Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every American will finally be a millionaire though not in the way they probably wanted.I cannot wait for bread to be worth $5 million.
Unlimited ...corruption.ok, who egged the Dems to do it because of a timid no?
View attachment 4321651
![]()
Democrats push to eliminate the debt ceiling, allow unlimited government borrowing
Dozens of House Democrats are supporting a bill that would eliminate the debt ceiling and allow the federal government to borrow whatever it needs to pay its bills.www.foxnews.com
The only niche where VR has succeeded is in FPV flight for RC drones and airplanes. The Fatshark and DJI FPV goggles and their various clones have had great success with the FPV crowd.VR won't succeed until you have something akin to the Star Trek Holodeck. That gets rid of the need for clunky-ass headsets and it solves the whole immersion problem nicely, imho.
Byeeaa. I can see that actually happening. Shit's so gay now people are getting busted for smuggling in eggs from Mexico. If prices don't go down soon I expect a Cartel centered around chicken eggs to rise up in power similar to what's going on with Avocado's.I cannot wait for bread to be worth $5 million.
The whole point of it is it does force a political agreement on the debt - the intent was "To stop the wild spending because we hit our cap" but a side effect of democracy is that suicidal policies are perfectly permissible as long as enough people agree on them.Does it even matter? Has the debt ceiling ever stopped the government? I thought they just raised it every time they hit their limit, which makes a limit pointless to begin with.
I don't think the powers to be care. It's been a real mask off couple of years.The whole point of it is it does force a political agreement on the debt - the intent was "To stop the wild spending because we hit our cap" but a side effect of democracy is that suicidal policies are perfectly permissible as long as enough people agree on them.
This is also why the legislation to remove the spending cap entirely would be insanity, it would axe the last vestige of any reason to ever control spending, and the last legislative avenue to try and do so. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised to see Financial interests treat its removal as reason to downgrade US credit worthiness in practice (Officially, they'll never want to touch the rates, regulatory suicide lies down that path). While on paper it means they will never default on their debts, truly, in practice it means they will never default on their debts as they will always borrow more and more, so any 'pay' you get back is just more of your money they borrowed to cover it.
I'm not sure who will have more egg on their faces though - The politicians responsible for engaging in what is functionally indistinct from currency debasement, or the economists feeding them bullshit fairy tales about MMT and how a nation can never go bankrupt and suffer consequences since it can just print its own money. A naivety born from the assumption that people are formulaic pawns, who will diligently shuffle from participating in one economic experiment to the next, instead of irrational actors who will stop acting on the system at all as the rules get more confusing and the outcomes less and less certain.I don't think the powers to be care. It's been a real mask off couple of years.
Definitely not the economists. Even politicians every now and then (especially if they have the wrong politics) get the axe for screwing up, but economists? When have they ever faced the axe?I'm not sure who will have more egg on their faces though - The politicians responsible for engaging in what is functionally indistinct from currency debasement, or the economists feeding them bullshit fairy tales about MMT and how a nation can never go bankrupt and suffer consequences since it can just print its own money. A naivety born from the assumption that people are formulaic pawns, who will diligently shuffle from participating in one economic experiment to the next, instead of irrational actors who will stop acting on the system at all as the rules get more confusing and the outcomes less and less certain.
The worse things get the more they stay the same.I'm not sure who will have more egg on their faces though - The politicians responsible for engaging in what is functionally indistinct from currency debasement, or the economists feeding them bullshit fairy tales about MMT and how a nation can never go bankrupt and suffer consequences since it can just print its own money. A naivety born from the assumption that people are formulaic pawns, who will diligently shuffle from participating in one economic experiment to the next, instead of irrational actors who will stop acting on the system at all as the rules get more confusing and the outcomes less and less certain.
I’ve been paying attention to politics for 25 years and not once has spending ever been curbed for this debt ceiling. There’s always the kabuki theatre of “will they or won’t they?” with the obvious answer being “they will” and the debt ceiling gets raised at the eleventh hour. Reminds me of the impotent threats to shut the government down which meant they would rope off the areas that actually made some kind of revenue while every useless bureaucrat still got paid in the end. Nothing will change, whether we keep this ceiling or not. Besides they need to lift the cap for reparayshuns that are coming down the pike, along with more funding for Ukraine, Israel, and bank bailouts when they start to go tits up this year.The purpose of the debt ceiling is for Republicans to pretend they were against spending they just voted for. Eliminating it would remove the last way Republicans can campaign on fiscal restraint.
Via a technicality, the economics are correct that a nation can never go bankrupt, they can just print infinite amounts of currency to repay the extant debts at any moment. The problem with this strategy is that it vitiates trust in the government and currency making the country unable to acquire loans, not to mention the huge amounts of inflation derived from this strategy. When this occurred in medieval times the King would just single out a large debtor and find them guilty of some sort of charge to clear the ledgers.I'm not sure who will have more egg on their faces though - The politicians responsible for engaging in what is functionally indistinct from currency debasement, or the economists feeding them bullshit fairy tales about MMT and how a nation can never go bankrupt and suffer consequences since it can just print its own money. A naivety born from the assumption that people are formulaic pawns, who will diligently shuffle from participating in one economic experiment to the next, instead of irrational actors who will stop acting on the system at all as the rules get more confusing and the outcomes less and less certain.
Reparations only if the democrats are truly out of scams. The rest is plenty accurateI’ve been paying attention to politics for 25 years and not once has spending ever been curbed for this debt ceiling. There’s always the kabuki theatre of “will they or won’t they?” with the obvious answer being “they will” and the debt ceiling gets raised at the eleventh hour. Reminds me of the impotent threats to shut the government down which meant they would rope off the areas that actually made some kind of revenue while every useless bureaucrat still got paid in the end. Nothing will change, whether we keep this ceiling or not. Besides they need to lift the cap for reparayshuns that are coming down the pike, along with more funding for Ukraine, Israel, and bank bailouts when they start to go tits up this year.
Those glowies always project their bioluminescence.The delicious irony of a FBI agent who helped investigate Trump's "Russian collusion" being caught actually colluding with Russia is amazing.
It's due to borrowing being explicitly defined in the Constitution. Only Congress can authorize borrowing money, a clause which invites the risk of serious legal shit flinging should someone try seeing if modern monetary theory truly obsoletes the debt ceiling. For all it's become effectively symbolic the debt ceiling is too politicized to start overtly ignoring.Dumb question, but how cna you have a "debt ceiling" if they control all the spending and printing anyway? Closest thing I can think of is inflation with printing and spending excess money to where its value would degrade over time.