Alice Springs nurse leaves Karl speechless detailing child sexual abuse

A registered nurse left Karl Stefanovic speechless on the Today show after revealing the disturbing reason some children roam the streets in Alice Springs, detailing horrific instances of the child sexual abuse that plagues many of Australia’s remote communities.

Rachel Hale, who has worked as a registered nurse for almost 14 years, spoke on Tuesday of the “level of trauma and shocking occurrences of sexual violence” she had witnessed, which mean some children in Alice Springs simply do not have a safe home to which to return.

“It haunts me. I have seen a four-year-old boy come in with anal warts and a six-year-old with vaginal sores,” she told Channel 9’s Today.

“A two-year-old was raped in Alice Springs last year. I have colleagues who witness things on a daily basis here, even in Darwin and the town community, where a first responder was turned out and the lights of the vehicle shone on a house, and they saw a man raping an eight-year-old girl.

“I asked, what happened to that little girl? What was she doing? Nothing, was the answer. She didn’t scream, she didn’t move, she didn’t cry out, because she is so used to that treatment.”

The descriptions were graphic and disturbing, Ms Hale said, but it was important for Australians to understand the reality of the unrest in Alice Springs.

“This is why these kids are on the street, and your viewers need to hear this,” she told the program.

“It’s an uncomfortable conversation, but it’s one that needs to be addressed.”

“The brutal reality. It’s uncomfortable, it’s awful,” said host Karl Stefanovic, who was left near-speechless by the account.

Ms Hale’s interview comes more than 15 years after the federal government’s Little Children are Sacred report, which found disturbing evidence of significant child sexual abuse in Northern Territory communities — and which prompted a number of new policies, including the Stronger Futures alcohol ban that was terminated last year.

Restrictions on alcohol and movement in Alice Springs would not work unless children were given a safe home, Ms Hale said.

“People want to know why kids are out on the street late at night. I’ve seen little children, about five or six years old, and they were out all night, and why aren’t the families and the parents being held responsible?” she asked, in response to a question about whether she believed restrictions in the town were working.

“I guess the short answer to that is, these kids are being raped at home, and the level of domestic violence that they see is horrific. So, it’s far safer for them to be on the streets than at home in these town camps.”

Ms Hale, who lives in Darwin but owns a business in Alice Springs and visits every two months, detailed more of the horrific scenes she had dealt with during a harrowing interview with Ben Fordham on 2GB radio on Tuesday.

“Us healthcare workers have got some form of PTSD because we see a lifelong career of this,” she said.

“You cannot unsee the things that we’ve seen.. I’ve seen an entire family with the same strain of gonorrhea from the children to the parents, let that sink in.”

Anthony Albanese earlier this month flew to Alice Springs to reintroduce a partial ban on alcohol — but Ms Hale criticised the short visit.

He (the Prime Minister) came into Alice Springs for five hours, and they come up with ‘we are restricting takeaway alcohol for Monday and Tuesday’, and that’s where the conversation ended. You have to be there on the ground,” she said.

“The children, they were all bussed out for the day when the Prime Minister was in town, and then they came back later on that night” Ms Hale added, referring to a widespread rumour that Indigenous youth were removed from Alice Springs for the government visit.

“It’s not fair on the people of Alice Springs when this happens. I guess these kids, their home life environment is so unstable and so unsafe, as I said, it’s far easier and safer for them to be in the streets. But these kids need to be put in a safe facility and rehabilitated.”

News.com.au previously spoke with Ms Hale, who provided footage of Alice Springs youth hurling racial abuse, spitting on and assaulting pub patrons just days after Mr Albanese’s visit.

In one video, a group of young Indigenous girls are standing outside the pub’s fence yelling at customers, before leaning through and spitting on a woman seated at a table.

Another video shows a man in a red shirt chasing a group of boys on the street after they allegedly stole something from his ute parked outside.

In a third video, a young man in a grey shirt gets in a fist fight with one of the teens as the pub’s security guard stands by watching.

“People describe these events that are happening here but no one’s actually seeing it,” Ms Hale aid.

“Probably by 7pm it started. The most disturbing part is the taunting by these kids — for the locals it’s like water off a duck’s back — but they stand on the other side of the fence slinging insults. It’s just disgusting, racist. ‘You white b****h, you white c**t.’ Everyone’s sick of it. The patrons downstairs, they were firing back telling them to p**s off, but they don’t stop.”


NT Police asked witnesses to come forward.

“NT Police condemn any form of anti-social behaviour, particularly alcohol related violence, within our community,” a spokesman said in a statement to news.com.au.

“We urge anyone who witnesses crime or anti-social behaviour to make contact on 131 444 or in an emergency triple-0. You can also report anonymous through Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.”

Earlier on Saturday, a news.com.au photographer witnessed a group of youths — including at least one girl wearing an ankle monitor — scrawling graffiti on walls along the Stuart Highway and throwing rocks at passing cars.

At one point an enraged tradie jumped out of his truck and chased two of the teens towards the Stott Terrace intersection near the Westpoint shopping centre.

One of the teens turned and picked up a rock from the ground, stopping in the middle of the road at the traffic lights to threaten the man.

Ms Hale said police were practically powerless to stop the young offenders.

Under controversial justice reforms passed by the Labor government in December, the Northern Territory became the first Australian jurisdiction to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 10 to 12.

Children under 12 who engage in behaviour that would normally constitute an offence will instead be offered “intensive” therapeutic programs and psychological assessments.

The bill also simplified the legal test, commonly known as doli incapax, which is used to determine whether a child under 14 years of age has the mental capacity to commit an offence.

“Because now kids that age can’t be charged, the adults are loading the cars up with kids and dropping them off in the suburbs, they go and do all the crimes,” said baker Darren Clark, founder of the Action for Alice Facebook page.

“And if they get caught, it’s a thing called ‘doli incapax’, which means I don’t know what I’m doing. They plead it on the spot, and the cops just take them home.”

Introducing the proposed changes in October, Attorney-General Chansey Paech insisted “the evidence is clear — the earlier a child enters the justice system, the more likely they are to reoffend”.

“Punitive measures are not a deterrent for 10 and 11-year-olds,” Mr Paech said at the time, reported the NT News.

“In fact, it is more likely to increase behavioural problems and reoffending. It’s time to get smarter on our youth justice approach and break the cycle of youth crime. We’re asking Territorians to come on a journey with us. We’ve heard loud and clear that the old system is not working.”

Ms Hale, like other locals in the town which is besieged on some nights by hundreds of marauding youths, slammed the government as out of touch with reality.

“What would you have police do with an 11-year-old who’s just assaulted someone with a machete, attempted rape, bashed someone with a rock, broken into a shopfront?” Ms Hale said.

“What happens in Alice Springs is they move them on — if they can catch them. The kids know this, therefore their actions have become quite brazen. You can slap an ankle bracelet on all these kids — then what?”

She also slammed the Opposition for simply pointing the finger at Labor. “I’m sick of one political person blaming the other party,” she said. “We don’t care whose problem it is, we care that the problem is fixed.”

Mr Clark, a local of 25 years, previously told news.com.au he, too, didn’t believe an alcohol ban would be effective.

“The roll back of the (alcohol) ban probably has added to the alcohol problems here, but we’ve had alcohol problems for a long time,” Mr Clark said.

“Taking the alcohol away is not going to give these kids a safe home … These children from a young age are witness to the kind of violence we cannot comprehend. The violence they now partake in, to us, is extreme. To them, it’s all they know.”

Ms Hale warned that, unless the youth crime problem was addressed soon, she feared something bad would happen.

The town that can’t stay open past sunset

‘Not OK’: Aussie city descends into chaos
“People are getting fed up,” she said. “Someone is going to lose their s**t and retaliate and one of these kids is going to die, and it’s going to be splashed all over the headlines.”

From https://www.news.com.au/national/cr...e/news-story/45110f8ecc7c5218350d7975f00d9521
 
"a recent study conducted in Melbourne reported that there was no tangible improvement in the social position of "removed" Aboriginal people as compared to "non-removed". Particularly in the areas of employment and post-secondary education, the removed children had about the same results as those who were not removed"

The disadvantage of an average IQ of 65 kind of dwarfs any benefit a good environment might bring.
 
It's the same ordeal for all 'indigenous' people. All they want to do is fuck kids, huff gasoline, and gamble. The indian reservations here in the US aren't much better. They're squalid shitholes full of criminals where child abuse is rampant because their law enforcement is done in-house.
This is why so little news coverage is put on missing Indian women. More often than not, it's some fellow Indian that raped and murdered the poor woman but when more facts emerge the mainstream media drops the story.
 
So, what I'm hearing is that all abo's who aren't productive members of society (or decent shit posters, like Dyn) should be sterilized? Ok, whatever is necessary.

When it comes to native peoples it's almost like they are a biological anachronism. You'd think removing them from the environment would solve the problem, but if the outcome is the same, then it means its a biogenetic issue. They just aren't capable of participating in a modern society. The scientists in the 19th century were onto something after all...
 
Last edited:
For people who have to deal with Abos...

It seems like Native/nonwhite people everywhere can be frustrating for the whites, but like I have never seen even the most based white person in the US say that they would never have a black (African-American) maid, cook, driver, or gardener. Ditto for Asians, Native Americans, and Mexicans, historically. The whole narrative of "in their place." Even if you dislike them in general, if you see an 80-year-old black man with a Santa Maria BBQ outside a roadside stand, you would absolutely eat there, no question.

Bongs in India, Spanish in Latin America, Dutch in Africa, and so forth set themselves up with handy little fiefdoms based on vast quantities of useful indigenous labor.

Have Abos traditionally been used as servants or notsomuch?

Where have Abos and whites traditionally intersected as far as labor goes?
 
I personally wonder what would if experiments were done on the abbo children.

Like what happens when the abbo children are given food, shelter, security, and denied drugs, booze and most of all no sexual violence.
Nothing changes because abbos remain fundamentally the same.

The western ideas of development and behavior have labored under a well meaning, but dangerously naive idea we are all born essentially the same, and are shaped almost entirely by our upbringing and experiences. This is mostly false. Humans, like all other creatures, are overwhelmingly shaped by genetics. Some creatures, entire groups, or species are born more aggressive and less intelligent than others.

No amount of loving care will make a pit bull a safer animal. It makes it more dangerous, because it becomes able to hide it's inherent nature. Abbos are no different. They lack the ability to have the mental skills to allow them to function in the modern world.
 
This was all known about generations ago. Anyone who has any contact with them knows their children are raped and abused regularly but you're not allowed to mention it. The police aren't allowed to investigate because the 'Elders' are the ones allowing and committing the crimes and won't allow the rest to co-operate. The occasional ones that go to court always end up having a few witnesses conveniently not rocking up.

The only thing worse than being born a dog on an abbo community is being born a human child.
 
a recent study conducted in Melbourne reported that there was no tangible improvement in the social position of "removed" Aboriginal people as compared to "non-removed". Particularly in the areas of employment and post-secondary education, the removed children had about the same results as those who were not removed
Reading over the entire "outcomes" section I see no mention of the relative rates of rape, violence and murder at the hands of their adoptive guardians vs their biological parents. Lots on economic outcomes and prison rates of course, "social position" yadda yadda but protecting children of your nation from horrific abuse is a good in itself regardless of other outcomes.

I won't deny that some of those children were probably abused by their new caregivers but if it was even 10% as much I'd be shocked and that's still a massive improvement.
 
You should include the following paragraph:
The study indicated that removed Aboriginal people were less likely to have completed a secondary education, three times as likely to have acquired a police record, and were twice as likely to use illicit drugs as were Aboriginal people who grew up in their ethnic community.[29] The only notable advantage "removed" Aboriginal people achieved was a higher average income. The report noted this was likely due to the increased urbanisation of removed individuals, and greater access to welfare payments than for Aboriginal people living in remote communities.[29] There seemed to be little evidence that removed mixed-race Aboriginal people had been successful in gaining better work even in urbanised areas.
Ripping children from their families made them more likely to be fuck ups. Who could have known?
 
If the authorities knew a white four year old was being raped by family, the child would be removed from the family and the family prosecuted.
Why aren’t these kids treated the same? They’re basically saying their lives aren’t worth as much. It strikes me constantly how racist anti-racist policies are. Same with that class of Muslim kids in Sweden where almost all the girls had been found to be circumcised. If that had been white girls, there’d be uproar.
How can this be dealt with? A genuine solution not a stupid political or SJW one. How can these kids be helped, protected and how can they stop them turning into feral nightmares? What solutions would be put in place of it was gangs of white kids? Why isn’t that done?
 
If the authorities knew a white four year old was being raped by family, the child would be removed from the family and the family prosecuted.
Why aren’t these kids treated the same? They’re basically saying their lives aren’t worth as much. It strikes me constantly how racist anti-racist policies are. Same with that class of Muslim kids in Sweden where almost all the girls had been found to be circumcised. If that had been white girls, there’d be uproar.
How can this be dealt with? A genuine solution not a stupid political or SJW one. How can these kids be helped, protected and how can they stop them turning into feral nightmares? What solutions would be put in place of it was gangs of white kids? Why isn’t that done?
"Uh it's their culture, we cannot interfere, that'd be racist"
 
All of the remote outback communities are pretty much the same unfortunately:
https://www.news.com.au/national/we...s/news-story/6d94f23d78a10bfe4af43c68b3079a0b
(a)
Yeah, the Derby, W.A stuff sounds horrible. No food but abo refugees?
If the authorities knew a white four year old was being raped by family, the child would be removed from the family and the family prosecuted.
Why aren’t these kids treated the same? They’re basically saying their lives aren’t worth as much. It strikes me constantly how racist anti-racist policies are. Same with that class of Muslim kids in Sweden where almost all the girls had been found to be circumcised. If that had been white girls, there’d be uproar.
How can this be dealt with? A genuine solution not a stupid political or SJW one. How can these kids be helped, protected and how can they stop them turning into feral nightmares? What solutions would be put in place of it was gangs of white kids? Why isn’t that done?
Taking Abo kids and putting them in the system is a problem. We get the BS about "muh stolen generation".

Not to mention.... no one wants to take Abo kids because they're....not compatible with civilized life.

As brutal as this will sound, most abos just... you could take them away at birth, like the Stolen generation was and you can give them a white upbringing, a full education and treat them like royalty, but they won't have the outcome, by and large, that one would expect.

Pacific Islanders, whilst sometimes trouble, are mostly capable of fitting in. They often work hard and have good family connections.

Abos aren't the same. They never have had a society like other cultures. They didn't build structures to live in, their rites and rituals, mores and norms are stuck 50,000 years in the past.
They've never advanced, biologically, socially or genetically.
They are literal, actual cavemen.
They have health problems like crazy, don't live overly long lives, they cannot handle alcohol and are exceptionally low IQ.

They tried giving them a self sustaining, money making place of their own and they destroyed it and burned it down. They give them houses and towns and they burn it down and destroy it.
They literally shit where they eat.

Letting them die off is the only humane solution for this ancient prototype of the modern human. But then you have whites who have Abo blood who carry that retardation gene who will be the problem.
 
Yes, I agree that they are most 'different' ethnicity on the planet. They had 50,000 years of isolation, some subspecies have formed with just twice that.
Whilst I agree they score poorly on IQ tests, their visual memory is top notch, so I'd say they are just adapted for a different world.
We cannot give them that world, if all the 'invaders' magically disappeared, they'd be treated far worse by Indonesia or China
What with automation, imports and immigration, there are less low cognative load jobs available for mentally challenged Australians of all races, it's a major challenge everywhere.

For example almost all digeridoo I tried to buy were made in Indonesia. Should we try to make stuff like that protected cultural artefacts to give them manufacturing jobs? I doubt it'd help many of the hundreds of thousands of unemployed/underemployed natives.
 
Last edited:
"When we got to Broome they put me and my cousin in the Broome lock-up. We were only ten years old."
Already ten years old and probably unable to read or write or count to twenty, yeah sure that's a future Lorentz right there.

The disadvantage of an average IQ of 65 kind of dwarfs any benefit a good environment might bring.
IQ is largely bunk.
There were two studies recently, both promoted by celebrity racist Steve Sailer (I mean this in the best possible way, I respect the man).

IQ tests are culturally unfair
Adoption study on the heritability of IQ (you'd be shocked to know that adoptees imported from Africa are doing worse than their White adopted siblings, can't imagine why, must be nigs are retarded)

IQ across time: extremely good Sailer article
choice quote
Finally, the fastest rising subtest on the WISC, Similarities, rewards abstract scientific thinking, what Flynn calls viewing the world through “scientific spectacles.”

A child gets a maximum score for replying that dogs and rabbits are “mammals.” A kid in 1947 who had never seen a nature documentary on TV would likely have said “They have four legs” or something else more concrete than the Linnaean category “mammals.”
In 1947 a child in the hollers of Kentucky would probably know more concrete things about dogs and rabbits than an urban child today. But IQ tests have tended to anticipate the direction in which global culture has evolved, away from the concrete and toward the abstract and two-dimensional, toward what can be represented on a piece of paper or a screen.
The Flynn Effect is a side effect of the developers of the IQ test being on “the right side of history.”

IQ scientists are pussyfooting around the issue and produce bunk dogwhistle thinkpieces which are supposed to deliver the holy grail "nigs are hopelessly retarded" but are prevented from actually proving (or disproving) that by design. To my best knowledge, a study which would resolve the matter of racial hopelessness of any race has never been attempted. (It is of course obvious that nigs and abos are more retarded on average right now, and IQ is heritable in the sense that retarded parents produce retarded children.)

IQ is still a good predictor of future "success" for a specific child per the usual metrics, because children who are trained to solve IQ tests are more likely to be better parented. In other words, it's an extreme dimensionality reduction of the current observable reality, and its usefulness is that of a now-failing euphemism shield in the War on Noticing.

Also, the abo babbies didn't have a good environment.
Taking Abo kids and putting them in the system is a problem. We get the BS about "muh stolen generation".
Why yes it is a problem. They were put into the system, digested, and shat out in the form of family-less abo laborers. What "should" have been done was to place some of them (the youngest, by lottery) in carefully selected adoptive families and raised according to said families' social class. They wouldn't be as good as White children (shitty mother's health, neglect during fetal development, racism), but they should be well-integrated and off the tugboat. And if not, there's your holy grail.

Ripping children from their families made them more likely to be fuck ups. Who could have known?
Exactly.
 
Back