Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread - Episode III - Revenge of the Ruski (now unlocked with new skins and gameplay modes!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
But has one issue. If you start to find unexpected damages in one reactor, you might find them in all others of the same model
Shit happens. We're discovering issues with shitty green energy as well.

Tell me, what exactly is YOUR solution to Europe's energy situation? Nuclear is hands down the best energy source on the planet. Make better reactors. The designs coming out nowadays a far more advanced than anything made in past decades.

*Edit* Looked at the Power2Gas stuff. Oh look, more solar/wind shit. I can't wait for this stuff to ultimately fail and Europe has to continue to buy expensive US gas, or the EU governments just rape Europoors wallets more and telling them to use even less energy.
 
Absolutely nothing, it would not affect me.
I'll just hate Russia and the West for its failure to help Ukraine properly even more intensely. Ukraine should not fight this war as it does, said that numerous times. Ukraine should pursue a campaign of terror against Russia, and avoid all direct military confrontations with an obviously superior military force. Failure to learn from Afghans might be a fatal flaw.

Ukraine doesnt have the social structure afghanistan has.

For a strong insurgency you need societies with plenty of parallel lines of authority and a large surplus of young men. Ukraine lacks these.
 
Shit happens. We're discovering issues with shitty green energy as well.

Tell me, what exactly is YOUR solution to Europe's energy situation? Nuclear is hands down the best energy source on the planet. Make better reactors. The designs coming out nowadays a far more advanced than anything made in past decades.

*Edit* Looked at the Power2Gas stuff. Oh look, more solar/wind shit. I can't wait for this stuff to ultimately fail and Europe has to continue to buy expensive US gas, or the EU governments just rape Europoors wallets more and telling them to use even less energy.
One of the main goals for the war, on the American side, is to permanently end the Russian/ German trading alliance. I'd say this part of the war has been a success for the Burgers. Germany is in a truly horrifying position economically. It is utterly dependent on cheap and plentiful Russian hydrocarbons to stay competitive, which has allowed them to be the only European country with a significant industrial sector and export driven economy. They're now having to buy expensive LPG from the US and Qatar just to keep the lights on. Watch as most German industrial plants are relocated overseas or close down. As things stand Germany will be Europe's rust belt in a few years. Still they get to stay as an American vassal, so silver linings.


Ukraine doesnt have the social structure afghanistan has.

For a strong insurgency you need societies with plenty of parallel lines of authority and a large surplus of young men. Ukraine lacks these.
Ukraine's population has shrunk by 50% since the nineties. There are maybe 25 million people left in the entire country, including the Russian occupied areas. The most tragic part of this war is that Ukraine is likely finished as a coherent nation even if they win. The people that have emigrated are not coming back. Post war Ukraine is going to be fucked economically, there will be no spare hundreds of billions from the west to rebuild, think Lebanon after the civil war in the eighties or Bosnia, but much worse.



It was never the Burger intention to enter into a prolonged and hopeless proxy war against the Russians. A war that will end up costing trillions and with no prospect of a positive outcome given Russia's vast logistical advantage. They fully expected that economic sanctions would destroy the Russian economy, how could it not? The CIA and all of the foreign policy think tanks were 100% certain that Russia would immediately suffer full scale collapse once the sanctions were put in place. Well obviously that hasn't happened and amazingly there doesn't seem to be a plan B except throw ever more money and weapons at a lost cause.
 
Shit happens. We're discovering issues with shitty green energy as well.

Tell me, what exactly is YOUR solution to Europe's energy situation? Nuclear is hands down the best energy source on the planet. Make better reactors. The designs coming out nowadays a far more advanced than anything made in past decades.

*Edit* Looked at the Power2Gas stuff. Oh look, more solar/wind shit. I can't wait for this stuff to ultimately fail and Europe has to continue to buy expensive US gas, or the EU governments just rape Europoors wallets more and telling them to use even less energy.
For the short term? Renewables. Simple as. Construction of nuclear takes, I think about 10 years. So that's out of the question. There are some small sclale reactor plans currently in the USA but I think even these are planned for 2030 at the latest. So that might change it.

For the long term there are mostly going to be two energy systems:
1. Renewables + Storage
2. Nuclear

That's it with some exceptions like Iceland. Don't get me wrong. Nuclear is a viable option. It would just take far to long in the current situation to have an effect. Or do you see this conflict still being active in 2033?

But that's enough energy related sperging from me. I don't want to derail the thread too much.
 
I think it's frowned upon here to post pics without adding one's own text, but I really have nothing to add to this...
Screen Shot 2023-02-02 at 0.08.44.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The nuclear power fleet of France is one of the major reasons why the electricity went up in price in 2022.
That's just dishonest. In 2022, France's costs did not rise any more rapidly than any years prior.
Screenshot 2023-02-01 160311.png
Second half of 2021-First half of 2022 - 64 cent increase, and is actually smaller than increase from first half of 2021 to second half (76 cents)
hey have major problems with corrosion damages within their plants. And since they did the "right thing" by developing one reactor type and then reproducing that one in series. That caused the price for construction to drop conciderably. But has one issue. If you start to find unexpected damages in one reactor, you might find them in all others of the same model.

So France had to shutdown a lot of their nuclear power plants in 2022 for unscheduled tests and maintenance in addition to the regular shutdowns.
No shit, when stuff gets damaged you repair it. As you acknowledge, this is a rare issue as there doesn't seem to be much of a problem like this since 1956. You point out one bad year to say that the entire idea doesn't work. Even in it's bad year and continuing into early 2023, France's costs are still rising less than Germany's (2.67% if we count EUR/MWh compared to 46.27%)

Same for price caps that are paid by the taxpayer.
Yes, but it isn't counted in the energy cost stats. You are artificially lowering the number. Germany's price caps cost it $14.5 billion euro in May alone, and that isn't reflected in the price. Adjusting for that fact keeps nations like France much lower on the cost list

Notice a pattern btw?
I see the implication. The implication is that the more renewables there are, the cheaper the energy. That would suggest that prices in Sweden and Norway would be significantly cheaper than in France or Netherlands. That is not so. Prices, and impact, of renewables (which aren't really renewable and don't last long) depend more on the location of the country.
For the short term?
And for the long term? After 25 years Solar panels start to lose their effectiveness, and soon after become a waste of space. First ever Soviet Nuclear plant, Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant, worked for 50 years before they shut it down. Ukraine boasts many of similar power plants (that Soviets built) that even 40 years later work like a dream, with no stop in sight. Many of the current Russian power plants from 1970's seem to be running without an issue. Experts have concluded that if properly maintained, Nuclear plants have no time limit.

Your plan is to shit up the world with extremely expensive short-term solutions that require extensive price controls to be function (all of which fuck over the tax payer), instead of using that same space for nuclear powerplants that can last indefinitely. That's just insane.
For the long term there are mostly going to be two energy systems:
1. Renewables + Storage
Why choose the literally lesser option? Nuclear works perfectly whether you are in coldlands of Russia, or hotlands of Spain unlike Wind Turbines (that don't work in Winter) and Solar Panels that barely work unless you have the rigth climate + right circumstances.
 
I think it's frowned upon here to post pics without adding one's own text, but I really have nothing to add to this...
View attachment 4395540
At first I thought it was manure, but having a sand statue is quite symbolic of Zelensky's leadership as well. As in, in a year there won't be trace left of it.

Time for some good news. Remember the American off-brand LARPer knockoff of Wagner PMC, called Mozart? Well, they're done. When confronted with the prospect of actually facing Wagner in combat, they promptly shat themselves and ran back home to post on Instagram and grift money from gullible /k/tards. Mission accomplished!
1675264846256.png

For some economic news, the UK is having a hard time keeping up with Russia, like some have correctly predicted last year.

Speaking of the UK, it also seems their military strength has been greatly, uh, let's say... exaggerated. Gotta admit, having their nuclear submarines held in place by superglue is pretty lol. Should've put some duct tape on it for good measure.

And now for a look at Sweden's chances of joining NATO. They are non-existent.
Sweden's accession to NATO is officially frozen indefinitely. At least for months, it is possible that for years. Finland could get into the alliance in its own way, but did not want to because of solidarity with the Swedes, to whom the Turkish president set "impossible" conditions. Now they hate him for it. But the West is leading things to something that will have to be glorified — for the same.

The State Department openly offers Erdoğan a bribe in the form of F-16 fighter jets if he agrees to NATO expansion northward. Erdoğan refused.

Behind the Kurdish separatists is a long bloody trail of terrorist acts. And the demand not to let the Swedes down until all the accomplices of the terrorists are handed over is the position not only of Erdoğan or the ruling Justice and Development Party, but of Turkey as a whole.

There is reason to believe that sooner or later Ankara will still be pushed through (through the Americans), and NATO will still expand to the north. Only the option in which Scandinavia is saved from destruction by neutrality, although unlikely, is still more likely than the scenario that Russia will attack the Finns and Swedes just like that.

In the event of a major war, being a NATO state on Russia's western borders is not a privilege, but something like membership in a "suicide squad"

Today's map from Rybar. The encirclement of Bakhmut is almost complete, looks like Seversk is going to be next.
1675265408335.png

For some kino, here's a Shturm-S complex destroying a Ukrainian troop transport, around the Svatovo direction.

 
Last edited:
They fully expected that economic sanctions would destroy the Russian economy, how could it not? The CIA and all of the foreign policy think tanks were 100% certain that Russia would immediately suffer full scale collapse once the sanctions were put in place.
I think one of the Russian politicians gave an interview the other day where he admitted it was a rather close call. Despite all contingencies, the scope of the sanctions was greater than expected and so the government agencies and the central bank had to work around the clock, scrambling to find solutions and establish new logistical chains on the fly. The article had a self-satisfied "we've done a good job" tone, but he admitted that at one point Russia's economy was hanging by a thread and had to be "ran in manual control mode" for a few weeks at the very beginning.
 
You know, I really couldn't care less how, or even IF, Europe ever fixes it's energy problem.

They had the tools, for DECADES, to become energy independent. But no. Too hard. The US runs these things on fucking ships with next to zero issues, but entire countries in Europe can't wrap their brains around this shit.

Post WW Europe is such a joke. Vassalization by the US has really done a number on them, as planned. Almost like lobotomy.

The only silver lining to things getting shittier in the US is knowing that Europe will always be shittier. And they act proud about it.
 
For some other news. Training for Ukrainian tank crews to be reduced from ten weeks to five weeks. As some (including myself) have predicted, the training that Ukrainian troops will receive in the use of western tanks will be minimal, meaning that either the tanks will be manned by disguised NATO troops, or that poor Ukrainian mobiks be forced to learn to drive tanks on the fly. Either way, not a good look for NATO.
WARSAW, Jan 31 (Reuters) - Poland aims to get training time on Leopard 2 battle tanks down to five weeks at a centre where Ukrainian soldiers are likely to be taught how to operate the Western battlefield workhorse against Russia's invasion.
The village of Swietoszow in western Poland, near the German border, hosts one of just three Leopard training centres in Europe - the others are in Germany and Switzerland.
The Polish military declined to confirm where Ukrainian soldiers would be trained, but military experts said Swietoszow was the most likely location.

"It is possible or even likely that the training of Ukrainian Leopard 2 tank crews will take place in Swietoszow, but other locations cannot be ruled out," said Jakub Pawlowski, military expert and deputy editor-in-chief of Defence24.pl.
A coalition of Ukraine's Western supporters formed in January to provide Kyiv with German-made Leopard tanks, and on Jan. 20 Ukrainian Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov said Ukrainian troops would be trained on Leopards in Poland.

At a training centre equipped with simulators, 14 crews of four personnel each can undergo instruction at once. Training on the Leopard - the vaunted modern battlefield tank used by many NATO member countries in Europe - has hitherto taken about 10 weeks but this could be reduced to five, instructors said.
"If we intensify training (by maximising the number of) instructors, our time and our weekends, we can train an entire crew in five weeks," Major Maciej Banaszynski, Poland's Leopard training centre commander, told Reuters on Tuesday.
 
For some other news. Training for Ukrainian tank crews to be reduced from ten weeks to five weeks. As some (including myself) have predicted, the training that Ukrainian troops will receive in the use of western tanks will be minimal, meaning that either the tanks will be manned by NATO troops, or that poor Ukrainian mobiks be forced to learn to drive tanks on the fly. Either way, not a good look for NATO.
Looking forward to Ukie tank crews bumrushing into ambushes.

But hey, Leo and Abrams just like a sedan. Super easy, no issues.
 
For some economic news, the UK is having a hard time keeping up with Russia, like some have correctly predicted last year.

Speaking of the UK, it also seems their military strength has been greatly, uh, let's say... exaggerated. Gotta admit, having their nuclear submarines held in place by superglue is pretty lol. Should've put some duct tape on it for good measure.
Can confirm this is untrue. Bong ex-defence minister is publicly calling for boots on the ground and for the UK to go to war with Russia. Neocons screaming for direct NATO intervention must means the Hohols are winning easy.




Clearly the scurrilous misinformation that the UK is a decrepit shithole ruled over by corrupt Pajeets can be once and for all put to bed. Putler is for sure shitting himself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back