Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Resident Cheeser]

I listened to Crowder's initial response about the contract, followed by Nick's coverage of Jeremy Boreing's response, and I'm siding with Nick on this, for the most part, regarding his take to Boreing's response.

Boreing kept on saying he is friends with Crowder, but then sends an offer sheet that he would send to a relative nobody like Shapiro's Zoomer lookalike -- that would be insulting right off the bat from such a longtime "friend". And if you know he's going to have a huge problem with the penalties regarding demonetization, which you say you'd negotiate out immediately, then why put it in there in the first place, other than to hope he doesn't notice so that you can screw him with those? Crowder is arguably bigger than anyone at the Daily Wire, and has a loyal audience, which would most likely give a decent initial return on investment. You're going to own everything he does while working for you, but you want him to bear the production costs and a healthy amount of the risk, while hoping to penalize him for things you know will come to fruition to mitigate the risk you're purchasing? I would tell them to start over, as well. Boreing also kept on going back to the investment they would have to make to support Crowder, but a lot of what he was pointing to (infrastructure, marketing staff, social media management) already exists at the company, or most of the heavy lifting is done by other services (YouTube, Facebook, Rumble, etc, etc.). Why harp on it like you have to hire a thousand more employees just to handle Crowder's addition to your lineup? He started to sound like a communist by the 100th time he harped on having to share the pain if he Crowder fails. No, Jeremy, you buy the risk with the hope of great profit from a very desirable pickup. Crowder's there to deliver his audience, and it's not his risk once you purchase the show.

Powerleveling a bit but I have done corporate contract negotiations so I know a lot more about this than Nick. When a company is negotiating, it cannot ever act in the way that two people can (a divorce, etc. can be "friendly" in its terms but something like this will not be, ever). It doesn't matter if the CEO is best friends with the person we are negotiating with, or if I'm best friends with the guy's lawyer and agent. This doesn't mean that you can't get along well and be smiling every step of the way, you absolutely can have incredibly productive negotiations – and that rapport goes a long way in the negotiation. But you have to have both parties at the table first.

The offer sheet was intended to start a negotiation, nothing in it is final. Telling them to start their offer over from scratch is more of a faux-pas for a "friend" than an even more aggressive offer sheet would have been. I would personally find it offensive if we were ever told to restart our offer from scratch, but I would never get offended by an outrageous counteroffer.

What Nick clearly doesn't understand (understandably, as he has never been involved in a negotiation like this, and hasn't ever practiced this type of law) is that DW has to share the pain because they employ several hundred people, and if they don't make money on the deal, there are a lot of jobs that could be put on the line. Nick has never been in a situation involving any corporate duties. That's why negotiations aren't treated as deals between friends, when there are huge knock-on effects.

Crowder is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is, and it seems the same is the case with Nick. Every calculation he made about Crowder's potential current revenue and membership numbers was pulled entirely from his ass and lacks any basis in reality. If you read the contract you will see that only their special commissioned content remains owned by them if/when he leaves. Rekieta didn't understand this part either. The production cost clause is standard. The social media stuff is pretty standard too, and actually generous with excluding all his big platforms from any oversight by them. Everything that Nick sees as an insurmountable obstacle or cause for great offense is standard negotiating practice that would have been resolved in about five seconds after both parties got together. He needs to stop simping for Crowder and go take some CLE credits.

 

[Captain Manning]

Still confused how pictures and videos are free speech in the context of social media based primarily around chatting. Nick, you can ban tit pics without becoming a Fascist despot.

Speech includes expressive conduct, and making photographs and videos is expressive conduct.

The issue is (and I think @chudbere might have been the first person to notice this) is that Nick is trying to be everything to everybody with his free speech absolutism. However, nobody needs a forum that's everything to everybody. KF isn't. KF is for the opinions you CAN'T express almost anywhere else (within reason). The lewds are re-posted here to mock. Not to be admired and wanked off too. Thirst posting gets you mocked on KF.

Were I in his position, I would organize my community around the speech that is actually at risk, and tell the wine mommies to fuck off since their speech is in no way at risk. These thots are not oppressed people. Those who refer to Keffals with the "incorrect" pronouns are. He should know this.

I think he just wants a wine mommy harem on Locals, and free speech absolutism is the weak ass justification for it.

 

[RotPockets]

Imagine being so butt frustrated you beg a company to make a big gay block button. I’ll block everyone in this thread right now crying about blocking/being blocked is bitch made shit

Always block anyone on twitter with pronouns in their bio if they start following you. They are just reporting everything you say to get you banned.

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

Nothing too exciting, Nick stopped watching porn. But yet knows porn star names, true coomer territory.

Also Nick is happy that his subs went from 474k to 475k after dropping from 477k. Apparently this is all because the Youtube algorithm of course and it coinciding with the time he was going full degeneracy was just coincidental.

Also enjoy this dump of lewds from last night. Here is a little teaser of the cool manlet Andrew in his Mortal Combat t-shirt and him in the position for a bull

Spoiler: Lewds

 

[Not Who You Think]

Still confused how pictures and videos are free speech in the context of social media based primarily around chatting. Nick, you can ban tit pics without becoming a Fascist despot.

That would require actual moderation (aka effort). Nick has no interest in that.

If he can get a bot to do it for him, he will.

 

[Strix454]

Still confused how pictures and videos are free speech in the context of social media based primarily around chatting. Nick, you can ban tit pics without becoming a Fascist despot.

My view is that Nick wants a porn and drugs social media platform. He doesn't want to ban tit pic because that is the kind of content and the kind of people he wants as an audience. It has nothing to do with free speech.

 

[Captain Manning]

My view is that Nick wants a porn and drugs social media platform. He doesn't want to ban tit pic because that is the kind of content and the kind of people he wants as an audience. It has nothing to do with free speech.

It absolutely doesn't! But he'll use "free speech" as the excuse because saying "I just wanna look at ass" is a bit too on the nose.

Given the myriad of topics he's covered over the years, and caught endless shit for, his Locals is now wasted potential. I think it's sad.

 

[Not Who You Think]

Speech includes expressive conduct, and making photographs and videos is expressive conduct.

The issue is (and I think @chudbere might have been the first person to notice this) is that Nick is trying to be everything to everybody with his free speech absolutism. However, nobody needs a forum that's everything to everybody. KF isn't. KF is for the opinions you CAN'T express almost anywhere else (within reason). The lewds are re-posted here to mock. Not to be admired and wanked off too. Thirst posting gets you mocked on KF.

Were I in his position, I would organize my community around the speech that is actually at risk, and tell the wine mommies to fuck off since their speech is in no way at risk. These thots are not oppressed people. Those who refer to Keffals with the "incorrect" pronouns are. He should know this.

I think he just wants a wine mommy harem on Locals, and free speech absolutism is the weak ass justification for it.

Null was the first to call it out:

May be relevant:

Null had some good advice for Nick back in August during The Null Position. Conversation was about Discord, but apparently doesn't just apply to Discord anymore. Takes place around the 2 hour mark (clip below):

View attachment 4241956

Quick overview: So Nick has problem with how porn is being posted on Discord. Null says to ban the topic of porn if Nick doesn't want it taking over as it has. Nick doesn't want to ban these people's "free speech". Null's solution of banning problem individuals (1:42 mark) is met with the same resistance from Nick as his face (and voice) drop to say that would be banning free speech. Null goes on to give Nick a reality check as to how the internet works, and even has to explain to Nick how accessible porn is on the internet. Null tries to explain to Nick that he doesn't have to be the entire internet to everyone, but Nick apparently doesn't understand or thinks that would limit his reach online.

Null is troubleshooting Nick's problem in a way that will address the issue, but the problem isn't Discord so much as it is Nick (user error). This is a significant contributor as to why similar issues (degenerate material) have followed Nick from Discord to Locals. There is a still another problem in addition to Nick's libertarian leanings though. It's a question of identity and purpose, which leaves Nick at a disadvantage in his (self induced?) midlife crises.

Null possesses the means of discerning what is/isn't on topic because he has a sense of purpose to his online existence. Nick does not, and without a clear sense of purpose, he lacks the means of discerning what is/isn't appropriate/healthy. This is why Nick has a brand called "Rekieta Law" that focuses on sex so much.

Nick cannot recognize poison and his ideology demands that he not address it. The closest thing Nick has to a sense of purpose/self at this juncture is shallow self-indulgence laced with exasperation. Just like his Locals chat. Fun times.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

That would require actual moderation (aka effort). Nick has no interest in that.

If he can get a bot to do it for him, he will.

He's being offered a bot to do it for him and he is insisting he will have them turn it off as soon as their "testing" is complete.

Also Nick is happy that his subs went from 474k to 475k after dropping from 477k. Apparently this is all because the Youtube algorithm of course and it coinciding with the time he was going full degeneracy was just coincidental.

Yeah I'm sure it's a coincidence, Youtube turned "sub punishment" on for Rekieta Law right after people found out Nick Rekieta went to Hedonism II. That's definitely it.

Also enjoy this dump of lewds from last night. Here is a little teaser of the cool manlet Andrew in his Mortal Combat t-shirt and him in the position for a bull

Ummm, have they turned the bot off already? That one photo is probably the most explicit yet and it's very poorly censored.

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

Ummm, have they turned the bot off already? That one photo is probably the most explicit yet and it's very poorly censored.

The bot was pretty shit, and didn't work for mobile devices. Pretty sure most of the locals chat is mobile users. He had it turned off midstream I think last night, but believe the lewds were after? I can't remember for sure though.

 

[Potatoherder]

Also Nick is happy that his subs went from 474k to 475k after dropping from 477k. Apparently this is all because the Youtube algorithm of course and it coinciding with the time he was going full degeneracy was just coincidental.

I am just a forum retard and even i can tell what happened: he started covering a topic his viewers were engaging with and youtube started pushing him up in the algorithm. This same thing happened with legalbytes.
Here is what happened to her after she covered logan paul and started to get a ton of comments and interaction


This is what happened to nick after he started covering the big drama topic in the conservative sphere and comments and interaction exploded.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I am just a forum retard and even i can tell what happened: he started covering a topic his viewers were engaging with and youtube started pushing him up in the algorithm. This same thing happened with legalbytes.
Here is what happened to her after she covered logan paul and started to get a ton of comments and interaction
View attachment 4299858

This is what happened to nick after he started covering the big drama topic in the conservative sphere and comments and interaction exploded.
View attachment 4299862

So Legal Bytes has gained ~10k subscribers in the last week and a half, whereas Rekieta's is totally flat. His channel is more dead than hers.

Keep in mind that the Youtube only updates sub counts for large channels in increments of 1k, so Nick may have only gained a couple hundred subscribers off his floor.

 

[Elescondido]

I'm calling it right now , Nick is 100% a gay closeted man , his cuck vacation was less about cuckoldry and more about having a chance to mess arround with dudes

also no straight man could have a voice that high pitched and even ignoring his voice he speaks in a really affeminate way

 

[Potatoherder]

So Legal Bytes has gained ~10k subscribers in the last week and a half, whereas Rekieta's is totally flat. His channel is more dead than hers.

Keep in mind that the Youtube only updates sub counts for large channels in increments of 1k, so Nick may have only gained a couple hundred subscribers off his floor.

My point was more that he seems to imply it's a completely mystery and one of Joe's family turns sub gain on/off at random. As for what types of gains Nick will get compared to LB i don't know. The subject matters are magnitudes different in terms of scale, logan paul has more fans than many small countries have populations. The drama Nick is covering is basically dead now and unless something else happens he will likely go stagnant again.

 

[sneedem&feedem]

Powerleveling a bit but I have done corporate contract negotiations so I know a lot more about this than Nick. When a company is negotiating, it cannot ever act in the way that two people can (a divorce, etc. can be "friendly" in its terms but something like this will not be, ever). It doesn't matter if the CEO is best friends with the person we are negotiating with, or if I'm best friends with the guy's lawyer and agent. This doesn't mean that you can't get along well and be smiling every step of the way, you absolutely can have incredibly productive negotiations – and that rapport goes a long way in the negotiation. But you have to have both parties at the table first.

The offer sheet was intended to start a negotiation, nothing in it is final. Telling them to start their offer over from scratch is more of a faux-pas for a "friend" than an even more aggressive offer sheet would have been. I would personally find it offensive if we were ever told to restart our offer from scratch, but I would never get offended by an outrageous counteroffer.

What Nick clearly doesn't understand (understandably, as he has never been involved in a negotiation like this, and hasn't ever practiced this type of law) is that DW has to share the pain because they employ several hundred people, and if they don't make money on the deal, there are a lot of jobs that could be put on the line. Nick has never been in a situation involving any corporate duties. That's why negotiations aren't treated as deals between friends, when there are huge knock-on effects.

Crowder is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is, and it seems the same is the case with Nick. Every calculation he made about Crowder's potential current revenue and membership numbers was pulled entirely from his ass and lacks any basis in reality. If you read the contract you will see that only their special commissioned content remains owned by them if/when he leaves. Rekieta didn't understand this part either. The production cost clause is standard. The social media stuff is pretty standard too, and actually generous with excluding all his big platforms from any oversight by them. Everything that Nick sees as an insurmountable obstacle or cause for great offense is standard negotiating practice that would have been resolved in about five seconds after both parties got together. He needs to stop simping for Crowder and go take some CLE credits.

The only person who said they were friends was Boring. In fact, Crowder specifically said that "many of these people aren't our friends."

You power level only made you come off like a corporate cock gobbler. Sort of like Ty, likely similar levels of competence. Poor widdle Daily Wire has to worry about their employees. All the employees Crowder himself has can get fucked though and Crowder can just use whatever is left of the 50 million over 4 years to pay them. Said employees also produce the show which Daily Wire would start to own but don't even bother covering the production budget.

It was a shitty boiler plate contract. Crowder told them to come back with a better one, they didn't. But for some reason Crowder is the idiot cause he didn't feel like taking it up the ass like most of the DW talking heads.

 

[Captain Manning]

Null was the first to call it out:

Right. I knew somebody on video called it out, and I remember saying "amen."

I am just a forum retard and even i can tell what happened: he started covering a topic his viewers were engaging with and youtube started pushing him up in the algorithm. This same thing happened with legalbytes.
Here is what happened to her after she covered logan paul and started to get a ton of comments and interaction
View attachment 4299858

This is what happened to nick after he started covering the big drama topic in the conservative sphere and comments and interaction exploded.
View attachment 4299862

Yeah, he's full of shit. He took a hit because of the degeneracy crap, and he's gaining some of it back because, wonder of wonders, people much rather hear about Crowder's contract dispute. I could easily see him beginning to gain some subs back merely because of Crowder's name in the title. Just like Legalbytes did with Logan Paul.

He just doesn't want to admit what actually happened here because the "haters" are dumb gay incels and he knows best.

Keep in mind that the Youtube only updates sub counts for large channels in increments of 1k, so Nick may have only gained a couple hundred subscribers off his floor.

Well, TBF, it's early, and I'm pretty sure you'll see a much steeper climb during and after the Rittenhouse interview. Possibly as high or higher than LegalBytes.

My position (which I think is pretty objective and reasonable) is that his situation is salvageable if he stops being a dumbass and swings back towards more legal oriented content. How salvageable, I don't know. He's probably still gonna catch at least some shit for the hypocrisy and personality change. He can't rewind that now.

EDIT: Typo.

 

[Lady Rackets Ass]

Right. I knew somebody on video called it out, and I remember saying "amen."


Yeah, he's full of shit. He took a hit because of the degeneracy crap, and he's gaining some of it back because, wonder of wonders, people much rather hear about Crowder's contract dispute. I could easily see him beginning to gain some subs back merely because of Crowder's name in the title. Just like Legalbytes did with Logan Paul.

He just doesn't want to admit what actually happened here because the "haters" are dumb gay incels and he knows best.


Well, TBF, it's early, and I'm pretty sure you'll see a much steeper climb during and after the Rittenhouse interview. Possibly as high or higher than LegalBytes.

My position (which I think is pretty objective and reasonable) is that is situation is salvageable if he stops being a dumbass and swings back towards more legal oriented content. How salvageable, I don't know. He's probably still gonna catch at least some shit for the hypocrisy and personality change. He can't rewind that now.

Thanks for sperging about subscriber counts you guys reminded me to unsubscribe

 

[Potatoherder]

Well, TBF, it's early, and I'm pretty sure you'll see a much steeper climb during and after the Rittenhouse interview. Possibly as high or higher than LegalBytes.

I keep forgetting rittenhouse is happening because of the lack of advertising and the fact it's been so delayed.

I shall make predictions on what will happen:

1. He will get over 500k subs in the aftermath of the interview
2. He will get over $10k in superchats if the full stream is on youtube.
3. Youtube viewer count will be at least 30k, rumble around 50k.

I even feel like $10k is low-balling the superchats but i am going to be conservative.

 

[Tsar Nicky]

I keep forgetting rittenhouse is happening because of the lack of advertising and the fact it's been so delayed.

I shall make predictions on what will happen:

1. He will get over 500k subs in the aftermath of the interview
2. He will get over $10k in superchats if the full stream is on youtube.
3. Youtube viewer count will be at least 30k, rumble around 50k.

I even feel like $10k is low-balling the superchats but i am going to be conservative.

The sub count will then start to drop again because he'll be too busy being cool and sexy to make content that people sub to him for.

 

[Captain Manning]

The sub count will then start to drop again because he'll be too busy being cool and sexy to make content that people sub to him for.

Yeah, that's the thing. The Rittenhouse thing will be a boon for him, but it'll be interesting to see where he goes from there. He still says the old content format doesn't interest him anymore.