What the hell is the point then other than confuse people?
Because sometimes they don't know when vehichle was destroyed? Documentation of battlefield isn't the first thing to do.
Logic and actions of US implies that they did.
But there are no evidence about that, yes?
Even retarded blogging communists can debunk this faggot
So you cannot bring any evidence of that exotic theory, right?
Can you at least properly use quote tool?
There is apperantely photos floting around on Telegram (or so west says) but we only have their word, and US reactions to use.
Can you show them? Or make any estimations how many of HIMARS was destructed?
Sorry man, but at this moment you are telling all of us that Oryx is photoshoped so cannot be trusted, but ruzzkie words without any visual evidence are true&honest and we should trust them.
you can simply post any 10 images off his front page and I will in detail explain how more than half of them are either old, fake (as in not destroyed vehicle just battle damaged or dirty), fake (as in posting UK losses as RU losses), or fake and gay in that they are photoshop creations by piglet propagandists.
Pick five random choosed and debunk them, go ahead.
Also - even if ruzzkie kill-count is two times bigger, and Ukrainian is two times lower they are still more smasbed ruzzkie shit than Ukrainian.
Assertation that not a single one was damaged is silly.
I will agree when I will see any evidence of smashed HIMARS. Way of use makes them extremly hard to attack (mostly their used in 'hit&run', but they are waaay from frontline both when hit and when run).
If Ukraine was fighting a war against any competent force I would agree that probably some of them was destroyed in one way or another, but great lord - Ukraine has war with ruzzkies, and ruzzkies are fucking idiots which cannot figure out how to secure own financial assets in west banks. That bunch of idiots burned several times and sunk own (and sole) CVL when it stays in shipyard. We are talking about ruzzkies, they are really extreme stupid (see: New Years Eve massacre admitted even by TASS. Ruzzkie soldiers want a party and used cellphones to air live transmission on social media using Ukrainian GSM service).
So no, as long as I didn't see any evidence that ruzzkies destroyed HIMARS I count 0 smashed down HIMARS.
NYT: "EU and NATO want to expand".
They need to expand due to ruzzkieland behavior. All former Warsaw Pact countries that joined NATO do it only because they try to avoid war with ruzzia - and it worked, ruzzia only try to invades countries outside of NATO.
tl'dr: ruzzia is isolated and going to be fucked due to own actions.
Why the hell is it even in US treasury jurisdiction? State departement I could understand, but this?
Because status of international criminal organization is related mostly to illegal economic activities, not being badass. And the sole aim is to prohibit american units off all kind (legal persons and so one) from making a deal with such organisations.
More:
https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/fr87_3207.pdf
Also whit the Germoney MOD: OK, point for You, some NATO officials are starting talking about the reality that ruzzkieland is warmonger.
Do not register or you will eventually be put on a list for them to ask you to be deported.
Still Ukraine isn't trying to force anyone comeback to fight.
I fail to see how sending 2 or 3 tank companies, MAYBE a year from now will do much of anything except stall Russia before the tanks get blown the fuck up. Its not like tanks are a magic weapon that will push Russia out of the Donbass. Its a delaying tactic at best, burning money at worst
Declared package of tanks from last few days is consisting already at least more than 100 west tanks (Leclercs, Leopards, Challangers, Abrams) and now some countires started to declaring more tanks from other eras (Poland added 30 PT-91 and 30 T-72 to this list). I bet that it will be around 300-400 tanks sended to end of spring.
Also this is a big number - 100 tanks is around one armoured brigade. And this is just the same scheme that used with HIMARS, in first pack their are going few vechicles, latter their will send more.
Other thing is that it is always a possibility that official numbers are lower than real ones - in theory NATO never used own soldiers i Ukraine, in pratice ruzzkielanders are crying about foreign soldiers of fortune and whole units of them by Ukraine.