Science Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’

• Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
• Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
• Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
• Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”

[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walkerart of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalisth my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.

Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs -- eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.

…

Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’ … ‘That is Not What We Say to the Public’ … ‘People Won’t Like That’ … ‘Don’t Tell Anyone’

Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.

www.projectveritas.com

Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company…

archived 26 Jan 2023 01:25:36 UTC

archive.ph

 

[Dr. Ricearoni]

Oh yes . All that’s in the covid thread. Cominarty is approved but try getting cominarty in America. You’ll be injected with the one that has the EUA and you’ll have zero ability to sue anyone of you are hurt.
It’s all in the covid thread. It’s horrific all the way down. Sit down and have a strong cup of tea ready.
the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research.
Ok. Have any of the groups you work woth done it for you or have you used their data? Is it being planned? Has it been done outside the Pfizer BioNTech development? Becasue that’s a very couched statement and it sounds a bit weaselly

The way the niggerfaggot phrased it, he said they're planning on doing it, so if he's to be believed, a claim that they haven't done it would be completely true. They're just omitting the "yet".

 

[Johnny Salami]

Now make them say so In front of Congress (along with every middle of the road employee) and have their labs searched. Then prevent those middle employees from having legal representation paid by Pfizer

 

[F_Break]

These two parts sound like they're tiptoeing around shifting the blame onto partner groups and basically saying, "Yeah, we do it, but it's mostly on computer simulations and we're totally required by law to do it and by the way, our lab security is top notch."

Working with collaborators, we have conducted research where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern.

Pfizer undertakes in vitro work (e.g., in a laboratory culture dish) to identify potential resistance mutations to nirmatrelvir, one of PAXLOVID’s two components. With a naturally evolving virus, it is important to routinely assess the activity of an antiviral. Most of this work is conducted using computer simulations or mutations of the main protease–a non-infectious part of the virus. In a limited number of cases when a full virus does not contain any known gain of function mutations, such virus may be engineered to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells. In addition, in vitro resistance selection experiments are undertaken in cells incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and nirmatrelvir in our secure Biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory to assess whether the main protease can mutate to yield resistant strains of the virus.

There's no denial that this guy was an employee or his position so he clearly was exactly who Veritas claimed he was. It looks like they're going to claim he was uninformed and spoke out of turn, and if that doesn't work, they'll try and shift the blame to research partners.

 

[DeeDee Megadoodoo]

Apparently he’s no longer visible in teams or the company directory. Damage mode engaged.

It's a shame how that guy is going to OD in some shabby hotel room.

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

The way the niggerfaggot phrased it, he said they're planning on doing it, so if he's to be believed, a claim that they haven't done it would be completely true. They're just omitting the "yet".

There's also a part of that statement that's throwing up red flags for me.

Working with collaborators, we have conducted research where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern.

See guys, we're not doing anything that wouldn't be out of place in Unit 731. We're just funding who are.

It's like I said earlier in the thread. The people running Pfizer should either kill themselves or be hanged like war criminals.

 

[Sammich]

What an absolute chicken shit statement. And they will get away with it because politicians are taking tons of money from lobbyists, and the msm are taking tons of money for ads. Big Pharma will never be made to pay for what they've fucking done. Look at Purdue and the Sackler family if you want proof.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

I would assume that most medical professionals eventually lose their empathy. There's only so many times you can see a bleeding dying human before your brain just stops caring. I used to work with many nurses in a home for the elderly, and basically all of them had become jaded over the years. It was amusing sometimes. We had a particularly nasty old guy shit his pants and die, and the nurses celebrated all day!

Let's wait and see the nurses when they'll have the same age as that nasty old guy if they might receive a taste of their own medecine.

 

[YarrBlueballs]

Phizer out here denying funding WMD-lite research like the US Gov denied funding the Taliban lmao

 

[Probably An Autist]

Pfizer apparently RESPONDS
https://www.pfizer.com/news/announcements/pfizer-responds-research-claims

Spoiler: Pfizer text, in case you dont wanna click

I didn't realize the VAX is STILL NOT FDA APPROVED

lets pretend im a retard who doesn't want to read all that science shit, what do they say in a tl;dr summary

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

MD is Medical Doctor, it's not an academic doctorate title.
He should have some academic participation considering he was employed in that position by such a large corporation.
I should mention he completely lacks the qualifications for such a position, not to brag but even with 3 times more qualifications Pfizer would reject you with 99% certainty for such a high level position.
His whole shtick is highly suspicious.

Diversity hire.

 

[Otterly]

These two parts sound like they're tiptoeing around shifting the blame onto partner groups and basically saying, "Yeah, we do it, but it's mostly on computer simulations and we're totally required by law to do it and by the way, our lab security is top notch."

There's no denial that this guy was an employee or his position so he clearly was exactly who Veritas claimed he was. It looks like they're going to claim he was uninformed and spoke out of turn, and if that doesn't work, they'll try and shift the blame to research partners.

Yeah, that’s how it’ll go. Pharma themselves do some of the work, other stuff is outsourced to third parties. A single project can have multiple lab vendors for example - simple safety stuff goes to a central lab, maybe they can do a few more interesting things, but specialist genotyping is done in a vendor lab, etc.
You need to pin them down with questions like have you ever now or in the past or are you planning or blah blah
They’ll get away with it. Amd there’ll be worse behind the scenes. The primate stuff is an in though - there aren’t that many labs with that kind of capability.

 

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

The way the niggerfaggot phrased it, he said they're planning on doing it, so if he's to be believed, a claim that they haven't done it would be completely true. They're just omitting the "yet".

Diversity hire.

Devil's advocate: Gaynigger doesn't know what Pfizer is actually doing despite having a position high up in the company. So he falls into PV's anal honeypot, and then Pfizer dismantles him for parts and pepperoni. Story goes nowhere.

James O'Keefe is saying that more whistleblowers from within Pfizer are contacting Project Veritas, so maybe there will be more claims soon.

 

[duckbutter&toejamsandwich]

It's funny that Pfizer keeps talking about Covid, because I don't think the cockgobbler said that the virus they are doing "directed evolution" on was Covid. They didn't mention any of the other viruses they have spoken of doing mRNA research on in the past.

 

[Otterly]

lets pretend im a retard who doesn't want to read all that science shit, what do they say in a tl;dr summary

The Pfizer injection got what’s called an emergency use authorisation (EUA.) that’s something that’s given in an emergency to allow something with minor minimal testing data to be used. To get one it needs to be serious and there needs to be no other reasonable treatment.
The government and companies and the fda were saying that the Pfizer jabs were fully approved. But what they actually said was that a thing called cominarty had the approval. What’s the difference? Who knows but cominarty isn’t given out in America. Everyone’s getting the stuff that’s got the emergency approval only.
You can’t be forced to take an EUA product. It has different legal status and ability to sue etc.
Also shows you why ivermectin and all other therapies were stomped on - the presence of something that works well would have meant the EUA could be challenged.
It’s all explained more in the covid thread. Search in there for EUA/FUll approval/Biologics. Or here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/pfize...ccine-not-approved-by-fda-in-actuality.99243/
So they said to for example the military ‘it’s approved now you MUST take it,’ then they seem to have given them the EUA product anyway.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

James O'Keefe is saying that more whistleblowers from within Pfizer are contacting Project Veritas, so maybe there will be more claims soon.

Let's hope these whistleblowers will said everything before they die of "accident", "robbery" or "suicide" like Vince Foster and Seth Rich.

 

[PumpkinSpiceBitchMeringue]

Is it me or is the Pfizer video gone fron Veritas' channel?

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Is it me or is the Pfizer video gone fron Veritas' channel?

Its not just you:

 

[BelUwUga]

It’s not as high as 50%. Most of us are decent people who just liked science and want to understand how things work, make drugs to treat stuff etc. I know a lot of very average people who kind of fell into it, a few lovely obsessives who live for it and a few who I think are capable of bad things.
From teaching medics, I’d say maybe 15% have that lack of humanity and feeling for people. A large number do have ego issues and that’s worsened by how they treat medical students - they’re worked quite hard and told it’s Ok because they’re a special cadre and better than everyone else. That can turn even the ones who are just egotistical rather than scary into arseholes but a lot of it gets knocked out of them when they hit the wards for real.
Surgeons? I’d say at least 50%. Maybe the majority. And that’s not always bad per se - if you’re cutting into people or seeing traumatic injury and you’re unable to see it at least on one level as a meat puzzle that needs fixing, you’re having a breakdown a few weeks into the job. Psychopathic traits can make you very successful, and a person with them IF they have self control and can manage socially can get very far. That kind of person neglected as a kid or a few traumatic experiences is how you get the real bad ones. When they have a stable upbringing, connections and a clear run at it, you get CEOs, masters of the universe types etc.
I always had a few in every cohort who made me shudder. Medicine attracts them like flies. Science less so, there’s not enough ego reinforcement in it.
As for researchers, it’s certainly not 50%, most of us are hapless science enjoyers who found academia was a ponzi and needed a job. I suspect the higher up the tree you go the more the percentage increases. And as we can see, a few in positions of power can do a lot of damage.
I chatted to a few colleagues over the pond about this last night and all of them had a similar response - feeling dirty, despondent and wondering what it’s all coming to. My sample may be a little biased as I’m not close to many raging Reddit types but most of them are what’s considered Normies. And not a single one of them went down the denial route- it was all ‘this ain’t what I signed up for, what’s wrong with the world?’

As someone well versed in American medfags, the person you're responding to is incorrect in adding that (benign) there. Medfags are an intelligent bunch and they know how to dance just on the correct side of the line.

I chatted to a few colleagues over the pond about this last night and all of them had a similar response - feeling dirty, despondent and wondering what it’s all coming to.

It's all coming down to the fact that if it finally took this much for American medfags to feel this way, they wouldn't believe me if I told them. That arrogance is half of what's going to lead to them dangling from lamposts or more wronged patients deciding to perforate some providers. As a field they wanted to play Mengele and now that they've flown too close to the sun it's going to start looking bleak for them. Even the most innocent among them that could conceivably exist are guilty of standing by silently as their colleagues killed an overwhelmingly larger portion of the public for the greater good. I see them as nothing more as broken eggs needed for an omelette.

 

[F_Break]

Is it me or is the Pfizer video gone fron Veritas' channel?

Youtube deleted it and issued a strike for "vaccine disinformation" even though pretty much everything was from a Pfizer director's own mouth. Conveniently, that strike prevents Veritas from uploading anything else for a week. Pre deletion the video had a surprisingly low view count so they were throttling the fuck out of it leading up to it. Unfortunately for Google and Pfizer, the Twitter upload of the video has more than twenty million views and counting.

 

[Otterly]

As someone well versed in American medfags, the person you're responding to is incorrect in adding that (benign) there. Medfags are an intelligent bunch and they know how to dance just on the correct side of the line.

It's all coming down to the fact that if it finally took this much for American medfags to feel this way, they wouldn't believe me if I told them. That arrogance is half of what's going to lead to them dangling from lamposts or more wronged patients deciding to perforate some providers. As a field they wanted to play Mengele and now that they've flown too close to the sun it's going to start looking bleak for them. Even the most innocent among them that could conceivably exist are guilty of standing by silently as their colleagues killed an overwhelmingly larger portion of the public for the greater good. I see them as nothing more as broken eggs needed for an omelette.

Those of us who actively spoke out against this are going to be punished twice. First we copped all the flak for saying this was wrong and then we will get lumped in with the rest and lynched. Universe has a grim sense of humour.
My previous employer brought a ‘key opinion leader’ in to lecture us on the need for pregnant women to have the shot. Questions were solicited. Mine were not asked and I was warmed afterwards that they were not in the spirit of discussion. I felt physically sick watching the presentation.