Science Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’

  • Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
  • Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
  • Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
  • Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”
[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walker:Part of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalist:Oh my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.
Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs -- eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.



Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

 
that doesn't make any sense, how do you maintain your generational wealth without being smart
If you have massive amounts of capital and of average intelligence it shouldn't be hard. Especially if you control many of the necessary components to generate more capital. I said they aren't super geniuses, not that they are super retards.
 
and are so completely out of touch as to how normal people think and behave that they may not be able to accurately predict out behaviors.
I was watching the Super League documentary where they tried to form a new elite football league with the richest teams in Europe. It failed but there’s a quote from the owner of Juventus and I’m paraphrasing. “Why are you talking about morality in business, there is no room for morals in business”, after backstabbing the godfather of his child. This is how the elite think, they don’t care if millions of us suffer and die as long as they make a profit.
 
I was watching the Super League documentary where they tried to form a new elite football league with the richest teams in Europe. It failed but there’s a quote from the owner of Juventus and I’m paraphrasing. “Why are you talking about morality in business, there is no room for morals in business”, after backstabbing the godfather of his child. This is how the elite think, they don’t care if millions of us suffer and die as long as they make a profit.
Documented since the Greek and Roman Empires.
Understood far earlier.

Never trust a hairless, talking, ape.
 
So I'm reading what the guy said and I don't know what's wrong with your comprehension of english, but the purpose of mutating the virus is said, IN HIS OWN WORDS, to predict future viruses, not to unleash it on people. He even says you don't want it being released on people. He doesn't say anything about mutating covid to profit off vaccines. It's more about trying to develop a vaccine before a mutation occurs so they can be on top of it right away instead of further down the line when it would already be too late. It's all there in plain English, to someone he is supposedly revealing the master plan to. There is nothing.

I'm sick of covid hysteria shit myself but you're just covid hysteria on the opposite end of the argument. It's pathetic. Quit looking for things you want to see where they don't exist.

lmao, Project Veritas. these guys are fucking scum even among journalists, glorified tabloid reporters, but they get passed around because the counterculture is so thirsty for the kind of opinion confirmation libs get from the MSM every day. the headline is straight up disingenuous tabloid bullshit - if you even just read the text summary of the conversation in the article, it's obvious this guy is not saying Pfizer is literally breeding new coronavirus variants to infect the public so they can sell more vaccines. this is what I gather from the actual video:

- Pfizer's virology team is trying to induce minor mutations in the 'rona in a laboratory setting, to hopefully create variants that may later crop up in the wild, allowing them to accelerate vaccine development/testing and get it to market sooner than the competition
- the guy neutrally agrees that the vax is making his company a lot of money. note that he's not a money guy according to any other selectively presented slice of info - "executive" is technically correct in a sense, I guess? but he's a science lead (R&D Strategy and mRNA Planning), not one of the chief jews in charge of company moneymaking policy
- he asks the Project Veritas guy not to tell anybody because it's perfect ammo for some shit-sucking journoscum to disignenuously twist into a sensationalist story which would certainly get him fired. according to their usual modus operandi, this Project Veritas dude is likely somebody who's been "undercover" and trying to get closer to this guy for a while in order to hopefully pull a morsel like this, meaning the journo-rat has likely spent a significant amount of time pretending to be this guy's friend, recording every conversation they have, building trust with the express aim of betraying it as soon as he got something juicy. note that in the video they appear to be at some kind of restaurant getting drinks, meaning he probably deliberately baited the guy into getting sauced up in the hopes that he would start talking reckless

this is why companies like Pfizer have draconian internal policies for dealing with the media. whatever the truth of what's actually happening inside a company like that, the media guys who are out there looking for stories are fucking predators. they know which stories have an audience waiting for them and all they need to get is a couple compromising pictures, a couple of unflattering lines caught on recording, just enough to make it look bad because they know what the audience wants to believe is way more important than the actual mundane details. if you can provide a plausible path to the thing the audience already wants to believe, bam, instant viral news story. truth is only valuable as seasoning - you want enough to make it interesting, but not too much or you lose the sensational flavor. this retard made the mistake of choosing to trust somebody while being a prime target for predatory journalism and now he's out on his ass for it, so "Veritas" can have their big story and pretend like it's yet more proof that they're the Real Deal. journoshits once again prove themselves to be the lowest form of life on the planet
No point in explaining anything, honestly. anti-vaccine tards are equally as insufferable as pro-vaccine tards. Equally in need of minecrafting.

edit: Boy is this place ever full of the exact same people they usually make threads about.
 
Last edited:
So I'm reading what the guy said and I don't know what's wrong with your comprehension of english, but the purpose of mutating the virus is said, IN HIS OWN WORDS, to predict future viruses, not to unleash it on people
Mutating the virus in the ways he describes will not allow them to predict wild type mutations.
It does NOT let you do this. It creates a totally different set of selection pressures than the virus circulating in the wild.
In the wild the pressures are to more transmissible and less virulent. When you do what he describes, you pressure towards far more virulent. Look up Ron Fouchier and his similar experiments with flu.
There is NO excuse that ‘oh guys it’s to see where it will go so we can have vaccine ready.’ It’s not going to show them what’s likely to happen in the wild.
Flu jabs for a year depend on sentinel samples - they see what’s circulating that year and coming to be more prevalent and they shove the worst four or so variants in a shot. The whole rationale of the mRNA platform is that can respond in a day or two to create a template for any vital variant you want (so again the use of serial passage is useless, it’s slow.)
What he’s describing is something that will drive selection of worse variants. You ONLY do primate work on this if you’re doing quite specific things looking at their immune system or specific transmission stuff.
It cannot be dismissed as ‘just trying to help.’
 
I'm sick of covid hysteria shit myself but you're just covid hysteria on the opposite end of the argument. It's pathetic. Quit looking for things you want to see where they don't exist.
Cool, now brush off the part where he says the regulator doesn't look into things too carefully because they don't want to rock the boat too much so there's a job waiting for them after their government career is done
 
So I'm reading what the guy said and I don't know what's wrong with your comprehension of english, but the purpose of mutating the virus is said, IN HIS OWN WORDS, to predict future viruses, not to unleash it on people. He even says you don't want it being released on people. He doesn't say anything about mutating covid to profit off vaccines. It's more about trying to develop a vaccine before a mutation occurs so they can be on top of it right away instead of further down the line when it would already be too late
You seem smart, do you want to buy the Brooklyn Bridge from me?
 
So I'm reading what the guy said and I don't know what's wrong with your comprehension of english, but the purpose of mutating the virus is said, IN HIS OWN WORDS, to predict future viruses, not to unleash it on people. He even says you don't want it being released on people. He doesn't say anything about mutating covid to profit off vaccines. It's more about trying to develop a vaccine before a mutation occurs so they can be on top of it right away instead of further down the line when it would already be too late. It's all there in plain English, to someone he is supposedly revealing the master plan to. There is nothing.

I'm sick of covid hysteria shit myself but you're just covid hysteria on the opposite end of the argument. It's pathetic. Quit looking for things you want to see where they don't exist.


No point in explaining anything, honestly. anti-vaccine tards are equally as insufferable as pro-vaccine tards. Equally in need of minecrafting.

Hey, you know that event a couple years ago where someone in Wuhan was dicking around with gain of function and ended up having it released that resulted in:
Largest wealth transfer ever
Countless small business and livelihoods ruined
Lockdown of everyone
Implementing the framework of a bio-security police state apparatus
Mystery science juice that must be injected

And yet no one responsible for this was held accountable?

Let's go for round two! Money is too be made yo!
 
Weird to take an angle of "you need to be smart to maintain generational wealth" in the world that gave us Sam Bankman-Fried.
I used to think that's a shitty philosophy too, but then I realized how fucking dumb people are. It really cements it more than anything. A lot of people are smart. I'm sure you are, and I like to think I am, but the people we typically consider to be full retard do things like scam billions off of people or run world governments. They might do dumb stuff, but they're clearly smarter than the people supporting the system they're benefitting from (or at least a huge amount of those people). Bitconnect and FTX both seemed like scams if you were the least bit skeptical, but you and I did not make billions last year. Maybe we exist in the middle ground between the sort of people that fall for a ponzi early and get out on the time and the sort that make the ponzi. Only thing is, our position doesn't get paid.
 
Youtube insider leaked a request to jannies in the "Medical misinfo queue" to remove this video.
veritas youtuber insider.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • veritas youtuber insider.jpeg
    veritas youtuber insider.jpeg
    212 KB · Views: 12
Youtube insider leaked a request to jannies in the "Medical misinfo queue" to remove this video.
View attachment 4377572
And that's not all, the guy who did a hit piece for Forbes on Project Veritas worked for...guess who? Pfizer!
( https://archive.ph/0DWbb )
This weekend, Forbes.com published a clumsy attempt to discredit the self-declared and first hand source – Jordon Trishton-Walker – who was caught on a Project Veritas hidden camera boasting about Pfizer’s active, dangerous mutation of the COVID-19 virus.
What Forbes doesn’t tell you is its author Dr. Bruce Y. Lee’s proximity to Pfizer, Inc. itself.

Dr. Lee’s argument against the veracity of the Veritas video boils down to this paragraph:
“…a Google search didn’t really reveal any legitimate source that could verify the person’s name and title. Similarly, a search on LinkedIn doesn’t reveal any such verifiable profiles either, just some accounts trying to spread his name… Of note, a search for “Triston” without the “h” did return an Urban Dictionary entry that described “Triston” as “a very hot and cute boy who always wants to disagree. Who has the softest hair in the entire world.” So if you are looking for someone hot, disagreeable, and really soft-haired, there is that.”
Dr. Lee would have known, if he had bothered to check, that search results related to Walker, especially on LinkedIn, were purged just moments after the Veritas video dropped:
 
The left despises Project Veritas, because the left is a bunch of sexual degenerates who can't not fall into any and every honey pot PV sets for them, no matter how ridiculously obvious a setup they may be.

Every. Fucking. Time.

You dangle pussy and/or dick in front of the left's heroes and champions, and they start singing like canaries, because they're all a bunch of slaves to their sexual depravity, and zealots who can't shut up about their own evil and degenerate machinations.

What really kills the left is that they know they can't flip it around and catch any righties in honey traps, because, with the right, there is no "quiet part" that they're going to catch them saying out loud, and they know it. The left knows that all the nefarious right wing schemes they accuse the right of plotting only exist in the minds of the lunatic left, so they know they won't be able to catch any right wing targets confirming some ridiculous shit that doesn't even exist.

When they tried to honey trap Giuliani, they didn't catch him going "Yes! It's true! I'm the grand cyclops of the Proud Boys, and the Jan 6th insurrection was my master plan!" No, they just caught an old guy lying on a bed fiddling with his pants.

TOTES BUSTED!

Lame as fuck.

The left knows they can't fight PV's fire with fire, because they got no fire.
 
The Daily Mail published that article about Jordon Walker and Pfizer.

Pfizer admits 'engineering' Covid mutants in lab studies to ensure its antiviral drug works on new variants — but pharma giant insists tests were not 'gain of function’ and did not pose risk to public​

  • Pharma giant finally responded to viral undercover video by Project Veritas
  • Denied doing gain of function or 'directed evolution' experiments in statement
  • Did admit to testing new mutations on its antiviral Paxlovid in low-risk studies
By CONNOR BOYD HEALTH EDITOR and CAITLIN TILLEY, HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and ANDREA CAVALLIER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 03:14 EST, 26 January 2023 | UPDATED: 17:50 EST, 30 January 2023

Pfizer has admitted it ‘engineered’ mutated Covid viruses in lab tests to ensure its vaccine and drugs remained effective against new variants – but the company denies the experiments posed a risk to the public.

In a press release sneaked out on Friday night, the pharma giant finally responded to an undercover video that went viral last week in which a supposed director at the firm claimed the company was exploring 'directed evolution' research on monkeys to make the virus 'more potent'.

Jordon Trishton Walker, who appears to have been a senior staffer in Pfizer's research and development division, was caught making the explosive claim in a sting by the right-wing activist group Project Veritas.

Pfizer flatly denied conducting gain of function or directed evolution research on monkeys but admitted that ‘in a limited number of cases’ it altered the virus and tested new mutations against its Covid antiviral drug Paxlovid in Petri dishes.
I probably already mentioned it but it might be worth to tell again. The Daily Mail did another article who was quickly removed but saved on Archive.md and the Wayback Machine.
 
I used to think that's a shitty philosophy too, but then I realized how fucking dumb people are. It really cements it more than anything. A lot of people are smart. I'm sure you are, and I like to think I am, but the people we typically consider to be full retard do things like scam billions off of people or run world governments. They might do dumb stuff, but they're clearly smarter than the people supporting the system they're benefitting from (or at least a huge amount of those people). Bitconnect and FTX both seemed like scams if you were the least bit skeptical, but you and I did not make billions last year. Maybe we exist in the middle ground between the sort of people that fall for a ponzi early and get out on the time and the sort that make the ponzi. Only thing is, our position doesn't get paid.
You’re equating intelligence with wealth, but I don’t think it’s as simple as that. The thing you’re missing in your equation is sociopathy because you need to be clever to figure out how to take advantage of people on a large scale but you have to be sick in the head to actually go ahead and do it. But it’s not a 1:1 ratio and there’s definitely plenty of dumb fuck rich people who just learn to play the game.
 
You’re equating intelligence with wealth, but I don’t think it’s as simple as that. The thing you’re missing in your equation is sociopathy because you need to be clever to figure out how to take advantage of people on a large scale but you have to be sick in the head to actually go ahead and do it. But it’s not a 1:1 ratio and there’s definitely plenty of dumb fuck rich people who just learn to play the game.
Oh yeah, I agree that there's an element of sociopathy, too. I guess it comes down to whether you value your conscience over wealth, so long as you're aware there will always be people who don't.
Personally, I'd just prefer wealth for the sake of the increased freedom it affords you from the evil people in high places.
 
Oh yeah, I agree that there's an element of sociopathy, too. I guess it comes down to whether you value your conscience over wealth, so long as you're aware there will always be people who don't.
Personally, I'd just prefer wealth for the sake of the increased freedom it affords you from the evil people in high places.
Freedom from the lizard people by becoming one? Sounds like a bad deal.
 
Oh yeah, I agree that there's an element of sociopathy, too. I guess it comes down to whether you value your conscience over wealth, so long as you're aware there will always be people who don't.
Personally, I'd just prefer wealth for the sake of the increased freedom it affords you from the evil people in high places.
That only works up to a certain point. There are plenty of normal dudes who got extremely wealthy from crypto and then got disappeared for not playing ball. Nikolai Mushegain is a good example. Being wealthy enough only makes the target on your back larger. Getting just enough money and then escaping to some second world shithole where you can live under the radar is the only way to get "freedom."
 
Back