Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 43 14.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.1%

  • Total voters
    293
I really don't believe anything that comes from Rekieta's pet spooks mouth. One of the ways you can tell if someone is speaking bullshit is how unnecessarily detailed the story is. Someone more knowledgeable on him will have to chime in but some of the stories I've heard from seem that way to me.

Think about it this way, if you where asked about a one night stand you had a few years ago how much would you remember? You might remember her name or what she looked like but everything else would be pretty vague. Drexel on the other hand seems to know the ins and outs of every woman he's "bedded" lives and these stories all are very similar. Notably these stories that sound like they came straight from some interracial cuckold inspired porno.
 
Last edited:
Latest LOCALS archive dump. This is for the Friday day stream chat.

This one started late again, but ran to the end of the chat. 1 of 2 problems solved.

The automatic chat switching has an issue that I spent 20 minutes on today, and it looks like it SHOULD work based on the test data set I fed it. It should no longer bite the carpet when it tried to switch.

I am a bit sad it missed the Friday degeneracy stream LOCALS chat, but timezones and work schedules be what be. Unless Nick opens another chat (livestream chats do not count--I need to write another script for those) I will no know until Monday if it is truly fixed. If it works, we will have 24/7 logging and Panoptes will live up truly to its name. If that happens, I will call V 1.1 a success, archive the source, then move on to 1.2 updates and features I want to add.

To be honest, I feel a bit like Panoptes is a wee one trying to learn to ride a bicycle. I am more emotionally rewarded when it does something right than I should be... but I am told I do take my code too seriously...
 

Attachments

Seriously what the fuck happened to Nick during the Depp trial to make him go full mask off coomer like this?
If he's being honest that he was always like this he at least had the sense to keep it under the table and not broadcast it, not when its contrary to the image he was presenting publically.
But then during the Depp trial he said he "had the worst day of his life" and he "had a lot of thinking to do" and since then he's been a fucking trainwreck?
So what was it that tipped Balldo over the ledge?
 
Last edited:
Seriously what the fuck happened to Nick during the Depp trial to make him go full mask off coomer like this?
If he's being honest that he was always like this he at least had the sense to keep it under the table and broadcast it, not when its contrary to the image he was presenting publically.
But then during the Depp trial he said he "had the worst day of his life" and he "had a lot of thinking to do" and since then he's been a fucking trainwreck?
So what was it that tipped Balldo over the ledge?
That is the million dollar question.
 
Seriously what the fuck happened to Nick during the Depp trial to make him go full mask off coomer like this?
If he's being honest that he was always like this he at least had the sense to keep it under the table and broadcast it, not when its contrary to the image he was presenting publically.
But then during the Depp trial he said he "had the worst day of his life" and he "had a lot of thinking to do" and since then he's been a fucking trainwreck?
So what was it that tipped Balldo over the ledge?
Couldn't get the tissue in time and jizzed on his own face while jerking it, got a little bit in his mouth and there was no Fanta to wash it down.
 
Seriously what the fuck happened to Nick during the Depp trial to make him go full mask off coomer like this?
If he's being honest that he was always like this he at least had the sense to keep it under the table and broadcast it, not when its contrary to the image he was presenting publically.
But then during the Depp trial he said he "had the worst day of his life" and he "had a lot of thinking to do" and since then he's been a fucking trainwreck?
So what was it that tipped Balldo over the ledge?
I've always assumed that his parents and perhaps in-laws had been supporting him for many years. That the price of their support was him having to accept a heavy parental presence in his life and having to be careful about things he did or said that would get back to them.
Then on "the worst day of his life", he finally decided that he had enough money to make a clean break from their authority and the money that came with it. So in his 40s, he finally became what most kids become around 23. This resulted in him acting out as if he were a 20-something idiot who had broken free from his parents and also had the money to live out every stupid idea in his head.
Its just a theory. But there is a considerable amount of evidence that suggests Nick had alot of money come into him from some source until he started making money from streaming. Someone paid for the house, for the law school, supported Nick & Wife & Children while he was going to law school and so on. I mean even having that big family and stay at home wife in the early days (the 2000s) seems to require way more money than Nick could have made from the jobs he had.
The other thing supporting the theory is Nick's occasional rants about how hard his life has been. In objective terms, it doesn't seem to have been hard. He certainly hasn't been done in by working. But if he had to tow the line for one or two sets of parents for years as an adult, that would be tough.
The Depp Trial may have also improved his finances to a point where doing it was possible. The timing certainly seems right. He probably peaked financially during Depp or went at least a step up financially.
 
That is the million dollar question.
It's the Philosophers Stone of Lolcowdom. The secret key that can transform a wholesome family man and God fearing Christian that respects his our wife into the coom brained, balldo reviewing, crusty titty drooling drunken wreck he is today.
If it has the power to Warp a persons morals and common sense like this, if it can cause Nick to fall to Chaos, we need to know the secret.
Ultimate power awaits the one who figures it out...
 
He certainly hasn't been done in by working. But if he had to tow the line for one or two sets of parents for years as an adult, that would be tough.
I dunno man. I'd tow the line if that meant not being a sperg online, not being a coomer and being conscious about what I do online. Especially if it bought me a nice house, put me through school and paid for my family.
 
If he was a decent lawyer and willing to take clients in the city, he could be billing $400+/hr.
We all know he wasn’t a decent lawyer, which is why him and the rest of Lawtube are online all the time risking their professional reputations and careers rather than actually practicing law.
 
If he was a decent lawyer and willing to take clients in the city, he could be billing $400+/hr.
To make bigger amounts of money he would have had to:
(a) Been living in or near a big city
(b) Been able to get a job working for someone else rather than launching a solo practice right out of school. (this would have included having the grades or the connections to get a job).
(c) Been willing put in alot of time and work to build a career. (harder for someone at his age than someone who graduates law school much younger).

It would also have helped if he had gone to a better law school. But even with alot of those things, success is not guaranteed. The law these days is no easy career path.
 
I've always assumed that his parents and perhaps in-laws had been supporting him for many years. That the price of their support was him having to accept a heavy parental presence in his life and having to be careful about things he did or said that would get back to them.
Then on "the worst day of his life", he finally decided that he had enough money to make a clean break from their authority and the money that came with it. So in his 40s, he finally became what most kids become around 23. This resulted in him acting out as if he were a 20-something idiot who had broken free from his parents and also had the money to live out every stupid idea in his head.
Its just a theory. But there is a considerable amount of evidence that suggests Nick had alot of money come into him from some source until he started making money from streaming. Someone paid for the house, for the law school, supported Nick & Wife & Children while he was going to law school and so on. I mean even having that big family and stay at home wife in the early days (the 2000s) seems to require way more money than Nick could have made from the jobs he had.
The other thing supporting the theory is Nick's occasional rants about how hard his life has been. In objective terms, it doesn't seem to have been hard. He certainly hasn't been done in by working. But if he had to tow the line for one or two sets of parents for years as an adult, that would be tough.
The Depp Trial may have also improved his finances to a point where doing it was possible. The timing certainly seems right. He probably peaked financially during Depp or went at least a step up financially.
This is my theory as well. I think I posted something similar weeks ago, but this is a much better statement of the theory
We all know he wasn’t a decent lawyer, which is why him and the rest of Lawtube are online all the time risking their professional reputations and careers rather than actually practicing law.
That is the thing... and it might be related to his sudden code switch. He was NEVER going to make a lot of money as a lawman in rural Minnesota, but maybe he was stuck there because of having to toe the line with his in-laws. They are close to LR's family in MN.
 
I've always assumed that his parents and perhaps in-laws had been supporting him for many years. That the price of their support was him having to accept a heavy parental presence in his life and having to be careful about things he did or said that would get back to them.
Then on "the worst day of his life", he finally decided that he had enough money to make a clean break from their authority and the money that came with it. So in his 40s, he finally became what most kids become around 23. This resulted in him acting out as if he were a 20-something idiot who had broken free from his parents and also had the money to live out every stupid idea in his head.
Its just a theory. But there is a considerable amount of evidence that suggests Nick had alot of money come into him from some source until he started making money from streaming. Someone paid for the house, for the law school, supported Nick & Wife & Children while he was going to law school and so on. I mean even having that big family and stay at home wife in the early days (the 2000s) seems to require way more money than Nick could have made from the jobs he had.
The other thing supporting the theory is Nick's occasional rants about how hard his life has been. In objective terms, it doesn't seem to have been hard. He certainly hasn't been done in by working. But if he had to tow the line for one or two sets of parents for years as an adult, that would be tough.
The Depp Trial may have also improved his finances to a point where doing it was possible. The timing certainly seems right. He probably peaked financially during Depp or went at least a step up financially.
One of the better theories. Our wife could have gotten upset that drexel did not want to plow because nick was upsetting him.
 
Seriously what the fuck happened to Nick during the Depp trial to make him go full mask off coomer like this?
If he's being honest that he was always like this he at least had the sense to keep it under the table and not broadcast it, not when its contrary to the image he was presenting publically.
But then during the Depp trial he said he "had the worst day of his life" and he "had a lot of thinking to do" and since then he's been a fucking trainwreck?
So what was it that tipped Balldo over the ledge?
Dude is clearly having a midlife crisis at the moment. That's really it, the only noteworthy part is that he is having his while being a somewhat popular figure online. He's getting attention from women who are having their own midlife crises and retarded fans who would happily suck is cock and pay for the privilege.

There's a good chance he and his wife end up in devoice when the novelty of this new found sexually liberation wears off or one of them pushes (or get caught) the boundaries a little too far.
 
We all know he wasn’t a decent lawyer, which is why him and the rest of Lawtube are online all the time risking their professional reputations and careers rather than actually practicing law.
There are a couple of burned out real lawyers in that group, who don't care if they burn their reputations anyway. Rekieta is as fake as legal eagle, though.

Most good/competent lawyers have spent time as associates at bigger firms before starting their own practices. It's basically part of the education process if you want to do anything complicated. Little Nickers got started pumping out kids instead and opened a strip mall storefront, probably because being an associate sounded like work.
 
What I find disturbing about Drex is his complete refusal to even acknowledge what a massive breach of trust his actions were.

Even if, hypothetically, he had been friends with the woman's mother for years and only met the daughter when she was an adult, it would still be a breach of trust to sleep with his friend's daughter. Consensual adults? Yes. But in polite society most of us can acknowledge that certain people are off-limits at least until you inform in advance, at the very least, even if you are a free adult who can do anything you like. That's the behaviour of normal people who respect their friends and family. If he were genuinely interested in this woman, the 'right' thing to do would be to approach her mother, his long-time friend, and say 'Hey, I know this is weird but I needed to let you know first. I am really, really interested in your daughter and our friendship matters to me, so I am letting you know I would like to be in a relationship with her.' There need be no mention of BDSM at all.

Instead he hid the whole thing. Whether there was grooming or not the point he misses is that he violated a friend's trust.

Imagine being this woman's mother. Her fight with Drex over her daughter may very well have imploded her relationship with her daughter as well, but even worse, the mother will be thinking for the rest of her life: did he plan this all along? Was he only friends with me to get at my daughter? All their interactions in the past will be reanalysed with this information, any off-colour jokes from him that she dismissed will be met with dawning horror. It is impossible that the mother is NOT going to suspect that he was probably sleeping with her earlier than he claims. For the rest of her life she will be tormented by the thought that she may have exposed her child willingly to a child predator. Whether Drex actually so much as winked at the daughter before she was 18 is irrelevant. Any parent in this position would forever be tormented because they can never actually know the truth.
To use Drex's line of reasoning, if what he was doing was okay, he would've been upfront about his relationship with his sub from the beginning...because he believes that dominant men "like him" have nothing to be ashamed about, and he's willing to he open about all the weird degenerate shit he does with women, "unlike" the people who are into cucking.

Which leads to the point, if he wasn't upfront about it with the mother of his sub, it's because he didn't want her to know. She found out because he didn't understand how Apple's messaging systems worked, because he deleted the messages. And the reason he didn't want the mother to know (to the extent he tries to conceal his tracks) can really only have two explanations: he either knew what he was doing was wrong, or he knew it was going to blow up in his face and cause a lot of irritation he didn't want. And it was likely both.

Which leads to the next point: He kept going on with the relationship after it had already been discovered, presumably fucking up his relationship with the mother, was it really worth it?

Is Drex really that fucking subservient to his physical desires that he just decides to be fucking stupid?

Maybe he is, but that sounds pretty fucking submissive to me.
 
I dunno man. I'd tow the line if that meant not being a sperg online, not being a coomer and being conscious about what I do online. Especially if it bought me a nice house, put me through school and paid for my family.
Different people are going to react really differently to that situation though. For some people, its going to be like a dream in that you can have a good home, a stay at home wife, a big bunch of kids and your own business you don't have to work too hard at. And all you have to do is be a good citizen, go to church, occasionally work and not make a fool of yourself in public.

But if your best friend and role model is Drex, if you believe that Drex really lives this life of independent wealth from organzing gang-bangs around the country and if you believe that the world of 1990s teenage comedy nudity films were documentaries, If you come to agree with Drex that children ruin lives and you share drex's dream of living in a house with a stripper pole in the living room. If your idea of gaining people's respect is being able to chug half a bottle of whisky......then maybe you would agree with Nick.
 
BEHOLD! The deep philosophical conversations on LOCALS! When is it ethical to send D-pics!


1674923307755.png
1674923395089.png



1674923441799.png
1674923472679.png


I am more motivated than ever to get reply-threading working on my archive.
 
Interesting to see the many posts with people wondering why Nick is doing this.

Its simple. Its a midlife crisis. That's all this is, its so easily seen because its so by the numbers. This is a classic example of the man with a bit of money and security, heading towards middle-aged, wanting to fuck about and "party one last time". I mean look at some of the highlights. Strange sexual kinks showing up, its swinging, the quintessential middle class, midlife activity. Buying a sporty fast car, which almost always ends badly as they have no experience with high-powered cars. I swear to Christ if he starts using TRT or coke, he will be the perfect example of a sad midlife crisis.
 
Interesting to see the many posts with people wondering why Nick is doing this.

Its simple. Its a midlife crisis. That's all this is, its so easily seen because its so by the numbers. This is a classic example of the man with a bit of money and security, heading towards middle-aged, wanting to fuck about and "party one last time". I mean look at some of the highlights. Strange sexual kinks showing up, its swinging, the quintessential middle class, midlife activity. Buying a sporty fast car, which almost always ends badly as they have no experience with high-powered cars. I swear to Christ if he starts using TRT or coke, he will be the perfect example of a sad midlife crisis.
While I agree, I believe that many more of us are shocked that he fell prey to it. I am not sure that all are convinced (at least I am not) that a mid-life crisis is an inevitable thing for every man. On top of that, the wholesome vibes that seemed to emanate from Nose prior to this made his seem resilient to such noncery.

I believe the quest is in pursuit of what changed the status quo that seemed to be keeping him on an even keel.

The answer might be the more disappointing 'he was really good at faking it the whole time', but many are seeking something more like 'drugs broke his brain', or 'he had a big fight with his family and got cut off'.
 
While I agree, I believe that many more of us are shocked that he fell prey to it. I am not sure that all are convinced (at least I am not) that a mid-life crisis is an inevitable thing for every man. On top of that, the wholesome vibes that seemed to emanate from Nose prior to this made his seem resilient to such noncery.

I believe the quest is in pursuit of what changed the status quo that seemed to be keeping him on an even keel.

The answer might be the more disappointing 'he was really good at faking it the whole time', but many are seeking something more like 'drugs broke his brain', or 'he had a big fight with his family and got cut off'.
I think the difference between the normal, human desire for one last hurrah as you're getting older and a full blown midlife crisis is a matter of degree. Also the addict's mantra of "If some feels good, more must feel even better."
 
Back