Science Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’

  • Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
  • Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
  • Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
  • Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”
[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walker:Part of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalist:Oh my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.
Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs -- eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.



Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

 
People always repeat that veritas are big fat liars, but never elaborate to anything substantial. The only thing I am think of is that weird project acorn video from like 15 years ago, but acorn itself was sketchy. As far as I know they've won every defamation suit against them. Also every news organization edits videos for the spicy bits. No one wants to listen to 20 minutes of banality for 1 minute of something interesting.
They snuck into a building dressed as a construction crew. But that just used to be journalism.

On the other hand, they’ve successfully sued NYT for defamation, and I think THAT nugget is why Pfizer is biting its lips

Is there a link/archive to this tweet?
It’s like the only thing Pfizer has tweeted for days. Just go look.

Edit: I am a fag who wrote this before I looked.
 
I love how every normie is defending Pfizer as if they own the company.
The way the left adores the corporations is just astounding to me. The 1980s left in the uk was all about how companies and government fucked over the working man and how to stand up against it. And yes I know that’s not what the Marxist left has ever really meant, but the unions/workers movements I grew up with are what I’d consider to be the older left. That they have gone from the miners strike to defending Pfizer of all things, and eagerly gobbling any corporate tat, idea, ideology and product or drug they’re fed - astonishing.
Whichever branch of the government dark arts manages that deserves trebles all round, frankly. They’re evil, but efficient
 
Not to mention that Veritas would absolutely be sued into the ground by Pfizer's legion of lawyers if this was a misrepresentation. Instead, look at the language used by Pfizer in relation to this fiasco. If it was a lie, don't you think they'd have said so?
Is there a link/archive to this tweet?
Nah this is a fake tweet. They've just blocked all responses to their tweets for now
 
They snuck into a building dressed as a construction crew. But that just used to be journalism.

On the other hand, they’ve successfully sued NYT for defamation, and I think THAT nugget is why Pfizer is biting its lips

The one charge I can find on PV was misdemeanor of trespassing on federal property under false pretenses.

Honestly, if you are a under cover investigating journalist and you never got hit with a charge like that you are either shit at your job that you never did anything groundbreaking or solid snake and never detected.

I do like how vaxtards will hold that one charge against PV while simultaneously ignoring the 1.2 billion dollar fine Pfizer got hit with for misleading consumers.
 
Not to mention that Veritas would absolutely be sued into the ground by Pfizer's legion of lawyers if this was a misrepresentation. Instead, look at the language used by Pfizer in relation to this fiasco. If it was a lie, don't you think they'd have said so?
I don't think we have any provenance on that Pfizer tweet yet. I've also never actually seen anyone use the term 'malinformation' in the wild like that. It's too cerebral of a bullshit to be effective when they could just say 'misinformation' instead. I think they're holding off on it until they get to spend a few more grinding people down before they start telling them that true things should be rejected because you're too stupid to think about them the right way.
 
this is why companies like Pfizer have draconian internal policies for dealing with the media. whatever the truth of what's actually happening inside a company like that, the media guys who are out there looking for stories are fucking predators. they know which stories have an audience waiting for them and all they need to get is a couple compromising pictures, a couple of unflattering lines caught on recording, just enough to make it look bad because they know what the audience wants to believe is way more important than the actual mundane details. if you can provide a plausible path to the thing the audience already wants to believe, bam, instant viral news story. truth is only valuable as seasoning - you want enough to make it interesting, but not too much or you lose the sensational flavor. this retard made the mistake of choosing to trust somebody while being a prime target for predatory journalism
Amazing. You have accurately described the modus operandi of every mainstream media organisation...yet that is absolutely not what has happened here. Just incredible.

@AgendaPoster
I should mention he completely lacks the qualifications for such a position,
Sure...if academic achievements and professional experience were the qualifications Pfizer was looking for. But he is a black homosexual, and I very strongly suspect those are the criteria by which he gained his position.
 
Last edited:
Redditors are the kinds of people who’d write letters to Stalin thinking he’d get them out of the gulags. Fuck ‘em.

Did you watch the follow up, where the guy starts yelling that he was "lying to impress a date" and does the instinctual nigger bolt? It's pretty awesome. These Veritas guys need to start adding a "why don't you take a seat over there" segment to all their shit.
 
Published anywhere?
His LinkedIn straight up had his Pfizer job on it before he nuked it.

1674850455820.png
 
Published anywhere?
Published As in his publications? No just two confirmations via text with screenshots of what looks like what comes up on teams when you search someone. Sent to me personally. I’m not putting them here, they both have their little circle pictures and names on. Believe or not, I guess I can’t prove it. But I trust both of them, they’re guys I’ve worked with on and off for over ten years, both decent blokes.
 
Or you're trying to us SIGN (shame, insult, guilt and need-to-be-right) to browbeat people to accept your opinion, that's also a possibility.
Hmm yes, a fellow KS enjoyer. That phrase is really helpful beyond personal relationships and it helps narrow down well intentioned critical thinkers or those who in this case identify as Vaccinated:tm:
 
Did you watch the follow up, where the guy starts yelling that he was "lying to impress a date"
I said this in the coof thread, but seriously, what sort of woman/faggot (cause this mark looks fruity) gets impressed by their date revealing evil plots?

Should we ask the posters at the Beauty Parlour if they like it when men plot to destroy the world?
 
I said this in the coof thread, but seriously, what sort of woman/faggot (cause this mark looks fruity) gets impressed by their date revealing evil plots?

Should we ask the posters at the Beauty Parlour if they like it when men plot to destroy the world?

lol, that's what I was thinking... and then I thought... well, fag morality must be pretty twisted.
 
I said this in the coof thread, but seriously, what sort of woman/faggot (cause this mark looks fruity) gets impressed by their date revealing evil plots?

Should we ask the posters at the Beauty Parlour if they like it when men plot to destroy the world?
Maybe it's like those chicks who dig school shooters
edit for typo
 
Last edited:
Nah this is a fake tweet. They've just blocked all responses to their tweets for now
probably fake but they are deleting tweets. i remember one with a black kid and some text of how great their vaccine is. EDIT: found archive from my claim, didnt found the fbi tweet https://archive.is/Fw79C
here is the kicker. they forgot to block the comments
left them a pepe for their troubles
 
Last edited:
It's just what happens when you put a diversity hire in a role he is not suited for.

It goes without saying that when you're planning an evil plot of questionable legality in addition to being completely unethical that if you're on the team you shut the fuck up. You never tell anyone about it. Ever. Go about your day and collect your fat paycheck for doing your part.

Nah, let's share this over a few beers with some dude I met on Grindr because I needed some dick.

Yeah, lol.
 
It's just what happens when you put a diversity hire in a role he is not suited for.

It goes without saying that when you're planning an evil plot of questionable legality in addition to being completely unethical that if you're on the team you shut the fuck up. You never tell anyone about it. Ever. Go about your day and collect your fat paycheck for doing your part.

Nah, let's share this over a few beers with some dude I met on Grindr because I needed some dick.

Yeah, lol.
Always hire fagfro-american gay penis inspectors, because ESG is important to impress your Davos sponsors while eviling
 
Back