Careercow Jack Russell Scalfani / Cooking With Jack / Jack on the Go Show / jakatak - YouTube "Celebrity" "Chef", Living Encyclopedia of Gluttony-Induced Maladies, Salmonella Elemental

[._.]

lol is this a halloween video that he put out like 3 months too late?
It looks horrifying and the 'monster' title--yeah the thumbnail does look like somebody vomited up Frankenstein and zombie flesh.

And on Jack stealing recipes. He does do that, but doesn't give a shit if he fucks up at any point since taking time to do things right ain't worth it. He wants food now and fuck anything that prevents it.

I wonder if he thinks if he fucks it up and makes it 'his way' that people wont find the recipe and cant say he stole it.

This one is one of the worst hes made ever. I cant imagine anyone in that house not going 'what is that smell' walking in and seeing it going 'Oh my god what did you do!?' When I was a kid I would pretend I was like a chef or an alchemist/chemist or something, I would do the things elementary school boys would sometimes do and like just mix a bunch of shit so you end up with like "I made you a milkshake mom!" and its like ketchup, chocolate milk, torn up chicken nuggets, cheese and bologna, and chocolate chips or something. Thats what this looks like. I thought the mushrooms or whatever that black stuff is, were like mussels and a greenish artichoke-butter sauce or something?

 

[AnOminous]

You can get away with using terms like "spices" to cover all the spices you have in it but you can copyright a recipe.

No you can't. You can copyright the text and expressive part of a recipe, but you can't copyright the recipe itself. Publications International, Ltd. v. Meredith Corp. (88 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 1996). You could make and sell something identical to IKEA meatballs with impunity (and store brands of virtually every name brand product are generally right next to them and even labeled things like "compare to" name brand), you just couldn't actually call them IKEA meatballs, because that's trademark.

There would possibly be a reasonable Lanham Act cause of action if another furniture store ripped off the whole concept of serving meatballs, because it is so iconic to the IKEA brand, but it wouldn't be copyright.

In fact, even IKEA itself has published its recipe: https://www.today.com/food/ikea-shares-recipe-swedish-meatballs-make-during-quarantine-t179469

It looks horrifying and the 'monster' title--yeah the thumbnail does look like somebody vomited up Frankenstein and zombie flesh.

If you made vile slop like this, would you dare to air it to the public? What the fuck goes on in Jack's head that makes him think it looks like anything other than fucking vomit? Not even the vomit of a healthy person, but the vomit of a diseased minion of Nurgle.

 

[Falcon Sebben]

No you can't. You can copyright the text and expressive part of a recipe, but you can't copyright the recipe itself. Publications International, Ltd. v. Meredith Corp. (88 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 1996). You could make and sell something identical to IKEA meatballs with impunity (and store brands of virtually every name brand product are generally right next to them and even labeled things like "compare to" name brand), you just couldn't actually call them IKEA meatballs, because that's trademark.

There would possibly be a reasonable Lanham Act cause of action if another furniture store ripped off the whole concept of serving meatballs, because it is so iconic to the IKEA brand, but it wouldn't be copyright.

In fact, even IKEA itself has published its recipe: https://www.today.com/food/ikea-shares-recipe-swedish-meatballs-make-during-quarantine-t179469

Then what's to prevent somebody from copying Coca-Cola's recipe, as it's out there on the internet, and making a copycat product that looks and tastes the same?

My understanding has always been that knock-offs have to change something, no matter how minor, so that their product tastes differently than their competitors in order to avoid being sued.

 

[Quixotic Man]

Then what's to prevent somebody from copying Coca-Cola's recipe, as it's out there on the internet, and making a copycat product that looks and tastes the same?

My understanding has always been that knock-offs have to change something, no matter how minor, so that their product tastes differently than their competitors in order to avoid being sued.

Coca Cola doesn't publish their recipe and to get the exact recipe you would have to have the same suppliers. If you were able to successfully formulate an exact copy of Coke, you would be free to sell it.

For Coca-cola this is especially impossible since they hold special permission to use cocaine extracted coca leaf extract in their recipe. In any realistic manner, ingredients in general are too variable to make exact copies practical.

 

[AnOminous]

Then what's to prevent somebody from copying Coca-Cola's recipe, as it's out there on the internet, and making a copycat product that looks and tastes the same?

Literally nothing. Other than trade secret law. If you actually stole the secret recipe, you would be committing a crime by appropriating it.

It would not be COPYRIGHT though.

 

[semitooth]

Another nightmare

 

[TheTractor]

I'm framing this and stashing it in my museum of horror section. A soy wendigo caught in the wild.

 

[Point Emerging]

Another nightmare

O h b r o t h e r......

If you haven't had any Irish cuisine on the east coast of the 'States as good as a theme restaurant at Universal Orlando, you're in trouble.

Boy, I wish the alligators would eat you now that you're down there, but you're just too full of gristle, bloat, and rotten tissue, Jackie Poo. Maybe next visit he'll go air boating and get hit in his fat stupid mug with a tarpon. I can only hope.

All of the food looks like it came from some fucked up, dystopian planet where everything's brown and sad, just like Jackie's organs.

 

[Kosher Salt]

But he doesn't get copyright in the least. It's like this. Suppose that he had a successful BBQ sauce. The ingredients have to be listed on the package. You can get away with using terms like "spices" to cover all the spices you have in it but you can copyright a recipe. Just check with anybody who's tried to put out the same exact product that already exists by another company. It's just if you give it out and make it public you can't. And even then it's a grey area But here's how you get around it.

Shit like this is covered under trade secret laws and nondisclosure agreements (which are special contracts). It's not copyright.

Exactly. Recipes are not protected. Written instructions are. Jack regularly copy and pastes his recipe instruction in to his Youtube description.

Simple step-by-step instructions (put X and Y together, do Z to them) are not sufficiently creative and expressive enough to be copyrightable. Now where you see those food blogs that include their own photos, and descriptions of the recipe, those are most definitely protected under copyright (and that's why Jack has got in trouble for stealing other people's photos to use as his video thumbnails). But the recipe itself - the ingredients and the instructions - aren't protected under copyright.

 

[Staffy]

Yeah, I'm all for this fatass going with his own concoctions rather than copying some poor sap's own recipe somewhere and butchering it, that vile garbage he made reflects his shit-induced craziness like his livestreams.

 

[Falcon Sebben]

Another nightmare

The fucking QR code is right there. Jagoff Scalfatty is supposed to be so tech savvy that he can't figure out how to read a QR code. The reason there's no prices is so that they can change them if necessary.

Beyond that, if that's the "best" Irish food you ever had then that's a real shame because it looked pretty mediocre to me.

 

[Blasterisk]

Beyond that, if that's the "best" Irish food you ever had then that's a real shame because it looked pretty mediocre to me.

Irish food is mediocre and Jack found a way to enjoy it without hopping the pond twice, so he stays winning. From a wendigo point of view anyway.

 

[VenomPlug]

All i hear is 'Gud Gud Gud'. No other details. Is this lolcow always like this?

 

[Hungry Homeless Handjob]

All i hear is 'Gud Gud Gud'. No other details. Is this lolcow always like this?

Yup Jack primarily judges food based on how easily he can shove it into his mouth. He’s not really into vegetables, nutrition or any flavor besides salt, meat and fat. Jack was never much of a taster or chef, but 4+ strokes have destroyed his taste buds and rotted away any cooking ability he had left. He’s also preoccupied with how much food costs and will bitch to anyone who will listen if he thinks something is too expensive. Besides meat=gud he doesn’t really have consistent rating criteria between restaurants or dishes, so any opinions he has end up being totally arbitrary.

 

[captkrisma]

A List of Free Food for Orlando Informer

As you can see from scrubbing the video and the website, none of these dishes were a part of the trip's free menu.

In Part 1 Jack gushes about free food and no lines, saying you feel like Michael Jackson, but we're 2 videos in and no rides or free food. Way to go fat fuck.

 

[ZipDisk]

Jack also likes sweet and hates bitter. Which made the carolina bbq wars all the funnier.

 

[p1138]

Another nightmare

This was the most exciting food we've had on the whole trip, that I've had in years

Of course, because it's a bunch of meat and fried shit. The only way to improve it for Fatty would be to put it in a blender so he could drink it, getting it into his gut quicker.

 

[ZipDisk]

Someone should tell Jack the fish was breaded, just to make him do flat mouth.

 

[Lenzperkins]

Another nightmare

Finnegan's Menu link

1. Irish loaded chips $11.95
2. Reuben $16.95
3. Potato & Onion Webb $9.95
4. Irish Fish & Chips $21.95
5. Misty Isle Potato Soup $6.95
6. Dublin Chicken Sandwich $16.95
7. Scotch Eggs $10.95
8. "Authentic" Shepherd's Pie $19.95
9. Beef tips
10. Split pea soup $6.95

The amount of food the Scalfanis orders is laughable.

He labels the Shepard's Pie authentic but it's made with beef instead of lamb.

Jack is a miserable fat slob. For a Christian who quotes the bible and asks his followers for prayer requests, he gloats about people losing their job. If this fat prick tried working a real job, he would not last a day. He truly is a pathetic human being.

 

[That Damned Tiger]

Jack is a miserable fat slob. For a Christian who quotes the bible and asks his followers for prayer requests, he gloats about people losing their job. If this fat prick tried working a real job, he would not last a day. He truly is a pathetic human being.

View attachment 4295998
View attachment 4296002
View attachment 4296007

What a douchebag.