Horrorcow James Terry Mitchell Jr / violetlanternwerewolf / werewolf2814 / 2814werewolf / Ouchdaddy - child rapist incel with a micropenis, Hitler whiteknight, Fat as hell, 2004 S Walnut St, Muncie, IN 47302

Who is James Terry Mitchell's patron god?

  • Slaanesh

    Votes: 117 42.4%

  • Nurgle

    Votes: 159 57.6%
  • Total voters
    276
Screen Shot 2016-05-01 at 10.34.14 AM.png

'They may be fun to look at' (:_(
 
  • Feels
  • Horrifying
  • Winner
Reactions: KiwisAreCute, Azure, Meowthkip and 19 others
Null said:
I can't get over how easily he normalizes that age difference. It's 7 years, almost her entire life at that point.
Click to expand...
Of course you can't, you can't understand how an IQ 124 mind works.

Also loved how he insisted he's not a pedophile, yet stated that underaged children are good to look at. Even more, how he answered "are you a molester?" with "only once."
EDIT: As soon as I'm able, his "they're good to look at" will be added to the wiki.
https://archive.is/wrBeM
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KiwisAreCute, VLAD, DirkBloodStormKing and 6 others
HighwayOverpass said:
Regularly is a good word to include. We can't forget that he said it continued until the girl was eleven years old. So he can't even say it was a one time event.
Click to expand...
No, he'll just try to downplay it by saying it was only fifteen times over three years or some bullshit number like that.

Of course raping an underage girl fifteen times over three years is better relatively speaking than doing it twenty, fifty or two-hundred and eighty four times. But that doesn't change the fact that even doing it once makes you a fucking monster.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jacquetta, Fiddleford, Muncie Anderson and 9 others
Phil Ken Sebben said:
No, he'll just try to downplay it by saying it was only fifteen times over three years or some bullshit number like that.

Of course raping an underage girl fifteen times over three years is better relatively speaking than doing it twenty, fifty or two-hundred and eighty four times. But that doesn't change the fact that even doing it once makes you a fucking monster.
Click to expand...
He seems to think that since he hasn't molested any other girls after that, he's all in the clear.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: VLAD, DirkBloodStormKing, Yawning Bulbasaur and 3 others
APerson said:
'They may be fun to look at'
Click to expand...
The mental image of JTM cruising by the elementary school on a tricycle to leer at children may be disturbingly real.

DrJonesHat said:
That is the crux of his argument.
Click to expand...
It'd be like if he were to admit to murdering someone over a decade ago, whining that he hasn't done it since, and claiming he's a "good person" despite admitting that the prospect of really murdering someone else is "fun to look at."

And metaphorically, raping a child kind of does murder them in a way.


There's also this: https://www.reddit.com/r/DaystromIn...9s_26_hour_day_work_for_its/d2oati2?context=3
2814werewolf - IQ of 124 said:
However just know that "titbit" looks mammary related to the american eye.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: DirkBloodStormKing, Scratch This Nut, Yawning Bulbasaur and 1 other person
Screen Shot 2016-05-02 at 1.51.39 AM.png
"[Autism means] at 16 I was much like a child her age so it was a romance of mostly equals...i was [not much] smarter than her"
As an autistic kiwi, that is absolute bullshit. I may begin to cry irrationally sometimes, or not know how to interact with my peers occasionally. But if JTM was normal enough to attend a public school (which he's mentioned before in the 'little boy raped me' story), he was still far, far above the girl's level.
"gifted intellectually in linguistics" Jimmy, I have this new thing you haven't heard of. It's called punctuation, and it lets people actually read your rants.
"she came out in a skin tight one piece bathing suit and she had little tits growing" Now I feel unclean. :(
"But I classify it as not molestation because I looked up the word in the dictionary and what we did doesn’t match the actual definition."
Wikipedia: "Child sexual abuse or child molestation is a form of child abuse in which an adult or older adolescent uses a child for sexual stimulation."
"If what I did was molestation, then so is every other sexual encounter." "EVERY SEX ACT IS RAPING ME, PLEASE PITY." :lol:
 
  • Feels
  • Horrifying
  • Agree
Reactions: Dusk, Jacquetta, Meowthkip and 12 others
APerson said:
View attachment 90620
"[Autism means] at 16 I was much like a child her age so it was a romance of mostly equals...i was [not much] smarter than her"
As an autistic kiwi, that is absolute bullshit. I may begin to cry irrationally sometimes, or not know how to interact with my peers occasionally. But if JTM was normal enough to attend a public school (which he's mentioned before in the 'little boy raped me' story), he was still far, far above the girl's level.
"gifted intellectually in linguistics" Jimmy, I have this new thing you haven't heard of. It's called punctuation, and it lets people actually read your rants.
"she came out in a skin tight one piece bathing suit and she had little tits growing" Now I feel unclean. :(
"But I classify it as not molestation because I looked up the word in the dictionary and what we did doesn’t match the actual definition."
Wikipedia: "Child sexual abuse or child molestation is a form of child abuse in which an adult or older adolescent uses a child for sexual stimulation."
"If what I did was molestation, then so is every other sexual encounter." "EVERY SEX ACT IS RAPING ME, PLEASE PITY." :lol:
Click to expand...
I hate it when people use whatever they have as an excuse. The fact he thinks AUTISM would prompt something like that just makes me angry.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: RWS Watcher, bloodcoffee, DirkBloodStormKing and 9 others
Well Pedobear answered my question in a truly autistic manner which was to be expected. Here's the problem though, it really doesn't answer anything and it comes off as, "whaaaa whaaaaa whaaaaaa! I'm autistic! We loved each other! Please feel bad for me!" and more of that.

I could sit here and write out a response rebutting each point but what good would it do? Pedobear still doesn't "get" it and wouldn't get it even if I did.

But I have to comment on this part:
James the Molester said:
When I met her we were just friends I didn’t see her sexually at all we would hang out watch old looney tunes or disney movies while our moms hung out talking drinking coffee etc. eventually one summer we had a pool in the yard and I was out playing and she came out in a skin tight one piece bathing suit and she had little tits growing and I had never touched a girl so I wrestled with her playfully and coped a few feels and that was purely curiosity. Had she ignored it that would have been the end it would be just friends and I likely would have lost my virginity in the one night stand with the 42 year old woman I met when I was 24. But the girl asked if I wanted to be boyfriend and girlfriend and since I loved her I agreed and that basically set in motion the love affair.
Click to expand...

You want to know something funny? I was practically in the same situation at some point. I was older and not an idiot but I was dealing with a love struck neighbor who was much younger than I was. I babysat her more than once when her folks went out at night. We'd be on the couch, watching cartoons, she'd be wrapped in a blanket or in her nightie sitting right next to me. She even claimed at some point that I was her boyfriend and when she saw me she had to give me a hug and a kiss on the cheek. I played it off, would hold her hand, act all embarrassed and never once did I ever consider taking advantage of her. Do you know why? It's because she was a fucking child and I'm not a pedophile. I don't care how adorable she was, I would never have tried to cop a feel or be intimate with her because she was a fucking child!

Years later she asked me to be her first. She was practically sixteen at that point and where we lived the age of consent is in fact sixteen. Had I not been seeing anybody I might have considered it but in hindsight I'm happy I didn't because it would have felt really wrong afterwards.

James the Pedophile said:
But I classify it as not molestation because I looked up the word in the dictionary and what we did doesn’t match the actual definition. Maybe there’s a different legal dictionary with a different definition which includes a description of what we did just so the law will include nonviolent noncoercive mutual masturbation and lovemaking but I have not yet seen that legal definition.
Click to expand...
From the Indiana Statutory Rape Laws: "In Indiana, a person can be convicted of statutory rape (also called child molestation, sexual misconduct, or child seduction) by engaging in sexual activity, even consensual sexual activity, with a child.

Under Indiana’s laws, a person who engages in any sex act with a child under the age of 14 commits the crime of child molestation."

By the laws of the state you live in, you committed an act of statutory rape and child molestation.

Let's take a look at the dictionary shall we? From the Oxford dictionary it reads:

Molest - verb: Assault or abuse (a person, especially a woman or child) sexually: 'he was charged with molesting and taking obscene photographs of a ten-year-old boy'

Maybe you're confused with the word "abuse" because you see it as "consensual" but by the laws of your state it doesn't matter if it's consensual or not. You abused her, you molested her, you're a piece of shit.

If what I did was molestation, then so is every other sexual encounter.
Click to expand...
You really are a thickie aren't you and I'm not referring to your waistline. See if you can follow this simple explanation.

This is okay: Person A is of age. Person B is of age.
Person A can consent to having sex with person B and vice versa. They are both of age and they are both capable of making a decision like having sex even if it's non penetrative.

This is not okay: Person A is not of age. Person B is of age.
Even if person A consents to having sex with person B they are not legally able to give consent. One is not of age and not legally able to make a decision like having sex even if it's non-penetrative.

I know you're trying to shield yourself from the terrible things you've done but you can't deny that what you did was illegal and you deserve to be locked up.
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • TMI
Reactions: Dancing Asian Man, Deadpool, doubledigitgendergap and 16 others
While we're on the subject of dictionary definitions, here's what Webster has to say on the meaning of "molest":

"to harm (someone) through sexual contact : to touch (someone) in a sexual and improper way" [emphasis mine]

But remember, JTM not only "has an IQ of 124," he's also "slightly gifted intellectually in linguistics."
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: KiwisAreCute, RWS Watcher, glutenfreebooty and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back