Culture The AP Interview: Pope says homosexuality not a crime - He still calls it a sin. Hey pope, remind me again, what are the wages of sin?

The AP Interview: Pope says homosexuality not a crime
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Nicole Winfield
2023-01-25 13:23:52GMT

VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Francis criticized laws that criminalize homosexuality as “unjust,” saying God loves all his children just as they are and called on Catholic bishops who support the laws to welcome LGBTQ people into the church.

“Being homosexual isn’t a crime,” Francis said during an exclusive interview Tuesday with The Associated Press.

Francis acknowledged that Catholic bishops in some parts of the world support laws that criminalize homosexuality or discriminate against the LGBTQ community, and he himself referred to the issue in terms of “sin.” But he attributed such attitudes to cultural backgrounds, and said bishops in particular need to undergo a process of change to recognize the dignity of everyone.

“These bishops have to have a process of conversion,” he said, adding that they should apply “tenderness, please, as God has for each one of us.”

Francis’ comments are the first uttered by a pope about such laws, but they are consistent with his overall approach to the LGBTQ community and belief that the Catholic Church should welcome everyone and not discriminate.

Some 67 countries or jurisdictions worldwide criminalize consensual same-sex sexual activity, 11 of which can or do impose the death penalty, according to The Human Dignity Trust, which works to end such laws. Experts say even where the laws are not enforced, they contribute to harassment, stigmatization and violence against LGBTQ people.

In the U.S., more than a dozen states still have anti-sodomy laws on the books, despite a 2003 Supreme Court ruling declaring them unconstitutional. Gay rights advocates say the antiquated laws are used to harass homosexuals, and point to new legislation, such as the “Don’t say gay” law in Florida, which forbids instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity in kindergarten through third grade, as evidence of continued efforts to marginalize LGBTQ people.


The United Nations has repeatedly called for an end to laws criminalizing homosexuality outright, saying they violate rights to privacy and freedom from discrimination and are a breach of countries’ obligations under international law to protect the human rights of all people, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Declaring such laws “unjust,” Francis said the Catholic Church can and should work to put an end to them. “It must do this. It must do this,” he said.

Francis quoted the Catechism of the Catholic Church in saying gay people must be welcomed and respected, and should not be marginalized or discriminated against.

“We are all children of God, and God loves us as we are and for the strength that each of us fights for our dignity,” Francis said, speaking to the AP in the Vatican hotel where he lives.

Francis’ remarks come ahead of a trip to Africa, where such laws are common as they are in the Middle East. Many date from British colonial times or are inspired by Islamic law. Some Catholic bishops have strongly upheld them as consistent with Vatican teaching, while others have called for them to be overturned as a violation of basic human dignity.

In 2019, Francis had been expected to issue a statement opposing criminalization of homosexuality during a meeting with human rights groups that conducted research into the effects of such laws and so-called “conversion therapies.”

In the end, after word of the audience leaked, the pope didn’t meet with the groups. Instead, the Vatican No. 2 did and reaffirmed “the dignity of every human person and against every form of violence.”

There was no indication that Francis spoke out about such laws now because his more conservative predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, recently died. The issue had never been raised in an interview, but Francis willingly responded, citing even the statistics about the number of countries where homosexuality is criminalized.

On Tuesday, Francis said there needed to be a distinction between a crime and a sin with regard to homosexuality.

“It’s not a crime. Yes, but it’s a sin,” he said. “Fine, but first let’s distinguish between a sin and a crime.”

“It’s also a sin to lack charity with one another,” he added.

Catholic teaching holds that while gay people must be treated with respect, homosexual acts are “intrinsically disordered.” Francis has not changed that teaching, but he has made reaching out to the LGBTQ community a hallmark of his papacy.

Starting with his famous 2013 declaration, “Who am I to judge?” — when he was asked about a purportedly gay priest — Francis has gone on to minister repeatedly and publicly to the gay and trans community. As archbishop of Buenos Aires, he favored granting legal protections to same-sex couples as an alternative to endorsing gay marriage, which Catholic doctrine forbids.

Despite such outreach, Francis was criticized by the Catholic LGBTQ community for a 2021 decree from the Vatican’s doctrine office that said the church cannot bless same-sex unions.

In 2008, the Vatican declined to sign onto a U.N. declaration that called for the decriminalization of homosexuality, complaining the text went beyond the original scope. In a statement at the time, the Vatican urged countries to avoid “unjust discrimination” against gay people and end penalties against them.

 
His position makes sense to me.

If I'm not mistaken the church has a problem with doing gay things, as it is an act of sin, not with gay people themselves. If a gay person is celibate, the church is ok with them. It's one of those "hate the sin, not the sinner" situations.

If just being gay is a crime that would seem to go against that position of the church. Plus, making it a crime could prevent them from seeking the spiritual guidance they need to forego the sin. The church rightfully sees the sin as a purely spiritual matter rather than a criminal matter.
 
Luther.JPG
Apologize
 
The worst part about talking about Pope Francis is that, 7/10 times, they're either actually citing a guy at least three degrees removed from him, they're cutting up what he said, or they themselves lack the doctrinal context for what he's talking about and make the wrong conclusions.

It's difficult to keep track of the things he does wrong, as a result.
This is some great cope. LOL. RIP the TradCath meme. Where is your apostolic succession and papal infalability now? Hahaha.
 
I am not, nor have I ever been, a Catholic.
WTF are you then you claimed to not be Orhtodox either but defended retarded orthodoxy and concepts behind things like apostolic sucession. Either way, this still applies to the mountains or edgy retards from 4chan that laugh at protestants over what some dumb mainline minster in Masschussets said. Hilarious stuff.
 
Dodging the question as usual.
I expressly stated that I was Orthodox in that several page argument. I bluntly denied being Catholic.

You were so excited to start another one of your stupid tiffs with me that you bafflingly failed at getting your facts straight despite said several page argument.
 
I expressly stated that I was Orthodox in that several page argument. I bluntly denied being Catholic.

You were so excited to start another one of your stupid tiffs with me that you bafflingly failed at getting your facts straight despite said several page argument.
Internet Orthodoxy is even dumber than the TradCaths and comes from the same strain of image board retards. I would like to see how many times you actually stood up for an entire church service. Regardless, I guess I misrecalled you denying being Orthodox. I don't know why you would bother defending the pope.
 
Internet Orthodoxy is--
Why are you even going on with this?

You thought I was "defending the pope" because I stated that he's often misrepresented, and you thought I was Catholic because you thought I was "defending the pope". The only reason all that happened was because, even now, you're apparently incapable of considering that someone might be interested in "truth"-- if only to disagree for the right reasons-- rather than "winning" some asinine game of gotchas for some "side" on the internet.
 
Why are you even going on with this?

You thought I was "defending the pope" because I stated that he's often misrepresented, and you thought I was Catholic because you thought I was "defending the pope". The only reason all that happened was because, even now, you're apparently incapable of considering that someone might be interested in "truth"-- if only to disagree for the right reasons-- rather than "winning" some asinine game of gotchas for some "side" on the internet.
Yes, heretics can be misinerpreted. Calm down. This is still funny.
 
For good or ill, Protestantism freed its practitioners from the sins and mismanagment of church leaders. You can end up with wacko faggot priests, but a protestant can then just go to a different church, or just not go to church. Catholics are dependent on their church, this was the flaw Luther recognized as the church began accepting donations for promised absolution.
A protestant is stands more alone and is more vulnerable to local subversion. A catholic though is more vulnerable to systemic subversion, and the outcome will be that with time more and more protestant denominations will remain more conservative than the Catholic Church until the pendulum swings back.
For example 47% of practicing Catholics vote democrat in US elections, only 19% of practicing protestants vote democrat. For one reason or another the Catholics in the US are more likely to vote for the pro abortion and pro LGBT party
 
being gay was never a crime, having anal sex was
control those homo urges and u get to live
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zero Day Defense
View attachment 4333211

Benedict got btfo'd for outing the gay mafia in the church...

archive

View attachment 4333215View attachment 4333219View attachment 4333220


View attachment 4333238

Oh and the Jews cut he vatician off from the international banking system for a minute cause he was against it and going to out it.
Can you tell us more? Maybe make a thread about it? Sounds fascinating.
 
Back