he can't stand what was his bread and butter any more. Frankly, I think he should have sucked it up and taken a break, then moved forward at a less mind-bending pace and maybe mixed in some of the racier content that is now all he does, with some sense of decorum about it.

But whatever, we lost a legal commentator and gained a lolcow. There but for the grace of God etc.

 

[LurkTrawl]

What the actual hell is wrong with you, Nick?

C'mon, give the guy a break. It has to be difficult to think straight when you have this blasting in your head 24/7

 

[Spaded Dave]

Because they know you hate it. Especially if they are, like Nick, making more money from it than the people mad at them will ever make.

Oh yeah, I hate it. It infuriates me to laugh at retards online.

Other things I hate: When shows I enjoy keep putting out more episodes, when restaurants I like keep serving food, and when a job I like keeps paying me money.

 

[AnOminous]

Because they know you hate it.

I mean they think that, but as disappointing as Nick's trajectory has been lately, the content is the funniest the thread has ever been. It's all ultimately entertainment, man. Dance for us, monkey boy.

 

[Procrastinhater]

Because they know you hate it. Especially if they are, like Nick, making more money from it than the people mad at them will ever make.

Thats the thing though. Laughing st someone for acting like a coombrained tard teenager when they're 40 isn't the same as being mad at them. And he's making a decent amount but not that much, certainly not what I'd call "fuck you money", not for a guy in his 40's thats been fairly sucessful and sensible. Certainly not enough to trade your dignity for.

 

[repentance]

Part of the problem with Nick is that he is driven by pure greed. Money is best thought as a means to an end rather than an end in itself.

I honestly wonder how much of this is rebellion against the family expectations.

His grandparents were philanthropists who wanted their children and grandchildren to learn the importance of giving and were devout Catholics. His parents also place a lot of importance on faith and philanthropy. Nick is one of the seven grandchildren.

Testimonials - Your Philanthropy

your-philanthropy.com