Science Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
  • Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
  • Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
  • Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
  • Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”
[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walker:Part of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalist:Oh my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.
Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs -- eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.



Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

 
A bit of a white pill though, there were democrats and republican elected officials in that Twitter spaces last night that are coming together to investigate.
I really wish I could share your optimism. At best, the investigators and the politicians would work hand in hand to find a "few rogue employees", all at low and mid level to be the scapegoats. They get terminated, tarred and feathered, and Pfizer gets a (relatively) microscopic fine. So many of these people were very happy to profit off of Pfizer stocks when government regulation and business pressure led to it being practically mandated.
This is an easy way to look like they actually give a shit about their subjects and distance themselves from being part of a group that forced it on the people.
 
He's saying that they're mutating it so they can preemptively make vaccines for different mutations and then if that particular strain pops up in the wild they will release that version of the vaccine.
You're retarded if you believe that Pfizer would spend all that time and money on developing a vaccine for a virus that doesn't exist yet for "just in case."

They're thinking: "we made all this money for vaccine that not only doesn't work, but also killing people, with the government protecting us. Imagine how much money we can make with the next outbreak!'

"Yeah, but who knows when that's going to happen?"

"💡"
 
You're retarded if you believe that Pfizer would spend all that time and money on developing a vaccine for a virus that doesn't exist yet for "just in case."

They're thinking: "we made all this money for vaccine that not only doesn't work, but also killing people, with the government protecting us. Imagine how much money we can make with the next outbreak!'

"Yeah, but who knows when that's going to happen?"

"💡"
I don't believe that at all and said I believe that's something they'd to, I am just saying the guy didn't admit to that part in the video, so if you say "he straight up admits they're going to infect the world" and then someone watches the video and he doesn't say that, they'll dismiss the whole thing.

I absolutely want to see the evil fucks in these companies nailed to the wall, but I think misrepresenting the words that came out of his mouth and what he was willing to admit to is only going to hurt the story.
 
I'm not putting EVERYONE in that basket, and that's why I was trying to be careful about what I refer to as "The Current Left", or the most marketable/marketed to demographics among the political left. That being said, I am putting "The Current Left" in a basket, because the generalization is fair. I'm aware of visibility bias, and won't shy away from the realization that it's simply easier to see people who are stereotypical, but in a "democratic system", it's not too uncharitable to judge a group by their mouthpieces, because those mouthpieces and highly visible examples are the rule, rather than the exception.

Some part of that has a lot to do to the fact that (in my opinion), we, as an entire society, are quickly moving on a vector pointed towards a monoculture. It's hard not to ignore the slow extinction of subcultures in the youth, or the general evaporation of forms/genres of media, even inside of pop culture. I think this is a partial side-effect of rapid globalization, which is why, for example there are so many 'woke', or outright generic movies, because they have to appeal to every country on earth. I'm starting to notice this on every social scale, big and small. On a long enough timescale, this narrowing of cultural diversity is naturally going to create more "NPCs" or "Living Stereotypes", which is why Zoomers all look the same and have far less (and far fewer) niche interests than the Millenials or Gen X. I'm not trying to "kids these days" about this, as I'm not that old and I do a pretty good job at keeping a finger on the membrane of the current generation, but noticing this worries me.

As for the left, in terms of general leftist policies, I can put all of them in a basket because I don't agree with any autistically specific flavor of leftism "that doesn't work because real leftism has never been tried" on anything that isn't a surface-level or less important issue, barring like one or two exceptions.

TL;DR, I think the world really is becoming more black and white as time moves on, whether we want it to be, or not.


ALSO:

Which is FUCKING RETARDED unless this really is intended to be a bioweapon, because the chances of a virus mutating in a lab, in a way that even remotely resembles what could happen naturally, is fucking NIL.
I disagree with your point about the monoculture in one sense, and I still think you are using a very niche brush with which to paint something as big as the population of the US. I think people are becoming more atomized and alienated than ever. I guess its because I dont necessarily equate culture with pop culture completely. there is overlap though.

Hollywood has figured out the optimal recipe for maximizing profits. The z-list superhero movie stuffed with woke bullshit and shitty cgi can be sold to children, low iq adults, and the chinese. This is like a shining example of the success of free market capitalism enable by globalism. Maximize profits by selling the lowest cost (effort) product you can and adding in meaningless woke bullshit because its free and wont cost you customers. I'm not saying I know how to fix this- I've thought a lot about "what is to be done" and I have no fucking idea. But this is what I mean about how the terms left/right have been rendered meaningless because everyone defines them differently. Maybe its that you see the woke shit as the driver and I see it as an annoying distraction that will probably peter out in the next few years.

I feel a lot of frustration when I see all the world's ills being blamed on "leftists" because the things that they are blamed for arent even leftist, theyre neo-liberal bullshit. Its become harder for Americans, especially young adults to delude ourselves into thinking everything is gonna just keep getting better and better.
 
I don't believe that at all and said I believe that's something they'd to, I am just saying the guy didn't admit to that part in the video, so if you say "he straight up admits they're going to infect the world" and then someone watches the video and he doesn't say that, they'll dismiss the whole thing.

I absolutely want to see the evil fucks in these companies nailed to the wall, but I think misrepresenting the words that came out of his mouth and what he was willing to admit to is only going to hurt the story.
He didn't have to outright say it, they wouldn't be making "vaccines" for viruses that don't exist in nature unless they were going to intentionally release it so that they could sell said vaccine. That is 100% what they plan on doing.
 
Then there’s the other side which brought you asbestos in baby powder
And as it turns out there's a lawsuit in the works because some of the people who accused J&J of putting asbestos in talcum powder were exposed elsewhere, even after stating they had zero exposure save the talcum powder.
I'd always like to imagine Hillary Clinton in a dark lit room menacingly sipping a cup of tea while conjuring up a plan to live in Donald Trump's head forever. Oh, after getting out the shower and wearing a nightgown.
Stop it. Get some help.
What blows me away was that the Phizer Phaggot actually thought he was talking to another fag. The black one was more campy than Lamar Latrelle, but the other guy sounds and behaves totally normal. I'd suggest nigger fags are so desperate for White dick that they lose all rationality but, well, the fact that they're nigger fags already precludes rationality.
@John.Doe can tell you stories about all the nigger faggots who want his 6'+ Aryan ass to bleach them harder than Mengele ever would. They might even ask him to leave the jackboots and armband on during sex.
 
Boston Consulting Group glows with the light of six million burning jews*.
View attachment 4345096

View attachment 4345140

View attachment 4345180

View attachment 4345204


There is so much to dig into here it is daunting. The more I look the more I see an organizations deeply imbedded with the US government. Manipulating election results, crashing the financial market, and always profiting off of the suffering of the American people. These are the people who are "advising" Pfizer on how to capture the FDA regulators, bypass CDC controls, and sell the US government billions of dollars of untested drugs. It isn't just the US people they are fucking over. When Russia refused to follow WHO directives during the start of the pandemic they began to withdraw financial support. When the Russians began their campaign in Ukraine they were able to donate food, medical supplies, and weapons to the Ukrainian government in less than 24 hours.


*in that they are black as the devil because the holocaust never happened, but it should
So like a good ol' rebel we can blame the damn yankees again?
 
What drives me crazy is that the left is intentionally burying their head in the sand about this and cheering on "their media" squelching this. To what end? Like what the actual fuck is the logic here? You're the fucking ones who got vaccinated. There are clearly issues with the vaccines at this point - excess deaths are up across the world - and we don't know to what extent, what's causing it, or ANYTHING. We need to draw attention to this so we can start to work on some kind of solution or cure to people who may be vaxx injured, or if its something else - identify it. We can't do that if this entire thing continues to be suppressed. Like this isn't minecraft, you can't cancel myocarditis because you don't agree with it.

It's like leading a fucking horse to water. I'm about ready to just give up trying to convince friends/family that got the vax to at least go to a doctor and get an EKG or something.
 
Will you fucking stop trying to bait the man into the thread?

I get it, he shitposts and does drive-by insults and you don't like it, but you look like a far bigger retard getting this level of butthurt over it.

So is there any source this guy actually works for pfizer other than Project Veritas? They could have just gotten some guy off the street to read a script.
Well, you have multiple pages worth of fucking links that show he does in this thread, so yes. Check pages 5-8.

What blows me away was that the Phizer Phaggot actually thought he was talking to another fag. The black one was more campy than Lamar Latrelle, but the other guy sounds and behaves totally normal. I'd suggest nigger fags are so desperate for White dick that they lose all rationality but, well, the fact that they're nigger fags already precludes rationality.
During one of the Twitter ones before Elon bought that platform, the PV Honeypot got the target to explain for like 10 minutes that he had been specifically told to not use things like Tinder and Grindr because of the risk of O'Keefe's feelers being out there.

He then proceeded to spill the beans for 10 fucking minutes. These people are all about hookup culture, to the point where they'll take the risk of it being a plant just if there's a chance they get laid.
 
During one of the Twitter ones before Elon bought that platform, the PV Honeypot got the target to explain for like 10 minutes that he had been specifically told to not use things like Tinder and Grindr because of the risk of O'Keefe's feelers being out there.

He then proceeded to spill the beans for 10 fucking minutes. These people are all about hookup culture, to the point where they'll take the risk of it being a plant just if there's a chance they get laid.
Yes, homosexuals are the OG Coomers
 
Pol Pot had the right idea, he just didn't think big enough.
Pol Pot.jpg
 
If I were a glowie, and I was on a date trying to impress a girl, I'd absolutely tell her about the time me and my boys overthrew a South American leader to install a puppet government. I'd imply I knew who killed Kennedy, but maybe she could extract the information out me, if you know what I'm saying. I'd be like, "hey, baby, you ever fuck on an alien spacecraft recovered from the Nevada desert? No? Do you want to?" Like, having a hand in shaping world history, or doing something unique and/or mysterious is impressive to people, and people lie or exaggerate on dates all the time. I'd tell a girl I could take her to where they faked the moon landing and she could jerk me off into Neil Armstrong's lunar footprint, and I'd really sell it, boy, would I make her believe every word I said. But, in reality, it would just be a quarry where I pressed down a rainboot a few hours before meeting up with her. Maybe I'd tell her the truth after, maybe not, who cares? Anyway, yeah, he may have been flexing how much power he has, or he may have been playing it up. Regardless, it does seem like this dude worked at Pfizer, and might know something he shouldn't be revealing to Grindr dates, but he can't help himself; he just wants to suck some dick a little too much
I see what your point is, but there's kind of a massive gap between "I'll tell you who killed Kennedy if you swallow" and "We're gonna make wads of cash by making everyone sick and selling the cure."
 
Back