Science Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’

  • Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
  • Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
  • Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
  • Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”
[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walker:Part of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalist:Oh my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.
Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs -- eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.



Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

 
Those of us who actively spoke out against this are going to be punished twice. First we copped all the flak for saying this was wrong and then we will get lumped in with the rest and lynched. Universe has a grim sense of humour.
My previous employer brought a ‘key opinion leader’ in to lecture us on the need for pregnant women to have the shot. Questions were solicited. Mine were not asked and I was warmed afterwards that they were not in the spirit of discussion. I felt physically sick watching the presentation.
Complicit is guilty, and not resisting is complicit. If you want to save your life then prove you resisted. Turn whistleblower and record people surreptitiously. Secure your innocence by your actions, or the blood is on your hands too. Many of my relatives had to take the jab because of cowards who said and did nothing, cowards who make more money than any of my family only to have far lower standards. Boohoo, won't someone think of the poor plague-engineer scientists. I know its a fools errand to ask a woman to stand up for anything though.
 
I am looking for this news to be in Spanish to share with my family, and even in New pipe I am getting these messages "to learn from the WHO"

View attachment 4347791

I have not found the video with captions in Spanish tho, just talk about it on radio shows. Fine, I will do it it myself then. Any good software to put captions on videos the easy way?
KDENlive.
Where's HHH? His opinion on this matter is invaluable and I must have his two cents on the situation.
His MO would be to blow it off because it's Project Veritas and call us all idiots for listening to them. If it were ever to go as far as a criminal investigation into Pfizer, and if findings were ever made, and Pfizer were found guilty in a courtroom & suffered consequences, his reaction would be "Okay, just because the broken clock is right twice a day doesn't mean you should listen to Project Veritas about everything, you guys. You're so gullible."
 
I think you should just take his word for it. It's important to have a healthy skepticism of everything except faggots posting about their unverifiable insider info in the autistic thunderdome thread.

the guy you're responding to is either just a larping schizo or like a low level lab tech. He can't stop mentioning his bona fides which is a sure sign that he has none. the following isnt directed to you, but this thread in general.

nobody with a working brain stem- left or right- likes/trusts/adores (lol) corporations in general, big pharma especially, and pfizer in particular. Liberals in the US have been having a narcissistic injury since trump got elected. They project their feelings of anger and humiliation onto trump. And to be fair, trump did say a lot of stupid shit about covid- but you cant convince me that fewer people would be dead if clinton had been president. They also direct their rage and derision at all the morons who thought they were rosa parks for refusing to wear masks in costco. "trust the science" is a cope and a taunt. 99% of people who took the vaccine did so because they were desperate to get back to work or scared about being fat/old and dying. The democrats lick big pharma taint with the same enthusiasm as the GOP. suggesting that libs want to fellate big pharma is the same as saying the average republican loves Dow chemical and thinks all the environmental damage they have done is "based" just because they think protesting it is a waste of time.

liberals in the US should be ashamed of themselves because they never penalize their own party leaders for being bargain basement center-right fuck-ups who enjoy being the opposition party because then they can just shrug their shoulders and not even pretend to push anything but the most faggoty idpol bullshit.

internet autists see this coping and cognitive dissonance and warp it into: the left loves corporations and trusts them completely.

The covid shit is all a red herring. Both the left and right should be riled up about the fact that they will be the first generation in this country's history to be worse off financially than their parents. Stagnated wages, college debt for a degree that cant get them a decent job, the "gig" economy (which is more dystopian than covid), massive inflation, a surveillance state that was already so far up our asses that they didnt need the pandemic to increase their access, crumbling infrastructure, Israel dictating middle eastern foreign policy to both parties... the list goes on and on.
If you're going to sperg about US politics, please do it in the US politics thread.
 
Complicit is guilty, and not resisting is complicit. If you want to save your life then prove you resisted. Turn whistleblower and record people surreptitiously. Secure your innocence by your actions, or the blood is on your hands too. Many of my relatives had to take the jab because of cowards who said and did nothing, cowards who make more money than any of my family only to have far lower standards. Boohoo, won't someone think of the poor plague-engineer scientists. I know its a fools errand to ask a woman to stand up for anything though.
You were so close - you were doing so well for yourself, and then you had to add this last bit.
 
You were so close - you were doing so well for yourself, and then you had to add this last bit.
That's your judgment.

There is a case to be made that medical grants and scholarships reserved for women have less return on investment, because men tend to form lifelong practices while women tend to retire after a few decades. The community has fewer doctors because we reserve educational opportunities and resources for women. These decisions and policies have impacts good and bad, intended and unintended.

Similarly there's a social expectation for men to throw their bodies into the gears to stop the machinery. A male scientist and even a family man who can rock the boat albeit with risk could still reasonably be expected to sacrifice himself to stop the jab mandate. A woman, especially a mother, won't face that expectation. Maybe we shouldn't have women in science and given the public trust, because there's an increased risk she'll put her family stability over the public good she's supposed to sound the alarm on. I'm sorry discussing the weaker sex's weaknesses offends you. If a woman would be exculpated for failing to do her job where a man wouldn't under the same circumstances, yes, its not just about being able to do the work, its also being assertive, doing your job and sounding the alarm, even when it's not all sunshine and yasss boss queen slay
 
He's saying that they're mutating it so they can preemptively make vaccines for different mutations and then if that particular strain pops up in the wild they will release that version of the vaccine.
Creating a vaccine from a lab made virus on the off chance it occurs in the wild is a longer stretch than simply releasing the virus the vaccine was made for.
 
Elon was mentioned earlier, and I find it somewhat odd that he's saying literally nothing about this. Given that he's commented on vaccine-related matters before, even very recently, and his position appears to be that he shares some criticism of the Covid response and of big pharma. And also given that he seems to comment on even the most mundane shit ever as long as a blue check tweets about it. He's definitely avoiding talking about this Pfizer shit, for whatever reason.
 
Elon was mentioned earlier, and I find it somewhat odd that he's saying literally nothing about this. Given that he's commented on vaccine-related matters before, even very recently, and his position appears to be that he shares some criticism of the Covid response and of big pharma. And also given that he seems to comment on even the most mundane shit ever as long as a blue check tweets about it. He's definitely avoiding talking about this Pfizer shit, for whatever reason.
The WEF has been saber rattling regulation and talking about a campaign to overcome the "obstacle" that is 1A. I'm sure Democrats and the various three letters have been calling in threats too.
 
Elon was mentioned earlier, and I find it somewhat odd that he's saying literally nothing about this. Given that he's commented on vaccine-related matters before, even very recently, and his position appears to be that he shares some criticism of the Covid response and of big pharma. And also given that he seems to comment on even the most mundane shit ever as long as a blue check tweets about it. He's definitely avoiding talking about this Pfizer shit, for whatever reason.
Gotta give him some credit. This never would have gotten traction without him unleashing the flood gates on Twitter. Wonder how he's feeling. He could turn out good or bad when everythings said and done but he's done an incredible job waking up normies.


Those of us who actively spoke out against this are going to be punished twice. First we copped all the flak for saying this was wrong and then we will get lumped in with the rest and lynched. Universe has a grim sense of humour.
My previous employer brought a ‘key opinion leader’ in to lecture us on the need for pregnant women to have the shot. Questions were solicited. Mine were not asked and I was warmed afterwards that they were not in the spirit of discussion. I felt physically sick watching the presentation.
That's the kind of shit that's just pure demonic evil. I mean can a baby even survive the shot? Everyone who proudly proclaimed online that they got it lost the baby.
 
KDENlive.

His MO would be to blow it off because it's Project Veritas and call us all idiots for listening to them. If it were ever to go as far as a criminal investigation into Pfizer, and if findings were ever made, and Pfizer were found guilty in a courtroom & suffered consequences, his reaction would be "Okay, just because the broken clock is right twice a day doesn't mean you should listen to Project Veritas about everything, you guys. You're so gullible."
You forgot to add "all while tearfully beating off."
 
Elon was mentioned earlier, and I find it somewhat odd that he's saying literally nothing about this. Given that he's commented on vaccine-related matters before, even very recently, and his position appears to be that he shares some criticism of the Covid response and of big pharma. And also given that he seems to comment on even the most mundane shit ever as long as a blue check tweets about it. He's definitely avoiding talking about this Pfizer shit, for whatever reason.
It could be he doesn't want to put his finger on the scale much more than he already has. I think he's probably smart enough to know he doesn't want to unleash too much shit on himself.

I don't blame him.
 
I mean can a baby even survive the shot? Everyone who proudly proclaimed online that they got it lost the baby.
Just anecdotal, husband’s buddy’s wife was pregnant and the obgyn told her the vaccine was totally safe, and covid would definitely murder her and the baby both.

Dad absolutely refused the jab but couldn’t talk her out of it. She had a horrible pregnancy with lots of bleeding and four months of bed rest but the little muffin made it. He’s probably lucky she never planned to breastfeed.
 
Elon was mentioned earlier, and I find it somewhat odd that he's saying literally nothing about this. Given that he's commented on vaccine-related matters before, even very recently, and his position appears to be that he shares some criticism of the Covid response and of big pharma. And also given that he seems to comment on even the most mundane shit ever as long as a blue check tweets about it. He's definitely avoiding talking about this Pfizer shit, for whatever reason.
Why? Sometimes the best way to shitpost is to do nothing and let your enemies do all the hard work.
It could be he doesn't want to put his finger on the scale much more than he already has. I think he's probably smart enough to know he doesn't want to unleash too much shit on himself.

I don't blame him.
Pretty much. He doesn't need to actually say anything when leaving the video up says plenty about what his position is.
 
Turn whistleblower and record people surreptitiously.
Well that would be pointless There’s nothing I could record or have access to that would be in any way relevant. I dont work with covid, my work is in another area, close enoigh to have a full understanding but different enough. I am not party to anything secret. Nobody is twirling moustaches and walking the corridors detailing nefarious plans in my line of work. I do my work, which is in an area that’s fairly sympathetic. I watch the same, probably publically available seminars and webinars the rest of the tens of thousands of people in my company do.
There IS no whistleblowing - I’m not in any kind of meeting or project where this is done, do you understand that? My company had nothing to do with any of the covid injections.
If people come forward they need to have materially relevant info. I hope they do. I have none. I’m looking at this the same way all of us are - piecing together the info you guys dig up and through my own lens of knowing the industry.
I mean I can go and nail my opinions to the church door, but that’s not going to do much. I have no power, and no more info than is in this thread.
There are almost 80k people working at Pfizer. If you lynch the lads making new antibiotics for what the covid team did, that’s fairly pointless. There will be under a hundred people with deep / not fragmentary knowledge of what happened at each of these companies. They will be general counsels, C level, and the ones in charge of and high enough in the work stream to have a full picture.
Well all get lynched I’m sure. I made enough of a visible pest of myself refusing the shots, certainly everyone in my work and personal life spent months having a go for it. My conscience is clear.
 
Back