Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

/co/ - Comics & Cartoons » Searching for posts with the image hash ‘OmTPSsRY0eYt1F2M7440fQ==’.

desuarchive.org desuarchive.org
From /co/ D0C52EC3-78EE-48FB-A6CD-1A412AA07043.png
Little Jim Sterling
Spent nights tossing and turning
Malding at internet crimes
Stuck a dilator in his tushie
And when the welt felt cushie
He said “What a good girl am I”!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: TheGuntinator, Dig20, From The Uncanny Valley and 11 others
Jim is seething at the idea that the Guardian would publish something with a headline of "Please don't use the Q-word", for those who don't know the Guardian this seems very odd as its a left-wing news outlet so lets go in and see what this is about. He can't have just read the title and judged it off that, right?
Untitled.png
Archive - Tweet

The first thing to note is that this isn't an opinion piece published by the Guardian but a letter that was sent in by a reader which they published, the second thing to note is that Jim is completely off base from what the letter actually says. The short version is that a gay man isn't happy that the label used by a minority of a minority has been prompted as a catchall term for LGBT and he'd rather it not be, very different from what you'd expect by Jim's response.
Untitled.png
Archive - Article
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: manlikebigp, From The Uncanny Valley, Scarface1 and 16 others
Moja Zemlja said:
Jim is seething at the idea that the Guardian would publish something with a headline of "Please don't use the Q-word", for those who don't know the Guardian this seems very odd as its a left-wing news outlet so lets go in and see what this is about. He can't have just read the title and judged it off that, right?
View attachment 4264380
Archive - Tweet

The first thing to note is that this isn't an opinion piece published by the Guardian but a letter that was sent in by a reader which they published, the second thing to note is that Jim is completely off base from what the letter actually says. The short version is that a gay man isn't happy that the label used by a minority of a minority has been prompted as a catchall term for LGBT and he'd rather it not be, very different from what you'd expect by Jim's response.
View attachment 4264396
Archive - Article
Click to expand...
What doesn't he identify as? Geez a Furry nonbinary, transsexual queer that still uses him/he
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, YarrBlueballs, Vinluv Handesbukia and 2 others
Moja Zemlja said:
Jim is seething at the idea that the Guardian would publish something with a headline of "Please don't use the Q-word", for those who don't know the Guardian this seems very odd as its a left-wing news outlet so lets go in and see what this is about. He can't have just read the title and judged it off that, right?
View attachment 4264380
Archive - Tweet

The first thing to note is that this isn't an opinion piece published by the Guardian but a letter that was sent in by a reader which they published, the second thing to note is that Jim is completely off base from what the letter actually says. The short version is that a gay man isn't happy that the label used by a minority of a minority has been prompted as a catchall term for LGBT and he'd rather it not be, very different from what you'd expect by Jim's response.
View attachment 4264396
Archive - Article
Click to expand...
He's so transparently desperate to be part of the in-group he's lashing out at anything that might get the spotlight on him. This whole charade reminds me of that scene in Tropic Thunder where blackface RDJ says "What do you mean, 'you people'?" and the actual black guy says, "what do you mean, 'you people'?"

Jim, you're not a queer pan trans enby gendertrash poly princess. You're a fat man in a dress going through a midlife crisis.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, YarrBlueballs, Brain Problems and 8 others
Oliver Onions said:
Jim, you're not a queer pan trans enby gendertrash poly princess. You're a fat man in a dress going through a midlife crisis.
Click to expand...
To be fair - that's the in-group. Typically fat, white men in dresses going through a midlife crisis.

If this were 20 years ago, Jim would have just bought an extremely fancy sports car and started going to car shows/track meets/etc instead. Man did he lose out be having his midlife crisis in like 2019 instead.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, YarrBlueballs, jasmi and 7 others
Good. It's about time actual gay people started speaking up about "queer". These guys in their 40s and 50s and that will have grown up having queer spat at them and now are expected to just be ok with being called that because a tiny amount of terminally online genderhairs have a grossly disproportionate amount of societal clout. All the gay people I know feel like they have nothing in common with the "LGBTQ community" and are more critical of them than anyone else is.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: CeleryBread, Magic Mirror, From The Uncanny Valley and 15 others
Just_a_Bored_Guy said:
Who's willing to bet the next Jimquisition will be about Limited Run Games?
Click to expand...
The moment customers are screwed over by someone with right politics, Jim suddenly stops being a consumer advocate. I think there were at least couple of examples of this but only one I can remember is his silence when Zoe Quinn effectively scammed people who crowdfunded her game.

Granted, Zoe Quinn isn't a billion dollar company, but to my knowledge he didn't make even a single tweet in the lines of "this sucks."

Also he had no problem calling out Gilson B. Pontes (the guy who got Jim's entire channel deleted for day or two) for making garbage shovelware Souls-clones despite presumably being an individual like Zoe Quinn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, Scarface1, YarrBlueballs and 3 others
  • Feels
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley and Vinluv Handesbukia
Tanner Glass said:
To be fair - that's the in-group. Typically fat, white men in dresses going through a midlife crisis.
Click to expand...
You're correct, I guess I'm talking about that group as a whole who are just trooning out for attention and/or as a way to inject themselves into a 'marginalised' community so they can play the victim despite being in absolutely no danger whatsoever.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley
James Rofl said:
Is he doing the soy-face in his profile picture? LOL What an ugly, ugly, profile picture.
Click to expand...
Its one his many selfies trying to get thirsty replies and honestly one of the less ugly ones, its fucking disgusting how much he tries to get people simp for him on his twitter.

Burt Offerings said:
Good. It's about time actual gay people started speaking up about "queer". These guys in their 40s and 50s and that will have grown up having queer spat at them and now are expected to just be ok with being called that because a tiny amount of terminally online genderhairs have a grossly disproportionate amount of societal clout. All the gay people I know feel like they have nothing in common with the "LGBTQ community" and are more critical of them than anyone else is.
Click to expand...
With the 2021 census data being released we actually have an idea of how small a minority this is, even within the 'LGBTQ community' they are a tiny minority and on the national level they're almost non-existant.
Untitled.png
Archive - Source
 
  • Informative
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, Clem Fandango, Nikes_JustDoIt and 10 others
The Penultimate Warrior said:
Jim claiming The Guardian - a news outlet that makes CNN look like the Daily Stormer - is a "transphobic rag" just shows what a deluded bubble he lives in.
Click to expand...
The main basis upon which it gets claimed is that some (mostly former) contributors like Julie Bindel, Hadley Freeman and Suzanne Moore were pretty iffy about trans nonsense, typically from the dreaded Liberal Feminist lens so it wasn't really because they were frothing at the mouth Christian conservatives or anything.

Of course, they've mostly left over the past few years because it turned into a big hoo-ha, and the paper's party line is all affirm affirm affirm nowadays, but troons never forget.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Magic Mirror, From The Uncanny Valley and Oliver Onions
Moja Zemlja said:
With the 2021 census data being released we actually have an idea of how small a minority this is, even within the 'LGBTQ community' they are a tiny minority and on the national level they're almost non-existant.
View attachment 4271199
Archive - Source
Click to expand...
This is extremely encouraging, and with 45 million respondents absolutely no one can claim this isn't broadly representative of the UK (probably also applicable to the west in general). This census data should be pinned somewhere to remind everyone that the complete infestation of the trans death cult online does not translate into the real world. They are and always have been an extremely vocal minority.

Now if only those 45 million people could give themselves a shake and stop letting their lives be ruled by that <1% of fucking lunatics, we might actually get somewhere.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Magic Mirror, Exterminatus, From The Uncanny Valley and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back