Science Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’

• Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
• Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
• Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
• Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”

[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walkerart of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalisth my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.

Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs -- eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.

…

Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’ … ‘That is Not What We Say to the Public’ … ‘People Won’t Like That’ … ‘Don’t Tell Anyone’

Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.

www.projectveritas.com

Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company…

archived 26 Jan 2023 01:25:36 UTC

archive.ph

 

[Otterly]

Straight white men are just statistically more likely to be competent and thus less likely to spill their guts to whores on Tinder.

Diversity hires are not suitable for the roles hoisted upon them.

There has been a lot of stuff in the press this past year about the James Webb telescope and how awfully homophobic nasa and him were blah blah cancel him and rename the telescope. But he wasn’t conducting a witch hunt against gays for being gay - the Lavender Scare was about how easily compromised they were, and how easy it was to get confidential data out of them either by honeypots, or by blackmail. It was a security issue. Plus ca change.
I’ll bet dollars to donuts that every pharma on the planet will have a sanitised all hands email about talking to the press on Monday.

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

internet autists see this coping and cognitive dissonance and warp it into: the left loves corporations and trusts them completely.

I am teetering on the edge of wanting to agree with most of what you're saying, but I have to make objection to this.

The Left LOVES corporations, and they DO trust them completely.

This isn't the Left from the days of the Bush/Gore or Bush/Kerry races, back when they did give a shit about things, and wanted to do something. This is the Left of the TikTok generation. This is the Left of Apple Soyboys and Avocado Toast. The only two things this current Left cares about are Climate Change, and the appearance of being morally correct, while also being moral relativists. They get their information the same way Republican Boomers get their information, which is through the path of least resistance, usually Cable TV or the Surface Web Big 5 news sites. They are the biggest offenders of hyperconsumerism, and conspicuous consumerism. When their team wins, they trust their government like a religion, and they also know that corporations control the government, ergo, they trust corporations, and have to treat them like a sacred calf, next to Democracy, and Empty-Handed Egalitarianism. They won't declare this openly, in fact, they'll insist that the opposite is true, but they quite literally would be nothing without the morning Frappuccino. I have not seen this Left ever utter the phrase, "Big Pharma", when their predecessors coined the phrase.

Like I said, but it's worth rephrasing, The Current Left, is the same personality type as The Republican Boomer. The lifelong company-man who always has a 'bootstraps adage' in the chamber. The guy whose Plasma TV has burn-in, in the shape of the Fox News logo in the bottom right corner of the screen. The only things that set them apart are personal views. I know this, because peoplewatching is my hobby, which is made extremely easy by way of my job, where I'm in their homes. The Current Left unironically watches CNN, they have the Funko Pop collection, they have Huffpo as a permanent tab on their Macbook Air, and they're the only people still asking me if I've been vaccinated.

 

[CognitiveDeficiency]

Pfizer has about 78,000 employees. When you’ve been in the industry a couple of decades, amd colleagues move around, you end up knowing a lot of people across various companies. It’s hardly insider knowledge to have someone say ‘yeah this guy shows up in the corporate directory so he works here.’ It’s not like they’re spilling top secret data. People are talking about this, it’s rustled some jammies.
I honestly don’t mind if you think I’m larping, but for the record, I’m not. Or maybe I am? Perhaps I work at Greggs and my only expertise is how frankensteiny the sausage rolls are? Who can say, in these strange times we live in.
The left sucks corporate cock, if that accusation upsets them they should have a think. And in turn, corpos love the left - sponsor a few pride floats and chuck some funko pops at people and they’ll forgive you using child slaves and asset stripping your country. They’ll even fight your corner against the nasty right! For free.

Stop eating Greggs. I can give you my recipe for sosig and puff pastry if you need it, but for the love of God stop eating that goyslop.

 

[Jimjamflimflam]

I think you should just take his word for it. It's important to have a healthy skepticism of everything except faggots posting about their unverifiable insider info in the autistic thunderdome thread.

the guy you're responding to is either just a larping schizo or like a low level lab tech. He can't stop mentioning his bona fides which is a sure sign that he has none. the following isnt directed to you, but this thread in general.

nobody with a working brain stem- left or right- likes/trusts/adores (lol) corporations in general, big pharma especially, and pfizer in particular. Liberals in the US have been having a narcissistic injury since trump got elected. They project their feelings of anger and humiliation onto trump. And to be fair, trump did say a lot of stupid shit about covid- but you cant convince me that fewer people would be dead if clinton had been president. They also direct their rage and derision at all the morons who thought they were rosa parks for refusing to wear masks in costco. "trust the science" is a cope and a taunt. 99% of people who took the vaccine did so because they were desperate to get back to work or scared about being fat/old and dying. The democrats lick big pharma taint with the same enthusiasm as the GOP. suggesting that libs want to fellate big pharma is the same as saying the average republican loves Dow chemical and thinks all the environmental damage they have done is "based" just because they think protesting it is a waste of time.

liberals in the US should be ashamed of themselves because they never penalize their own party leaders for being bargain basement center-right fuck-ups who enjoy being the opposition party because then they can just shrug their shoulders and not even pretend to push anything but the most faggoty idpol bullshit.

internet autists see this coping and cognitive dissonance and warp it into: the left loves corporations and trusts them completely.

The covid shit is all a red herring. Both the left and right should be riled up about the fact that they will be the first generation in this country's history to be worse off financially than their parents. Stagnated wages, college debt for a degree that cant get them a decent job, the "gig" economy (which is more dystopian than covid), massive inflation, a surveillance state that was already so far up our asses that they didnt need the pandemic to increase their access, crumbling infrastructure, Israel dictating middle eastern foreign policy to both parties... the list goes on and on.

Imagine running this much interference for a multi billion, multi national company and doing it all for free.

Lulz kill yourself

 

[ShitLurker]

It's great stuff. First he explains that he's "literally a liar" and only bragging about helping to murder people to get another fag's dick hard. Then he encourages the restaurant to participate in a kidnapping by telling them not to unlock the doors so people could leave, then his diversity-hire, peanut brain realizes he's actually fucked, and that afro-flight instinct kicks in.

https://twitter.com/hodgetwins/status/1618767434613411840

Am I being retarded or is my connection being shit? Because I saw it for a second through nitter and when I wanted to play it I get tweet not exist errors and on twitter something went wrong errors. Is it archived?

 

[mister fireworks]

I am teetering on the edge of wanting to agree with most of what you're saying, but I have to make objection to this.

The Left LOVES corporations, and they DO trust them completely.

This isn't the Left from the days of the Bush/Gore or Bush/Kerry races, back when they did give a shit about things, and wanted to do something. This is the Left of the TikTok generation. This is the Left of Apple Soyboys and Avocado Toast. The only two things this current Left cares about are Climate Change, and the appearance of being morally correct, while also being moral relativists. They get their information the same way Republican Boomers get their information, which is through the path of least resistance, usually Cable TV or the Surface Web Big 5 news sites. They are the biggest offenders of hyperconsumerism, and conspicuous consumerism, when their team wins, they trust their government like a religion, and they also know that corporations control the government, ergo, they trust corporations, and have to treat like a sacred calf, next to Democracy, and Empty-Handed Egalitarianism.

Like I said, but it's worth rephrasing, The Current Left, is the same personality type as The Republican Boomer. The lifelong company-man who always has a 'bootstraps adage' in the chamber. The guy whose Plasma TV has burn-in, in the shape of the Fox News logo in the bottom right corner of the screen. The only things that set them apart are personal views. I know this, because peoplewatching is my hobby, which is made extremely easy by way of my job, where I'm in their homes. The Current Left unironically watches CNN, they have the Funko Pop collection, they have Huffpo as a permanent tab on their Macbook Air, and they're the only people still asking me if I've been vaccinated.

I think you are mistaking memes and twitter faggots for "the left". The comparison that came to mind was back in the 90s, early 2000s when liberals thought Bush voters were drooling retards who though every sand nigger "hated us or our freedoms" and blindly supported the invasion of iraq as thew only means to stop terrorism in the US. Truth is bush voters just didnt really care either way- the cost of the war was not something that was "felt" personally by Americans. Hell, even the libs who REEE'd about the war relied on the argument that the weapons of mass destruction were fake. They didnt ask, why are we in afganhistan/iraq when most of the terrorists were saudis, and the Saudis wanted Saddam out of power since the gulf war.

I think one of the toughest things about discussing politics in the US is that we are stuck with using terms like left/right when most people ant even agree on the definition of each as it relates to the US population. A lot of the stuff you mentioned about "the left" transcends politics in the US. The people you see in real life (apparently a lot of douchey looking macbook users) and what the algorithm serves up fore you online will always be influential on how you view the larger world. I know that I have personally fallen into the trap of not realizing that the shit I see in the specific online places I go is not a perfectly objective window into the world. I get frustrated when I see people talking about the left as this soy-filled monolith, because its self-defeating. It reminds me of when clinton spent her whole campaign calling trump voters evil racists who were too dumb to vote in their own interest.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Slightly off-topic but I found this blog post posted by a guy named Jordon Walker back in 2011 and could it be the same guy then PV caught?
https://ivypremed.blogspot.com/2011/05/me-and-my-blog.html ( https://archive.ph/vt0Ry )

There's some recent comments who was dropped about the incident with PV.

 

[mister fireworks]

You're weaving in shocking statements with truths and half-truths, but it's all meant to deflect from the main issue. Stop it.

Not my problem you find the truth shocking. The main issue is that this nigger's statements are not verified true because some other poster claims to work in biotech. Nothing @Otterly has said in this thread indicates that they are anything but a low level employee at pfizer.

 

[Makhno]

You had me up to the part where the feds deliberately allowed Elon to get ahold of Twitter because it outlived its usefulness to Biden Administration, which as you can see, didn't take all that long. Remember, the government gave the CDC and Twitter's old management the greenlight to suppress every piece of data critical of mRNA vaccines for nearly two years. Considering Twitter is such a useful propaganda tool for the DNC, they would not have allowed Elon to buy Twitter out if they even had that degree of direct control over the platform.

Not to play defense for Elon, of course. He's shady as fuck and he has all this unwarranted support from weird techbro nerds and room temperature IQ freeze peach absolutists. The only reason he seems like the good guy now is because his long-term interests for the future of the West run conflict with the real Great Satan, Klaus Schwab.

Not the Biden admin lol the military industrial complex and global Judeo-Anglo empire built on economic hegemony. People who actually think what party occupies the White House matters after 1965 are total fucking retards who like to play childish games of pretend team sports in lieu of taking personal agency in their own futures.

 

[Jar-Jar Fanboy]

I said this in the coof thread, but seriously, what sort of woman/faggot (cause this mark looks fruity) gets impressed by their date revealing evil plots?

Should we ask the posters at the Beauty Parlour if they like it when men plot to destroy the world?

If I were a glowie, and I was on a date trying to impress a girl, I'd absolutely tell her about the time me and my boys overthrew a South American leader to install a puppet government. I'd imply I knew who killed Kennedy, but maybe she could extract the information out me, if you know what I'm saying. I'd be like, "hey, baby, you ever fuck on an alien spacecraft recovered from the Nevada desert? No? Do you want to?" Like, having a hand in shaping world history, or doing something unique and/or mysterious is impressive to people, and people lie or exaggerate on dates all the time. I'd tell a girl I could take her to where they faked the moon landing and she could jerk me off into Neil Armstrong's lunar footprint, and I'd really sell it, boy, would I make her believe every word I said. But, in reality, it would just be a quarry where I pressed down a rainboot a few hours before meeting up with her. Maybe I'd tell her the truth after, maybe not, who cares? Anyway, yeah, he may have been flexing how much power he has, or he may have been playing it up. Regardless, it does seem like this dude worked at Pfizer, and might know something he shouldn't be revealing to Grindr dates, but he can't help himself; he just wants to suck some dick a little too much

 

[afternoon_tea]

I really wish people would stop spinning this as the guy admitting Pfizer is planning to release the mutated virus to infect the public. I believe as much as many of you that they are greedy and evil enough to do something like that, but that's not what this guy admitted to.

He's saying that they're mutating it so they can preemptively make vaccines for different mutations and then if that particular strain pops up in the wild they will release that version of the vaccine.

It's dangerous and unethical gain of function research all to make a buck and that should be bad enough, the guy even fucking admits he knows this kind of research is what probably lead to the pandemic in the first place.

The reason I think this matters is if you try and sell this story as something it's not then people are going to easily be able to debunk that aspect and ignore the actually fucked up shit he actually admitted to. The part about how pharmaceutical companies are basically an arm of the government also shouldn't be ignored.

This story is serious shit and it's already going to have an uphill battle gaining traction because of the powerful entities involved, only focusing on something that's not even said outright in the interview is going to make it even harder to gain traction with people who might be on the fence.

 

[Makhno]

Yeah I’d agree with this. You dont walk into director level easily. An MD isn’t enough and urology experience isn’t getting you the knowledge you need for complex research like this.
What stands out to me is the BCG stint and the bit I think I saw in his CV earlier in this thread or another about a stint doing mandarin.
BCG, like many consultants are basically another corporate/government/spy arm. That he had some involvement with china with a consultancy that’s fairly shady, then directly into director level in a research area he has zero background in is shady. The short reporting chain is odd. Not completely unknown, but the people I know who do this are working in specific projects way above their pay grade (nothing shady, I must add for the ones I know.)
I am also fairly sure I’ve seen BCG involved in other ‘pies’ but I’ll leave that to my fellow autists to dig up

He went to Yale where he did sexual favors for the right people simple as.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

What blows me away was that the Phizer Phaggot actually thought he was talking to another fag. The black one was more campy than Lamar Latrelle, but the other guy sounds and behaves totally normal. I'd suggest nigger fags are so desperate for White dick that they lose all rationality but, well, the fact that they're nigger fags already precludes rationality.

 

[Ser Prize]

I'd imply I knew who killed Kennedy, but maybe she could extract the information out me, if you know what I'm saying. I'd be like, "hey, baby, you ever fuck on an alien spacecraft recovered from the Nevada desert? No? Do you want to?"

Didn't Kennedy pull that on Monroe?

 

[SpergioLeonne]

I really wish people would stop spinning this as the guy admitting Pfizer is planning to release the mutated virus to infect the public. I believe as much as many of you that they are greedy and evil enough to do something like that, but that's not what this guy admitted to.

It’s a matter of, “How likely is it that they’d accurately create a strain that nature was going to create anyways, and wouldn’t it be tempting to let a strain escape if you already have a vaccine optimized for it?”

I don’t guarantee anyone that’s what would happen, but they shouldn’t put themselves in that position. AND this shit leaked from a lab in the first place. Our spidey senses should be tingling, and Pfizer ought to live in fear if this is the path they’re choosing.

He's saying that they're mutating it so they can preemptively make vaccines for different mutations and then if that particular strain pops up in the wild they will release that version of the vaccine.

“If”. So how many variants should they develop, just in case, and what’s the overhead on that? We’re talking a lot of monkeys.

It's dangerous and unethical gain of function research all to make a buck and that should be bad enough, the guy even fucking admits he knows this kind of research is what probably lead to the pandemic in the first place.

Yeah, this is the most solid part.

The reason I think this matters is if you try and sell this story as something it's not then people are going to easily be able to debunk that aspect and ignore the actually fucked up shit he actually admitted to. The part about how pharmaceutical companies are basically an arm of the government also shouldn't be ignored.

Yeah I agree with this, I just think that with where we are, with Pfizer already having lied about the clot shot preventing transmission, and the fact that the world spent at least a year trying to twist my arm into not just taking this, but my wife taking it when she was pregnant with our first in 2020, and then the fucks approving it for toddlers after it was already obviously useless.. my daughter has a classmate in daycare, two years old, has had three boosters.

It’s fucking sick. I’m not dropping the stick.

This story is serious shit and it's already going to have an uphill battle gaining traction because of the powerful entities involved, only focusing on something that's not even said outright in the interview is going to make it even harder to gain traction with people who might be on the fence.

This story is just the latest thing. There’s a mountain of information from all sorts of angles that all show Pfizer is evil. It’s not like we need people to get over their hatred of Project Veritas this one time or anything, we just need them to realize they’re never, ever going to be vindicated in their paranoia or their authoritarian impulse.

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

I think you are mistaking memes and twitter faggots for "the left". The comparison that came to mind was back in the 90s, early 2000s when liberals thought Bush voters were drooling retards who though every sand nigger "hated us or our freedoms" and blindly supported the invasion of iraq as thew only means to stop terrorism in the US. Truth is bush voters just didnt really care either way- the cost of the war was not something that was "felt" personally by Americans. Hell, even the libs who REEE'd about the war relied on the argument that the weapons of mass destruction were fake. They didnt ask, why are we in afganhistan/iraq when most of the terrorists were saudis, and the Saudis wanted Saddam out of power since the gulf war.

I think one of the toughest things about discussing politics in the US is that we are stuck with using terms like left/right when most people ant even agree on the definition of each as it relates to the US population. A lot of the stuff you mentioned about "the left" transcends politics in the US. The people you see in real life (apparently a lot of douchey looking macbook users) and what the algorithm serves up fore you online will always be influential on how you view the larger world. I know that I have personally fallen into the trap of not realizing that the shit I see in the specific online places I go is not a perfectly objective window into the world. I get frustrated when I see people talking about the left as this soy-filled monolith, because its self-defeating. It reminds me of when clinton spent her whole campaign calling trump voters evil racists who were too dumb to vote in their own interest.

I'm not putting EVERYONE in that basket, and that's why I was trying to be careful about what I refer to as "The Current Left", or the most marketable/marketed to demographics among the political left. That being said, I am putting "The Current Left" in a basket, because the generalization is fair. I'm aware of visibility bias, and won't shy away from the realization that it's simply easier to see people who are stereotypical, but in a "democratic system", it's not too uncharitable to judge a group by their mouthpieces, because those mouthpieces and highly visible examples are the rule, rather than the exception.

Some part of that has a lot to do to the fact that (in my opinion), we, as an entire society, are quickly moving on a vector pointed towards a monoculture. It's hard not to ignore the slow extinction of subcultures in the youth, or the general evaporation of forms/genres of media, even inside of pop culture. I think this is a partial side-effect of rapid globalization, which is why, for example there are so many 'woke', or outright generic movies, because they have to appeal to every country on earth. I'm starting to notice this on every social scale, big and small. On a long enough timescale, this narrowing of cultural diversity is naturally going to create more "NPCs" or "Living Stereotypes", which is why Zoomers all look the same and have far less (and far fewer) niche interests than the Millenials or Gen X. I'm not trying to "kids these days" about this, as I'm not that old and I do a pretty good job at keeping a finger on the membrane of the current generation, but noticing this worries me.

As for the left, in terms of general leftist policies, I can put all of them in a basket because I don't agree with any autistically specific flavor of leftism "that doesn't work because real leftism has never been tried" on anything that isn't a surface-level or less important issue, barring like one or two exceptions.

TL;DR, I think the world really is becoming more black and white as time moves on, whether we want it to be, or not.


ALSO:

He's saying that they're mutating it so they can preemptively make vaccines for different mutations and then if that particular strain pops up in the wild they will release that version of the vaccine.

Which is FUCKING RETARDED unless this really is intended to be a bioweapon, because the chances of a virus mutating in a lab, in a way that even remotely resembles what could happen naturally, is fucking NIL.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

I really wish people would stop spinning this as the guy admitting Pfizer is planning to release the mutated virus to infect the public. I believe as much as many of you that they are greedy and evil enough to do something like that, but that's not what this guy admitted to.

He's saying that they're mutating it so they can preemptively make vaccines for different mutations and then if that particular strain pops up in the wild they will release that version of the vaccine.

It's dangerous and unethical gain of function research all to make a buck and that should be bad enough, the guy even fucking admits he knows this kind of research is what probably lead to the pandemic in the first place.

The reason I think this matters is if you try and sell this story as something it's not then people are going to easily be able to debunk that aspect and ignore the actually fucked up shit he actually admitted to. The part about how pharmaceutical companies are basically an arm of the government also shouldn't be ignored.

This story is serious shit and it's already going to have an uphill battle gaining traction because of the powerful entities involved, only focusing on something that's not even said outright in the interview is going to make it even harder to gain traction with people who might be on the fence.

I actually agree with this in a big way

What was more glaring to me wasn't what they're doing with their "directed evolution" research, as suspicious as it is, it was the part where he outright admits that they have a revolving door between regulators and pfizer and he outright says "yeah its great for us (our industry) but not for the american people" because the regulators will go easier on pfizer due to wanting to work for them after their stint as a regulator is done. and admitting covid is a cash cow.

Its that admission of the lax regulation due to the revolving door that everyone should be harping on hard.

 

[afternoon_tea]

I'm not putting EVERYONE in that basket, and that's why I was trying to be careful about what I refer to as "The Current Left", or the most marketable/marketed to demographics among the political left. That being said, I am putting "The Current Left" in a basket, because the generalization is fair. I'm aware of visibility bias, and won't shy away from the realization that it's simply easier to see people who are stereotypical, but in a "democratic system", it's not too uncharitable to judge a group by their mouthpieces, because those mouthpieces and highly visible examples are the rule, rather than the exception.

Some part of that has a lot to do to the fact that (in my opinion), we, as an entire society, are quickly moving on a vector pointed towards a monoculture. It's hard not to ignore the slow extinction of subcultures in the youth, or the general evaporation of forms/genres of media, even inside of pop culture. I think this is a partial side-effect of rapid globalization, which is why, for example there are so many 'woke', or outright generic movies, because they have to appeal to every country on earth. I'm starting to notice this on every social scale, big and small. On a long enough timescale, this narrowing of cultural diversity is naturally going to create more "NPCs" or "Living Stereotypes", which is why Zoomers all look the same and have far less (and far fewer) niche interests than the Millenials or Gen X. I'm not trying to "kids these days" about this, as I'm not that old and I do a pretty good job at keeping a finger on the membrane of the current generation, but noticing this worries me.

As for the left, in terms of general leftist policies, I can put all of them in a basket because I don't agree with any autistically specific flavor of leftism "that doesn't work because real leftism has never been tried" on anything that isn't a surface-level or less important issue, barring like one or two exceptions.

TL;DR, I think the world really is becoming more black and white as time moves on, whether we want it to be, or not.


ALSO:

Which is FUCKING RETARDED unless this really is intended to be a bioweapon, because the chances of a virus mutating in a lab, in a way that even remotely resembles what could happen naturally, is fucking NIL.

Yeah it is really retarded and reeks of glowy bioweapons experimentation but I'm not sure if Pfizer pfag even realizes it or if he buys the explanation he was given. He might just not have been willing to say that part out loud.

Although his extreme freak out does make me wonder if he suspects there's more to it.

 

[CansOfCant]

What blows me away was that the Phizer Phaggot actually thought he was talking to another fag. The black one was more campy than Lamar Latrelle, but the other guy sounds and behaves totally normal. I'd suggest nigger fags are so desperate for White dick that they lose all rationality but, well, the fact that they're nigger fags already precludes rationality.

It wasn't the PV con's color that sold the deal, it was precisely because he didn't act like a flaming queer that made him attractive.

Fags hate other fags.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

It wasn't the PV con's color that sold the deal, it was precisely because he didn't act like a flaming queer that made him attractive.

Fags hate other fags.

But wait, if you’re black and gay, does that mean you will fuck like, Boogie2988?