War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
Does a Tweet count as an article?

zelen0.jpg
 
Yeah, this is a bigger problem: not if they can shoot, but how well they can shoot since the biggest NATO tank advantage is range/accuracy.
There's plenty of older ammo that can be interchangeably fired out of the Rh/44 and M256 and since the worst threats are minimized I think they'd be the primary rounds we deliver. As to FCS systems they're already pre-programmed for any and all rounds that might be issued, or rather they should be for the sake of NATO interoperability.
 
Russia-affiliated journalist paid for Quran burning in Sweden
5215125.JPG
Swedish media suggest that Moscow was behind the protest aiming to sabotage Sweden's NATO membership bid

Swedish journalist Chang Frick, affiliated with Russian propagandist channel RT, paid for Danish far-right activist Rasmus Paludan to publicly burn the Quran near the Turkish embassy in Sweden.

The protest that took place on Saturday caused backlash in Turkey and led to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan saying that Sweden shouldn’t expect Ankara’s support for its NATO membership bid. Swedish media suggest that Moscow was behind the Quran burning, using Frick, who has worked as a freelancer for RT and its subsidiary Ruptly.

The timing of the event is particularly significant as it came shortly before the planned visit of Sweden's Defense Minister Pal Jonson to Turkey, which was canceled after the protest was announced. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova has previously said that if Sweden and Finland join NATO it could lead to “negative implications” for peace in Europe. The Nordic countries applied for the membership in the U.S.-led alliance amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine and were negotiating with Ankara for months to secure its approval.

Swedish media learned that while Paludan, who also holds Swedish citizenship, traveled to Stockholm specifically for the protest, his application fee for the demonstration permit was paid by Frick. Paludan confirmed to the media that the idea to burn the Quran was proposed to him by Frick. He also guaranteed that any damage that Paludan could sustain as a result of this protest will be covered.

Frick, who is known for his pro-Russian position, is an owner of the news site Nyheter idag and presenter of the SD channel Riks, which is financed by the Sweden Democrats party. Henrik Vinge, deputy party leader, told local media that Sweden Democrats were not involved in Paludan’s actions.

2145215.JPG

Frick, who denies having any ties with RT since 2014, confirmed paying for Paludan but claimed he did not believe that the protest had jeopardized Sweden’s NATO application. “If I, by paying 320 kroner in an administrative fee to the police, sabotaged the application, it was probably on very shaky ground from the beginning,” he told Swedish media.

He added that he did it "to support freedom of speech" and aimed against Turkey. "In this particular case, I support this kind of activity when it comes to Turkey and Erdogan," he said.

Latest reports said that Frick Attach filesalso paid for Paludan’s plane ticket to Sweden, but both Paludan and Frick deny it.

 
Russia-affiliated journalist paid for Quran burning in Sweden
View attachment 4336389
Swedish media suggest that Moscow was behind the protest aiming to sabotage Sweden's NATO membership bid

Swedish journalist Chang Frick, affiliated with Russian propagandist channel RT, paid for Danish far-right activist Rasmus Paludan to publicly burn the Quran near the Turkish embassy in Sweden.

The protest that took place on Saturday caused backlash in Turkey and led to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan saying that Sweden shouldn’t expect Ankara’s support for its NATO membership bid. Swedish media suggest that Moscow was behind the Quran burning, using Frick, who has worked as a freelancer for RT and its subsidiary Ruptly.

The timing of the event is particularly significant as it came shortly before the planned visit of Sweden's Defense Minister Pal Jonson to Turkey, which was canceled after the protest was announced. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova has previously said that if Sweden and Finland join NATO it could lead to “negative implications” for peace in Europe. The Nordic countries applied for the membership in the U.S.-led alliance amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine and were negotiating with Ankara for months to secure its approval.

Swedish media learned that while Paludan, who also holds Swedish citizenship, traveled to Stockholm specifically for the protest, his application fee for the demonstration permit was paid by Frick. Paludan confirmed to the media that the idea to burn the Quran was proposed to him by Frick. He also guaranteed that any damage that Paludan could sustain as a result of this protest will be covered.

Frick, who is known for his pro-Russian position, is an owner of the news site Nyheter idag and presenter of the SD channel Riks, which is financed by the Sweden Democrats party. Henrik Vinge, deputy party leader, told local media that Sweden Democrats were not involved in Paludan’s actions.

View attachment 4336387

Frick, who denies having any ties with RT since 2014, confirmed paying for Paludan but claimed he did not believe that the protest had jeopardized Sweden’s NATO application. “If I, by paying 320 kroner in an administrative fee to the police, sabotaged the application, it was probably on very shaky ground from the beginning,” he told Swedish media.

He added that he did it "to support freedom of speech" and aimed against Turkey. "In this particular case, I support this kind of activity when it comes to Turkey and Erdogan," he said.

Latest reports said that Frick Attach filesalso paid for Paludan’s plane ticket to Sweden, but both Paludan and Frick deny it.

It's also an election year in Turkey, so it's no wonder they reacted so dramatically on this silly ploy
 
There's plenty of older ammo that can be interchangeably fired out of the Rh/44 and M256 and since the worst threats are minimized I think they'd be the primary rounds we deliver. As to FCS systems they're already pre-programmed for any and all rounds that might be issued, or rather they should be for the sake of NATO interoperability.

I guess let me clarify:
I know that the FCS can accept a variety of ammo, the issue is will the slavs crewing it be able to update the system about the new/different rounds.
 
Armored route-clearing mine-plows are coming to Ukraine:
The contract signed in Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, details the delivery of a large quantity of NATO proven Full Width Mine Ploughs, provided by Pearson Engineering for integration with Wisent 1 from FFG.
The pairing of front-end equipment with Wisent 1 has been proven by both companies, with systems provided most notably to the Danish Armed Forces along with a number of other end-users.
Facilitated by the German Federal Government, the equipment will be delivered to Ukraine within 2023 under UOR conditions.
The route opening mine plough, considered a ‘flagship’ product among Pearson Engineering’s range of front-end equipment, is designed to provide combat vehicles with minefield breaching capability. Ground engaging tines arranged across the full width of the vehicle displace buried pressure-fused mines to create a trafficable path. The route opening mine plough is often deployed together with an obstacle clearance system and Magnetic Signature Duplicator from Pearson Engineering. In the U.S., it is deployed with a MICLIC line charge system.
More than 3,000 mine ploughs of various type and design have been provided by Pearson Engineering to end-users across five continents.
Supplied for route proving, self-protection or as a configurable variant, Pearson Engineering mine ploughs have been integrated with a wide range of combat vehicles. Most recently, VECTOR, a self-protection variant designed for use with wheeled vehicles with comparably low traction, was introduced to the market.
Pearson Engineering has previously supplied equipment to NATO Forces across a number of UORs. As far back as 2009, orders were placed by the U.S. Army for Pearson Engineering’s SPARK II route proving roller which saw more than 2,000 enter service within two years. In recognition of the achievement, Pearson Engineering received The Queen’s Award for Enterprise in the Innovation category in 2012, as well as the same award for International Trade in 2013 for efforts relating to the supply of equipment to support NATO Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2022, the Queen’s Award for Enterprise was approved again in the International Trade category in support of service to new markets across the globe.
“We are proud to be in a position to provide proven equipment quickly to forces on the ground in Ukraine. Our ability to do so is testament to the partnership we have forged with FFG over two decades, and the exceptional abilities of our team at Armstrong Works.
“We have proven our capabilities before, scaling-up our design, delivery and manufacturing rapidly to protect soldiers. As an end-user some years ago, I have seen first-hand the quality achieved by the company under such challenging circumstances.”
Business Development Director for Pearson Engineering, Richard Beatson.
RDT_20230125_232238531762778025339952.png
 
If that were true, then what about the thousands of volunteer & state contracted medics, electricians, GSE techs, engineers, etc from NATO countries? Not an insignificant number have been killed by Russian missiles & artillery so far.
Admittedly that's speculation on my part but I'd imagine a military contractor is different from a medic or electrician. Considering they're maintaining weapons used to kill Russian soldiers.

They're way ahead on that count; we started training a core of their maintainers on systems like NASMS, Patriot, M777, HIMARS, etc, months before they actually got to Ukraine; the first classes likely got shipped to training sites before confirmations were made publicly.
That's the ideal way of managing a diverse fleet of tanks. I think if anything this is a micro-version of how NATO tanks would operate on a grand scale. I wouldn't be surprised if Ukrainians were used to instruct future NATO commanders tactics they used with a diverse fleet of tanks and armored vehicles.
 
Admittedly that's speculation on my part but I'd imagine a military contractor is different from a medic or electrician. Considering they're maintaining weapons used to kill Russian soldiers.
Not much difference at all, the main one being who's doing the contracting; but that's just who's writing the paychecks, be it the Ukrainian or NATO, a megacorp like KBR/Halliburton, or one of the myriad volunteer orgs in country. In Iraq our militiary contracted thousands of TCN drivers, mechanics, and engineers, but the US Army wasn't the only employer; just the primary one (since Iraq wasn't really in a position to write many paychecks & those Iraqi petro-dinars never went to the moon).

But just like haji & their Iranian suppliers of rockets & EFPs, Russia doesn't discriminate; given they've said as much multiple times & specifically shoot at power-generation stations, transmitters, waterworks, repair & POL depots (if they can find them), warehouses, hospitals, etc. To them, any Westerner working in Ukraine is a mercenary & prime target, especially if they find a facility is full of Western subject-matter experts.

That's the ideal way of managing a diverse fleet of tanks. I think if anything this is a micro-version of how NATO tanks would operate on a grand scale.
:optimistic::optimistic::optimistic:
I wouldn't be surprised if Ukrainians were used to instruct future NATO commanders tactics they used with a diverse fleet of tanks and armored vehicles.
We've already been sending veteran Ukrainians through our war colleges & technical schools observer/instructors, while after the war are definitely going to be in high-demand for years by everyone. Seems like the world has suddenly remembered that combat-proven cossacks are a good thing to have in their hip-pocket.
 
I guess let me clarify:
I know that the FCS can accept a variety of ammo, the issue is will the slavs crewing it be able to update the system about the new/different rounds.
My point is that they shouldn't have to. As long as the Abrams and the Leopard 2 both each nations' version of the L/44, then the ballistics should be already programmed in because of NATO interoperability needs. Just as easy as telling an Abrams "Hey, you're firing DM33 and not M829".

As to Slavs being dumb... they've managed to figure out everything else we've sent. If they can get and keep HIMARS and M777 howitzers working, I'm sure they can find some guys for MBTs.
 
I haven't really been following the whole Russia Ukraine war as much as I did. Though I am not completely unaware of what's going on. I still have my old sources. I heard they are going send Challengers M1's and Leopard 2's. I don't know how quickly they will get them into the fight. But I think training could take a year alone. Then you have the logistical issues. I don't know much about the challenger 2 and Leopard 2 but I do know the M1 is a pretty heavy tank it's also pretty big. It uses up a lot of fuel as well and needs a lot of maintenance. I am sure the Leopard 2 and Challenger 2 are probably about the same as the M1 when it comes to fuel and maintenance requirements. I heard the Ukrainians are supposed to be getting like 190 T72's from various Eastern European countries. I think they would be better off with the T-72's since it's a tank they are already familiar with. They have the ammo for it and the spare parts. It's also a lighter and smaller tank compared to modern Western tanks. But whatever, they will give them the big Western tanks it seems.

Anyway, I can't wait to see the videos of the Western tanks popping the turrets off Russian tanks or Russian tanks wrecking Western tanks.
 
Turkey shouldn't be in NATO to begin with.

IMO.
Turkey is a major pain in the ass, but they are too valuable to not have in NATO.
They are in control of the only enter and exit point from the Black Sea.
With them in NATO, they will block the black sea fleet from exiting the Black Sea.
Their army is also pretty huge and is of pretty good quality.

ezgif-3-5cd73ee3f5.jpg
Map for reference.
 
https://www.parlament.ch/press-releases/Pages/mm-sik-n-2023-01-24.aspx?lang=1033

COMMISSION TO AUTHORIZE RE-EXPORT OF WAR MATERIAL TO UKRAINE​

You're going to need to run it through a translator, but the gist of it is that the Swiss are thinking of revising the ban on re-export. God damn, Russia. How badly do you have to fuck up for the Swiss to decide to become even slightly less neutral?

https://archive.md/wWO2P

Pentagon Will Increase Artillery Production Sixfold for Ukraine​

Clickbait headline aside, article does talk about Uncle Sam stocking up for his own needs as well, so that's one positive of this conflict and one less thing for Uncle Johnny to screech about.

https://twitter.com/nickschifrin/status/1618013758974222336
The Abrams will be sent using Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), NOT through Presidential Drawdown Authority, the officials confirmed. Which means when it comes to spring offensives, the focus will be on getting Ukrainians trained and operating the Leopard 2's.
30 or so Abrams as was talked about, so not a lot, but...

https://twitter.com/Flash_news_ua/status/1617912320721846276
At the eighth meeting in the "Ramstein" format, 12 countries agreed to transfer about 100 Leopard 2 to Ukraine, – ABC News.
So, you know how it was going to be just a few Leos prior? My guess is the USA wants to see how effective the Leopards are before committing any Abrams tanks to the fray.

https://twitter.com/kyivindependent/status/1617503918807973888
Russia, Estonia expel ambassadors over 'destroyed relations.' Russia has summoned Estonian Ambassador Margus Laidre, ordering him to leave the country, followed by Estonia making the same move, the AP reported, citing the countries' foreign ministries.
Pretty big deal to just outright expel an ambassador.
 
Just as easy as telling an Abrams "Hey, you're firing DM33 and not M829".
Again, this relies on the Slav telling the FC about the new ammo (and telling it correctly)

Admittedly that's speculation on my part but I'd imagine a military contractor is different from a medic or electrician. Considering they're maintaining weapons used to kill Russian soldiers.
Not much difference at all, the main one being who's doing the contracting; but that's just who's writing the paychecks, be it the Ukrainian or NATO, a megacorp like KBR/Halliburton, or one of the myriad volunteer orgs in country. In Iraq our militiary contracted thousands of TCN drivers, mechanics, and engineers, but the US Army wasn't the only employer; just the primary one (since Iraq wasn't really in a position to write many paychecks & those Iraqi petro-dinars never went to the moon).
Not all contractors are the same. Some of them are civilians collecting a paycheck, but others are put in uniform. You aren't subject to the UCMJ or part of any military branch. You are a uniformed contractor because it afforded them protections under the Geneva convention. That is, if Foreign (russian) intelligence scoops you up, you have to be treated as POW under the Geneva convention. But DoD was super anal about when and where you can wear the uniform.
Its pretty common for military medical personnel.
My guess would be anyone wrenching on tanks in a war zone is going to be in a uniform. Not sure how that'd shake out if you're working for the DoD in Ukraine.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?

Turkey is a major pain in the ass, but they are too valuable to not have in NATO.
They are in control of the only enter and exit point from the Black Sea.
With them in NATO, they will block the black sea fleet from exiting the Black Sea.
Their army is also pretty huge and is of pretty good quality.
So we should support the return of Constantinople to Greece and kick out the mudslimes. Agreed.

Also their Army WAS of good quality. (Comparatively, I mean they did get their ass handed to them by the Greeks.) Erdogan & his party has been purging the officer core over the past two decades or so, replacing "competence" with "loyalty" as the main qualification for promotion. Ataturk's legacy of preventing the Turk military from becoming another Arab army (and preventing Cleric rule and becoming another Pedo-worshipping backwater) is being pissed away.

30 or so Abrams as was talked about, so not a lot, but...
[...]
So, you know how it was going to be just a few Leos prior? My guess is the USA wants to see how effective the Leopards are before committing any Abrams tanks to the fray.
The 10 challenegers/30 Abrams are more about having a training platform and testing your logistics than a fighting force. My assumption is that the US wants to see proven logistics and tactics before they commit to shipping Abrams.

heavy tank it's also pretty big. It uses up a lot of fuel as well and needs a lot of maintenance. I am sure the Leopard 2 and Challenger 2 are probably about the same as the M1 when it comes to fuel and maintenance requirements. I heard the Ukrainians are supposed to be getting like 190 T72's from various Eastern European countries. I think they would be better off with the T-72's since it's a tank they are already familiar with. They have the ammo for it and the spare parts. It's also a lighter and smaller tank compared to modern Western tanks. But whatever, they will give them the big Western tanks it seems.
Ukraine is going to need to move away from the T-72 in the by now inevitable induction into NATO.

Ukraine also doesn't have a huge cadre of T-72 crews. Ukraine's previous tank of choice was (upgraded) T-64s. I'll grant that moving someone from T-64 to T-72 will be easier than Leopard/Challenger/Abrams. They are also training more soldiers than they had before the war; no reason to train the new guys on old equipment.

Solid point on the logistics, but again the T-72 wasn't their primary tank. And in the first couple months of the war Ukraine's logistics competence surprised everyone.
 
Again, this relies on the Slav telling the FC about the new ammo (and telling it correctly)



Not all contractors are the same. Some of them are civilians collecting a paycheck, but others are put in uniform. You aren't subject to the UCMJ or part of any military branch. You are a uniformed contractor because it afforded them protections under the Geneva convention. That is, if Foreign (russian) intelligence scoops you up, you have to be treated as POW under the Geneva convention. But DoD was super anal about when and where you can wear the uniform.
Its pretty common for military medical personnel.
My guess would be anyone wrenching on tanks in a war zone is going to be in a uniform. Not sure how that'd shake out if you're working for the DoD in Ukraine.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?


So we should support the return of Constantinople to Greece and kick out the mudslimes. Agreed.

Also their Army WAS of good quality. (Comparatively, I mean they did get their ass handed to them by the Greeks.) Erdogan & his party has been purging the officer core over the past two decades or so, replacing "competence" with "loyalty" as the main qualification for promotion. Ataturk's legacy of preventing the Turk military from becoming another Arab army (and preventing Cleric rule and becoming another Pedo-worshipping backwater) is being pissed away.


The 10 challenegers/30 Abrams are more about having a training platform and testing your logistics than a fighting force. My assumption is that the US wants to see proven logistics and tactics before they commit to shipping Abrams.


Ukraine is going to need to move away from the T-72 in the by now inevitable induction into NATO.

Ukraine also doesn't have a huge cadre of T-72 crews. Ukraine's previous tank of choice was (upgraded) T-64s. I'll grant that moving someone from T-64 to T-72 will be easier than Leopard/Challenger/Abrams. They are also training more soldiers than they had before the war; no reason to train the new guys on old equipment.

Solid point on the logistics, but again the T-72 wasn't their primary tank. And in the first couple months of the war Ukraine's logistics competence surprised everyone.
The ukrainians are actually perfectly capable of producing modern main battle tanks the problem is during 2019 to 2014 the idiots at the defense Ministry decided to continuously export them and fill out all the contracts instead of using all the tanks they constructed to the equip the Ukrainian Army
Because of this they only have four of the domestically produced main battle tank the t84

Man maybe if someone just invaded your country you should focus more on building up your own military instead of sitting around going yeah we we're going to keep exporting these extremely needed modern tanks for reasons

That's because they kept electing people like petrol poroshenko zielinsky who believed in peaceful solutions to the Russian problem
Don't vote for liberals when someone is occupying a large percentage of your country

 
Not all contractors are the same. Some of them are civilians collecting a paycheck, but others are put in uniform. You aren't subject to the UCMJ or part of any military branch. You are a uniformed contractor because it afforded them protections under the Geneva convention. That is, if Foreign (russian) intelligence scoops you up, you have to be treated as POW under the Geneva convention. But DoD was super anal about when and where you can wear the uniform.
Its pretty common for military medical personnel.
My guess would be anyone wrenching on tanks in a war zone is going to be in a uniform. Not sure how that'd shake out if you're working for the DoD in Ukraine.
Thank you for making my point more succinct.

In regards to civilian contractors wearing combat uniforms, for both of my deployments none of those I saw or worked with wore complete sets; at most they'd rock an old DCU field jacket, separate trousers, or the same in civilian patterns, and most common were Army-issued coveralls. It wasn't until I got to Carson in '06 that I saw our civilian mechanics wearing full ACUs w/ nametapes, headgear, and insignia; which I assumed was something stipulated by an anal general who signed their contracts.

But again they didn't wear them downrange. Not that it would've made any difference to the hajis, even if they got captured; because they'd still get beheaded no matter what they're wearing.

At least the Russians aren't totally subhuman, just mostly.

Edit:
I just found something that I haven't seen yet; scraps purported to be from a Russian SU-25 shot-down in Ukraine for sale, with accompanying art piece.
$300.00

Authentic aluminum exterior skin fragment with original camouflage paint from Russian Federation Sukhoi Su-25 ground attack aircraft lost in combat outside Kyiv, Ukraine in 2022, combined with the artwork of Ron Cole in this 11x17-inch wall-hanging display.
The Ukrainian people have proven to the world that they are both resilient and innovative, both on the battlefield and with how they've found ways to support themselves in a time of great crisis. Over the past few months, Cole's Aircraft has connected with some fine patriots in the region with access to the detritus of their fight for survival. Parts of Russian combat aircraft, such as this Su-25, have been salvaged and sent directly to us in the United States. We're happy to help support our Ukrainian friends, and simultaneously offer these pieces to people around the world who appreciate these historic events, the aircraft involved, as well as the spirit of Ukrainian resistance. Nobody knows how the situation will evolve in the future - but for now, we have a limited amount of this material to share with you.
Each display is framed as shown and signed & numbered by the artist.

Su-25-virt.jpg
My non-art fag take is there's way too much going on in this image, and I highly doubt the bird in question dropped it's ordnance pretty much as the pilot was punching out, especially at such a low altitude.

6JI6EN6PQZLVZP2GONAJHRU4PA_480x480.jpg
For $300 I'd want more proof that it's actually from a combat-loss airframe; not just their say-so, a photo of some random crash-site in Ukraine, and essentially undamaged, perfectly cut pieces.... especially since there's sources for cut up pieces of Sukhois & MiGs for sale, even on Facebook & Amazon.

Considering how well this war & aircraft losses have been documented, for $300 I'd expect they at least geolocate the crash. And hell, include a picture of the pilot too, alive or not.
 
Last edited:
Masterful propaganda from former progressive darling Glenn Greenwald, worth your half an hour.
There is literally no criticism of Russia in all his war videos and opinions. I think maybe he said 2-3 times that Russia invaded which is bad, followed by BUUUUT! long rants about NATO and the US.
Everything wrong is the US' fault. Nothing bad would've happened without the US. Russia and Ukraine are almost non-existent entities, they have no intentions or plans of their own. They are simple reactionary forces responding to the one country that truly exists, the US.
There's fearmongering about nuclear war, just on time with the Kremlin line of these last 2 days after tanks got mentioned.
There are also rather nauseating mentions of the Donbas situation, which is described as occurring in a country that nobody should care about, and Glenn thinks that it's just normal that Donbas and Crimea suddenly change nationality, there are no mentions of Russian infiltration or arming and fighting with separatists.
Glenn also essentially embraces the America First Trump isolationist agenda, nearly explicitly, which is quite the insane turn of events.
Do these people realize that their failure to ever criticize Russia, in dozens of hours of war content where US, EU and Ukraine are demonized, is highly suspicious?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back