War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
Let's say we had a topic of discussion:
"[Country] has decided to deliver [System] to Ukraine. Will this have an effect on the war?"

In this thread I would expect the following:
"It's better armed than your usual IFV, would be interesting to see whether that makes a difference."​
"Any kind of armor would help at this point."​
"Leopard 2 when?"​
"[8 paragraphs about the history of different vehicles and their role in the Cold War]"​

In the happenings thread I would expect the following:
"Another billion dollars of taxpayer money sent to the corrupt ukies."​
"Cope. Russia will capture them soon. What difference is it supposed to make when Odessa will fall tomorrow?"​
"Ugh. This tragic war, how terrible it is! How terrible this vehicle is, why must they bring more bloodshed, why must they..."​
"Better than the Russian ones which don't work at all lolol"​
The most frequent posters are divided into two distinct camps, Pro-Russia and Pro-NATO. There is no communication nor reconciliation between the two. When they reply to each other, it is either to say "everything you just said is false" or perhaps to call them a cocksucker. Beyond that, they mostly interact through negrates.

I asked a couple times how many casualties had probably occurred, and the answers I got back (from both sides) were far higher or lower than any official statistic, whether Russian or Ukrainian. I suppose that, in the absolute sense, a discussion is taking place, and everyone is expressing their sincere views. But I cannot recommend it.

Random article:
Will the war in Ukraine spell the end of Transnistria?

Russia's war on Ukraine has not being going as President Vladimir Putin intended. He hasn't been able to defeat Ukraine so far, and it seems probable that he won't. Nor has he succeeded in paralyzing and dividing the European Union and NATO — quite the opposite, in fact.

Indeed, contrary to his plans, Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova are now several steps closer to EU integration than they had ever dreamed possible.

There may also be other unintended consequences of the war in Ukraine. One of the most important would be the resolution of the Transnistria conflict in Moldova.

In 1991-92, Russia showed the world for the first time since the collapse of the Soviet Union that it was capable of destabilizing and dividing a former Soviet republic, arming pro-Russia separatists in Moldova, unleashing a war, creating a pseudo state (Transnistria) and then freezing the conflict for an extended period of time.

The resulting pro-Russia breakaway region of Transnistria is a narrow strip of land almost 200 kilometers (120 miles) long and 30 kilometers wide between the Dniester River and Moldova's eastern border with Ukraine. It split from Moldova in 1992 but is not recognized as a sovereign state by the international community or, indeed, even by Russia.

Just under 2,000 Russian soldiers are still stationed in Transnistria. The village of Cobasna in the north is home to Europe's largest military depot, where about 20,000 tons of Soviet-era ammunition and equipment are stored. Although Russia officially agreed in 1999 to withdraw both its troops and weapons from Transnistria within a few years, it never did so.

Europe's 'black hole'

For over 30 years, Transnistria has been a "black hole" in Europe, as a report by the European Parliament put it in 2002. It has kept itself afloat with money from Moscow and with smuggling, human trafficking and money laundering.

For many years, Ukraine also played a role in this development: After 1992, members of the ruling elite in Ukraine and Russian economic officials created a smuggling ring centered on Transnistria that bolstered the economy in the breakaway region, making it impossible for Moldova to exert any economic control over it. Over time, corrupt members of Moldova's elite were also drawn into these illicit dealings.

Ukrainian ports vital for Transnistria's economy

For 30 years, Transnistria's economy depended on the illegal transportation of goods to and from Odesa and other ports on the Black Sea.

It all began in the 1990s, when the then-president of Ukraine, Leonid Kuchma, rolled out the red carpet for Igor Smirnov, the first president of the self-proclaimed, internationally unrecognized Republic of Transnistria. The reason for the warm welcome was apparently that Kuchma's son-in-law was owner of the one of the largest steel companies in Transnistria.

Over the years, other politicians in Kyiv were enticed into doing "business" with the separatists in Transnistria behind Moldova's back.

Change in Ukraine's policy toward Transnistria

Ukraine now admits that it owes Moldova because it tolerated the "black hole" for decades and even profited from it. The pro-government press in Kyiv has devoted many column inches to the analysis of this subject and has even suggested that a possible Russian defeat in the war on Ukraine should result in the dissolution of pro-Russia Transnistria.

"Kyiv just ignored the Transnistria issue, and some authorities benefited from this smuggling 'black hole.' Everything changed with the full-scale Russian invasion," journalist Sergiy Sydorenko wrote recently in European Pravda. "It is obvious that a frozen conflict near the border threatens national security and limits the European future of Ukraine and Moldova."

The question now, he wrote, is "how actually to eliminate the frozen conflict."

Tanks on the border

When Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the Ukrainian authorities gave orders for the Transnistrian section of the Moldova–Ukraine border to be closed and secured by tanks. This brought the smuggling to an abrupt halt.

The separatist regime in Transnistria's capital, Tiraspol, responded with complaints about an "economic blockade" and called on Russia to step in and save the breakaway region. So far, its calls have been ignored.

What's more, Tiraspol's hope that Russia would swiftly occupy Ukraine and that the breakaway region would be unified with Russia was dashed by the resistance of Ukraine's army.

Conflict resolution by peaceful means

The government in Moldova's capital, Chisinau, stands in solidarity with Ukraine, helps Ukrainian refugees and is firmly convinced that, in doing so, it is on the right side of history.

It is also convinced that the Transnistria conflict should only be resolved by peaceful means and in a way that does not obstruct Moldova's pro-EU course. President Maia Sandu has said Moldova must become a member of the European Union by the end of the decade.

In European Pravda, Sydorenko described Moldova's approach to the current situation. "Bloody Russian aggression against Ukraine only strengthens the desire of Moldovans to avoid war at all costs," he wrote. "There are no circumstances under which Chisinau would consent to welcome the Armed Forces of Ukraine on its territory." He also emphasized that Ukraine's government understands this fact.

Moldova's soft, soft approach

The Moldovan government's defense budget for 2023 is its biggest ever. Much of the money will be spent on securing Moldovan airspace. The country's armed forces will also be beefed up by Piranha armored vehicles from Germany.

Nevertheless, Moldova's government not only wants to avoid military confrontation with Transnistria — it also wants to avoid exerting any economic pressure on the separatist regime in Tiraspol. "We're all in the same boat. We should not upset the balance," Oleg Serebrian, Moldova's deputy prime minister for reintegration, said recently.

And he has good reason for saying so: Moldova relies on electricity from the Cuciurgan power station, which is located in Transnistria and is powered by Russian gas that is supplied by Moldova. As absurd as the situation may seem — as if Moldova is supporting and bankrolling the separatists — it is a necessity because, without power from Cuciurgan, the lights would go out in Moldova.

But all this could soon change. Moldova is working flat out on plans to break its dependence on Transnistrian electricity and Russian gas. If its plans work out, Transnistria might just go bankrupt and fall into Moldova's lap, because without the smuggling routes through Ukraine and the gas supplies from Chisinau, Transnistria would have no chance of survival.

This article was originally published in German.
 
Hi, this is a reminder that this thread is for articles and discussion related to the articles only. Everything else, including whether Russia can dunk on Nato, about your family in Ukraine, how you hate this war, how you think this war should go, what you think Russia or Ukraine should do, etc, all that goes to the happenings thread.
Where were you a few months ago when the vatniggers were daily shitting up the thread, posting bullshit and not posting one article?
 
Not exactly article or news, but back in the 90s there was one videogame show on Russian TV called "От Винта!"
In episode 59 back in like '96, they talk about M1A2 Abrams tank simulator, at 4:07 they describe a mission set in *drum roll* independent Ukraine that decided to join NATO and is now facing Russian invasion, hence the Abrams
I shit you not

Yo, ain't that M16 in their manual? ROFL
123.png
 
I am not triggered by battlegore, but I also don't feel that it makes a substitute for making a point, something the Pro-russian posters in discussion thread disagree with.

"LOL here's some guys dying" isn't discussion, its a snuff porn circle jerk. Which is their right to have, I'd just like it not shitting up threads I'm posting in, which is why I post in this one - if there's recorded violence in this thread, there is commentary and context on it.
Generally if you have battlegore to post, spoiler it since the entire forum is *technically* meant to be Safe For Work. I understand the logical dissonance of that, where Dear Feeder displays FoodieBeauty lingerie revenge porn on stream, but those are his rules and intentions. It can also be tough choosing between using your work computer or being a filthy phoneposter to get your Farms fix, such is the kiwi's struggle. As long as it's Ukraine war related, it belongs in any of the Ukraine threads really. Could stay here or be moved depending on the additional commentary you add to a post or who you're replying to. I think that covers the little details.

Not exactly article or news, but back in the 90s there was one videogame show on Russian TV called "От Винта!"
In episode 59 back in like '96, they talk about M1A2 Abrams tank simulator, at 4:07 they describe a mission set in *drum roll* independent Ukraine that decided to join NATO and is now facing Russian invasion, hence the Abrams
I shit you not
That guy is way darker than I would expect for a Russian XPlay.
 
Generally if you have battlegore to post, spoiler it since the entire forum is *technically* meant to be Safe For Work. I understand the logical dissonance of that, where Dear Feeder displays FoodieBeauty lingerie revenge porn on stream, but those are his rules and intentions. It can also be tough choosing between using your work computer or being a filthy phoneposter to get your Farms fix, such is the kiwi's struggle. As long as it's Ukraine war related, it belongs in any of the Ukraine threads really. Could stay here or be moved depending on the additional commentary you add to a post or who you're replying to. I think that covers the little details.


That guy is way darker than I would expect for a Russian XPlay.
We did representation before it was cool
 
https://liveuamap.com/en/2023/14-january-the-uk-will-provide-challenger-2-tanks-to-ukraine

The UK will provide Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak confirms during a call with President Zelensky​

The army is mothballing 79 Challenger 2s as part of the challenger 2 LEP, so I assume they'll come from that part of the fleet. Challenger 2 has a rifled bore turret. I'm not sure how that plays into compatibility, but I don't think it'll be an issue. I do wonder if they'll include HESH in the deal. It's also got second generation chobham armour (dorchester), which would see off most of what the Russians can throw at it (assuming the MoD doesn't strip that and replace it with gen 1, which is pretty much the export version and carried on the Abrams).

Best of all, it comes with a water boiler, so the ukies can make tea while under fire.

Another successful colonisation.
 
The army is mothballing 79 Challenger 2s as part of the challenger 2 LEP, so I assume they'll come from that part of the fleet. Challenger 2 has a rifled bore turret. I'm not sure how that plays into compatibility, but I don't think it'll be an issue. I do wonder if they'll include HESH in the deal. It's also got second generation chobham armour (dorchester), which would see off most of what the Russians can throw at it (assuming the MoD doesn't strip that and replace it with gen 1, which is pretty much the export version and carried on the Abrams).
The thing is for Ukraine is that beggars can't be choosers.
You can't really complain when the rest of the world gives you a bunch of different tanks, some of which end up being incompatible; because at the end of the foreign governments giving you tanks when you asked is better than foreign governments NOT giving you tanks when you asked.

Having a motley crew of military equipment is a logistical nightmare; but a logistical nightmare is a more favorable outcome to losing a war and getting annexed by your shitty neighbor.

That and everyone responsible for sending their different shit also seems responsible for providing and sending future ammo for it.
 
Best of all, it comes with a water boiler, so the ukies can make tea while under fire.
They'll replace it with one of these:
samovar.png
Having a motley crew of military equipment is a logistical nightmare; but a logistical nightmare is a more favorable outcome to losing a war and getting annexed by your shitty neighbor.
Could put some kind of cringe reference on Rebels from Star Wars here, since that's their fleet in a nutshell.

|For the actual news, Russia is flinging missiles at Ukraine again, details later I guess.
 
Last edited:
https://liveuamap.com/en/2023/14-january-the-uk-will-provide-challenger-2-tanks-to-ukraine

The UK will provide Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak confirms during a call with President Zelensky​

according the Guardian, around 10 of them are being send.
Maybe this will get the ball rolling with more countries sending tanks to them "cough"Leopard II "cough".
 
What city?
Dnipro, happened at 16:20 local time
At least 10 wounded, 2 of them are children, 3 people in serious condition. 15 people have been saved from the ruins so far. Entire section of 9-story building collapsed.
1231.jpg1241.jpg

Since we've been talking about it lately, the reason I can't possibly coexist with people in the other thread within the context of this overall topic, is that they consider this normal and would make all sorts of excuses to justify it.
How could that ever be reconciled?
There has to be something fundamentally wrong with a person if they think this is okay.

For context, today is also a holiday called "Old New Year", or just Orthodox New Year. It's also a Saturday when most people are at home after week's work.

Supposed to be a video but it didn't play for me: https://t.me/bilatserkvatv/19178?single

Upd: By 17:30 local time confirmed 2 deaths, 27 people wounded, 6 of them children, all hospitalized.
 
Last edited:
It's classic whataboutism. The other thread is full of it, when it's not full of cope about inches taken after miles lost. Some people can't grasp the idea that supporting Ukraine against Russia is actually consistent with being anti-war in general. And they can't grasp the idea that someone doing something bad in the past doesn't justify doing it again now.

BBC has a live update on the war, including the dnipro strike strike. (https://archive.md/J31Jm)

Current headlines are Moldova claiming they've found russian missile wreckage after the bombardment and info about the challenger 2 decision. They're sending 12.
I've tried arguing these very points countless times, I don't bother anymore.

As for the tanks, that's unlikely to have any serious impact on the overall situation (that would require a lot more), but at the very least it would sustain Ukrainian efforts as they're defending their land. And it also means more invaders getting their dues. It's a net good.
 

5 dead in Russian missile strike on apartment building in Dnipro, official says​


A regional Ukrainian leader said five people were killed by a Russian missile that struck a nine-story apartment building in the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro.

At least 27 people were injured, including six children. All of them are in the hospital, according to Valentyn Reznichenko, the head of the Dnipropetrovsk regional military administration.

Images and video from the scene show the collapsed front of the building and a fierce fire in the immediate aftermath of the strike, which occurred early Saturday afternoon local time. There was a series of detonations after the initial impact, possibly as cars or gas lines ignited.

Kyrylo Tymoshenko, deputy head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, said earlier that "at least one entrance is missing, people who were at home on a holiday are under the rubble."

Tymoshenko said 15 people had been rescued in the destroyed entrance of the building. The State Emergency Service and all city services are at the scene, he said.


Missile strikes will lead to emergency power cuts across Ukraine, energy minister says​


Damage to power infrastructure from a wave of Russian missile strikes has led to emergency power outages in most regions across Ukraine, Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko said.

"Today, the enemy attacked the country's power generation facilities and power grids again," Halushchenko said on Facebook. "There are attacks in Kharkiv, Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Zaporizhzhia, Vinnytsia and Kyiv regions."
"The next days will be difficult. Power engineers are already working to restore electricity supply," the energy minister continued.

Saturday's wave of missile attacks follows a relative lull that had allowed Ukrainian power companies to reduce the power deficit caused by damage to transformers and substations.


Two-thirds of Russian missiles intercepted in wave of strikes, Ukraine military says​


About two-thirds of the Russian missiles fired at Ukraine on Saturday were intercepted, according to the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

"In total, the enemy made about 28 launches of cruise missiles of various types and 5 launches of guided aircraft missiles," Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhnyi said on Telegram.
Defense forces destroyed 18 cruise missiles and three guided aircraft missiles, he said.

Zaluzhnyi said that early Saturday morning, the capital of Kyiv was attacked by anti-aircraft guided missiles from the north. Such weapons — S-300s — have rarely been used against Kyiv.

He said Russians forces later used a mix of air-launched cruise missiles, sea-launched cruise missiles and guided missiles fired from aircraft to target the critical infrastructure of Ukraine.

Denys Shmyhal, the Ukrainian prime minister, earlier said air defenses saved "the lives of thousands of people."
The wave of Russian missile attacks Saturday was the first in two weeks.


Ukraine power company says its plants in five regions have been hit​


The CEO of the Ukrainian state power company Ukrenergo says the country's power system suffered twelve waves of missile strikes Saturday.

"Unfortunately, energy facilities in 5 regions were hit," Volodymyr Kudrytskyi wrote on Facebook. "Power engineers are already working on the restoration."

Kudrytskyi said power plants and substations of Ukrenergo had been hit, but the "controllability and integrity of the power system was preserved."

"However, the deficit in the system is significant," he continued. "The situation is difficult in Kharkiv and Lviv regions. Repair teams are already working there, as well as in other regions, and the elimination of the consequences of the attack continues."
"Coordinated work of the military and power engineers does not allow the enemy to achieve their main goal - to plunge the whole country into cold and darkness," the power CEO said.


Nearly 60 injured in Dnipro missile strike, according to regional official​


The number of people injured in a deadly Russian missile strike that hit an apartment block in the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro on Saturday has risen to almost 60, according to an official.

Valentyn Reznichenko, the head of the Dnipropetrovsk regional military administration, said 12 children are among the injured. The rescue operation at the site Dnipro continues.

At least five have been killed in the strike, Reznichenko said earlier.


Russian troops attempt to advance in Donetsk region amid "heavy battles" for Soledar, Ukrainian military says​


The Ukrainian military said the battle for the town of Soledar continue as Russian forces try to advance in several parts of the eastern Donetsk region.

The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine said late Saturday local time that "the enemy does not abandon its intentions to completely take over Donetsk region."

"To do so, it focuses its main efforts on offensive operations on Bakhmut direction. Heavy battles for Soledar continue," the military said.

"Ukrainian forces repel enemy attacks round the clock. The occupiers suffer heavy losses," the General Staff said.
"The enemy is also advancing on Lyman, Avdiivka, and Novopavlivka directions," it added.
Ukrainian forces recaptured Lyman at the end of September.

On Friday, Russia said its forces had taken Soledar following weeks of fierce fighting, but Ukraine has denied the claim.
The General Staff also said Russian units in parts of Donetsk were below strength because of recent casualties.

"The manning level of certain units of the 3rd separate motorized rifle brigade of the 1st army corps located in the vicinity of Horlivka (Donetsk region) remains low, up to 40 percent," it alleged.

In the south, according to the General Staff, the Russians are trying to strengthen their defense capabilities on the east bank of the Dnipro river in Kherson.

"The movement of personnel, weapons, military equipment, and ammunition is reported," the military said.


A child is among 5 killed in Dnipro missile strike, Ukrainian emergency service says​


The State Emergency Service of Ukraine said that one child was killed in the Russian missile strike on an apartment block in the central city of Dnipro.

"Five people died including one child," according to its Telegram account.

The SES also said 64 people, including 14 children, were injured.

"The damaged and surviving parts of the block are being inspected. The search for people under the rubble is being organized," it said.
Thirty-five people, including six children, were rescued from the wreckage, according to the SES.

 
More kamikaze drone assembly-line footage, w/ benefactor plug. Definitely a cost-effective donation for killing Russians.

Video of immediate aftermath, Dnipro strike; whatever hit it was big, like Iskander or Tochka big.
As for the tanks, that's unlikely to have any serious impact on the overall situation (that would require a lot more), but at the very least it would sustain Ukrainian efforts as they're defending their land. And it also means more invaders getting their dues. It's a net good.
The first batch won't be immediately put on the line, but will be used to train crews in-country for when more tanks arrive.

AFAIK, the first crews have already been training in Germany, Poland, & the UK. They'll serve as school cadre when Ukraine's own Leopards & Challengers show up, and I expect the first real combat use will be later in the spring (i.e. for the big counter-offensive); although the AFU will probably send 1-2 immediately to the front for photops.
 
Last edited:
Nice, so Absolutego got sidelined and niggers got the jannie broom. It is impossible to co-exist with the distilled post-2016 4chan, specifically of /chug/ variety in that Happenings thread, so might as well fuck off completely.

Please threadlock me, or else you sick deeze nuts, jannies.
 
Nice, so Absolutego got sidelined and niggers got the jannie broom. It is impossible to co-exist with the distilled post-2016 4chan, specifically of /chug/ variety in that Happenings thread, so might as well fuck off completely.

Please threadlock me, or else you sick deeze nuts, jannies.
As of time of writing, in 2 pages of the Happenings thread, there are 2 posts actually reporting/discussing current events. The rest are a mix of Euromaidan, Western Decadence, and of course calling someone an Israeli shill.

Based on that, what was most likely meant was: Keep posting as normal, but any off-topic (such as complaining about Germany/France/USA, or whether Zelensky is a legitimate president) should be kept there.
 
There's rumors circulating that it was supposedly Ukrainian AA that hit the residential building in Dnipro, they're of course unsubstantiated and stem from one man's mistake, as well as classic deflection by Russia who's been using this excuse all along.
Arestovych essentially said that Ukrainian AA successfully intercepted the rocket, because he likes talking up Ukrainian armed forces and works as a sort of hype man in this regard, or just mixed shit up and meant some other strike because there's been many, with the use of S-300 as well which they could in fact intercept.
But based on the footage available, there's no sound of explosion before the missile hit that would indicate AA reaching its target (let alone footage of AA working there), which is the claim Russians and their shills are making, since Arestovych is everything they have to support said claim.

Ukrainian Air Force gives a fairly specific account of yesterday's attack. 5 bombers Tu-23M3 launched 5 X-22 missiles from Kursk Oblast over the Azov Sea. One of them, launched approximately 15:30 (their timezone I assume) hit the residential building. They claim to have detected with a radar approximate launch position, its speed and height of its flight path, and that they have no doubt that it's X-22. Adding that they have no countermeasures for it. "Since the start of Russia's aggression against Ukraine, they have launched over 210 such missiles, we weren't able to intercept a single one".
Of course it would help to dispel doubt if they find fragments or post radar data if possible.
Stands to reason they'd be deniying it if it was their fault too, but there's no concrete confirmation for that either.

This whole thing reminds me of the trolley problem. Would seem obvious you'd try to intercept a missile coming your way, and sometimes collateral damage might be unavoidable. You might've saved barracks with 300 soldiers inside or power station that provides thousands of people with necessary electricity, but at the cost of fewer lives. It sucks.

Of course I wish all the AIDS and cancer on pilots of these bombers and their families.

Goddamn reporters, man:
Can't imagine the sort of luck it takes to survive 9 stories collapsing on your head, at least proportional to the misfortune of having one of 5 missiles fall on your house specifically, I would assume.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back