Science Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’

  • Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
  • Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
  • Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
  • Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”
[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walker:Part of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalist:Oh my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.
Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs -- eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.



Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

 
And they don’t give a fuck or understand weird concepts like gain of function research and the legal loopholes corporations go through to conduct that research. To them this guy is basically saying Pfizer has their back and is looking out for them.
And if it was that easy to control the narrative Pfizer wouldn't have gone full DFE to the point they're pretending this guy never even existed. Near as I can tell they're refusing to admit the PV video even exists, not even a boilerplate "Project Veritas are known liars and engage in deceptive editing" statement from them.
  • Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
  • Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
  • Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
  • Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations."
Yeah, this guy absolutely gave away far too much of the game.
 
And if it was that easy to control the narrative Pfizer wouldn't have gone full DFE to the point they're pretending this guy never even existed. Near as I can tell they're refusing to admit the PV video even exists, not even a boilerplate "Project Veritas are known liars and engage in deceptive editing" statement from them.
Sure let’s just see how much change happens because of this. I guarantee zero. Even if Pfizer are fined in years to come they already work that into their profit margins and the people who facilitated all this horror are shielded from punishment.
 
Sure let’s just see how much change happens because of this. I guarantee zero. Even if Pfizer are fined in years to come they already work that into their profit margins and the people who facilitated all this horror are shielded from punishment.
Yeah, they're fine with the current COVID vaccine, but its a bit hard to sell people on anything else you make when you're getting up to zombie movie shenanigans in your laboratories. Fauci may have come out smelling like roses about COVID, but what about that beagle torture he was involved with, hmm?
 
Yeah, they're fine with the current COVID vaccine, but its a bit hard to sell people on anything else you make when you're getting up to zombie movie shenanigans in your laboratories. Fauci may have come out smelling like roses about COVID, but what about that beagle torture he was involved with, hmm?
Yeah I’m sure he cares about any of that in his million dollar mansion with his personal chef cooking him breakfast, lunch and dinner. He probably walks his own dog around the local dog park thinking to himself how much of a positive difference he’s made on the world and what a great bloke he is. Heck, there’s even a Netflix special that proves it.
 
Yeah I’m sure he cares about any of that in his million dollar mansion with his personal chef cooking him breakfast, lunch and dinner. He probably walks his own dog around the local dog park thinking to himself how much of a positive difference he’s made on the world and what a great bloke he is. Heck, there’s even a Netflix special that proves it.
Yeah, and all that is a consolation prize compared to what he used to be. I know what you're saying and thinking, but men like him desire power above all else, and he's probably inwardly seething over what he lost far more than he's enjoying what he has.
 
Yeah, and all that is a consolation prize compared to what he used to be. I know what you're saying and thinking, but men like him desire power above all else, and he's probably inwardly seething over what he lost far more than he's enjoying what he has.
I’m sorry but that just sounds like cope. These people trample all over us get rewarded for it. I know this sounds like a libshit argument but I’m not calling for the abolishment of capitalism, I just want some accountability.
 
I’m sorry but that just sounds like cope. These people trample all over us get rewarded for it. I know this sounds like a libshit argument but I’m not calling for the abolishment of capitalism, I just want some accountability.
It is, but I'd rather have him there than continuing to be a scumbag bureaucrat. I'm with you what I'd really like to see, but since that isn't practical or legal I'll take what I can get.
 
The Daily Mail published that article about Jordon Walker and Pfizer.


I probably already mentioned it but it might be worth to tell again. The Daily Mail did another article who was quickly removed but saved on Archive.md and the Wayback Machine.
Oh now that’s interesting. The DM are scumbags BUT they also sometimes publish stuff no one else will do and can sometimes be a genuine thorn (hillsborough for example they would not let go of and they did end up pushing tptb to do more.)
They get sued a lot and they have very very good lawyers. So I suspect they got the frighteners put on them, pulled it, and now the lawyers have been over it and said yes, publish. Interesting .
 
Screenshot_20230131_123018_Twitter.jpg


Link to tweet.
 
Don't be fooled by the Daily Mail posting about the Project Veritas/Pfizer incident for the second time. If you read the article it's very eye-rolling inducing.
They try to act impartial stating they spoke to two different scientists. They blow their cover though when they only quote a few sentences from the "Pfizer bad" guy then spend the rest of the article letting this other guy and his colleague explain to you why this is all a nothing burger and the things Jordon said don't actually mean what you think they do and blah, blah, blah.
Daily Mail is only trying to cover their own asses after they pulled the story and then got called out for doing so.
The ~~~new and improved~~~ article is for the sheep who believe that big pharma would never hurt you.
 
That only works up to a certain point. There are plenty of normal dudes who got extremely wealthy from crypto and then got disappeared for not playing ball. Nikolai Mushegain is a good example. Being wealthy enough only makes the target on your back larger. Getting just enough money and then escaping to some second world shithole where you can live under the radar is the only way to get "freedom."
Mind expanding on this? You piked my curiosity.
 
We already know this but it might be worth to repeat the details with that article.

Project Veritas claims to have obtained internal documents from an employee at Google showing the company’s scramble to do public relations fallout for Pfizer, Inc.

The internal documentation was shared on Twitter on Monday: https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1620193873875320834

The document reads “URGENT GUIDANCE: Project Veritas video on the Pfizer vaccine, 27 Jan 2023.” It states:

WHAT: A clip unloaded by Project Veritas featuring a Pfizer official is rapidly spreading on the platform. The video, when uploaded in its entiretly contains a timestamp that violates the COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation policy for making a categorical claim that COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective, and should therefore be removed unless it contains sufficient EDSA/CRC.


The document than proceeds to direct employees to “check the 4 corners and metadata for EDSA that clearly contradicts, refutes or countervails the violative timestamp without additional promotion (generalization, aggregation, repetition, affirmation).”

It then states to “Action the content” with a “STRIKE” if “no sufficient CRC is present in the 4 corners, title or description.”


“It is important that we remove violative reuploads of this content as it spreads harmful misinformation about approved vaccines against COVID-19,” the directive adds.
Talk about having the "Pfizergate" and "Googlegate" at the same time.
 
Back