Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
Defaulting on it right out of the gate doesn't exactly inspire confidence.

If that happened that's not just weird, it's an ethics violation for an attorney representing a client to contact a represented party directly. MN RPC 4.2. And he is representing a client, even though it's his own LLC.

It's seen as an attempt by a lawyer to take advantage of a non-lawyer's legal naivete by bypassing their chosen counsel.
Apparently it was Monty's counsel he was trying to contact and not Monty himself.
 
Like how Nick got his start with Maddox's suit, it might be a good chance for someone new to capture a part of his original law-interested audience by going through the documents and procedural shenanigans of this one (if it survives). Nick was probably intending to do this himself, but would that be wise if he's already not in a great position?
This is Clairebere's moment to shine! And by shine I mean not having that fucking waste of oxygen drunk dipshit on her stream and just doing the talking herself.
If she started covering the Rekieta trial as well as providing some filtered Godwinson type slams (minus the blatant lies) she might make it big.
Would also be comfy af
 
Looks like something a Knight would wear on Monty Python. The Duke of Balldo.
1673821171195.png

He is ready to pilot the Balldotron 9000.
 
The level of immaturity present in Nick and Kayla is worrying considering their age.
You’d be surprised how childish adults actually are. Difference is, posting or streaming it on the internet has only become a thing recently in the grand scheme of things.
It seems they either disregard or haven't achieved meaningful life experiences since their late teens/early twenties.
I mean, yeah. Nick outright said they’ve been raising the kids for most of it and have only recently got the money and by extension time to do things that they wanted.
At least, not until she can distinguish between what will hurt/help Nick.
As is the case with most content creator partners, they don’t know what makes good content.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Now you have also been initiated into the cursed knowledge that there exists a device forged of silicone to armor your balls so that you might ruin Our Wife's asshole
One balldo to rule them all, one balldo to find them, One balldo to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them; In the Land of Mordor Minnesota where the shadows lie.
Nick should think carefully about why a guy like that would even take a case like this. He also might want to re-think talking shit about that guy on the internet.
First of all, you need to be sober to think about any case and tbh Nick being sober a whole day or at least a few hours, yeah well, you get the picture.
 
This is Clairebere's moment to shine! And by shine I mean not having that fucking waste of oxygen drunk dipshit on her stream and just doing the talking herself.
If she started covering the Rekieta trial as well as providing some filtered Godwinson type slams (minus the blatant lies) she might make it big.
Would also be comfy af
I honestly wouldn't be the best person to do something like that. I can parse a little bit of legalese here and there but I have no law experience and would most definitely miss spotting any procedural issues or errors or even bad arguments/mis-cited precedents from established case law. Basically it would just be me reading PDFs and going "hmmmm that's interesting" and nodding my head like a retard. Surely there's someone already in the Lawtube community that does a pretty good job of that stuff and can manage not to be dry as dust while doing it?
 
Surely there's someone already in the Lawtube community that does a pretty good job of that stuff and can manage not to be dry as dust while doing it?
A lot of people in the Lawtube community would be bias towards Rekieta. Any inconvenient details that crop up on Nick's side would likely be glossed over.

Lawtwitter (note the difference) has beef with Nick over the Vic case, but Montagraph's case is such dogshit I suspect they might actually grudgingly side with Nick when all is said and done (which is only fair, I guess). Plus, as the name suggests, they are on Twitter. I don't think they do videos.

Also, there's just the simple fact that few people really did what Nick used to do in general. He was very unique in that regard from about 2018 to about 2020.
 
You’d be surprised how childish adults actually are. Difference is, posting or streaming it on the internet has only become a thing recently in the grand scheme of things.
Not surprising, but still worrisome because of where it often leads. Media romanticizes/markets recaptured youth to aging people with money, whether it's hair loss solutions, diets, products for sexual needs, or vacations with the promise that one can be/feel/look young again. Many people fall for it even as early as their mid 30's when their body doesn't move/look like it did ten years ago. The end result is usually embarrassing, no matter how much money they throw at it.

Nick might think he has the money to purchase a solution to his insecurity over his age/wasted years through sexual pursuits or buying a fancy(?) car. From observing the older generations, this seems a temporary fix, at best. Would recommend aging gracefully over recapturing youth.

I mean, yeah. Nick outright said they’ve been raising the kids for most of it and have only recently got the money and by extension time to do things that they wanted.
Yes, it is sad to think that having/raising offspring wouldn't be as meaningful to Nick as the shenanigans he's been up to lately. It begs the question; if Nick could do it all again, would he trade his children for a lifetime supply of whisky, Balldo's, and wine moms?

As is the case with most content creator partners, they don’t know what makes good content.
Agreed.
 
I honestly wouldn't be the best person to do something like that. I can parse a little bit of legalese here and there but I have no law experience and would most definitely miss spotting any procedural issues or errors or even bad arguments/mis-cited precedents from established case law. Basically it would just be me reading PDFs and going "hmmmm that's interesting" and nodding my head like a retard. Surely there's someone already in the Lawtube community that does a pretty good job of that stuff and can manage not to be dry as dust while doing it?
Seize the moment. Make not knowing the law your schtick! As if Rekieta is a fucking legal expert anyway - hardly. Just work it through, avoid the toxic guests who add less than zero and grow the audience. You could even live stream looking it all up and rather than the Rekieta style bloviating boasting and ludicrously wrong hot takes just do the typical baseball / talking dead discussion. Chat will love it. And there will be one or more attorneys or fake attorneys in chat to tell us all what to think anyway.
And when they do try and tell us what to think you got yourself a show
 
This is Clairebere's moment to shine! And by shine I mean not having that fucking waste of oxygen drunk dipshit on her stream and just doing the talking herself.
Between talking over Claire and his stupid John-Michael Howson giggle, randbot is a liability who doesn't stay on topic and brings nothing of value to the table.
 
Once again a content creator finds success after struggling for a long time, it goes to their head, and being the exception, the guy who knows that he's just different and he's got it under control, fails to remember the simple advice, make the content, but don't be the content.
 
Once again a content creator finds success after struggling for a long time, it goes to their head, and being the exception, the guy who knows that he's just different and he's got it under control, fails to remember the simple advice, make the content, but don't be the content.
@Dixieland Buckaroo referenced Viva in the Lawtube thread the other day and it really got my almonds activated. The guy is a squeaky clean le wholesome family man, works like a dog, gets some pretty big guests, and has a massive following. Could you imagine how Nick would interview Glenn Greenwald? "Hey Glenn so you're gay, right? Balls or no balls? Have you heard of the balldo?" while the chat creams themselves for the hundredth time over that old chestnut. No wonder Rittenhouse ghosted him, but instead you can have Mindset talking about fucking drugged up club hoes yet again. But the point is that Viva's not narcissistic enough to believe his personal life is more important than the material he covers and keeps a pretty clear line between the two.

SO WHAT IS VIVA HIDING?

It really is amazing to think about all of the people who fall on their knees to suck off Nick to praise his work ethic, but what monumental thing has he really done? Sit at the computer for 10+ hours? High schoolers do that all the time when they're playing video games and jerking off, but they aren't making thousands of dollars off it with a stay-at-home wife and a full time nanny watching the kids upstairs. You have guys like Good Lawgic waking up at 4 AM every day to go see the Ghislaine Maxwell trial in person, Viva on the ground streaming from the trucker protests, and all of those guys who were attending the Depp trial live. Now Nick's channel is in complete retrograde and there's a nonzero chance that he defaults to Montegraph because he's too lazy, I don't believe a thing he says about trying to contact his counsel.
 
Furry Conventions do seem to get a lot of people attending...

Yeah, Furries always seemed to me to be more akin to the people who'd use a glory hole than genuine animal fuckers. They're too fat/ugly/weird to persuade a human to have sex with them unless they completely conceal themselves within some kind of acrylic fur suit.

If you're genuinely into bestiality, you probably aren't spending hundreds on a fur suit. You'd just be sneaking onto somebody's farm at night.
 
Back